Hand Coded XHTML vs. XHTML Editors vs. WYSIWYG XHTML Tools
Sep 06,2007 18:01
Hand coded XHTML is typically authored
with text editors such as vi, emacs, pico, notepad.exe, etc. You
type everything for maximum flexibility. I'm asking you to do it
this way early in the course, since you will have to write programs
that dynamically generate XHTML later in the course. If you become
dependent on more automated tools too soon, you may have difficulty
later when writing JSP, PHP, or Perl/CGI programs later in the
course.
XHTML editors provide help typing the "boilerplate" code with the use of menus, templates, etc. Some of the WYSIWYG tools also provide this mode for authoring XHTML.
WYSIWYG Tools hide the XHTML coding and details from you and let you concentrate on "the design". Good looking XHTML documents can be generated quickly, but you lose flexibility. Some examples are Dreamweaver, Frontpage, GoLive, RapidWeaver, Mozilla Composer, SeaMonkey Composer, and many more. -- g/madey
XHTML editors provide help typing the "boilerplate" code with the use of menus, templates, etc. Some of the WYSIWYG tools also provide this mode for authoring XHTML.
WYSIWYG Tools hide the XHTML coding and details from you and let you concentrate on "the design". Good looking XHTML documents can be generated quickly, but you lose flexibility. Some examples are Dreamweaver, Frontpage, GoLive, RapidWeaver, Mozilla Composer, SeaMonkey Composer, and many more. -- g/madey