title

main page

group

publications

synthesis

conformation

PKS

Blogochemosphere


On Pharma

Totally Medicinal

Chembark

Chemistry Links

Chemistry Guide.org

Yahoo: Chemistry: Institutes

UCLA: Chempointers

Matt McIntosh's Links to Synthetic Groups

Genealogy of Famous Chemists

Gordon Research Conferences

American Chemical Society

ACS Organic Division

Chemistry Journals Online

ND Electronic Theses

Web of Science

Electronic Journals at ND

Tetrahedron Letters

Tetrahedron

Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry

Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters

J. of the American Chemical Society       ASAP

J. of Organic Chemistry         ASAP 

Organic Letters         ASAP 

J. Med. Chem.

J. Nat. Prod.

Science

Nature

PNAS

Journal of Biological Chemistry

Chemistry & Biology
 
Angewandte Chemie
 
Chemistry: A European Journal

ChemBioChem

European Journal of Organic Chemistry
 
Chemical Communications

Natural Product Reports

Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry

Pharmaceutical Information
Pharmaceutical Companies

National Cancer Institute Database 

Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program 

World PharmaWeb
Funding Sources







The Power of Organic Synthesis and Structure-Activity Relationships

    Organic synthesis has evolved at a remarkably rapid pace over the past century. While the 1970’s were a decade that initiated the development of selective reactions particularly in a stereochemical sense, it has been clear since the 1980’s that synthetic chemists can prepare even the most complex targets. The continuing discovery and development of new synthetic methods have now made practical syntheses of large quantities of complex molecules a reality. This has been particularly true in the polyketide field where asymmetric methods targeting the stereochemical structure common to these targets are plentiful. Recently, these methods have been highlighted in the gram-scale synthesis of complex natural products such as discodermolide and other polyketides.

    Classic analogue design seeks to optimize biological activity through systematic structural modification. While polyketides such as erythromycin, pikromycin, amphotericin, rifamycin, bafilomycin and several others have been studied from a medicinal chemistry perspective including numerous analogues, systematic modification to their structures have not been accomplished. Of course erythromycin’s biological activity comes from pendant sugars and therefore modifications to the polyketide skeleton have been justifiably limited.  There are, however, examples of drastically simplified analogues of polyketides retaining biological activity. Wender’s simplified bryostatin and Romo’s pateamine A analogue are two such examples. With its relatively simple structure, the epothilones, a set of compounds with which we are quite familiar, were arguably the first polyketide to be exhaustively studied with SAR.

    By focusing our interest on polyketides we have harnessed powerful synthetic techniques capable of reliably delivering sources of the natural material as well as analogues. When deemed necessary we have also contributed new synthetic methods for the construction of particular structural units common to these targets but not well serviced by current technology. We have already completed the total synthesis of several complex polyketides such as epothilone A-D, myriaporones 1, 3 and 4 as well as peloruside A.  In addition, late stage efforts are focused on apoptolidin, ambruticin, cornexistin, and acutiiphycin.

targets