Developing Global Concerns About Piracy 

Topic area Intellectual Property and/or Whistle-Blowing
Target audience Undergraduate Students in IS/CS/CE/EE (probably later in the course after an introduction to Whistle-Blowing)
Activity type Discussion, Writing as a Homework Exercise
Time required One hour background reading; one class period plus an optional homework exercise 
Attachments Worksheet
Additional materials In-class scenario and activity (all included here)
Background needed to complete the assignment
  • Some knowledge of intellectual property issues and legislation in the U.S.
  • The degree to which these laws are applicable outside the U.S.
  • International copyright agreement(s)
  • What is meant by a software audit?
  • Is intellectual property a global value? (may be hard to determine)
References
  • The Software & Information Industry Association (SIIA), formerly known as the Software Publishers' Association (SPA), has a Web site at http://www.siia.net/piracy/ which gives their strong opinions on the issue of software protection..  There is some content on international copyright issues here also but other links should be found.
  • http://www.exescan.com//index.htm is a sample commercial Web site which produces software for the purposes of software audits.
  • Section 10.4.8 of Sara Baase's book, A Gift of Fire, p. 358, published by Prentice-Hall, 1997 has a relevant case study and discussion for the situation in the U.S.
  • Sara Baase's Instructors' Web Site  has a U.S. case study with additional discussion and more citations in her (text needed to fully follow) Chapter 5 exercises
  • See "The Morality of Software Piracy:  A Cross Cultural Approach" by Swinyard, Rhine, and Kahn in Social Issues in Computing, p. 497, edited by Chuck Huff and Thomas Finholt.  Also, see other chapters in this book and other standard textbooks on software piracy and whistle-blowing.
  • Other perspectives on this issue can be found in the articles from Deborah G. Johnson's and Helen Nissenbaum's book, Computer Ethics and Social Values, Prentice-Hall, 1995.  The recommended articles are "Should I Copy My Neighbor's Software" by Helen Nissenbaum, p. 200 and "How to Interpret the Lotus Decision (and How Not To)" by Pamela Samuelson, p. 253, which suggest the range of individual positions.  See Pamela Samuelson's other writings on software protection.
  • There is a helpful discussion in Chapter 5 of Ethical and Social Issues in the Information Age by Joseph Migga Kizza, Springer Verlag, 1998 on all the major software protection methods.
  • I have not yet found it, but I would like to find, a good discussion on a country where community issues transcend profit making as values in the culture.  (The Chuck Huff reference above is the best I have found thus far.)
Last modified 8/21/99

Abstract:

A student on a summer internship with an international company is asked to do a software audit.  While performing this software audit the student discovers the company has only purchased one legal copy of the US software product but the company is using approximately one hundred copies in this overseas location.   What alternative courses of action should the internship student consider taking in this situation and how should s/he proceed?

Goals for the activity:

Knowledge / skills / attitudes to be developed (behavioral objectives):

What a software audit is.
Intellectual property laws in the US; impact of US law on companies operating internationally.
Intellectual property law is not necessarily global.
Recognition that the whole world does not see intellectual property as we do in the U.S..
That conflicting legal constraints impact issues to be wrestled with in the workplace.
The pressure brought to bear even on student interns as they become involved in the workplace.
What looks "right" in the U.S. may not be so clear in a global setting.

Procedure:

OVERVIEW:

Ask questions about the situation; determine the facts; determine a set of alternate strategies; evaluate
the impact of each of these alternate strategies; and reach a conclusion on the action(s) the student should take.

Please read the following SCENARIO:   [Responses can be developed on an individual or group basis using the accompanying worksheet.]
 
 

A student has landed a summer internship (junior year) with a company for whom s/he would ultimately like to be employed.  When asked to do a software audit of what copies of which application software packages exist on the company's desktops and laptops in the international setting, s/he begins to discover something which may be a potential problem.  Although the student intern must reconcile the number of copies of the software on the machines with the invoices for their purchase, s/he discovers by the middle of the summer that only a few copies appear to have been actually paid for.  What should the student employee do about this, if anything?

After discussing the facts of the case with your instructor or peers,  determine if there seems to be an ethical issue here.  If the consensus is not, continue reading or move on to another scenario.  If the group conclusion is that an ethical issue exists, write a statement down in your own words of what you believe to be the ethical issue(s) confronted here.  Then, continue reading:

After much reflection and remembering s/he is being paid a substantial wage and wishes to be employed after the coming school year, the student decides to write out for reflection as many options as s/he believes are available and viable.  Write down a set of such options.  (You should easily be able to come up with four or five.)  After completing this list of five options (or more), write out at least one positive AND/OR negative result of each and every action.

After completing this process, determine which of the actions appears to be the "best" ethical action to take.  Write out the reason(s) why you believe this to be the best strategy.

[Some instructors may request this be turned in at another time or in another way.]
 

Assessing outcomes:

The instructor may choose to have each student (or group) submit the answers to each of the questions in the exercise.  These responses can be graded if the instructor chooses to do so on the basis of completeness, the thoughtfulness of the responses, and the logical arguments presented.  The following series of  "what if" questions may be illustrative for further discussion and should get the students to think about the broader implications in this situation:


Additional remarks:

The SIIA contends on their Web site $11,000,000,000 [that's $11 billion] was lost globally in 1998.  The report can be downloaded from the SIIA Web site.  In the U.S. losses correlate closely to city size among large U.S. cities as noted in the same source.

The  worksheet can be printed on one page double sided, if desirable.

The last "what if" question was actually the context in which this case occurred.  Additional details and the "resolution" are available from the developer.

You might wish to bring up and discuss "Most Favored Nation" (MFN) status for China and the links to privacy, forced labor, piracy, and many current commercial developments.  However, this might take your discussions too far afield from the current project focus.

Author contact information:

 R. Waldo (Wally) Roth
 Computing and System Sciences Department
 Taylor University, Upland, IN 46989-1001
 Phone: (765) 998-5269
 FAX:  (765) 998-4940
 E-mail:  wlroth@tayloru.edu


Page maintained by: kwb@csee.usf.edu