REQUIREMENTS

WEB-CT

A. JAMES MCADAMS

NOTRE DAME

Print Page

Private / Public / Internet: Utopia/Dystopia

 

Home / Morality Tales / Private Realms / Public Realms / Corporate and Individual / Utopia/Dystopia / Projects

 

PolS 486 / CAPP 479

'extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, ... moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue'

Barry Goldwater

 
 
     
 

Page Two

For the final two regular sections of this course, we will consider some of the potentially stupendous benefits of the World Wide Web (utopia) as well as some of the most worrisome and threatening (dystopia). For each of the two--Hyperprivacy and Hyperpublicity--I am juxtaposing potential 'virtues' against possible 'vices.'

Date TBA

The Realm of Hyperprivacy

We have already encountered romantic notions about the Internet's capacity to liberate people. It provides them with the ultimate privacy tool---the desktop computer. But, is this device as liberating as it seems?

The Vision:

John Perry Barlow, "A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace"

Hyperprivacy, Virtue or Vice?

An old story, the hackers versus the crackers. Is one better than the other?

Philip Tellis, "Hackers are not Crackers"

Jonathan Littman, excerpts from The Fugitive Game (in your Reader), and also surf through:

On Kevin Mitnick, by Kevin Mitnick

The Cult of Kevin Mitnick (simply unbelievable)

Bruce Gottlieb, "Hack CouNterHaCk" (Reader)

Hacked Pages

Optional: If you get the time, this Frontline site has scores of interesting tips, recommendations, stories, and explanations about the whole topic of hacking.

 

 

 
 
 

REQUIREMENTS

WEB-CT

A. JAMES MCADAMS

NOTRE DAME

Print Page

Page Three

 

Date TBA

A Realm of Hyperpublicity

Guiding Issues:

Now we go back to where we began the course. Compare and contrast the first half of Sunstein's Republic.com with Chapter 7 of Howard Rheingold's Smart Mobs. How is the utopia/dystopia theme foreshadowed in these accounts? Could both authors be correct simultaneously? Remember: They are speaking abstractly. But after the material we have covered, you are analyzing concretely.

Hyperpublicity, Virtue or Vice:

In much of what we've read, the idea of the 'public realm' has been treated as a good in itself. When people join to pursue a common cause, there is supposedly the potential for creating something that transcends the narrow interests of the individual. But certainly, this can't always be true.

In this section, we will examine both positive and negative examples of hyperpublicity, or hyperpublic-ness (if there were such a word), to speculate about the Internet's capacity for bringing people together. In particular, I have selected cases of radical movements that thrive on the resources provided by the Internet.

As you reflect upon the positive and the negative aspects of such movements, think about America's experience, What role have protest movements played in American history? Why do these protest movements seem to recur? Note: The US was founded on a tradition of radical protest. Why do most Americans today have such a marked aversion to political protest?

The most prominent political protests of your generation have been represented by the very diverse groups--left-wing radicals, skinheads, anarchists, trade unions, minorities, libertarians, computer nerds, environmentalists--that have come together to campaign against global organizations such as the WTO, IMF, and World Bank. These protests, which began in Seattle 1999, came out of nowhere. They will likely recur.

Surf through the first two sites below: 1) What role does the Internet play in sustaining these protests? 2) Why would many Americans feel uncomfortable about these sites?

The Ruckus Society (especially "Gallery" and "Training," their links)

Net Action , especially Virtual Activist Training Reader

Then, surf some of the largely offensive sites below. Caution: Some of them contain disturbing images, especially The Nuremberg Files, so be careful. Read as much as you like.

Question: Should Web Sites or Internet Service Providers be allowed to promote violence about any or all of the following. . . .?

. . . sports: Mob Handed; Hooligans.cz; Terrace Links; Midwest Skins.

. . . controversial policies : The Nuremberg Files; Police Powers;

. . . political opinions: Blood and Honour

. . . religion: Resistance, Who Runs USA?

. . . or, for that matter, whatever forms of hatred appeal to somebody: Hate Directory?

Even if we don't like these sites, is there anything we can do about them? Can we use them to monitor the groups who run them? Can we get rid of these sites?

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

 

 
 
A. James McAdams / Nanovic Institute for European Studies / Department of Political Science / amcadams@nd.edu