The Graduate Student Seminar is put on by the Mathematics Graduate Student Association . GSS meets approximately every other Monday.
All talks are at 4:15 in HH229 (Fall)/ HH229 (Spring) unless otherwise noted.
To volunteer to give a talk, or for anything else regarding the seminar, contact Alexander Diaz Lopez.
|Monday, September 2||Brian Hall||Classical and Semiclassical Limits in Quantum Mechanics|
|Monday, September 16||Lien-Yung Kao||A Weil-Petersson Type (Pressure) Metric of Metric Graphs|
|Monday, September 30||Renato Ghini Bettiol||Basic Bifurcation Theory and Geometric Variational Problems|
|Monday, October 14||Peter Ulrickson||Poincare, His Duality Theorem, and the Beginnings of Algebraic Topology|
|Monday, November 4||Edward Burkard||From Classical Mechanics to Symplectic Geometry|
|Monday, November 18||To be announced||To be announced|
|Monday, December 2||Jennifer Garbett||To be announced|
|Monday, January 27||Eric Wawerczyk|
|Monday, February 10|
|Monday, March 3|
|Monday, March 17|
|Monday, March 31|
|Monday, April 14|
|Monday, April 28|
On the surface, quantum mechanics and classical mechanics appear totally different, with a classical particle being described by a trajectory in R^2n and a quantum particle by a "wavefunction" on R^n. Nevertheless, there is a widespread belief that in the limit as Planck's constant (which is a basic parameter in quantum mechanics) tends to zero, one should somehow recover classical mechanics. I will talk about how this idea works out for the energy spectrum of a particle moving in the real line. A simple result shows that the quantum energy spectrum fills in the entire range of the classical energy function for small values of Planck's constant; this is a form of the "classical limit." A deeper result is "semiclassical": the individual energy levels of the quantum system (which are inherently quantum mechanical quantities) can be determined approximately by a condition on the underlying classical trajectory.
No prior knowledge of quantum mechanics will be assumed (or required), and there will be plenty of pictures.
On the fertile ground of the Teichmüller-Thurston theory, we are fascinated by the classical Weil-Petersson metric. Following the pioneer works of S. Wolpert, M. Bridgeman[1, 2] and C. McMullen, we have a new dynamical, thermodynamic formalism, interpretation of the W.-P. metric on the Teichmüller space.
In this talk, following the work of M. Pollicott and R. Sharp, we are going to discuss the simplest analogy on graphs and see how the whole machinery goes. And further explore some different properties from the classic W-P metric. If time permit, I will talk about some new results on Higher Teichmüller theory.
 M. Bridgeman, "Hausdorff dimension and the Weil-Petersson metric to quasi-Fuchsian space," Geom. and Top. 14(2010), 799-831.
 M. Bridgeman and E. Taylor, "An extension of the Weil-Petersson metric to quasi-Fuchsian space," Math. Ann. 341(2008), 927-943.
 M. Bridgeman, D. Canary, F. Labourie and A. Sambarino, "The pressure metric for convex presentations," Preprint (2013), 1-96.
 C. McMullen, "Thermodynamics, dimension and the Weil-Petersson metric," Invent. Math. 173(2008), 365-425.
 M. Pollicott and R. Sharp, "A Weil-Petersson metric of metric graphs," Preprint (2012), 1-13.
 W. Parry and M. Pollicott, "Zeta functions and the periodic orbit structure of hyperbolic dynamics," Astérisque, 187-188(1990).
 S. Wolpert, "Thurston's Riemannian metric for Teichmüller space," J. Diff. Geom. 23(1986), 143-174.
Broadly speaking, bifurcation occurs when the Implicit Function
Theorem fails. In the first half of this talk, I will make this
statement precise and give some examples (the only prerequisite to
understanding this part is multi-variable calculus). In the second
half of this talk, I will discuss how bifurcation can be used to
produce new solutions of PDEs and geometric variational problems,
surveying on some recent results in ,  and .
 R. B., P. Piccione, Delaunay type hypersurfaces in cohomogeneity one manifolds, preprint, arXiv:1306.6043 [math.DG].
 R. B., P. Piccione, Bifurcation and local rigidity of homogeneous solutions to the Yamabe problem on spheres, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 47 (2013), no. 3-4, 789-807, arXiv:1107.5335 [math.DG].
 R. B., P. Piccione, Multiplicity of solutions to the Yamabe problem on collapsing Riemannian submersions, to appear in Pacific J. Math., arXiv:1304.5510 [math.DG].
Henri Poincare founded the field of algebraic topology toward the end of the 19th century. We'll survey some definitions and results of Poincare's 1895 paper Analysis Situs and its five supplements. One goal of the talk is to answer the question - how did Poincare think about Poincare duality? The talk won't assume much familiarity with topology (don't worry if you aren't familiar with Poincare duality), and will include some historical remarks in addition to the mathematical content.
Starting with Newton's Second Law of Motion, we will talk about how to
evolve classical mechanics into symplectic geometry. After that, we
will talk about two well known items in symplectic topology: the
nonsqueezing theorem and Arnold's conjecture on fixed points.
This talk is intended to be at a fairly basic level, and more of an
overview than anything else. Depending on the audience, some knowledge
of manifolds may be assumed (at the level of the Basic Topology
 D. McDuff & M. Salamon, "Introduction to Symplectic Topology." 2nd edition. Oxford Mathematical Monographs, Oxford Science Publications, 1998
 L. Polterovich, "The geometry of the group of symplectic diffeomorphisms." ETH Lectures in Mathematics, Birkhauser, 2001
To be announced