Topic IndexACCREDITATION Pelesh, Due Process in the Accreditation Context: A Reply, 22:175 (1995). Prairie and Chamberlain, Due Process in the Accreditation Context, 21:61 (1994). Cassou and Curran, Secular Orthodoxy and Sacred Freedoms: Accreditation of Church-Related Law Schools, 11:293 (1984). Simons, Case Comment, Avins v. White: Defamation in the Accreditation Process, 8:268 (1981-82). Tayler and Hylden, Judicial Review of Accrediting Agency Actions: Marlboro Corp. D/B/A The Emery School v. The Association of Independent Colleges and Schools, 4:199 (1977). ADMINISTRATORS Cranman and Ward, Book Review, THE RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE MODERN UNIVERSITY , by Robert Bickel & Peter Lake, 26:389 Johnstone, Book Review, FAILING THE FUTURE: A DEAN LOOKS AT HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY, by Annette Kolodny, 25:909 (1999). Gibbs, Book Review, CREATING A SAFE CAMPUS – A GUIDE FOR COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATORS, by David Nichols, 24:695 (1998). Davis, Scaling the Ivory Tower: State Public Records Laws and University Presidential Searches, 21:353 (1994). Gibbs, Book Review, CHOOSING A COLLEGE PRESIDENT: OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS, by Judith B. McLaughlin and David Reisman, 18:329 (1991). Kennelly, Book Review, ON ASSUMING A COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY PRESIDENCY, LESSONS AND ADVICE FROM THE FIELD, by Estela M. Bensimon, Marian L. Gade and Joseph F. Kauffman, 16:731 (1990). Gee, Introduction to Reflections on Higher Education in the 1970’s, 8:443 (1981-82). Hornby, Book Review, HIGHER EDUCATION AND THE LAW, by Harry T. Edwards and Virginia Davis Nordin, 7:181 (1980-81). Hornby, Book Review, THE LAW OF HIGHER EDUCATION: LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION MAKING, by William A. Kaplin. 7:181 (1980-81). Haslam, The Locus of Decision Making in Colleges and Universities: The Broad Perspective, 1:199 (1973). Middleditch, College and University Fringe Benefits, 1:172 (1973). Whaley, Interinstitutional Cooperation Among Educational Organizations, 1:93 (1973). ADMISSIONS Pieronek, Book Review, THE BIG TEST: THE SECRET HISTORY OF THE AMERICAN MERITOCRACY, by Nicholas Lemann, 26:549 (2000). Steinbach, Michaelson, Routh, and Dreier, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Amici Curiae, 26:467 (2000). Hendricks, Madden, Burman, Tyler, Hoge, Williams, and Gregorie, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Defendants-Appellees, 26: 445 (2000). Rosman, Hemmat, Wright, and Bader, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants, 26: 429 (2000). Vinik, Kumin, and O’Brien, Affirmative Action in College Admissions: Practical Advice to Public and Private Institutions for Dealing with the Changing Landscape, 26:395 (2000). Olivas, Book Reviews, THE LEANING IVORY TOWER, LATINO PROFESSORS IN AMERICAN UNIVERSITIES, ed. by Raymond V. Padilla and Rudolfo Chavez Chavez; RACE AND REPRESENTATION: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, ed. by Robert Post and Michael Rogin; SHAMEFUL ADMISSIONS, THE LOSING BATTLE TO SERVE EVERYONE IN OUR UNIVERSITIES, by Angela Browne-Miller; THE UNIVERSITY IN RUINS, by Bill Readings: Race, Raza, and Ruins, 24:123 (1997). Pullin and Heaney, The Use of Flagged Test Scores in College and University Admissions: Issues and Implications Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act, 23:797 (1997). Ware, Tales From the Crypt: Does Strict Scrutiny Sound the Death Knell for Affirmative Action in Higher Education?, 23:43 (1996). Garfield, Squaring Affirmative Action Admissions Policies With Federal Judicial Guidelines: A Model for the Twenty-First Century, 22:895 (1996). Vaseleck, Stop Working and Put Down Your Pencils: The Use and Misuse of Standardized Admission Tests, 20:405 (1994). Smith, Case Comment, Anderson v. University of Wisconsin: Handicap and Race Discrimination in Readmission Procedures, 15:431 (1989). O'Neil, Preferential Admissions Revisited: Some Reflections on DeFunis and Bakke, 14:423 (1988). Rothstein, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act: Emerging Issues for Colleges and Universities, 13:229 (1986). Wilson, De Funis- What Now?, 2:83 (1974). Wilson, Admissions and Preferences: Sequel to De Funis, 1:38 (1973). ANNUAL REVIEW Weber, Diability Discrimination in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:351 (1999). Pieronek, Discrimination Against Students in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:307 (1999). Lee, Employment Discrimination in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:291 (1999). Stoner and Detar, Disciplinary and Academic Decisions Pertaining to Students in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:273 (1999) Von Gerichten, Tort Litigation in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:245 (1999). Johnsen and Todd, Federal Immunity Law in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:221 (1999). O’Shea, First Amendment Cases in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:193 (1999). Tucker, Disability Discrimination in Higher Education: 1997 in Review, 25:349 (1998). Bodensteiner, Student Discrimination in Higher Education: 1997 in Review, 25:331 (1998). Lee, Employment Discrimination in Higher Education: 1997 in Review, 25:313 (1998). Schupansky and Stoner, Disciplinary and Academic Decisions Pertaining to Students: 1997 in Review, 25:293 (1998). Hoye, Tort Litigation in Higher Education: 1997 in Review, 25:257 (1998). Johnsen, Federal Immunity Law in Higher Education: 1997 in Review, 25:225 (1998). O’Shea, The First Amendment: 1997 in Review, 25:201 (1998). Tucker, Disability Discrimination in Higher Education: 1996 Case Law in Review, 24:243 (1997). Lee, Employment Discrimination in Higher Education: A Review of the 1996 Judicial Decisions, 24:225 (1997). Pavela, Disciplinary and Academic Decisions Pertaining to Students: A Review of 1996 Judicial Decisions, 24:213 (1997). Bickel, Tort-Accident Cases: Traditional Tort Rules in the College or University Setting, 24:187 (1997). Johnsen, Federal Immunity Law in Higher Education: A Review of 1996 and 1997 Judicial Decisions, 24:161 (1997). O’Shea, The First Amendment: 1996 in Review, 24:131 (1997). Robinson, Introduction, Higher Education and the Courts: 1995 in Review, 23:307 (1997). O’Shea, First Amendment: 1995 in Review, 23:309 (1997). Johnsen, Immunity: 1995 in Review, 23:333 (1997). Bickel, Torts: 1995 in Review, 23:357 (1997). Pavela, Student Disciplinary Actions: 1995 in Review, 23:391 (1997). Hustoles and Smith, Employment Discrimination: 1995 in Review, 23:403 (1997). Sroka, Discrimination Against Students: 1995 in Review, 23:431 (1997). Rothstein, Disability Discrimination: 1995 in Review, 23:475 (1997). Robinson and Pieronek, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1994 in Review, 22:367 (1996). Robinson and Huber, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1993 in Review, 21:157 (1994). Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1992 in Review, 20:125 (1993). Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1991 in Review, 19:73 (1992). Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1990 in Review, 18:163 (1991). Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1989 in Review, 17:149 (1990). Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1988 in Review, 16:201 (1989). Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1987 in Review, 15:87 (1988). Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1986 in Review, 14:303 (1987). ATHLETICS AND SPORTS Leduc, Note, Law v. National Collegiate Athletic Association: A Guide to How Courts Will Treat Future Antitrust Challenges to NCAA Regulations, 26:139 (1999). Ruiz, Note, National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Smith: Must the NCAA Play By the Rules? 26: 119 (1999). Church and Neumeister, University Control of Student-Athletes with Disabilities Under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act, 25:105 (1998). Leahy, Note, The Title Bout: A Critical Review of the Regulation and Enforcement of Title IX in Intercollegiate Athletics, 24:489 (1998). Beauchamp, Book Review, GAMES COLLEGES PLAY – SCANDAL AND REFORM IN INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS, by John R. Thelin, 23:301 (1996). Mitten, Book Review, UNSPORTSMANLIKE CONDUCT – EXPLOITING COLLEGE ATHLETES, by Walter Byers (with Charles Hammer), 22:1081 (1996). Chang, Note, Coercion Theory and the State Action Doctrine as Applied in NCAA v. Tarkanian and NCAA v. Miller, 22:133 (1995). Mulderink, Case Comment, Par for the Female Course: Cohen v. Brown University Mandates an Equal Playing Field in Intercollegiate Athletics, 22:111 (1995). Delaney, Sack, Morris, and Sperber, 1995 Symposium: Round Table Discussion on Collegiate Athletics Reform, 22:96 (1995). Oriard, Landry, and Leonard, 1995 Symposium: College Athletics as a Vehicle for Social Reform, 22:77 (1995). Hesburgh and Albino, 1995 Symposium: Reform and Renewal in College Sports, 22:63 (1995). Justus, Brake, and Davidson, 1995 Symposium: Title IX, 22:48 (1995). Padilla and McMillen, 1995 Symposium: Educating the Athlete, 22:37 (1995). Katz and Hilliard, 1995 Symposium: Government Attempts at Regulation, 22:20 (1995). Gerberding, 1995 Symposium: Historical Perspective of Amateurism, 22:11 (1995). Beauchamp, 1995 Symposium: Introduction and Welcome, 22:2 (1995). 1995 Symposium (various authors), Sports Reform: College Athletics in Flux, 22:1 (1995). Williams, Lower Pay for Women's Coaches: Refuting Some Common Justifications, 21:643 (1995). Pieronek, Note, A Clash of Titans: College Football v. Title IX, 20:351 (1994). Kettle and McCarthy, Case Comment, An End Run Around the Sherman Act? Banks v. NCAA and Gaines v. NCAA, 19:295 (1993). Schaller, Drug Testing and the Evolution of Federal and State Regulation of Intercollegiate Athletics: A Chill Wind Blows, 18:131 (1991). Meyers, Note, State Open-Records Acts and the NCAA By-Law Requiring Coaches to Disclose their "Athletically-Related" Outside Income: Emptying the Coaches' Pockets for Public Inspection?, 16:497 (1990). Cosgrove, Note, A Survey of State Athlete-Agent Legislation: Origins and Effects, 16:433 (1990). Ranney, The Constitutionality of the Drug Testing of College Athletes: A Brandeis Brief for a Narrowly-Intrusive Approach, 16:397 (1990). Leeson, Note, The Drug Testing of College Athletes, 16:325 (1989). Alessandro, Note, The Student-Athlete Right-to-Know Act: Legislation would Require Colleges to Make Public Graduation Rates of Student Athletes, 16:287 (1989). Conboy, Book Reviews, LAW IN SPORT AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, by Annie Clement, and LAW IN SPORT, by Bernard Patrick Maloy, 16:171 (1989). Rasnic, Book Review, FUMBLE: BEAR BRYANT, WALLY BUTTS AND THE GREAT COLLEGE FOOTBALL SCANDAL, by James Kirby, 16:165 (1989). Longo and Thoman, Case Comment, Haffer v. Temple University: A Reawakening of Gender Discrimination in Intercollegiate Athletics, 16:137 (1989). Stoner and Nogay, The Model University Coaching Contract ("MCC"): A Better Starting Point for Your Next Negotiation, 16:43 (1989). Poskanzer, Spotlight on the Coaching Box: The Role of the Athletic Coach within the Academic Institution, 16:1 (1989). Bhirdo, Haviland, and Warth, Case Comment, McCormack v. National Collegiate Athletic Association: Collegiate Athletics Sanctions from an Antitrust and Civil Rights Perspective, 15:459 (1989). Tyler, Note, State Open Records Laws and the NCAA: Does the NCAA Qualify as a "Governmental Body" and, if so, May its Members Invoke the Privilege of Self-Critical Analysis?, 15:349 (1989). Graff, Myers, and Tyler, Case Comment, Blair v. Washington State University: Making State ERA's a Potent Remedy for Sex Discrimination in Athletics, 14:575 (1988). Dixon, Note, Achieving Educational Opportunity Through Freshman Ineligibility and Coaching Selection: Key Elements in the NCAA Battle for Academic Integrity of Intercollegiate Athletes, 14:383 (1987). Graves, Commentary, Coaches in the Courtroom: Recovery in Actions for Breach of Employment Contracts, 12:545 (1986). Judge, Student-Athletes as Employees: Income Tax Consequences, 13:285 (1986). Rowe, Case Comment, NCAA v. Board of Regents: A Broadening of the Rule of Reason, 11:377 (1984). Staton, Note, Recent Cases Concerning the Rights of Student Athletes, 10:209 (1983-84). Atkinson, Note, Workers' Compensation and College Athletics: Should Universities be Responsible for Athletes Who Incur Serious Injuries?, 10:197 (1983-84). Remington, NCAA Enforcement Procedures Including the Role of the Committee on Infractions, 10:181 (1983-84). Weistart, Legal Accountability and the NCAA, 10:167 (1983-84). Pauley, Case Comment, Williams v. Hamilton, 8:399 (1981-82). Branchfield and Grier, Aiken v. Lieuallen and Peterson v. Oregon State University: Defining Equity in Athletics, 8:369 (1981-82). Ruxin, Unsportsmanlike Conduct: The Student-Athlete, the NCAA, and Agents, 8:347 (1981-82). Thompson and Young, Taxing the Sale of Broadcast Rights to College Athletics – An Unrelated Trade or Business?, 8:331 (1981-82). Thomas and Wildgen, Women in Athletics: Winning the Game But Losing the Support, 8:295 (1981-82). Faccenda, Introduction to Symposium on Athletics in Higher Education, 8:291 (1981-82). Gaal, DiLorenzo, and Evans, Hew’s Final “Policy Interpretation” of Title IX and Intercollegiate Athletics, 6:345 (1979-80). Gaal and DiLorenzo, The Legality and Requirements of HEW’s Proposed “Policy Interpretation” of Title IX and Intercollegiate Athletics, 6:161 (1979-80). Title IX Athletics, 6:73 (1979-80) (Conference Outline). Hermann, Sports and the Handicapped: Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and Curricular, Intramural, Club and Intercollegiate Athletic Programs in Postsecondary Educational Institutions, 5:143 (1977-79). Kadaielski, Postsecondary Athletics in an Era of Equality: An Appraisal of the Effect of Title IX, 5:123 (1977-79). Dickerson and Chapman, Contract Law, Due Process, and the NCAA, 5:107 (1977-79). Horn, Intercollegiate Athletics: Waning Amateurism and Rising Professionalism, 5:97 (1977-79). Weistart, Antitrust Issues in the Regulation of College Sports, 5:77 (1977-79). Edmonds, Postsecondary Athletics and the Law: A Selected Bibliography, 5:65 (1977-79). Zuckman, Throw ‘Em to the Lions (or Bengals): The Decline and Fall of Sports Civilization as Seen Through the Eyes of a United States District Court, 5:55 (1977-79). Hochberg, The Four Horsemen Ride Again: Cable Communications and Collegiate Athletics, 5:43 (1977-79). Lowell, Judicial Review of Rule-Making in Amateur in Amateur Athletics, 5:11 (1977-79). Kaplin, An Overview of Legal Principles and Issues Affecting Postsecondary Athletics, 5:1 (1977-79). McGuire, The NCAA- Institution Under Constitutional Siege, 2:175 (1974-75). ATTORNEYS O’Neil, The Lawyer and the Client in the Campus Setting: Who is the Client, What does the Client Expect and how May the Attorney Respond?, 19:333 (1993). Dunham, Case Studies on Wrongdoing on Campus: Ethics and the Lawyer’s Role, 19:315 (1993). Drinan, Lawyer-Client Confidentiality in the Campus Setting, 19:305 (1993). Richmond, Students' Rights to Counsel in University Disciplinary Proceedings, 15:289 (1989). Helms, Patterns of Litigation in Postsecondary Education: A Case Law Study, 14:99 (1987). Kennard, Book Review, EDUCATION LAW, ed. by James A. Rapp, 12:565 (1986). Daane, The Role of University Counsel, 12:399 (1985). Kaplin, Law on the Campus 1960-1985: Years of Growth and Challenge, 12:269 (1985). Shaffer, Review Essay: Legal Resources for Higher Education Law, 12:83 (1985). Greenleaf, Academic Institutions in the Light and Shadow of the Law, 12:1 (1985). Olivas and Denison, Legalization in the Academy: Higher Education and the Supreme Court, 11:1 (1984). Gray and Toohey, Doing Business in the New Technology: Problems for College and University Counsel, 10:455 (1983-84). Hoornstra and Liethen, Academic Freedom and Civil Discovery, 10:113 (1983-84). Lautsch, Computers and the University Attorney: An Overview of Computer Law on Campus, 5:217 (1977-79). Williams, The Code of Professional Responsibility and the College and University Lawyer, 2:248 (1975). Sensenbrenner, University Counselor: Lore, Logic and Logistics, 2:13 (1974). Beale, Delivery of Legal Service to Institutions of Higher Education, 2:5 (1974). Corbally, University Counsel- Scope and Mission, 2:1 (1974). O’Neil, Court and Campus- Striking a New Balance, 1:199 (1973). AUXILIARY ENTERPRISES Switzer, New IRS Guidelines Target College and University UBIT, 21:489 (1995). Brody, The First Amendment, Governmental Censorship, and Sponsored Research, 19:199 (1993). Horton, Traditional Single-Sex Fraternities on College Campuses: Will They Survive in the 1990's?, 18:419 (1992). Niccolls, Nave, and Olswang, Unrelated Business Income Tax and Unfair Competition: Current Status of the Law, 15:249 (1989). Walker and Israeloff, Historic Preservation and the Institutional Owner, 14:59 (1987). Rich, Malpractice Issues in the Academic Medical Center, 13:149 (1986). Kertz and Hasson, University Research and Development Activities: The Federal Income Tax Consequences of Research Contracts, Research Subsidiaries and Joint Ventures, 13:109 (1986). Rumsey, Legal Aspects of the Relationship Between Fraternities and Public Institutions of Higher Education: Freedom of Association and Ability to Prohibit Campus Presence or Student Membership, 11:465 (1985). Lawton, Carder, and Weisman, Recent Governmental Action Regarding the Treatment of Seriously Ill Newborns, 11:405 (1985). Schneider, Political Interference in Law School Clinical Programs: Reflections on Outside Interference and Academic Freedom, 11:179 (1984). Hitchner, Medicare and Medicaid Reimbursement of Teaching Hospitals and Faculty Physicians, 10:79 (1983-84). Wallis, Case Comment, "Negligent Publishing": Implications for University Publishers, 9:209 (1982-83). Ward, Commentary, The Georgia Grind: Can the Common Law Accommodate the Problems of Title in the Art World: Observations on a Recent Case, 8:533 (1981-82). Weil, A Checklist of Legal Considerations for Museums, 7:346 (1980-81). Ward, Copyright in Museum Collections: An Overview of Some of the Problems, 7:297 (1980- 81). Loar and Sky, General Operating Support for Museums: Problems in Paradise, 7:267 (1980-81). Francis, Federal Tax Problems of College and University Auxiliary Organizations, 3:72 (1975). BANKRUPTCY Aiello and Behrens, Student Loans, Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code and the 1984 Bankruptcy Amendments, 13:1 (1986). Vecchione, Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code as an Alternative to Closing or Merger, 8:1 (1981-82). Bissell, Brief for Appellants in Handsome v. Rutgers University, 6:241 (1979-80). Millsap and Wright, Recent Cases on Student Transcript Rights after Bankruptcy, 6:231 (1979-80). BRIEFS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS FROM COUNSEL Steinbach, Michaelson, Routh, and Dreier, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Amici Curiae, 26: 467 (2000). Hendricks, Madden, Burman, Tyler, Hoge, Williams, and Gregorie, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Defendants-Appellees, 26: 445 (2000). Rosman, Hemmat, Wright, and Bader, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants, 26: 429 (2000). Michaelson, Smith, Drier, and Steinbach, Board of Education of the Township of Piscataway v. Sharon Taxman, 24:671 (1998). University of Richmond v. Bell: Plaintiff’s Reply Brief to Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, 10:36 (1983-84). University of Richmond v. Bell: Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, 10:34 (1983-84). University of North Carolina Council on Biotechnology Patent Task Group Report, 9:541 (1982-83). Pajaro Dunes Conference Draft Statement, 9:533 (1982-83). Consent Decree, Rajender v. The University of Minnesota, 8:219 (1981-82). Guthrie, Brief Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners in University of Texas v. Camenisch, 8:68 (1981-82). Giddings, Petitioner’s Brief in University of Texas v. Camenisch, 8:58 (1981-82). Consent Decree in The United States Department of Labor, Office of Contract Compliance Programs v. Regents of University of California, 8:54 (1981-82). Reback and Vogt, AAMC v. Carey: Briefs in Support of a Motion to Enjoin Enforcement of New York’s Standardized Test Disclosure Law, 7:132 (1980-81). Bissell, Brief for Appellants in Handsome v. Rutgers University, 6:241 (1979-80). COMPUTERS Cranman, Privacy and Technology: Counseling Institutions of Higher Education, 25:69 (1998). Allred, Note, May a Public University Restrict Faculty Expression on its Internet World Wide Web Sites? Academic Freedom and University Facility Use Restrictions, 24:325 (1997). Price, College and Universities as Internet Service Providers: Determining and Limiting Liability for Copyright Infringement, 23:183 (1996). Lautsch, Book Review, COMPUTERS IN EDUCATION: LEGAL LIABILITIES AND ETHICAL ISSUES CONCERNING THEIR USE AND MISUSE, by Patricia A. Hollander, 14:163 (1987). Hollander, An Introduction to Legal and Ethical Issues Relating to Computers in Higher Education, 11:215 (1984). Lautsch, Computers and the University Attorney: An Overview of Computer Law on Campus, 5:217 (1977-79). CONTRACTS Lemmer and Pompeo, "Educating" Lawyers about
the Implications of Cost Accounting Swan, Early Retirement Incentives with Upper Age Limits under the Older Workers Benefits Protection Act, 19:53 (1992). Cole and Goldblatt, Award of Construction Contracts: Public Institutions’ Authority to Select the Lowest Possible Bidder, 16:177 (1989). Stoner and Nogay, The Model University Coaching Contract ("MCC"): A Better Starting Point for Your Next Negotiation, 16:43 (1989). Sullivan, Note, The College or University Power to Withhold Diplomas, 15:321 (1989). Kertz and Hasson, University Research and Development Activities: The Federal Income Tax Consequences of Research Contracts, Research Subsidiaries and Joint Ventures, 13:109 (1986). Graves, Commentary, Coaches in the Courtroom: Recovery
in Actions for Breach of Employment Contracts, 12:545 (1986). Ende and Lane, Book Review, CONTRACTING FOR SERVICES, ed. by Lanora F. Welzenbach, 11:399 (1984). Jennings, Breach of Contract Suits by Students Against Post-secondary Institutions: Can They Succeed?, 7:191 (1980-81). Dickerson and Chapman, Contract Law, Due Process, and the NCAA, 5:107 (1977-79). Horn, Intercollegiate Athletics: Waning Amateurism and Rising Professionalism, 5:97 (1977-79). DEBT COLLECTION Woodcock, Burden of Proof, Undue Hardships, and Other Arguments for the Student Debtor under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8)(B), 24:377 (1998). Lake and Pedulla, Case Comment, Elter v. Great Lakes Higher Education Corporation: State Agencies that Grant Educational Loans May Discriminate Against Student Bankrupts Who Default on Prior Education Loans, 17:261 (1990). Aiello and Behrens, Student Loans, Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code and the 1984 Bankruptcy Amendments, 13:1 (1986). Ayres and Sagner, The Bankruptcy Reform Act and Student Loans: Unraveling New Knots, 9:361 (1982-83). Hunter, Collecting Defaulted Student Loans: How Much Diligence is Due?, 9:149 (1982-83). DISCRIMINATION Curkovic, Accent and the University: Accent as Pretext for National Origin Discrimination in Tenure Decisions, 26:727 (2000). Stoner and Ryan, Burlington, Faragher, Oncale, and Beyond: Recent Developments in Title VII Jurisprudence, 26:645 (2000). Kaplin, A Typology and Critique of Title IX Sexual Harassment Law After Gebser and Davis, 26:615 (2000). Steinbach, Michaelson, Routh, and Dreier, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Amici Curiae, 26:467 (2000). Hendricks, Madden, Burman, Tyler, Hoge, Williams, and Gregorie, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Defendants-Appellees, 26: 445 (2000). Rosman, Hemmat, Wright, and Bader, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants, 26: 429 (2000). Vinik, Kumin, and O’Brien, Affirmative Action in College Admissions: Practical Advice to Public and Private Institutions for Dealing with the Changing Landscape, 26:395 (2000). Weber, Disability Discrimination in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:351 (1999). Pieronek, Discrimination Against Students in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:307 (1999). Lee, Employment Discrimination in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:291 (1999). Regan, ‘Tis Better to “Benefit” Than To “Receive” - The Standard Delimiting Coverage Under Title IX and Other Federal Antidiscrimination Statutes, 26:107 (1999). Neiger, Actual Knowledge Under Gebser v. Lago Vista: Evidence of the Court’s Deliberate Indifference or an Appropriate Reponse for Finding Institutional Liability?, 26:1 (1999). Pieronek, Book Review, BECOMING GENTLEMEN, by Lani Guinier, et al., 25:627 (1999). Bekavac, Book Review, BECOMING GENTLEMEN, by Lani Guinier, et al., 25:619 (1999). Bors, Academic Freedom Faces Learning Disabilities: Guckenberger v. Boston University, 25:581 (1999). Tucker, Disability Discrimination in Higher Education: 1997 in Review, 25:349 (1998). Bodensteiner, Student Discrimination in Higher Education, 25:331 (1998). Lee, Employment Discrimination in Higher Education, 25:313 (1998). Phelps, Book Review, CULTIVATING HUMANITY: A CLASSICAL DEFENSE OF REFORM IN LIBERAL EDUCATION, by Martha C. Nussbaum, 25:185 (1998). Weber, Disability Discrimination Litigation and Institutions of Higher Education, 25:53 (1998). Whitman, Affirmative Action on Campus: The Legal and Practical Challenges, 24:637 (1998). Lee, Discrimination Against Students in Higher Education: A Review of the 1996 Judicial Decisions, 24:619 (1998). Leahy, Note, The Title Bout: A Critical Review of the Regulation and Enforcement of Title IX in Intercollegiate Athletics, 24:489 (1998). Tucker, Disability Discrimination in Higher Education: 1996 Case Law in Review, 24:243 (1997). Lee, Employment Discrimination in Higher Education: A Review of the 1996 Judicial Decisions, 24:225 (1997). Coleman and Jarvis, Tuition Adjustment for Law School Students: A Necessary Accommodation under the ADA?, 24:45 (1997). Sampen, Age Discrimination and Reasonable Non-Age Factors, 24:1 (1997). Pullin and Heaney, The Use of Flagged Test Scores in College and University Admissions: Issues and Implications Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act, 23:797 (1997). O’Neill, Single-Sex Education after United States v. Virginia, 23:489 (1997). Rothstein, Disability Discrimination in Higher Education: A Review of the 1995 Judicial Decisions, 23:475 (1997). Sroka, Discrimination Against Students in Higher Education: 1995 in Review, 23:431 (1997). Hustoles and Smith, Employment Discrimination Cases in Higher Education: 1995 in Review, 23:403 (1997). Fellrath, Case Comment, Coleman v. Zatechka: The ADA and Student Life, 23:285 (1996). Barber, Waivers of Academic Progress Requirements for Federal Financial Aid: A Reasonable Accommodation for Students with Learning Disabilities?, 23:231 (1996). Alger and Coleman, Beyond Speech Codes: Harmonizing Rights of Free Speech and Freedom from Discrimination on University Campuses, 23:91 (1996). Ware, Tales From the Crypt: Does Strict Scrutiny Sound the Death Knell for Affirmative Action in Higher Education?, 23:43 (1996). Tucker, Application of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504 to Colleges and Universities: An Overview and Discussion of Special Issues Relating to Students, 23:1 (1996). Milani, Disabled Students in Higher Education: Administrative and Judicial Enforcement of Disability Law, 22:989 (1996). Garfield, Squaring Affirmative Action Admissions Policies with Federal Judicial Guidelines: A Model for the Twenty-First Century, 22:895 (1996). Roth, Case Comment, Rosenberger v. Rector: The First Amendment Dog Chases its Tail, 21:723 (1995). Williams, Lower Pay for Women's Coaches: Refuting Some Common Justifications, 21:643 (1995). McCusker, The Americans With Disabilities Act: Its Potential for Expanding the Scope of Reasonable Academic Accommodations, 21:619 (1995). Hernandez, Note, The Constitutionality of Racially Restrictive Organizations within the University Setting, 21:429 (1994). Bainbridge, Essay, Student Religious Organizations and University Policies Against Discrimination on the Basis of Sexual Orientation: Implications of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 21:369 (1994). Baida, Not All Minority Scholarships are Created Equal, Part II: How to Develop a Record that Passes Constitutional Scrutiny, 21:307 (1994). Vargyas, Commentary, Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public Schools and its Impact on Title IX Enforcement, 19:373 (1993). Frazier and Dymersky, A Quandary of the Civil Rights Act of 1991: Is the New Law Retroactive?, 19:259 (1993). DiScala, Olswang, and Niccolls, College and University Responses to the Emotionally or Mentally Impaired Students, 19:17 (1992). Gray, Impact of the Proposed Civil Rights and Women's Equity in Employment Act on Colleges and Universities, 18:559 (1992). Hill, Note, Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990: Significant Overlap with Section 504 for Colleges and Universities, 18:389 (1992). Scott and Weingart, Case Comment, A Professor's Choice: Employment or Religious Conviction: EEOC v. University of Detroit, 18:315 (1991). Ward, Note, Race-Exclusive Scholarships: Do they Violate the Constitution and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964?, 18:73 (1991). Olivas, Commentary, Federal Law and Scholarship Policy: An Essay on the Office for Civil Rights, Title VI, and Racial Restrictions, 18:21 (1991). Brammer, Lallo, and Ney, Case Comment, Brown v. Trustees of Boston University: The Realization of Title VII's Legislative Intent, 17:551 (1991). Rothstein, Commentary, Students, Staff and Faculty with Disabilities: Current Issues for Colleges and Universities, 17:471 (1991). McClamrock, Note, The First Amendment and Public Funding of Religiously Controlled or Affiliated Higher Education, 17:381 (1991). Frost, Shifting Meanings of Academic Freedom: An Analysis of University of Pennsylvania v. EEOC, 17:329 (1991). Lake and Pedulla, Case Comment, Elter v. Great Lakes Higher Education Corporation: State Agencies That Grant Educational Loans May Discriminate Against Student Bankrupts Who Default on Prior Educational Loans, 17:261 (1990). Keyes, Health-Care Professionals with AIDS: The Risk of Transmission Balanced Against the Interests of Professionals and Institutions, 16:589 (1990). Hodulik, Prohibiting Discriminatory Harassment by Regulating Student Speech: A Balancing of First-Amendment and University Interests, 16:573 (1990). Haviland, Note, Student Discriminatory Harassment, 16:311 (1989). Longo and Thoman, Case Comment, Haffer v. Temple University: A Reawakening of Gender Discrimination in Intercollegiate Athletics, 16:137 (1989). Smith, Case Comment, Anderson v. University of Wisconsin: Handicap and Race Discrimination in Readmission Procedures, 15:431 (1989). Fick, Book Review, ACADEMICS IN COURTS: THE CONSEQUENCES OF FACULTY DISCRIMINATION LITIGATION, by George R. LaNoue and Barbara A. Lee, 15:239 (1988). Finkin, Commentary, Tenure After an Uncapped ADEA: A Different View, 15:43 (1988). Dutile, God and Gays at Georgetown: Observations on Gay Rights Coalition of Georgetown University Law Center v. Georgetown University, 15:1 (1988). Curry, Manderfeld, and Sullivan, Case Comment, Pime v. Loyola University of Chicago: The Seventh Circuit Extends the BFOQ Defense, 14:607 (1988). Graff, Myers, and Tyler, Case Comment, Blair v. Washington State University: Making State ERA’s a Potent Remedy for Sex Discrimination in Athletics, 14:575 (1988). Ruebhausen, Commentary, The Age Discrimination in Employment Act Amendments of 1986: Implications for Tenure and Retirement, 14:561 (1988). Andrews, Note, State Legislation on Comparable Worth: Will it Bring Pay Equity to Academe?, 14:469 (1988). O'Neil, Preferential Admissions Revisited: Some Reflections on DeFunis and Bakke, 14:423 (1988). Claque, The Affirmative Action Showdown of 1986: Implications for Higher Education, 14:171 (1987). Delano, Discovery in University Employment Discrimination Suits: Should Peer Review Materials be Privileged?, 14:121 (1987). Weeks, Book Review, THE DISMISSAL OF STUDENTS WITH MENTAL DISORDERS: LEGAL ISSUES, POLICY CONSIDERATIONS AND ALTERNATIVE RESPONSES, by Gary Pavela, 13:429 (1987). Cole, Recent Legal Developments in Sexual Harassment, 13:267 (1986). Rothstein, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act: Emerging Issues for Colleges and Universities, 13:229 (1986). White, Book Review, THE RIGHTS OF TEACHERS, by David Rubin (with Steven Greenhouse), 12:561 (1986). Weeks, Equal Pay: The Emerging Terrain, 12:41 (1985). Stacy and Holland, Legal and Statistical Problems in Litigating Sex Discrimination Claims in Higher Education, 11:107 (1984). Renahan, Case Comment, Bob Jones University v. United States: No Tax Exemptions for Racially Discriminatory Schools - Supreme Courts Clarifies Thirteen Year Policy Imbroglio, 11:69 (1984). Rothstein, Reproductive Hazards and Sex Discrimination in the Workplace: New Legal Concerns in Industry and on Campus, 10:495 (1983-84). Stanley, Note, The Rights of Gay Student Organizations, 10:397 (1983-84). Kubasek, Book Review, DISCRIMINATION, AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY, ed. by W. E. Block and M. A. Walker, 10:331 (1983-84). Bodner, Commentary, Analyzing Faculty Salaries in Class Action Sex Discrimination Cases, 10:305 (1983-84). Tashjian-Brown, Title IX: Progress Toward Program Specific Regulation of Private Academia, 10:1 (1983-84). Orleans, Book Review, ABILITY TESTING OF HANDICAPPED PEOPLE: DILEMMA FOR GOVERNMENT, SCIENCE, AND THE PUBLIC, ed. by Susan W. Sherman and Nancy M. Robinson, 9:347 (1982-83). Lee, Balancing Confidentiality and Disclosure in Faculty Peer Review: Impact of Title VII Litigation, 9:279 (1982-83). Bompey and Saltzman, The Role of Statistics in Employment Discrimination Litigation – A University Perspective, 9:263 (1982-83). Lines, Tuition Discrimination: Valid and Invalid Uses of Tuition Differentials, 9:241 (1982-83). Casey, Case Comment, Constructive Discharge under Title VII in Institutions of Higher Education, 9:191 (1982-83). Orleans and Smith, Commentary, Who Should Provide Interpreters Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act?, 9:177 (1982-83). Schwartz and Woods, Public Television and the Hearing Impaired, 9:1 (1982-83). Flygare, Commentary, TDCA v. Burdine: The Decreasing Burden for Employers in Title VII Litigation, 8:519 (1981-82). Buckley, Perspective on Gunther, 8:433 (1981-82). Bompey, Decoupling Tenure and Employment Under the 1978 Amendments to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 8:425 (1981-82). Tucker, Perspective on Camenisch, 8:409 (1981-82). Consent Decree, Rajender v. University of Minnesota, 8:219 (1981-82). Green, An Application of the Equal Pay Act to Higher Education, 8:203 (1981-82). Guthrie, Brief Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners in University of Texas v. Camenisch, 8:68 (1981-82). Giddings, Petitioners Brief in University of Texas v. Camenisch, 8:58 (1981-82). Tytel, Spirt v. Long Island University: TIAA-CRED and the Sex-Based Mortality Table Controversy, 7:119 (1980-81). Orleans, Memorandum: First Thoughts on Southeastern Community College v. Davis, 6:263 (1979-80). Bompey, 1979 Update: Cases and Issues in Age Discrimination, 6:195 (1979-80) (Conference Outline). Gaal and DiLorenzo, The Legality and Requirements of HEW’s Proposed “Policy Interpretation” of Title IX and Intercollegiate Athletics, 6:161 (1979-80). Legal Diagnosis and Defense of An Employment Civil Rights Claim, 6:135 (1979-80) (Conference Outline). Status of Quotas As A Remedy In Discrimination Cases, 6:129 (1979-80) (Conference Outline). Update on Age Discrimination, 6:123 (1979-80) (Conference Outline). Update on Handicap Discrimination, 6:113 (1979-80) (Conference Outline). Title IX Athletics, 6:73 (1979-80) (Conference Outline). Laster, State Law on Mandatory Retirement of Tenured Faculty After the 1978 Age Discrimination in Employment Act Amendments, 5:211 (1977-79). Ford, The Implications of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act Amendments of 1978 for Colleges and Universities, 5:161 (1977-79). Hermann, Sports and the Handicapped: Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and Curricular, Intramural, Club and Intercollegiate Athletic Programs in Postsecondary Educational Institutions, 5:143 (1977-79). Kadzielski, Postsecondary Athletics in An Era of Equality: An Appraisal of the Effect of Title IX, 5:123 (1977-79). Bassen, Synopsis of State Laws Regulating Employment of the Handicapped, 4:293 (1977). Haslam, Age Discrimination in Campus Employment, 2:326 (1975). Reidhaar, Minority Preference in Student Admissions, 2:197 (1975). Bickel and Vandercreek , Class Action Aspects of Federal Employment Discrimination Litigation, 2:157 (1974-75). Wilson, De Funis- What Now? 2:83 (1974). Frohnmayer, Title IX, Education Amendments of 1972, 2:49 (1974). Steinbach and Reback, Equal Employment + Equal Pay = Multiple Problems for Colleges and Universities, 2:25 (1974). La Noue, Tenure and Title VII, 1:206 (1974). Wilson, Admissions and Preferences: Sequel to De Funis, 1:38 (1973). Relihan, Means and Ends: The Evolution of Federal Administration Doctrine on Equal Employment Opportunity, 1:33 (1973). Stitt and Limitone, University Fair Employment Practices Litigation Strategy and Tactics, 1:20 (1973). Gregory, Making the Affirmative Action Plan Work, 1:16 (1973). Frohmayer, Current Developments in Federal Law Affecting Equal Employment Opportunity in Higher Education, 1:1 (1973). ETHICS O’Neil, The Lawyer and the Client in the Campus Setting: Who is the Client, What does the Client Expect and How May the Attorney Respond?, 19:333 (1993). Dunham, Case Studies on Wrongdoing on Campus: Ethics and the Lawyer’s Role, 19:315 (1993). Drinan, Lawyer-Client Confidentiality in the Campus Setting, 19:305 (1993). Jones, Book Review, ETHICS AND HIGHER EDUCATION, ed. by William W. May, Crises in Higher Education and the Need for Solutions – But What Kind?, 18:621 (1992). American Academy of Pediatrics Guidelines for Infant Bioethics Committees, 11:433 (1985). Capron, Legal Perspectives on Institutional Ethics Committees, 11:417 (1985). Bennett, Book Review, LEGAL ETHICS AND LEGAL EDUCATION, by Michael J. Kelly, 7:353 (1980- 81). FACULTY Curkovic, Accent and the University: Accent as Pretext for National Origin Discrimination in Tenure Decisions, 26:727 (2000). Crosson, Book Review, ACADEMIC DUTY, by Donald Kennedy, 25:435 (1998). Sims, Book Review, ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND TENURE: ETHICAL ISSUES, by Richard T. De George, 25:443 (1998). Smith, Cohen v. San Bernardino Valley College: The Scope of Academic Freedom Within the Context of Sexual Harassment Claims and In-Class Speech, 25:1 (1998). Streitz and Hunkler, Note, Teaching or Learning: Are Teaching
Assistants Students or Allred, Note, May a Public University Restrict Faculty Expression on its Internet World Wide Web Sites? Academic Freedom and University Facility Use Restrictions, 24:325 (1997). Lee, Employment Discrimination in Higher Education: A Review of the 1996 Judicial Decisions, 24:225 (1997). Torke, Book Review, FREE SPEECH IN THE COLLEGE COMMUNITY, by Robert M. O’Neil, 24:699 (1998). Oakley, Book Review, THE OPENING OF THE AMERICAN MIND: CANONS, CULTURE, AND HISTORY, by Lawrence Levine, 24:119 (1997). Hustoles and Smith, Employment Discrimination Cases in Higher Education: 1995 in Review, 23:403 (1997). O’Shea, First Amendment in Higher Education: 1995 in Review, 23:307 (1997). Alger and Coleman, Beyond Speech Codes: Harmonizing Rights of Free Speech and Freedom from Discrimination on University Campuses, 23:91 (1996). Pavela, Book Review, DECONSTRUCTING ACADEMIC FREEDOM, ed. by William W. Van Alstyne, 22:359 (1995). Brooks, Adequate Cause for Dismissal: The Missing Element in Academic Freedom, 22:331 (1995). Newman, At Work in the Marketplace of Ideas: Academic Freedom, the First Amendment, and Jeffries v. Harleston, 22:281 (1995). Hiers, New Restrictions on Academic Free Speech: Jeffries v. Harleston II, 22:217 (1995). Kennan, Commentary, The Moral Functions of Higher Education in Modern Society, 20:69 (1993). Metzger, Professional and Legal Limits to Academic Freedom, 20:1 (1993). Kreiser, AAUP Perspectives on Academic Freedom and United States Intelligence Agencies, 19:251 (1993). Robison and Sanders, The Myths of Academia: Open Inquiry and Funded Research, 19:227 (1993). Brody, The First Amendment, Governmental Censorship, and Sponsored Research, 19:199 (1993). Swan, Early Retirement Incentives with Upper Age Limits under the Older Workers Benefits Protection Act, 19:53 (1992). Scott and Weingart, Case Comment, A Professor's Choice: Employment or Religious Conviction: EEOC v. University of Detroit, 18:315 (1991). Brammer, Lallo, and Ney, Case Comment, Brown v. Trustees
of Boston University: The Hasty, Note, Worker's Compensation: Will College and University Professors be Compensated for Mental Injuries Caused by Work-Related Stress?, 17:535 (1991). Rothstein, Commentary, Students, Staff and Faculty with
Disabilities: Current Issues for Frost, Shifting Meanings of Academic Freedom: An Analysis of University of Pennsylvania v. EEOC, 17:329 (1991). Dumas, McIntyre, and Zelenock, Case Comment, Parate v.
Isibor: Resolving the Conflict Swan, Subjective Hiring and Promotion Decisions in the Wake of Fort Worth, Atonio, and Price Waterhouse, 16:553 (1990). Jasper, Note, Britain's Education Reform Act: A Lesson in Academic Freedom and Tenure, 16:449 (1990). Traynor, Defamation Law Shock Absorbers for its Ride into the Groves of Academe, 16:373 (1990). Craver, The Implications of the Elimination of Mandatory Retirement for Professors, 16:343 (1990). Connolly and Marshall, Sexual Harassment of University
or College Students by Faculty Luzum and Pupel, Case Comment, Weinstein v. University of Illinois: The "Work-for-Hire" Doctrine and Procedural Due Process for Nontenured Faculty, 15:369 (1989). Cunningham, Leeson, and Stadler, Case Comment, Kahn v. Superior Court of the County of Santa Clara: The Right to Privacy and the Academic Freedom Privilege with Respect to Confidential Peer Review Materials, 15:73 (1989). Finkin, Commentary, Tenure After an Uncapped ADEA: A Different View, 15:43 (1988). Keller, Consensual Amorous Relationships Between Faculty and Students: The Constitutional Right to Privacy, 15:21 (1988). Curry, Manderfeld, and Sullivan, Case Comment, Pime v. Loyola University of Chicago: The Seventh Circuit Extends the BFOQ Defense, 14:607 (1988). Ruebhausen, Commentary, The Age Discrimination in Employment Act Amendments of 1986: Implications for Tenure and Retirement, 14:561 (1988). Olswang, Union Security Provisions, Academic Freedom and Tenure: The Implications of Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson, 14:539 (1988). Attanasio, Does the First Amendment Guarantee a Right to Conduct Scientific Experiments?, 14:435 (1988). Dixon, Lynch, and Swem, Case Comment, Pace v. Hymas: Termination of Tenured University Faculty: Financial Exigency and the Burden of Proof in a Substantive Due Process Claim, 13:417 (1987). Delano, Discovery in University Employment Discrimination
Suits: Should Peer Review Andrews, Dang, and McLean, Note, Recent Development: Church Licensed Professors: The Curran Controversy, 13:375 (1987). Cole, Recent Legal Developments in Sexual Harassment, 13:267 (1986). Ramirez, The Balance of Interests between National Security Controls and First Amendment Interests in Academic Freedom, 13:179 (1986). Mawdsley, Plagiarism Problems in Higher Education, 13:65 (1986). White, Book Review, THE RIGHTS OF TEACHERS, by David Rubin (with Steven Greenhouse) 12:561 (1986). Wright, Faculty and Law Explosion: Assessing the Impact – A Twenty-five Year Perspective (1960-85) for College and University Lawyers, 12:363 (1985). Weeks, Equal Pay: The Emerging Terrain, 12:41 (1985). Special Committee on Education and the Law (Association of the Bar of the City of New York), Due Process in Decisions Relating to Tenure in Higher Education, 11:323 (1984). White, Book Review, DOLLARS AND SCHOLARS: AN INQUIRY INTO THE IMPACT OF FACULTY INCOME UPON THE FUNCTIONS AND FUTURE OF THE ACADEMY, ed. by R. Linnell, 11:257 (1984). Orleans, Book Review, DOLLARS AND SCHOLARS: AN INQUIRY INTO THE IMPACT OF FACULTY INCOME UPON THE FUNCTIONS AND FUTURE OF THE ACADEMY, ed. by R. Linnell, 11:237 (1984). Lee and Olswang, Scientific Misconduct: Institutional
Procedures and Due Process Gillmore, Student Ratings as a Factor in Faculty Employment Decisions and Periodic Review, 10:557 (1983-84). Kirk, Judicial Deference to Institutional Autonomy: The Irony of Yeshiva and the Financial Exigency Cases, 10:541 (1983-84). Begin and Lee, Criteria for Evaluating the Managerial Status of College Faculty: Applications of Yeshiva University by the NLRB, 10:515 (1983-84). Hustoles, Faculty and Staff Dismissals: Developing Contract and Tort Theories, 10:479 (1983-84). Lovain, Note, Grounds for Dismissing Tenured Postsecondary Faculty for Cause, 10:419 (1983-84). Bodner, Commentary, Analyzing Faculty Salaries in Class Action Sex Discrimination Cases, 10:305 (1983-84). Richards, Note, "Financial Emergency" and the Faculty Furlough: A Breach of Contract?, 10:225 (1983-84). Finkin, Book Review, BEYOND TRADITIONAL TENURE, by Richard P. Chait and Andrew T. Ford, 10:105 (1983-84). Hartnett, Book Review, BEYOND TRADITIONAL TENURE, by Richard P. Chait and Andrew T. Ford, 10:95 (1983-84). Simon, Faculty Writings: Are They "Works Made for Hire" under the 1976 Copyright Act?, 9:485 (1982-83). Olswang, Planning the Unthinkable: Issues in Institutional
Reorganization and Faculty Barnes and Schlottman, After "Decoupling": Further Thoughts, 9:315 (1982-83). Lee, Balancing Confidentiality and Disclosure in Faculty Peer Review: Impact of Title VII Litigation, 9:279 (1982-83). Hodges, Note, Postsecondary Faculty Members' Rights to Free Speech, 9:85 (1982-83). Moran and Shepard, The Future of Faculty Collective Bargaining at Private Universities, 9:41 (1982-83). Bompey, Decoupling Tenure and Employment Under the 1978
Amendments to the Age Geetter, The University of Connecticut v. The University of Connecticut Chapter of the AAUP: Brief on Determining Faculty Workload in the Collective Bargaining Context, 8:254 (1981-82). Irby, Fantel, Milam, and Schwarz, Commentary, Faculty Rights and Responsibilities in Evaluating and Dismissing Medical Students, 8:102 (1981-82). Consent Decree: United States Department of Labor, Office of Contract Compliance Programs v. Regents of University of California, 8:54 (1981-82). Smith, Protecting the Confidentiality of Faculty Peer Review Records: Department of Labor v. The University of California, 8:20 (1981-82). Finkin, Commentary, The Yeshiva Decision: A Somewhat Different View, 7:321 (1980-81). Lee, Faculty Role in Academic Governance and the Managerial Exclusion: Impact of the Yeshiva Decision, 7:222 (1980-81). Shapiro, Memorandum: Early Retirement Incentives and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 7:174 (1980-81). Hanna, McLendon v. Morton and the Legislative Response: A Procedural Barrier to Quality Education in West Virginia? 7:111 (1980-81). Flygare, Commentary, Board of Trustees of Keene State v. Sweeney: Implications for the Future of Peer Review in Faculty Personnel Decisions, 7:100 (1980-81). Bodner, Commentary, The Implications of Yeshiva University for Collective Bargaining Rights of Faculty at Private and Public Institutions of Higher Education, 7:78 (1980-81). Weston, Outside Activities of Faculty Members, 7:68 (1980-81). Duerr, Annotation: Reinstatement as a Remedy in Cases Involving Termination of Tenured Faculty, 7:57 (1980-81). McKee, Tenure by Default: The Nonformal Acquisition of Academic Tenure, 7:31 (1980-81). Olswang and Fantel, Tenure and Periodic Performance Review: Compatible Legal and Administrative Principles, 7:1 (1980-81). Faculty Collective Bargaining? The Yeshiva Case, 6:67 (1979-80) (Conference Outline). A New Look at Faculty Contracts, 6:13 (1979-80) (Conference Outline). Laster, State Law on Mandatory Retirement of Tenured Faculty after the 1978 Age Discrimination in Employment Act Amendments, 5:211 (1977-79). Stevens, Evaluation of Faculty Competence as a “Privileged Occasion,” 4:281 (1977). Menard, May Tenure Rights of Faculty Be Bargained Away?, 2:256 (1975). Bergan, Grievance- Arbitration Procedures and Contract Administration, 1:371 (1974). Blackwell, The Law of Copyright and Fair Use Doctrine, 1:222 (1974). La Noue, Tenure and Title VII, 1:206 (1974). Middleditch, College and University Fringe Benefits, 1:172 (1973-74). Schultz, Nontenured Faculty: Current Legal and Practical Problems in Connection with Nonrenewal of Such Appointments, 1:74 (1973). FINANCIAL AID TO STUDENTS Barber, Waivers of Academic Progress Requirements for Federal Financial Aid: A Reasonable Accommodation for Students with Learning Disabilities?, 23:231 (1996). Koon, Note, United States v. Brown University and a New Proposal to Discern whether Certain Financial Aid Constitutes "Trade or Commerce," 22:191 (1995). Thomas and Hirschman, Minority-Targeted Scholarships: More than a Black and White Issue, 21:555 (1995). Swanson, Note, Atlanta College of Medical & Dental Careers, Inc. v. Riley: The Right of a School to Appeal the Education Department's Calculation of its Loan Default Rate, 21:141 (1994). Lohman, Case Comment, The Final Frustration of Defaulting NHSC Scholars?: United States v. Hatcher, 19:385 (1993). Baida, Not All Minority Scholarships are Created Equal: Why Some May be More Constitutional than Others, 18:333 (1992). Ward, Note, Race-Exclusive Scholarships: Do they Violate the Constitution and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964?, 18:73 (1991). Olivas, Commentary, Federal Law and Scholarship Policy: An Essay on the Office for Civil Rights, Title VI, and Racial Restrictions, 18:21 (1991). Guerre, Note, Financial Aid in Higher Education: What's Wrong, Who's Being Hurt, What's Being Done, 17:483 (1991). McClamrock, Note, The First Amendment and Public Funding of Religiously Controlled or Affiliated Higher Education, 17:381 (1991). Richmond, Private Colleges and Tuition Price-Fixing: An Antitrust Primer, 17:271 (1991). Lake and Pedulla, Case Comment, Elter v. Great Lakes Higher Education Corporation: State Agencies That Grant Educational Loans May Discriminate Against Student Bankrupts Who Default on Prior Educational Loans, 17:261 (1990). Gunn, Commentary, Economic and Tax Aspects of Prepaid-Tuition Plans, 17:243 (1990). Scheske, Note, Financial Aid and Antitrust: Financial-Aid Packages Subject of Justice Department Probe, 17:43 (1990). Bovee, Goettling, and Ritter, Case Comment, Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind: The Establishment Clause and Financial Aid to Students for Religious Education at Private Institutions, 13:397 (1987). Aiello and Behrens, Student Loans, Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code and the 1984 Bankruptcy Amendments, 13:1 (1986). Mooney, Note, Conditioning Student Aid on Draft Registration: The Legislation and Regulations, 10:379 (1983-84). Hunter, Collecting Defaulted Student Loans: How Much Diligence is Due?, 9:149 (1982-83). FINANCIAL ASPECTS OF INSTITUTIONAL MANAGEMENT Daniel and Sun, The Sherman Act Antitrust Provisions and Collegiate Action: Should There Be a Continued Exception for the Business of the University?, 25:451 (1999). McGuire, Note, Federal Research Grant Funding at Universities:
Legislative Waves from Salaway, Note, UMIFA and a Model for Endowment Investing, 22:1045 (1996). Swanson, Note, Atlanta College of Medical & Dental Careers, Inc. v. Riley: The Right of a School to Appeal the Education Department's Calculation of its Loan Default Rate, 21:141 (1994). Dunn and Camacho, Case Comment, NCAA v. Commissioner of IRS: When will the Internal Revenue Service Consider an Activity Regularly Carried On?, 19:39 (1992). Gordon and Spuehler, Questions and Answers Explaining the New Tax Rules Applicable to Tax-Sheltered Annuities, 17:435 (1991). Kelly, Financing Higher Education: Federal Income-Tax Consequences, 17:307 (1991). Shearer, Ward, and Wattley, Case Comment, Student Government Association v. Board of Trustees of the University of Massachusetts: Forum and Subsidy Analysis Applied to University Funding Decisions, 17:65 (1990). Cole and Goldblatt, Award of Construction Contracts: Public Institutions' Authority to Select the Lowest Responsible Bidder, 16:177 (1989). Daane, Commentary, Regents of the University of Michigan v. State of Michigan: South African Divestiture and Constitutional Autonomy, A Case Commentary, 15:313 (1989). Suffern, Commentary, The Impact of the National Association of Attorney General Model Solicitation Act on Colleges and Universities, 15:177 (1988). Dixon, Lynch, and Swem, Case Comment, Pace v. Hymas: Termination of Tenured University Faculty: Financial Exigency and the Burden of Proof in a Substantive Due Process Claim, 13:417 (1987). Kertz and Hasson, University Research and Development Activities: The Federal Income Tax Consequences of Research Contracts, Research Subsidiaries and Joint Ventures, 13:109 (1986). Johnson and Weeks, To Save a College: Independent College
Trustees and Decisions on Flaherty, Exempt Organizations and Real Estate Syndications after the Tax Reform Act of 1984, 12:61 (1985). Richards, Note, "Financial Emergency" and the Faculty Furlough: A Breach of Contract?, 10:225 (1983-84). McCullogh and Foster, Reviewers’ Comments, 8:15 (1981-82). Vecchione, Chapter 11 of Bankruptcy Code as an Alternative to Closing or Merger, 8:1 (1981- 82). Reidhaar, Memorandum: The Legal Implications of Divestment of University Investments in Companies Doing Business in South Africa, 7:164 (1980-81). Lautsch, Computers and the University Attorney: An Overview of Computer Law on Campus, 5:217 (1977-79). Wilson, Financial Exigency: Examination of Recent Cases Involving Layoff of Tenured Faculty, 4:187 (1977). Greenawalt, Constitutional Limits on Aid to Sectarian Universities, 4:177 (1977). Burke, Federal Taxation of State Colleges and Universities: Recent Developments Call for Reconsideration of Theories of Exemption, 4:43 (1976). Teitell, Federal Tax Implications of Charitable Gift Annuities, 3:26 (1975). Habecker, Students, Christian Colleges, and the Law: and the Walls Come Tumbling Down, 2:369 (1975). Hopkins, Regulations of Interstate Charitable Solicitations: Implications for Colleges and Universities, 2:289 (1975). Wheeler, Fiduciary Responsibilities of Trustees in Relation to the Financing of Private Institutions of Higher Education, 2:210 (1975). Tucker, Financial Exigency- Rights, Responsibilities, and Recent Decisions, 2:103 (1974-75). Hopkins, Rule 144: The Applicability of the Restricted
Securities Requirements to Colleges and Universities, 1:136
(1973-74). Merz, Book Review, FUNDING SCIENCE IN AMERICA: CONGRESS, UNIVERSITIES, AND THE ACADEMIC PORK BARREL, by James D. Savage, 26:803 (2000). Sidbury, The Disclosure of Campus Crime: How Colleges and Universities Continue to Hide Behind the 1998 Amendment to FERPA and How Congress Can Eliminate the Loophole, 26:755 (2000). Sherman, How Free is Free Enough? Public University Presidential Searches, University Autonomy, and State Open Meeting Acts, 26:665 (2000). Estes, State University Presidential Searches: Law and Practice, 26:485 (2000). Harpool, Minimum Compliance with Minimum Standards: Managing Trustee Conflicts of Interest, 24:465 (1998). Harpool, The Sibley Hospital Case: Trustees and Their Loyalty to the Institution, 23:255 (1996). Ugland; Hawkers, Thieves and Lonely Pamphleteers: Distributing Publications in the University Marketplace, 22:935 (1996). Attridge, Book Review, UP THE UNIVERSITY: RECREATING HIGHER EDUCATION IN AMERICA, by Robert and Jon Solomon, 21:825 (1995). Davis, Scaling the Ivory Tower: State Public Records Laws and University Presidential Searches, 21:353 (1994). Page and Hunnicutt, Freedom for the Thought That We Hate: A Policy Analysis of Student Speech Regulation at America's Twenty Largest Public Universities, 21:1 (1994). Harrison, Hate Speech: Power in the Marketplace, 20:461 (1994). Bickel and Lake, Reconceptualizing the University's Duty
to Provide a Safe Learning Mikva, Commentary, How Do We Manage the Right to Hate?, 19:35 (1992). Gibbs, Book Review, CHOOSING A COLLEGE PRESIDENT: OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS, by Judith B. McLaughlin and David Reisman, 18:329 (1991). Neiman, Book Review, LIBERAL JUSTICE AND THE MARXIST CRITIQUE OF EDUCATION, by Kenneth A. Strike, 18:125 (1991). Malloy, Book Review, GOVERNING TOMORROW'S CAMPUS: PERSPECTIVES AND AGENDAS, by Jack H. Schuster, Lynn H. Miller and Associates, 18:121 (1991). Steinberg, Rape on College Campuses: Reform Through Title IX, 18:39 (1991). Bok, Commentary, Universities: Their Temptations and Tensions, 18:1 (1991). Carrington, Book Review, COLLEGE CRIME PREVENTION AND PERSONAL SAFETY AWARENESS, by Max C. Bromley and Leonard Territo, 17:565 (1991). Salsich, Book Review, HIGHER EDUCATION AND STATE GOVERNMENTS, by Edward R. Hines, 17:429 (1991). Shearer, Ward, and Wattley, Case Comment, Student Government Association v. Board of Trustees of the University of Massachusetts: Forum and Subsidy Analysis Applied to University Funding Decisions, 17:65 (1990). Kennelly, Book Review, ON ASSUMING A COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY PRESIDENCY: LESSONS AND FROM THE FIELD, by Estela M. Bensimon, Marian L. Gade and Joseph F. Kauffman, 16:731 (1990). McClamrock, Meyer, and Spencer, Case Comment, Alabama
Student Party v. Student Government Association of the
University of Alabama: The First Amendment and Hodulik, Prohibiting Discriminatory Harassment By Regulating Student Speech: A Balancing of First-Amendment and University Interests, 16:573 (1990). Goldrick and Rakow, Book Review, SEXUAL ASSAULT ON CAMPUS: WHAT COLLEGES CAN DO, by Aileen Adams and Gail Abarbanel, 16:547 (1990). Jasper, Note, Britain's Education Reform Act: A Lesson in Academic Freedom and Tenure, 16:449 (1990). Schlesinger, Commentary, The Opening of the American Mind, 16:425 (1990). Bhirdo, Note, The Liability and Responsibility of Institutions of Higher Education for the On-Campus Victimization of Students, 16:119 (1989). Alessandro, Murray, and Reed, Case Comment, Fox v. Board
of Trustees of the State Dutile, God and Gays at Georgetown: Observations on Gay Rights Coalition of Georgetown University Law Center v. Georgetown University, 15:1 (1988). Bennett, Education and the Constitution: The Case of Citizen James Madison, 14:417 (1988). Antonini, Fantozzi, and Pruss, Case Comment, Harvard Law School Forum v. Schultz: When Exclusion of Aliens under the Immigration and Naturalization Act Conflicts with First Amendment Rights of United States Citizens, 14:153 (1987). Swan, The Eleventh Amendment Revisited: Suits Against State Government Entities and their Employees in Federal Courts, 14:1 (1987). Brickley and Ryan, Case Comment, Miller v. Rutgers and Kovats v. Rutgers: Application of the Eleventh Amendment in Suits Against State Colleges and Universities, 13:407 (1987). Mingle, Book Review, THE COSTS AND BENEFITS OF OPENNESS: SUNSHINE LAWS AND HIGHER EDUCATION, by Harlan Cleveland, 12:569 (1986). Johnson and Weeks, To Save a College: Independent College
Trustees and Decisions on Fishbein, New Strings on the Ivory Tower: The Growth of
Accountability in Colleges and Beach, The Management and Governance of Academic Institutions, 12:301 (1985). Kaplin, Law on the Campus 1960-1985: Years of Growth and Challenge, 12:269 (1985). Cabranes, American Higher Education and the Law: Some Reflections on NACUA's Silver Anniversary, 12:261 (1985). Cleveland, The Costs and Benefits of Openness: Sunshine Laws and Higher Education, 12:127 (1985). Greenleaf, Academic Institutions in the Light and Shadow of the Law, 12:1 (1985). O'Neil, Academic Freedom and the Constitution, 11:275 (1984). Olivas and Denison, Legalization in the Academy: Higher Education and the Supreme Court, 11:1 (1984). Hoornstra and Liethen, Academic Freedom and Civil Discovery, 10:113 (1983-84). Newell, Use of Campus Facilities for First Amendment Activity, 9:27 (1982-83). Mathews, Higher Education and Society, 8:463 (1981-82). Weinberger, Reflection on the Seventies, 8:451 (1981-82). Simon, The Application of State Sunshine Laws to Institutions of Higher Education, 4:83 (1976). HEALTH SCIENCES Ende, Anderson, and Crego, Liability Insurance: A Primer for College and University Counsel, 23:609 (1997). Horger, Case Comment, Medicare Reimbursement to Provider
University Hospitals for Jones, Tax Exemption Issues Facing Academic Health Centers in the Managed Care Environment, 24:261 (1997). Keyes, Health-Care Professionals with AIDS: The Risk of Transmission Balanced against the Interests of Professionals and Institutions, 16:589 (1990). Kobasic, Note, Institutional Review Boards in the University Setting: Review of Pharmaceutical Testing Protocols, Informed Consent and Ethical Considerations, 15:185 (1988). Brickley, Note, AIDS: A University's Liability for Failure to Protect its Students, 14:529 (1988). Wagner, Human Tissues Research: Who Owns the Results?, 14:259 (1987). Rich, Malpractice Issues in the Academic Medical Center, 13:149 (1986). American Academy of Pediatrics, Guidelines for Infant Bioethics Committees, 11:433 (1985). Capron, Legal Perspectives on Institutional Ethics Committees, 11:417 (1985). Lawton, Carder, and Weisman, Recent Governmental Action Regarding the Treatment of Seriously Ill Newborns, 11:405 (1985). Rothstein, Introduction to Special Issue on the Treatment of Seriously Ill Newborns: Implications for University Hospitals, 11:403 (1984-85). Conlon, Book Review, HEALTH CARE LABOR LAW, ed. by Iva Michael Shepard and A. Edward Doudera, 9:355 (1982-83). Pavela, Therapeutic Paternalism and the Misuse of Mandatory Psychiatric Withdrawals on Campus, 9:101 (1982-83). Jeddeloh, Education Program Cost Reimbursement in University
Hospitals: Is There a INSURANCE Higgins and Zulkey, Liability Insurance Coverage: How
to Avoid Unpleasant Surprises, Shapiro, Memorandum: Early Retirement Incentives and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 7:174 (1980-81). Tytel, Spirt v. Long Island University: TIAA-CREF and the Sex-Based Mortality Table Controversy, 7:119 (1980-81). INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Cranman, Privacy and Technology: Counseling Institutions of Higher Education, 25:69 (1998). Miller, Case Comment, Coursepacks and Copyright: Fair Use in Princeton University Press v. Michigan Document Services, 23:525 (1997). Price, College and Universities as Internet Service Providers: Determining and Limiting Liability for Copyright Infringement, 23:183 (1996). Donohue, Note, First-to-File vs. First-to-Invent: Will Universities be Left Behind? 21:765 (1995). Zelenock, Book Review, COPYRIGHT, FAIR USE, AND THE CHALLENGE FOR UNIVERSITIES, by Kenneth D. Crews, 21:615 (1995). Kilby, The Discouragement of Learning: Scholarship Made for Hire, 21:455 (1995). Irwin, Stotlar, and Mulrooney, A Critical Analysis of
Collegiate Licensing Policies and Kasunic, Fair Use and the Educator's Right to Photocopy Copyrighted Material for Classroom Use, 19:271 (1993). Brody, The First Amendment, Governmental Censorship, and Sponsored Research, 19:199 (1993). Zelenock, Book Review, TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AND THE UNIVERSITY, by Gary W. Matkin, 19:49 (1992). Sacken, Commercialization of Academic Knowledge and Judicial Deference, 19:1 (1992). Bianchi, Brenna, and Shannon, Case Comment, Basic Books, Inc. v. Kinko's Graphic Corp: Potential Liability for Classroom Anthologies, 18:595 (1992). Burgoyne, The Copyright Remedy Clarification Act of 1990: State Educational Institutions Now Face Significant Monetary Exposure for Copyright Infringement, 18:367 (1992). Capano, Hoey, and Zuch, Case Comment, In re Cronyn: Can
Student Theses Bar Patent Davis, Commentary, University Research and the Wages of Commerce, 18:29 (1991). Miller, Subpoenas in Academia: Controlling Disclosure, 17:1 (1990). Schinner, Establishing a Collegiate Trademark Licensing Program: To What Extent Does an Institution have an Exclusive Right to its Name?, 15:405 (1989). Luzum and Pupel, Case Comment, Weinstein v. University of Illinois: The "Work-for-Hire" Doctrine and Procedural Due Process for Nontenured Faculty, 15:369 (1989). Graziano and Boren, Suing States for Copyright Infringement – An Eleventh Amendment Bar?, 15:269 (1989). Wagner, Human Tissue Research: Who Owns the Results?, 14:259 (1987). Lautsch, Book Review, COMPUTERS IN EDUCATION: LEGAL LIABILITIES AND ETHICAL ISSUES CONCERNING THEIR USE AND MISUSE, by Patricia A. Hollander, 14:163 (1987). Olson, Copyright and Fair Use: Implications of Nation Enterprises for Higher Education, 13:489 (1986). Sorenson, Impact of the Copyright Law on College Teaching, 12:509 (1986). Olson, Copyright and Fair Use: Implications of Nation Enterprises for Higher Education, 12:489 (1986). Burshtein, Collegiate Licensing in Canada and the Statutory Advantage, 12:227 (1985). Lachs, University Patent Policy, 10:263 (1983-84). Ramey, Note, Off-the-Air Educational Videorecording and Fair Use: An Analysis, 10:341 (1983-84). Neuenschwander, Oral History and Copyright: An Uncertain Relationship, 10:147 (1983-84). Bell and Majestic, Protection and Enforcement of College and University Trademarks, 10:63 (1983-84). Simon, Faculty Writings: Are They "Works Made For Hire" Under the 1976 Copyright Act?, 9:485 (1982-83). Ward, Commentary, The Georgia Grind: Can the Common Law Accommodate the Problems of Title in the Art World: Observations on a Recent Case, 8:533 (1981-82). Anderson, Commentary, Licensing of Colleges and University Trademarks, 8:97 (1981-82). Smith, Implications of the Uniform Patent Legislation to Colleges and Universities, 8:82 (1981-82). Harris, Memorandum: Introductory Guide to Academic Risks of Copyright Infringement, 7:328 (1980-81). Ward, Copyright in Museum Collections: An Overview of Come of the Problems, 7:297 (1980-81). Edwards, Usages of Copyrighted Musical Works Permissible Without Acquiring a Copyright License, Assignment, or Release, 6:363 (1979-80). Lautsch, Computers and the University Attorney: An Overview of Computer Law on Campus, 5:217 (1977-79). Cardozo, To Copy or Not to Copy For Teaching and Scholarship: What Shall I Tell My Client?, 4:59 (1976-77). Mancino and Sugarman, Tax Aspects of University Patent Policy, 3:41 (1975). Zirkel, Copyright Law in Higher Education: Individuals, Institutions, and Innovations, 2:342 (1975). McCaffrey, Patent Policy in Federal Government Contracts and Grants, 1:230 (1974). Blackwell, The Law of Copyright and the Fair Use Doctrine, 1:222 (1974). LABOR LAW Lee, Employment Discrimination in Higher Education: 1997 in Review, 25:313 (1998). Streitz and Hunkler, Note, Teaching or Learning: Are Teaching Assistants Students or Employees?, 24:349 (1997). Lyons, Case Comment, EEOC v. Board of Governors of State Colleges and Universities: Collective Bargaining Agreements and Age Discrimination in Employment Act Claims: What Counts as Retaliation under ADEA Section 4(D), 20:241 (1993). Nagle, Note, Yeshiva's Impact on Collective Bargaining in Public-Sector Higher Education, 20:383 (1994). Swan, Subjective Hiring and Promotion Decisions in the Wake of Fort Worth, Atonio, and Price Waterhouse, 16:553 (1990). Cosgrove, Grundy, and Heffernan, Case Comment, Shannon v. Bepko: Public Colleges and Universities as State Agencies: Standards for Eleventh Amendment Protection, 16:151 (1989). Barnes and Khorey, The Effects and Use of Administrative Determinations in Subsequent Employment Litigation, 16:189 (1989). Stadler, Note, Drug Testing of College and University Employees, 15:321 (1989). Olswang, Union Security Provisions, Academic Freedom and Tenure: The Implications of Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson, 14:539 (1988). Judge, Student-Athletes as Employees: Income Tax Consequences, 13:285 (1986). Begin and Lee, Criteria for Evaluating the Managerial
Status of College Faculty: Conlon, Book Review, HEALTH CARE LABOR LAW, ed. by Ira Michael Shepard and A. Edward Doudera, 9:355 (1982-83). Veazie, University Collective Bargaining: The Experience of the Montana University System, 9:51 (1982-83). Moran and Shepard, The Future of Faculty Collective Bargaining at Private Universities, 9:41 (1982-83). Geetter, The University of Connecticut v. The University of Connecticut Chapter of the AAUP: Brief on Determining Faculty Workload in the Collective Bargaining Context, 8:254 (1981-82). Finkin, The Yeshiva Decision: A Somewhat Different View, 7:321 (1980-81). Lee, Faculty Rule in Academic Governance and the Managerial Exclusion: Impact of the Yeshiva Decision, 7:222 (1980-81). Tytel, Commentary, Spirt v. Long Island University: TIAA-CREF and the Sex-Based Mortality Table Controversy, 7:119 (180-81). Bodner, The Implications of Yeshiva University for College Bargaining Rights of Faculty at Private and Private Institutions of Higher Education 7:78 (1980-81). Bompey and Witten, Settlement of Title VII Disputes: Shifting Patterns in a Changing World, 6:317 (1979-80). Nelson and Ward, Burdens of Proof Under Employment Discrimination Legislation, 6:301 (1979-80). Ward, Diagnosing an Employment Civil Rights Claim, 6:279 (1979-80). Faculty Collective Bargaining: The Yeshiva Case, 6:67 (1979-80) (Conference Outline). Laster, State Law on Mandatory Retirement of Tenured Faculty After the 1978 Age Discrimination in Employment Act Amendments, 5:211 (1977-79). Ford, The Implications of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act Amendments of 1978 for Colleges and Universities, 5:161 (1977-79). Sensenbrenner, Collective Bargaining Legislation for Public Higher Education From the Management Side of the Table, 4:27 (1976). Menard, May Tenure Rights of Faculty Be Bargained Away?, 2:256 (1975). Kahn, Current and Emerging Labor Relations Issues in Higher Education, 2:123 (1974-75). Ferguson and Bergan, Grievance- Arbitration Procedures and Contract Administration, 1:371 (1974). Schwartzman, The Administration’s Approach to Collective Bargaining, 1:351 (1974). Holway and O’Donnell, Unfair Labor Practices in the Academic Setting, 1:325 (1974). Kennedy, The Educators’ Role in Educating the NLRB: Requirements of a Complete Record, 1:305 (1974). Kahn, Conducting a “No-Union” Election Campaign on Campus, 1:291 (1974). McHugh, Faculty Unionism and Tenure, 1:46 (1973). LEGISLATION Frazier and Dymersky, A Quandary of the Civil Rights Act
of 1991: Is the New Law Gray, Impact of the Proposed Civil Rights and Women's
Equity in Employment Act on Schaller, Drug Testing and the Evolution of Federal and State Regulation of Intercollegiate Athletics: A Chill Wind Blows, 18:131 (1991). Olivas, Commentary, Federal Law and Scholarship Policy: An Essay on the Office for Civil Rights, Title VI, and Racial Restrictions, 18:21 (1991). Brammer, Lallo, and Ney, Case Comment, Brown v. Trustees
of Boston University: The Meyers, Note, State Open-Records Acts and the NCAA Bylaw Requiring Coaches to Disclose their "Athletically-Related" Outside Income: Emptying the Coaches' Pockets for Public Inspection?, 16:497 (1990). Alessandro, Note, The Student-Athlete Right-to-Know Act:
Legislation Would Require Colleges to Make Public Graduation
Rates of Student Athletes, 16:287 (1989). Daane, Commentary, Regents of the University of Michigan v. State of Michigan: South African Divestiture and Constitutional Autonomy, A Case Commentary, 15:313 (1988). Suffern, Commentary, The Impact of the National Association of Attorneys General Model Solicitation Act on Colleges and Universities, 15:177 (1988). Andrews, Note, State Legislation on Comparable Worth: Will it Bring Pay Equity to Academe?, 14:469 (1988). Lam, Restrictions on Technology Transfer among Academic Researchers: Will Recent Changes in the Export Control System Make a Difference?, 13:311 (1986). Mingle, Book Review, THE COSTS AND BENEFITS OF OPENNESS: SUNSHINE LAWS AND HIGHER EDUCATION, by Harlan Cleveland, 12:569 (1986). Smith, The Implications of the Uniform Patent Legislation to Colleges and Universities, 8:82 (1981-82). Hanna, Commentary, McLendon v. Morton and the Legislative Response: A Procedural Barrier to Quality Education in West Virginia?, 7:111 (1980-81). LIABILITY MacLachlan, Dangerous Traditions: Hazing Rituals on Campus and University Liability, 26:511 (2000). Von Gerichten, Tort Litigation in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:245 (1999). Johnsen and Todd, Federal Immunity Law in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:221 (1999). Thro, The Eleventh Amendment Revolution in the Lower Federal Courts, 25:501 (1999). Hoye, Tort Litigation in Higher Education: 1997 in Review, 25:257 (1998). Johnsen, Federal Immunity Law in Higher Education, 25:225 (1998). Rutledge, Hell Night Hath No Fury Like a Pledge Scorned . . . and Injured: Hazing Litigation in U.S. Colleges and Universities, 25:361 (1998). Bickel, Tort-Accident Cases: Traditional Tort Rules in
the College or University Setting, Johnsen, Federal Immunity Law in Higher Education: A Review of 1996 and 1997 Judicial Decisions, 24:161 (1997). Bickel and Lake, The Emergence of New Paradigms in Student-University Relations: From In Loco Parentis to Bystander to Facilitator, 23:755 (1997). Bickel, Tort Accident Cases Involving Colleges and Universities: A Review of the 1995 Judicial Decisions, 23:359 (1997). Johnsen, Immunity Law in Higher Education: A Review of
the 1995 Judicial Decisions, Shea, Case Comment, Duty of Care Owed to University Athletes in Light of Kleinknecht, 21:591 (1995). Naples, Note, Reading, ‘Riting and Response: Holding Colleges and Universities Liable under CERCLA, 20:483 (1994). Bickel and Lake, Reconceptualizing the University's Duty
to Provide a Safe Learning Schroeder, Evolving Theories in Legal Liability: How will they Affect Cooperative Extension?, 18:483 (1992). Evans, Note, "A Stranger in a Strange Land": Responsibility and Liability for Students Enrolled in Foreign-Study Programs, 18:299 (1991). Steinberg, Rape on College Campuses: Reform Through Title IX, 18:39 (1991). Carrington, Book Review, COLLEGE CRIME PREVENTION AND PERSONAL SAFETY AWARENESS, by Max C. Bromley and Leonard Territo, 17:565 (1991). Hasty, Note, Worker's Compensation: Will College and University Professors Be Compensated for Mental Injuries Caused by Work-Related Stress?, 17:535 (1991). Dumas, Note, Defective Buildings and Grounds – A Dangerous Condition for Colleges and Universities, 17:351 (1991). Richmond, Private Colleges and Tuition Price-Fixing: An Antitrust Primer, 17:271 (1991). Higgins and Zulkey, Liability Insurance Coverage: How
to Avoid Unpleasant Surprises, Scheske, Note, Financial Aid and Antitrust: Financial-Aid Packages Subject of Justice Department Probe, 17:43 (1990). Guerre, Hasty, and Paige, Case Comment, Gehling v. St. George's University School of Medicine, Ltd.: Continued Erosion of Colleges' and Universities' Duty to Students Injured in Collegiate Activities, 16:677 (1990). Bhirdo, Note, The Liability and Responsibility of Institutions of Higher Education for the On-Campus Victimization of Students, 16:119 (1989). Connolly and Marshall, Sexual Harassment of University
or College Students by Faculty Graziano and Boren, Suing States for Copyright Infringement: An Eleventh Amendment Bar?, 15:269 (1989). Manderfeld, Note, College and University Liability Under Superfund, 15:217 (1988). Miyamoto, Liability of Colleges and Universities for Injuries
Sustained by Students while Kobasic, Smith, and Zucker, Case Comment, Eiseman v. State
of New York: The Duty of a College to Protect its Students
from Harm by Other Students Admitted under Special Brickley, Note, AIDS: A University's Liability for Failure to Protect its Students, 14:529 (1988). McLean, Note, Tort Liability of Colleges and Universities for Injuries Resulting from Student Alcohol Consumption, 14:399 (1987). Lautsch, Book Review, COMPUTERS IN EDUCATION: LEGAL LIABILITIES AND ETHICAL ISSUES CONCERNING THEIR USE AND MISUSE, by Patricia A. Hollander, 14:163 (1987). Helms, Patterns of Litigation in Postsecondary Education: A Case Law Study, 14:99 (1987). Swan, The Eleventh Amendment Revisited: Suits Against State Government Entities and their Employees in Federal Courts, 14:1 (1987). Brickley and Ryan, Case Comment, Miller v. Rutgers and Kovats v. Rutgers: Application of the Eleventh Amendment in Suits Against State Colleges and Universities, 13:407 (1987). Cole, Recent Legal Developments in Sexual Harassment, 13:267 (1986). Rich, Malpractice Issues in the Academic Medical Center, 13:149 (1986). Roth, The Impact of Liquor Liability on Colleges and Universities, 13:45 (1986). Steadman and Woods, Bradley Center, Inc. v. Wessner: The Psychotherapist's Duty to Warn, 10:293 (1983-84). Lansing and Hauserman, Rape on Campus: Postsecondary Institutions as Third Party Defendants, 8:182 (1981-82). Vitality of Eleventh Amendment Immunity and Other Section 1983 et seq.Defenses, 6:53 (1979-80) (Conference Outline). Sensenbrenner, Collective Bargaining Legislation for Public Higher Education From the Management Side of the Table, 4:27 (1976). Aiken, Adams and Hall, Liability- Legal Liabilities in Higher Education: Their Scope and Management, 3:125 (1976). Porth, Personal Liability of Trustees of Higher Education Institutions, 2:143 (1974-75). Aiken, Tort Liability of Governing Boards, Administrators and Faculty in Higher Education, 2:129 (1974-75). Porth, Personal Liability of Trustees of Educational Institutions, 1:84 (1973). MUSEUMS Weil, A Checklist of Legal Considerations for Museums, 7:346 (1980-81). Ward, Copyright in Museum Collections: An Overview of Some of the Problems 7:297 (1980-81). Loar and Sky, General Operating Support for Museums: Problems in Paradise, 7:267 (1980-81). PERSONNEL Ware, Somers, and Speake, Immigration Law and Higher Education:
Employment of Hasty, Note, Worker's Compensation: Will College and University Professors be Compensated for Mental Injuries Caused by Work-Related Stress?, 17:535 (1991). Meyers, Note, State Open-Records Acts and the NCAA By-Law Requiring Coaches to Disclose their "Athletically-Related" Outside Income: Emptying the Coaches' Pockets for Public Inspection?, 16:497 (1990). Barnes and Khorey, The Effects and Use of Administrative Determinations in Subsequent Employment Litigation, 16:189 (1989). Stadler, Note, Drug Testing of College and University Employees, 15:321 (1989). Rothstein, Reproductive Hazards and Sex Discrimination in the Workplace: New Legal Concerns in Industry and on Campus, 10:495 (1983-84). Hustoles, Faculty and Staff Dismissals: Developing Contract
and Tort Theories, 10:479 Madsen, New State Legislation on Informing Workers about
Hazardous Substances in the Unemployment Insurance Problems: A Practicum, 6:43 (1979-80) (Conference Outline). Middleditch, College and University Fringe Benefits, 1:172 (1973-74). REAL PROPERTY Dumas, Note, Defective Buildings and Grounds- A Dangerous Condition for Colleges and Universities, 17:351 (1991). Cole and Goldblatt, Award of Construction Contracts: Public Institutions’ Authority to Select the Lowest Responsible Bidder, 16:177 (1989). Walker and Israeloff, Historic Preservation and the Institutional Owner, 14:59 (1987). Flaherty, Exempt Organizations and Real Estate Syndications After the Tax Reform Act of 1984, 12:61 (1985). REGULATORY MEASURES Davis, Scaling the Ivory Tower: State Public Records Laws and University Presidential Searches, 21:353 (1994). Page and Hunnicutt, Freedom for the Thought That We Hate: A Policy Analysis of Student Speech Regulation at America's Twenty Largest Public Universities, 21:1 (1994). Naples, Note, Reading, ‘Riting and Response: Holding Colleges and Universities Liable under CERCLA, 20:483 (1994). Schaller, Drug Testing and the Evolution of Federal and State Regulation of Intercollegiate Athletics: A Chill Wind Blows, 18:131 (1991). Guerre, Note, Financial Aid in Higher Education: What's Wrong, Who's Being Hurt, What's Being Done, 17:483 (1991). Meyers, Note, State Open-Records Acts and the NCAA By-Law Requiring Coaches to Disclose their "Athletically-Related" Outside Income: Emptying the Coaches' Pockets for Public Inspection?, 16:497 (1990). Bhirdo, Haviland, and Warth, Case Comment, McCormack v. National Collegiate Athletic Association: Collegiate Athletics Sanctions from an Antitrust and Civil Rights Perspective, 15:459 (1989). Daane, Commentary, Regents of the University of Michigan v. State of Michigan: South African Divestiture and Constitutional Autonomy, A Case Commentary, 15:313 (1989). Suffern, Commentary, The Impact of the National Association of Attorneys General Model Solicitation Act on Colleges and Universities, 15:177 (1988). Antonini, Fantozzi, and Pruss, Case Comment, Harvard Law School Forum v. Schultz: When Exclusion of Aliens under the Immigration and Naturalization Act Conflicts with First Amendment Rights of United States Citizens, 14:153 (1987). Lam, Restrictions on Technology Transfer Among Academic Researchers: Will Recent Changes in the Export Control System Make a Difference?, 13:311 (1986). Rothstein, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act: Emerging Issues for Colleges and Universities, 13:229 (1986). Kirby, Federal Antitrust Issues Affecting Institutions
of Higher Education: An Overview, Weber, State Public Records Acts: The Need to Exempt Scientific Research Belonging to State Universities from Indiscriminate Public Disclosure, 10:129 (1983-84). Ayers and Sagner, The Bankruptcy Reform Act and Student Loans: Unraveling New Knots, 9:361 (1982-83). Madsen, New State Legislation On Informing Workers About Hazardous Substances in the Workplace - Will It Impact on University Teaching and Research?, 9:325 (1982-83). Weinberger, Reflection on the Seventies, 8:451 (1981-82). Richardson, A Delicate Balance: U.S. Government and Higher Education, 8:445 (1981-82). Reback and Vogt, AAMC v. Carey: Briefs in Support of a Motion to Enjoin Enforcement of New York’s Standardized Test Disclosure Law, 7:132 (1980-81). Wallick and Chamblee, Bridling the Trojan Horse: Rights and Remedies of Colleges and Universities Under Federal Grant-Type Assistance Programs, 4:241 (1977). Lacovara, How Far Can the Federal Camel Slip Under the Academic Tent?, 4:223 (1976). Jenkins, Regulation of Colleges and Universities Under the Guaranteed Student Loan Program, 4:13 (1976). Oaks, A Private University Looks at Government Regulation, 4:1 (1976). Barkin, Legal Implications of Office of Education Criteria for the Self-Supporting Student, 2:229 (1975). RELIGION Beaty, Book Review, THE DYING OF THE LIGHT: THE DISENGAGEMENT OF COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES FROM THEIR CHRISTIAN CHURCHES, by James T. Burtchaell, C.S.C., 26:177 (1999). Harrington, Civil and Canon Law Issues Affecting American Catholic Higher Education 1948-1998: An Overview and the ACCU Perspective, 26:67 (1999). Araujo, Ex Corde Ecclesiae and Mission-Centered Hiring in Roman Catholic Colleges and Universities: To Boldly Go Where We Have Gone Before, 25:835 (1999). Gafney, Tales of Two Cities: Canon Law and Constitutional Law at the Crossroads, 25:801 (1999). Whitt, "What We Have Here is a Failure to Communicate": The Mind of the Legislator in Ex Corde Ecclesiae, 25:769 (1999). Cafardi, Giving Legal Life to the Ex Corde Ecclesiae Norms: Corporate Strategies and Practical Difficulties, 25:751 (1999). Bassett, The American Civil Corporation, the "Incorporation Movement" and the Canon Law of the Catholic Church, 25:721 (1999). Gordon and Durham, Toward Diverse Diversity: The Legal Legitimacy of Ex Corde Ecclesiae, 25:697 (1999). Burtchaell, Out of the Heartburn of the Church, 25:653 (1999). Robinson, Introduction to Symposium on Ex Corde Ecclesiae, 25:645 (1999). McGarvie, Creating Roles for Religion and Philanthropy in a Secular Nation: The Dartmouth College Case and the Design of Civil Society in the Early Republic, 25:527 (1999). Roth, Case Comment, Rosenberger v. Rector: The First Amendment Dog Chases its Tail, 21:723 (1995). Bainbridge, Essay, Student Religious Organizations and University Policies Against Discrimination on the Basis of Sexual Orientation: Implications of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 21:369 (1994). Laycock, The Rights of Religious Academic Communities, 20:15 (1993). Lyons, Note, Oregon v. Smith and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act: An Educational Perspective, 20:333 (1994). Noonan, Religious Law Schools and the First Amendment, 20:43 (1993). O’Neil, Case Comment, Bishop v. Aronov: A Comment, 18:381 (1992). Scott and Weingart, Case Comment, A Professor's Choice:
Employment or Religious McClamrock, Note, The First Amendment and Public Funding of Religiously Controlled or Affiliated Higher Education, 17:381 (1991). Dutile, God and Gays at Georgetown: Observations on Gay Rights Coalition of Georgetown University Law Center v. Georgetown University, 15:1 (1988). Andrews, Dang, and McLean, Note, Recent Development: Church Licensed Professors: The Curran Controversy, 13:375 (1987). Bovee, Goettling, and Ritter, Case Comment, Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind: The Establishment Clause and Financial Aid to Students Attending Private Religious Institutions, 13:397 (1987). Cassou and Curran, Secular Orthodoxy and Sacred Freedoms: Accreditation of Church-Related Law Schools, 11:293 (1984). Smart, Widmar v. Vincent and the Purposes of the Establishment Clause, 9:469 (1982-83). Furay, Book Review, CHURCH AND CAMPUS: LEGAL ISSUES IN RELIGIOUSLY AFFILIATED HIGHER EDUCATION, by Phillip R. Moots and Edward McGlynn Gaffney, Jr., 7:186 (1980-81). RESEARCH Parrish, The Federal Government and Scientific Misconduct Proceedings, Past, Present, and Future as Seen through the Thereza Imanishi-Kari Case, 24:581 (1998). Katerberg, Note, Institutional Review Boards, Research on Children, and Informed Consent of Parents: Walking the Tightrope between Encouraging Vital Experimentation and Protecting Subjects’ Rights, 24:545 (1998). McGuire, Note, Federal Research Grant Funding at Universities: Legislative Waves from Auditors Diving into Overhead Cost Pools, 23:563 (1997). Parrish, Scientific Misconduct and the Plagiarism Cases, 21:517 (1995). Lemmer and Pompeo, "Educating" Lawyers about
the Implications of Cost Accounting Lewis and Vincler, Storming the Ivory Tower: The Competing Interests of the Public's Right to Know and Protecting the Integrity of University Research, 20:417 (1994). Shockley, The Availability of "Trade Secret" Protection for University Research, 20:309 (1994). MacCordy, The Threat of Proposed Patent Law Changes to the Research University, 20:295 (1994). Villarreal and Zacharakis, Note, "Where Did You Dig Up That Old Fossil?": Will Universities Own the Research Specimens that they Collect or Purchase?, 20:225 (1993). Kreiser, AAUP Perspectives on Academic Freedom and United States Intelligence Agencies, 19:251 (1993). Robison and Sanders, The Myths of Academia: Open Inquiry and Funded Research, 19:227 (1993). Shattuck, Secrecy on Campus, 19:217 (1993). Brody, The First Amendment, Governmental Censorship, and Sponsored Research, 19:199 (1993). Zelenock, Book Review, TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AND THE UNIVERSITY, by Gary W. Matkin, 19:49 (1992). Davis, Commentary, University Research and the Wages of Commerce, 18:29 (1991). Miller, Subpoenas in Academia: Controlling Disclosure, 17:1 (1990). Kobasic, Note, Institutional Review Boards in the University Setting: Review of Pharmaceutical Testing Protocols, Informed Consent and Ethical Considerations, 15:185 (1988). Attanasio, Does the First Amendment Guarantee a Right to Conduct Scientific Experiments?, 14:435 (1987). Wagner, Human Tissue Research: Who Owns the Results?, 14:259 (1987). Lam, Restrictions on Technology Transfer Among Academic Researchers: Will Recent Changes in the Export Control System Make a Difference?, 13:311 (1986). Kertz and Hasson, University Research and Development Activities: The Federal Income Tax Consequences of Research Contracts, Research Subsidiaries and Joint Ventures, 13:109 (1986). Burke, University Policies on Conflict of Interest and Delay of Publication, 12:175 (1985). White, Book Review, PARTNERS IN THE RESEARCH ENTERPRISE: UNIVERSITY-CORPORATE RELATIONS IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, ed. by T. Langfitt, S. Hackney, A. Fishman, and A. Glowasky, 11:257 (1984). Orleans, Book Review, PARTNERS IN THE RESEARCH ENTERPRISE: UNIVERSITY-CORPORATE RELATIONS IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, ed. by T. Langfitt, S. Hackney, A. Fishman, and A. Glowasky, 11:237 (1984). Caruso, Book Review, MARINE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND THE LAW OF THE SEA, by Alfred H. A. Soons, 11:65 (1984). Olswang and Lee, Scientific Misconduct: Institutional Procedures and Due Process Considerations, 11:51 (1984). Bartlett and Siena, Research and Development Limited Partnerships as a Device to Exploit University Owned Technology, 10:435 (1983-84). Broome, Case Comment, A Limitation on Federal Authority to Deny Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Equipment, 10:325 (1983-84). Weber, State Public Records Acts: The Need to Exempt Scientific Research Belonging to State Universities From Indiscriminate Public Disclosure, 10:129 (1983-84). Hoornstra and Liethen, Academic Freedom and Civil Discovery, 10:113 (1983-84). Fowler, University-Industry Research Relationships: The Research Agreement, 9:515 (1982-83). Sullivan and Bader, The Application of Export Control
Laws to Scientific Research at Kertz, Tax Exempt Organizations and Commercially Sponsored
Scientific Research, 9:69 McCaffrey, Patent Policy in Federal Government Contracts and Grants, 1:230 (1974). STUDENTS Rutledge, Book Review, WRONGS OF PASSAGE: FRATERNITIES, SORORITIES, HAZING AND BINGE DRINKING, by Hank Nuwer, 26:789 (2000). Crockett, Book Review, WRONGS OF PASSAGE: FRATERNITIES, SORORITIES, HAZING AND BINGE DRINKING, by Hank Nuwer, 26: 783 (2000). Friedl, Punishing Students for Non-Academic Misconduct, 26:701 (2000). MacLachlan, Dangerous Traditions: Hazing Rituals on Campus and University Liability, 26:511 (2000). Weithman, Book Review, ONE CASE AT A TIME: JUDICIAL MINIMALISM ON THE SUPREME COURT, By Cass R. Sunstein, 26:379 (1999). Pieronek, Discrimination Against Students in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:307 Stoner and Detar, Disciplinary and Academic Decisions Pertaining to Students in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:273 (1999). O’Shea, First Amendment Cases in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:193 (1999). Alger, Book Review, THE SHADOW UNIVERSITY, by Alan Charles Kors and Harvey A. Silverglate, 25:901 (1999). Bekavac, Book Review, BECOMING GENTLEMEN, by Lani Guinier, et al., 25:619 (1999). Bors, Academic Freedom Faces Learning Disabilities: Guckenberger v. Boston University, 25:581 (1999). O’Neil, Student Fees and Student Rights: Evolving Constitutional Principles, 25:569 (1999). Raskoff, Book Review, WHEN HOPE AND FEAR COLLIDE: A PORTRAIT OF TODAY’S COLLEGE STUDENT, by Arthur Levine and Jeanette S. Cureton, 25:613 (1999). Pieronek, Book Review, BECOMING GENTLEMEN, by Lani Guinier, et al., 25:627 (1999). Perkins, Note, Sylvester v. Texas Southern University: An Exception to the Rule of Judicial Deference to Academic Decisions, 25:399 (1998). Rutledge, Hell Night Hath No Fury Like a Pledge Scorned . . . and Injured: Hazing Litigation in U.S. Colleges and Universities, 25:361 (1998). O’Shea, The First Amendment: 1997 in Review, 25:201 (1998). Stoner and Schupansky, Disciplinary and Academic Decisions Pertaining to Students, 25:293 (1998). Phelps, Book Review, CULTIVATING HUMANITY: A CLASSICAL DEFENSE OF REFORM IN LIBERAL EDUCATION, by Martha C. Nussbaum, 25:185 (1998). Torke, Book Review, FREE SPEECH IN THE COLLEGE COMMUNITY, by Robert M. O’Neil, 24:699 (1998). Michaelson, Board of Education of the Township of Piscataway v. Sharon Taxman, 24:671 (1998). Whitman, Affirmative Action on Campus: The Legal and Practical Challenges, 24:637 (1998). Lee, Discrimination Against Students in Higher Education: A Review of the 1996 Judicial Decisions, 24:619 (1998). Pavela, Disciplinary and Academic Decisions Pertaining to Students: A Review of 1996 Judicial Decisions, 24:391 (1997). Streitz and Hunkler, Note, Teaching or Learning: Are Teaching Assistants Students or Employees?, 24:349 (1997). Pavela, Applying the Power of Association on Campus: A Model Code of Academic Integrity, 24:97 (1997). Hauser, Intimate Associations under the Law: The Rights of Social Fraternities to Exist and to be Free From Undue Interference by Host Institutions, 24:59 (1997). Coleman and Jarvis, Tuition Adjustment for Law School Students: A Necessary Accommodation under the ADA?, 24:45 (1997). Grossi and Edwards, Student Misconduct: Historical Trends in Legislative and Judicial Decision-Making in American Universities, 23:829 (1997). O’Shea, Book Review, FIGHTING WORDS – THE POLITICS OF HATEFUL SPEECH, by Laurence R. Marcus, 23:597 (1997). Pavela, Disciplinary and Academic Decisions Pertaining to Students: A Review of the 1995 Judicial Decisions, 23:391 (1997). O’Shea, First Amendment: 1995 in Review, 23:309 (1997). Alger and Coleman, Beyond Speech Codes: Harmonizing Rights of Free Speech and Freedom from Discrimination on University Campuses, 23:91 (1996). Sorenson and LaManque, The Application of Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier in College Litigation, 22:971 (1996). Ugland, Hawkers, Thieves and Lonely Pamphleteers: Distributing Publications in the University Marketplace, 22:935 (1996). Saurack, Note, Protecting the Student: A Critique of the Procedural Protection Afforded to American and English Students in University Disciplinary Hearings, 21:785 (1995). Roth, Case Comment, Rosenberger v. Rector: The First Amendment Dog Chases Its Tail, 21:723 (1995). Kramer, Case Comment, The Free Rider Problem and First Amendment Concerns: A Balance Upset by New Limitations on Mandatory Student Fees, 21:691 (1995). Page and Hunnicutt, Freedom for the Thought That We Hate: A Policy Analysis of Student Speech Regulation at America's Twenty Largest Public Universities, 21:1 (1994). Papandreou, Case Comment, Krebs v. Rutgers: The Potential for Disclosure of Highly Confidential Personal Information Renders Questionable the Use of Social Security Numbers as Student Identification Numbers, 20:79 (1993). Hartman, Hateful Expression and First Amendment Values: Toward a Theory of Constitutional Constraint on Hate Speech at Colleges and Universities after R.A.V. v. St. Paul, 19:343 (1993). Rottinghaus and Wilds, Case Comment, Wynne v. Tufts University School of Medicine, 19:185 (1992). DiScala, Olswang, and Niccolls, College and University
Responses to the Emotionally or Lallo, Note, Student Challenges to Grades and Academic Dismissals: Are they Losing Battles?, 18:577 (1992). Horton, Traditional Single-Sex Fraternities on College Campuses: Will They Survive in the 1990's?, 18:419 (1992). Evans, Note, "A Stranger in a Strange Land": Responsibility for Students Enrolled in Foreign-Study Programs, 18:299 (1991). Capano, Note, Stopping Students from Cheating: Halting the Activities of Term-Paper Mills and Enforcing Disciplinary Sanctions Against Students Who Purchase Term Papers, 18:277 (1991). Rothstein, Commentary, Students, Staff and Faculty with Disabilities: Current Issues for Colleges and Universities, 17:471 (1991). Stoner and Cerminara, Harnessing the "Spirit of Insubordination": A Model Student Disciplinary Code, 17:89 (1990). Shearer, Ward, and Wattley, Case Comment, Student Government Association v. Board of Trustees of the University of Massachusetts: Forum and Subsidy Analysis Applied to University Funding Decisions, 17:65 (1990). Harvey, Fraternities and the Constitution: University-Imposed Relationship Statements May Violate Student Associational Rights, 17:11 (1990). McClamrock, Meyer, and Spencer, Case Comment, Alabama
Student Party v. Student Hodulik, Prohibiting Discriminatory Harassment by Regulating Student Speech: A Balancing of First-Amendment and University Interests, 16:573 (1990). Goldrick and Rakow, Book Review, SEXUAL ASSAULT ON CAMPUS: WHAT COLLEGES CAN DO, by Aileen Adams and Gail Abarbanel, 16:547 (1990). Haviland, Note, Student Discriminatory Harassment, 16:311 (1989). Bhirdo, Note, The Liability and Responsibility of Institutions of Higher Education for the On-Campus Victimization of Students, 16:119 (1989). Curry, Note, Hazing and the "Rush" toward Reform: Responses from Universities, Fraternities, State Legislatures, and the Courts, 16:93 (1989). Connolly and Marshall, Sexual Harassment of University
or College Students by Faculty Sullivan, Note, The College or University Power to Withhold Diplomas, 15:335 (1989). Richmond, Students' Rights to Counsel in University Disciplinary Proceedings, 15:289 (1989). Miyamoto, Liability of Colleges and Universities for Injuries
Sustained by Students while Keller, Consensual Amorous Relationships between Faculty and Students: The Constitutional Right to Privacy, 15:21 (1988). Kobasic, Smith, and Zucker, Case Comment, Eiseman v. State
of New York: The Duty of a College to Protect Its Students
from Harm by Other Students Admitted under Special Brickley, Note, AIDS: A University's Liability for Failure to Protect its Students, 14:529 (1988). Ryan, Note, The First Amendment on Campus: The Rights of the Student Press v. The Rights of the Students, 14:505 (1988). Bennett, Education and the Constitution: The Case of Citizen James Madison, 14:417 (1988). McLean, Note, Tort Liability of Colleges and Universities for Injuries Resulting from Student Alcohol Consumption, 14:399 (1987). Swem, Note, Due Process Rights in Student Disciplinary Matters, 14:359 (1987). Reams, Revocation of Academic Degrees by Colleges and Universities, 14:283 (1987). Weeks, Book Review, THE DISMISSAL OF STUDENTS WITH MENTAL DISORDERS: LEGAL ISSUES, POLICY CONSIDERATIONS AND ALTERNATIVE RESPONSES, by Gary Pavela, 13:429 (1987). Steele, Mandatory Student Fees at Public Universities: Bringing the First Amendment within the Campus Gate, 13:353 (1987). Milam and Marshall, Impact of Regents of the University of Michigan v. Ewing on Academic Dismissals from Graduate and Professional Schools, 13:335 (1987). Judge, Student-Athletes as Employees: Income Tax Consequences, 13:285 (1986). Cole, Recent Legal Developments in Sexual Harassment, 13:267 (1986). Rothstein, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act: Emerging Issues for Colleges and Universities, 13:229 (1986). Mawdsley, Plagiarism Problems in Higher Education, 13:65 (1986). Roth, The Impact of Liquor Liability on Colleges and Universities, 13:45 (1986). Keller, Note, Shall the Truce Be Unbroken? New Jersey
v. T.L.O. and Higher Education, Reidhaar, The Assault on the Citadel: Reflections on a Quarter Century of Change in the Relationships between the Student and the University, 12:343 (1985). Davenport, The Catalog in the Courtroom: From Shield to Sword?, 12:201 (1985). Long, Standard of Proof in Student Disciplinary Cases, 12:71 (1985). Rumsey, Legal Aspects of the Relationship Between Fraternities and Public Institutions of Higher Education: Freedom of Association and Ability to Prohibit Campus Presence or Student Membership, 11:465 (1985). Stanley, Note, The Rights of Gay Student Organizations, 10:397 (1983-84). Olswang, Cole, and Wilson, Program Elimination, Financial Emergency, and Student Rights, 9:163 (1982-83). Ayres, Commentary, Widmar v. Vincent: The Beginning of the End for the Establishment Clause, 8:511 (1981-82). Golden, College Student Dismissals and the Eldridge Factors: What Process Is Due?, 8:495 (1981-82). Hauserman and Lansing, Rape on Campus: Post-secondary Institutions as Third Party Defendants, 8:182 (1981-82). Nordin, The Contract to Educate: Toward a More Workable Theory of the Student-University Relationship, 8:141 (1981-82). Gordon, Commentary, Stretton, Ong, and Ezekial: Due Process Rights of Medical Students, 8:120 (1981-82). Jennings, Breach of Contract Suits by Students Against Postsecondary Institutions: Can They Succeed?, 7:191 (1980-81). Pavella, Limiting the “Pursuit of Perfect Justice” on Campus: A Proposed Code of Student Conduct, 6:137 (1979-80). Problems in Confidentiality of Institutional Records, 6:81 (1979-80) (Conference Outline). The Enrollment Contract and Its Consequences, 6:1 (1979-80) (Conference Outline). Lautsch, Computers and the University Attorney: An Overview of Computer Law on Campus, 5:217 (1977-79). Newell, A Right of Access to Student Newspapers at Public Universities, 4:209 (1977). Schatken, Student Records at Institutions of Postsecondary Education: Selected Issues Under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974, 4:147 (1977). Habecker, Students, Christian Colleges, and the Law: and the Walls Come Tumbling Down, 2:369 (1975). Toombs and DiBiase, College Rules and Court Decisions: Notes on Student Dismissal, 2:355 (1975). Holloway and Tharp, Recent Developments in Student Affairs, 2:115 (1974-75). Beach, Fundamental Fairness in Search of a Legal Rationale in Private College Student Discipline and Expulsions, 2:65 (1974). Kelly, Double Prosecution of the State University Student, 1:269 (1974). Holloway, Recent Developments in Student Affairs, 1:264 (1974). TAXATION Cerny and Livingston, IRS Intermediate Sanctions: How
They Will Impact Colleges and Jones, Book Review, THE TAX LAW OF COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES, by Bertrand M. Harding, Jr., 25:191 (1998). Jones, Tax Exemption Issues Facing Academic Health Centers
in the Managed Care Switzer, New IRS Guidelines Target College and University UBIT, 21:489 (1995). Harding and McClellan, Unreasonable Compensation: The Hidden Issue in the IRS College and University Examination Guidelines, 20:111 (1993). Dunn and Camacho, Case Comment, NCAA v. Commissioner of IRS: When Will the Internal Revenue Service Consider an Activity Regularly Carried on?, 19:39 (1992). Gordon and Spuehler, Questions and Answers Explaining the New Tax Rules Applicable to Tax-Sheltered Annuities, 17:435 (1991). Kelly, Financing Higher Education: Federal Income-Tax Consequences, 17:307 (1991). Gunn, Commentary, Economic and Tax Aspects of Prepaid-Tuition
Plans, 17:243 (1990). Stein, Note, Foreign Educational Programs in Britain: Legal Issues Associated with the Establishment and Taxation of Programs Abroad, 16:521 (1990). Niccolls, Nave, and Olswang, Unrelated Business Income Tax and Unfair Competition: Current Status of the Law, 15:249 (1989). Judge, Student-Athletes as Employees: Income Tax Consequences, 13:285 (1986). Kertz and Hasson, University Research and Development Activities: The Federal Income Tax Consequences of Research Contracts, Research Subsidiaries and Joint Ventures, 13:109 (1986). Flaherty, Exempt Organizations and Real Estate Syndications After the Tax Reform Act of 1984, 12:61 (1985). Renahan, Case Comment, Bob Jones University v. United States: No Tax Exemptions for Racially Discriminatory Schools – Supreme Courts Clarifies Thirteen Year Policy Imbroglio, 11:69 (1984). Broome, Case Comment, A Limitation on Federal Authority to Deny Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Equipment, 10:325 (1983-84). Henze, Commentary, State Universities as Political Subdivisions: Where is the Border?, 9:341 (1982-83). Kertz, Tax Exempt Organizations and Commercially Sponsored
Scientific Research, 9:69 Behrsin, Commentary, Housestaff Stipends and the “Fellowship” Exclusion under Section 117 of the Internal Revenue Code, 8:131 (1981-82). Reidhaar, Memorandum: The Legal Implications of Divestment of University Investments in Companies Doing Business in South Africa, 7:164 (1980-81). Update on Unrelated Business Income, 6:97 (1979-80) (Conference Outline). Current Tax Issues, 6:17 (1979-80) (Conference Outline). Lautsch, Computers and the University Attorney: An Overview of Computer Law on Campus, 5:217 (1977-79). Burke, Federal Taxation of State Colleges and Universities: Recent Developments Call for Reconsideration of Theories of Exemption, 4:43 (1976). Selected Bibliography, 3:116 (1975). Myers, The Law of Private Inurement and Unrelated Income Taxation: Implications for Colleges and Universities, 3:96 (1976). Francis, Federal Tax Problems of College and University Auxiliary Organizations, 3:72 (1975). Hopkins, Scholarships and Fellowship Grants: Current Tax Developments and Problems, 3:54 (1975). Sugarman and Mancino, Tax Aspects of University Patent Policy, 3:41 (1975). Tietell, Federal Tax Implications of Charitable Gift Annuities, 3:26 (1975). Whaley, Charitable Remainder Trusts and Pooled Income Funds: Internal Revenue Service Ruling Policy, 3:15 (1975). Fink, Taxation and Philanthropy- A 1976 Perspective, 3:1 (1975). Myers, Recent Federal Tax Developments Affecting Colleges, Universities, and Donors, 2:269 (1975). Myers, Remainder Gifts Under the Tax Reform Act of 1969: A Post-Final Regulation Outline with Forms, 1:106 (1973-74). TELECOMMUNICATIONS Hochber, The Four Hoursemen Ride Again: Cable Communications and Collegiate Athletics, 5:43 (1977-79). Telecommunications on Campus, 6:83 (1979-80) (Conference Outline). TUITION AND FEES Coleman and Jarvis, Tuition Adjustment for Law School Students: A Necessary Accommodation under the ADA?, 24:45 (1997). Kramer, Case Comment, The Free Rider Problem and First Amendment Concerns: A Balance Upset by New Limitations on Mandatory Student Fees, 21:691 (1995). Walsh, Case Comment, Smith v. Regents of the University of California: The Marketplace is Closed, 21:405 (1994). Ward, Note, Race-Exclusive Scholarships: Do They Violate the Constitution and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964?, 18:73 (1991). Olivas, Commentary, Federal Law and Scholarship Policy: An Essay on the Office for Civil Rights, Title VI, and Racial Restrictions, 18:21 (1991). Guerre, Note, Financial Aid in Higher Education: What's Wrong, Who's Being Hurt, What's Being Done, 17:483 (1991). Kelly, Financing Higher Education: Federal Income-Tax Consequences, 17:307 (1991). Richmond, Private Colleges and Tuition Price-Fixing: An Antitrust Primer, 17:271 (1991). Gunn, Commentary, Economic and Tax Aspects of Prepaid-Tuition Plans, 17:243 (1990). Scheske, Note, Financial Aid and Antitrust: Financial-Aid Packages Subject of Justice Department Probe, 17:43 (1990). Evans, Hill, and Scheske, Case Comment, Knapp v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue: Tuition Assistance or Scholarship, A Question of Taxation, 16:699 (1990). Antonini, Note, First Amendment Challenges to the Use of Mandatory Student Fees to Help Fund Student Abortions, 15:61 (1988). Steele, Mandatory Student Fees at Public Universities: Bringing the First Amendment within the Campus Gate, 13:353 (1987). Morton, Note, Who Should Speak? Who Should Pay? The Complexities of Refunding Student Fees at Public Colleges and Universities, 11:481 (1985). Lines, Tuition Discrimination: Valid and Invalid Uses of Tuition Differentials, 9:241 (1982-83). Fishbein, Legal Aspects of Student Activity Fees, 1:190
(1973-74). |
Educating a Different Kind of Lawyer