The Revival of Scholastic Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century
2. Esquisse d'une histoire générale et comparée des civilisations mediévals, p. 239.
3. Ibid., p. 240.
4. Ibid., p. 247.
5. Ibid., p. 241.
6. Ibid., p. 242.
7. Ibid., p. 242.
8. Ibid., p. 246.
9. Ibid., p. 246.
10. Ibid., p. 286.
11. Ibid., p. 290-292.
12. Cf. Secretan, La Restauration du Thomisme, Revue Philosophique, Vol. 18, p. 64 ff.
13. Cf. the article: Belief and Realities, Philos. Rev., March, 1906.
14. Cf. Gonzalez, Historia de la Filosofˇa, Vol. 4, p. 462.
15. In La Philosophie mediévale d'après M. Picavet, Rev. de Philso., 1906.
16. Cf. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theol., Q. 16, art. 5-8.
17. Cornoldi, Leçons de Philosophie Scholastique, p. 3.
18. Ibid., p. 5.
19. Cf. Royce, The Conception of God, p. 49; Harris, Hegel's Logic, p. ix.
20. Un Siècle, p. 377.
21. Ibid., p. 389.
2. Hauréau, Histoire de la philosophie scholastique, tome 1, p. 36.
3. Cf. De Wulf, Introduction à la philosophie néo-scholastique, pp. 91-192.
4. Blanc, Dictionnaire de philosophie ancienne, moderne et contemporaine, art. Scholastique.
5. Taine, Histoire de la littérature anglaise, t. 1, pp. 223-225.
6. Penjon, Précis d'histoire de la philosophie, pp. 165. Cf. De Wulf, op. cit., pp. 11 ff.
7. Hegel, Lectures on the History of Philosophy, Vol. 3, p. 38.
8. J.S. Mill, System of Logic, Bk. 2, chap. 2, sect. 2.
9. Scotus Erigena, De Divisione Naturae, cap. 72.
10. In Walter of St. Victor's In Quator Labyrinthos Franciae. Cf. Turner, History of Philosophy, pp. 302 ff.
11. In Baldwin's Dict. of Philosophy and Psychology; art. Scholasticism. Another definition of Mr. Dewey's will be discussed in this chapter.
12. Hegel, Lectures on the History of Philosophy, Vol. 3, p. 39.
13. Weber, History of Philosophy, New York, 1904, pp. 201-202.
14. Tyrrell, The Faith of the Millions, 1st Series, p. 224.
15. Baldwin's Dict. of Philosophy and Psychology, art. Scholasticism.
16. De vera religione, cap. 5. Cf. Turner, op. cit., p. 248.
17. De Anima, 7; De Carne Chr., 2.
18. Adv. Prax., 7.
19. Migne, Vol. ccxii, col. 557.
20. Introductio ad Theologiam; Migne, Vol. clxxviii, col. 1050.
21. Cur Deus Homo? 1, 1-2.
22. Summa Theologica, Pars 1, Q. 1, art. 1, ad. 1. Cf. also: Art. 2, 3 and 5, in which the nature and the relations of the two sciences are accurately discussed.
23. Ueberweg, History of Philosophy, Vol. 1, P. 355.
24. Turner, History of Pbilosophy, pp. 417 ff.
25. F. J. E. Woodbridge, The Problem of Metaphysics, Philos. Rev., 1903, p. 368.
26. Janvier, L'action intellectuelle et politique de Léon XIII, p. 49.
27. Cf. Lutoslawski, Kant in Spanien, Kantstudien, 1897, pp. 217 ff.
28. Mazella, De Deo Creante, pp. 156 ff.
2. Lib. 1, tract. 2, cap. l, 2, 3.
3. Cf. Mansion, L'induction chez Albert le Grand, Rev. Neo-Scol., 1906, pp. 246 ff.
4. De mineralibus, lib. 2, tract. 2, cap. 1.
2. Woodbridge, The Problem of Metaphysics, Philos. Rev., 1903, p. 375.
3. Cf. Spencer, First Principles, Chap. 4.
4. Farges, Acte et Puissance, p. 17.
5. Vacherot, Le nouveau spiritualisme, p. 163.
6. Grande Encyclopédie, art. Aristote.
7. Phys., IV, c.2, sect. 10.
8. Farges, Acte et Puissance, Sect. V.
9. Cf. Mercier, Métaphysique générale ou Ontologie, p. 489.
10. Locke, An Essay concerning Human Understanding, Bk. 2, chap. 13, sect. 19.
11. Ibid., Bk. 1, chap. 4, sect. 18.
12. Ibid., Bk. 4, chap. 4, sect. 12.
13. Ibid., Bk. 2, cbap. 23, sect. 1, Note.
14. Hume, Treatise on Human Nature, Bk. 1, Pt. 4, Sect. 3; Selby- Biggs's ed., p. 222.
15. Ibid., Bk. 1, Pt. 4, Sect. 3.
16. Ibid., Selby-Bigge's ed., p. 222.
17. Ibid., Bk. 1, Pt. 4, Sect. 5; Selby-Bigge's ed., p. 223.
18. Ibid., Bk. 1, Pt. 4, Sect. 2.
19. Ibid., Bk. 1, Pt. 4, Sect. 2; Selby-Bigge's ed., p. 207.
20. Ibid., Bk. 1, Pt. 3, Sect. 5; Selby-Bigge's ed., p. 84.
21. Ibid., Selby-Bigge's ed., p. 165.
22. Ibid., p. 208.
23. Ibid., p. 208.
24. Ibid., p. 575.
25. Ibid., p. 576.
26. Ibid., p. 608.
27. Rickaby, General Metaphysics, p. 238.
28. J. S. Mill, System of Logic, Bk. 1, chap. 3, sect. 7.
29. Ibid., Bk. 1, chap. 3, sect. 8.
30. Ibid., Bk. 1, chap. 3, sect. 9.
31. Ibid., Bk. 1, chap. 3, sect. 3.
32. Ibid., Bk. 1, chap. 3, sect. 7.
33. Ibid., Bk. 1, chap. 6, sect. 3.
34. Ibid., Bk. 1, chap. 3, sect. 6.
35. Ibid., Bk. 1, chap. 3, sect. 6.
36. Kant, Critique Of Pure Reason, Meiklejohn's transl., p. 136.
37. The Logic of Hegel, Wallace's transl., pp. 273-274.
38. Balmes, Fundamental Philosophy; Brownson's transl., Vol. 2, p. 338.
39. Ibid., Vol. 2, p. 339.
40. Ibid., Vol. 2, p. 339.
41. Thomas Aquinas, Quolib. 9, a. 5, ad 2.
42. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theol., P. i, Q. 90, a. 2.
43. Cf. Cornoldi, Leçons de Philos. scol., p. 138; Schiffini, Principia Philos., p. 520; Ginebra, Elementos de Filos., Vol. 1, p. 174; Rickaby, General Metaphysics, p. 254.
44. Spinoza, Ethics, Bohn's ed., p. 45.
45. Mercier, Métaphysique générale ou Ontologie, p. 529.
46. Hume, Treatise on Human Nature, Selby-Bigge's ed., p. 4.
47. Ibid., p. 75.
48. Ibid., p. 75.
49. Ibid., pp. 75-76.
50. Ibid., p. 76.
51. Ibid., p. 78.
52. Ibid., pp. 79-80.
53. Ibid., p. 87.
54. Ibid., p. 165.
55. Ibid., p. 12.
56. We remember that we have no mind.
57. Ibid., p. 84.
58. Ibid., p. 77.
59. Ibid., pp. 160-161.
60. Ibid., p. 162.
61. Ibid., p. 166.
62. Ibid., pp. 77, 78, etc.
63. Ibid., p. 92.
64. Mercier, Métaphysique générale ou Ontologie, p. 481.
65. Thomas Aquinas, Contra Gentiles, Lib. 3, cap. 2.
66. Henslow, Directivity; Hibbert Journal, Vol. 6 (October, 1907), pp. 150-151.
2. Nys, Comnologie, p. 170.
3. Ginebra, Elementos de Filosofia, Vol. 1, p. 200.
4. Saint-Hilaire, Physique, Préface, p. 38.
5. Farges, Matière et Forme, p. 138.
6. Ibid., p. 139.
7. Thomas Aquinas, De principiis naturae, xxxi, in init.
8. Thomas Aquinas, Summa contra Gentiles, lib. 2, cap. 54.
9. Duns Scotus, De Rerum Principio, Q. 7, art. 1.
10. St. Augustine, Confessions, Bk. XII, art. 6; Pusey's ed., p. 251.
11. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theol., P. 1, Q, 56.
12. Cf. Farges, Matière et Forme, 2. Partie, p. 143 ff.
13. Farges, Matière et Forme, p. 147.
14. Cf. Ginebra, Elementos de Filosofia, Vol. 1, p. 200.
15. Cf. Harper, op. cit., Vol. 2, p. 188.
16. Fons Vitae, V, 21.
17. Cf. Turner, History of Philosophy, p. 327.
18. In 2. Sent., Dis. 3, P. 1, art. 1.
19. Duns Scotus, De Rerum Principio, Q. 8, art. 4; Opera, Vol. 4, p. 378.
20. Duns Scotus, De Rerum Principio, Q. 8, art. 3.
21. Ibid., ibid.
22. Farges, Matière et Forme, p. 126.
23. Ibid., p. 134.
24. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, Pars 1, Q. 50, art. 4, c.
25. Quodlibet, 111, 16. Cf. Turner, History of Philosophy, p. 385.
26. Cf. Duns Scotus, De Rerum principio, Q. 8, art. 4.
27. Cf. Urraburu, Compendium Philosophiae Scholasticae, Vol. 4, pp. 29 ff.
28. Cf. Thomas Aquinas, De Potentia, Q. 3, art. 8.
29. Cf. Tait, Properties of Matter, p. 20.
30. Cf. Whetham, Recent Development of Physical Science, p. 270.
31. Ibid., p. 292.
32. Cf. Spencer, First Principles, Pt. 1, Chap. 3, sect. 18.
33. La matière, les ions, les électrons; Rev. de Philos., 1907, p. 156.
34. Larmor, AEther and Matter, p. 78.
35. Lodge, Modern Views of Electricity, p. 396.
36. Lodge, op. cit., p. 396.
2. Ibid., p. 17.
3. J. S. Mill, System of Logic, Bk. 1, chap.2, sect. 4.
4. Cf. Ginebra, Elementos de Filosofia, Vol. 2, p. 73.
5. Berkeley, op. cit., p. 53.
6. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theol., P. 3, q. 2, art, 1, ad 2.
7. Hume, Treatise on Human Nature, Selby-Bigge's ed., pp. 242-243.
8. Cf. Gardair, La Nature Humaine, pp. 169 ff.
9. Maher, Psychology, 3d ed., pp. 452 ff.
10. Cf. Urraburu, Compendium Philosophiae Scholasticae, Vol. 4, p. 240.
11. Maher, op. cit., p. 486. The same view is also maintained by Meurin, Ethics, p. 161.
12. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theol., P. 1, Q. 104, art. 4, c. Cf. Urraburu, op. cit., pp. 656ff.
13. G. S. Fullerton, System of Metaphysics, p. 267.
14. Thomas Aquinas, Summa contra Gentiles, Lib. 2, chap. 56.
15. Ibid., Lib. 3, cap. 68.
2. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theol., P. 1, Q. 2, art. 1; C. G., Lib. 1, cap. 11.
3. Cf. Driscoll, God, pp. 29ff.
4. Boedder, Natural Theology, p. 33.
5. Ibid., p. 34.
6. Cf. Thomas Aquinas, C. G., lib. 1, cap. 16; also Garrigou-Lagrange, Le Dieu fini du Pragmatisme, Rev. des sci. philos. et theol., 1907, pp. 252 ff.
7. Cf. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theol., P. 1, Q. 11, art. 3.
8. Cf. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theol., P. 1, Q. 3, art. 7; Boedder, Natural Theology, p. 93.
9. Hegel, Logic, Wallace's ed., pp. 60ff.
10. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theol., P. 1, Q. 3, art. 3.
11. Ibid., P. 1, Q. 3, art. 4.
12. Ibid., P. 1, Q. 14, art. 4.
13. Ibid., P. 1, Q. 19, art. 1.
14. Ibid., P. 1, Q. 4, art. 1, ad 1.
2. Plato, Dialogues, Jowett's ed., Vol. 3, pp. 97-98.
3. Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, Bk. 1, chap. 5; Browne's ed., p. 7.
4. Ibid., Bk. 1, chap. 7; Browne's ed., pp. 15-17.
5. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theol., 1-2, Q. 31, art. 5, ad 3.
6. Kant, Critique of Practical Reason and other works, Abbott's ed., p. 23.
7. Ibid., p. 14.
8. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theol., 1-2, Q. 10, art. 2, c.
9. Fullerton, System of Metaphysics, p. 557.
10. Secretan, La Restauration du Thomisme; Rev. Philos ., Vol. 18, p. 78.
11. Ibid., p. 78. Let us compare with this last statement the following passage from St. Thomas's Summa contra Gentiles: "Caput LXXXVIII: Quod in Deo est liberum arbitrium. Ex predictis autem ostendi potest, quod in Deo liberum arbitrium invenitur, nam liberum arbitrium dicitur respectu eorum quae non necessitate quis vult, sed propria sponte; unde in nobis est liberum arbitrium respectu ejus quod volumus currere vel ambulare. Deus autem alia a se non ex necessitate vult, ut supra ostensum est. Deo igitur liberum arbitriurn habere competit (C. G., L. 1, c. 88). Risum teneatis, amici?
12. Ibid., p. 82.
13. C. G., Lib. 2, c. 48.
14. C. G., Lib. 3, c. 73.
15. C. G., Lib. 3, c. 73.
16. Summa Theol., P. i, Q. 83, art. 1, c.
17. Ibid., 1-2, Q. 1, art. 1, c.
18. Ibid., 1-2, Q. 10, art. 4, c.
19. Ibid., 1-2, Q. 23, art. I, c.
20. Ibid., 1-2, Q. 23, art. 3.
21. Ibid., 1-2, Q. 23, art. 4, c.
22. Ibid., 1-2, Q. 23, art. 3, c.
2. Cf. Besse, Deux centres du mouvement thomiste, pp. 15-16.
3. Encyclical AEterni Patris; In Thomas Aquinas's Summa Theol., Romae, 1894, Vol. 6, pp. 426 ff.
4. Ibid., p. 432.
5. Ibid., p. 432.
6. Ibid., p.436.
7. Ibid., p.434.
8. Cf. Gomez Izquierdo, Historia de la Filosofia del siglo XIX, p. 464.
9. Cornoldi, Lecons de Philosophie Scolastique; Paris, 1878, p. 16.
10. Cf. Gomez lzquierdo, op. cit., p. 464.
11. Cf. Talamo, L'Aristotelismo della Scolastica, 3. ed., Siena, 1881, pp. 234 ff.
12. Ibid., pp. 151ff.
13. Ibid., pp. 361ff.
14. Ibid., p. 151.
15. Cf. Blanc, Histoire de la Philosophie, t. 3, p. 559.
16. Besse, Deux centres du mouvement thomiste, p. 25.
17. Ibid., pp. 30-31.
18. Ibid.,p. 35.
19. Ibid., p. 34, note.
20. Cf. Domet de Vorges, Bibliographie de la Philosophie thomiste de 1877 à 1887; Ann. de Philos. chr., vol. xviii, pp. 529ff.
21. De Maria, Philosophia Peripatetico-Scholastica, Vol. 1, p. viii.
22. Ibid., Vol. 1, pp. 441 ff.
23. Ibid., Vol. 1, pp. 529 ff.
24. Cf. Gomez Izquierdo, op. cit., p. 450.
2. In the work: La Filosofia en la Nueva España, Lagos, 1885.
3. Garcia, Tomismo y Neotomismo, pp. 350-351.
4. Latinus, Une excursion philosophique en Espagne, Rev. Neo- Scol., 1901, pp. 192ff.
5. Balmes, Fundamental Philosophy, New York, 1903; Brownson's Introduction, p. viii.
6. Balmes, Fundamental Philosophy, V. 1, p. II.
7. Ibid., V. 1, p. 347.
8. Ibid., p. 432.
9. Ibid., p. 42.
10. Cf. Latinus, Une excursion philosophique en Espagne, Rev. Neo- Scol., 1901.
11. Cf. Ferreira-Deusdado, La Philosophie Thomiste en Portugal, Rev. Néo-Scol., 1898.
12. Cf. Valverde Tellez, Bibliografˇa Filosófica Mexicana, p. 41.
13. Cf. Valverde Tellez, Apuntaciones históricas de la Filosofˇa en México, p. 262.
14. In Obras de R. Cagigas, pp. 176ff. Also given in Valverde's Apuntaciones, p. 402ff.
15. Cf. Tomismo y Neotomismo, p. 421.
16. Garcia, Tomismo y Neotomismo, pp. 148 ff.
17. The greatest supporter of Positivism in Mexico is Mr. Porfirio Parra. Its most irreducible adversary has been Mr. J. M. Vigil.
18. Cf. Ramirez, Filosofia Positivista, p. 95.
19. CarrasquilIa, Sobre el estudio de la filosofia; Repert. Colomb., Aug., 1881.
20. Cf. Revista del Colegio del Rosario, June, 1906, p. 316.
21. Carrasquilla, Ensayo sobre la Doctrina Liberal, p. xiii.
22. Quoted in article by Pedro M. Carreño, in La Prensa, Bogotá, Dec. 14, 1907.
2. The works belonging to this collection are indicated in our Bibliography by the word Beitrage.
2. Métaphysique des Causes, Introduction, pp. 14-15.
3. Cf. Fonsegrive, Elements de Pltilosophie, vol. 2, p. 247, note 1.
4. Cf. ~Mgr. d'Hulst, Conférences de Notre-Dame, p. 370; Paris, Poussielgue, 1891.
5. Cf. Delmas, Ontologia, pp. 183 ff.
5. Cf. Rev. Philos., Jan., 1896, p. 61.
2. Cf. Pécsi, Cursus Brevis Philosophiae, Vol. 2, pp. 34 ff.
3. It is easy to notice the resemblance of Mr. Pécsi's view with the view we have defended in our section on Cosmology. This section, however, has not been influenced in the slightest degree by Mr. Pécsi's theory. It was written in 1906, as a dissertation for the degree of M.A., under the title of "The Scholastic Doctrine of Matter and Form in the Face of Modern Scientific Discoveries," and has not been modified since the publication of Mr. Pécsi's work.
4. Cf. Pécsi, Cursus Brevis Philosophicae, pp. 29, 39 ff.
5. Cf. Pécsi, Crisis axiomatum modernae Phisicae, pp. 51 ff.; also Cursus Brevis, Vol. 2, pp. 89-90.
6. Cf. Domet de Vorges, in Ann. de Philos. Chrét., vol. xviii, pp. 595-596.
2. Ibid., p. 159.
3. Cf. Truth of Thought, pp. 197, 61.
4. Poland, Truth of Thought, p. 54.
5. Ming, Data of Modern Ethics, p. 89.
6. Ronayne, God Knowable and Known, p. 32.
7. Brother Azarias, Essays Philosophical, pp. 158-159.
8. Ibid., p. 85.
9. Ibid., p. 85.
10. Cf. Catholicity and Pantheism, p. 21.
11. Ibid., p. 14.
12. Ibid., p. 20.
13. Driscoll, The Soul, p. 40.
14. Driscoll, God, p. 3.
15. Ibid., p. 79.
16. Philosophy of the Bible, pp. 56, 57, 162.
17. Ibid., pp. 81, 83.
18. Ibid., p. 110.
19. Ibid., p. vi.
20. Ibid., p. 3.
21. Ibid., p. 84.
22. Ibid., p. 42.
23. Ibid., p. 19.