McFall, R.M. (1991). Manifesto for a science of clinical psychology. Clinical Psychologist, 44, 75-88.
McFall, R.M (2006). The Quest for a science of clinical psychology: A progress report. Clinical Science, Fall Issue, 4-7.

Bootzin, R.R. (2007). Psychological Clinical Science: Why and How We Got to Where We
Are. In T. Treat, R. Bootzin, & T. Baker (Eds), Psychological Clinical Science: Papers in honor of Richard McFall. Psychology Press, New York, NY.

McLean, C.P et al. (2007). Teaching students to think like scientists. The Behavior Therapist, 84-87.
Popper, K.R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson of London. Read pages 3-26; 57-73; 248-281.

Stanovich, K. (2007). Falsifiability: A discourse on how to foil little green men in the head. How to think straight about psychology, 8th Edition. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company.

Peterson, C. (2009). Minimally sufficient research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 7-9.

Underwood, B.J. (1975). Individual differences as a crucible in theory construction. American Psychologist, 30, 128-134.

Waller, N.G. (2004). The Fallacy of the null hypothesis in soft psychology. Applied & Preventive Psychology, 11, 83-86.

Stanovich, K. (2007). Operationalism and essentialism: But doctor, what does it really mean? How to think straight about psychology, 8th Edition. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company.

Meehl, P.E. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald,
and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical
Psychology, 46
, 806-834.

Miller, G.A. (2004). Another quasi-30 years of slow progress. Applied & Preventive Psychology,
11
, 61-64.
Sternberg, R.J. (2007). The importance of problem-driven research: Bringing Wachtel’s
argument into the present. Applied & Preventive Psychology, 12, 37-38.
Stanovich, K. (2007). But it’s not real life! The “artificiality criticism” and psychology. How to think straight about psychology. 8th Edition. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company.

Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P.E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests.
Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.

Clark, L.A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in
objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309-319.

Clark, L.A. (2005). Temperament as a unifying basis for personality and psychopathology.
Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 505-521.
Hemple, C.G. (1965). Fundamentals of taxonomy. In Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: The Free Press.

Follette, W.C., & Houts, A.C. (1996). Models of scientific progress and the role of theory in taxonomy development: A case study of the DSM. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1120-1132.

Spitzer, R.L., Endicott, J., & Robbins, E. (1978). Research diagnostic criteria: Rationale and reliability. Archives of General Psychiatry, 35, 773-782.

Wakefield, J.C. (1992). The concept of mental disorder: On the boundary between biological facts and social values. American Psychologist, 47-373-388.

Meehl, P.E. (1995). Bootstraps taxometrics: Solving the classification problem inpsychopathology. American Psychologist, 50.

Lilienfeld, S.O., Ammirati, R., & Landfield, K. (2009). Giving debiasing away: Can psychological research on correcting cognitive errors promote human welfare. Perspective on Psychological Science, 4, 390-398.

Nisbett, R.E., & Wilson, T.D. (1977). Telling more than we know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.

Ericsson, K.A., & Simon, H.A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215-251.

Moffitt, T.E., Caspi, A., & Rutter, M. (2006). Measured gene-environment interactions in psychopathology: Concepts, research strategies, and implications for research, intervention, and public understanding of genetics. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 5-27.

Caacioppo, J.T., Berntson, G.G., Lorig, T.S., Norris, C.J., Rickett, E., & Nusbaum, H. (2003). Just because you’re imaging the brain doesn’t mean you can stop using your head: A primer and set of first principles. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 85, 650-661.

Cole, S.W. (2009). Social regulation of human gene expression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 132-137.
Kagan, J. (2007). A trio of concerns. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 361-376.

Miller, G.A. & Keller, J. (2000). Psychology and neuroscience: Making peace. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 212-215.

Wood, J. M., Nezworski, M. T., & Stejskal, W. J. (1996). The Comprehensive System for the Rorschach: A critical examination. Psychological Science, 7, 3-10.

Lilienfeld, S.O. Wood, J.M., & Garb, H. (2000). The scientific status of projective techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1, 27-66.

Hibbard, S. (2003). A critique of Lilienfeld et al.’s (2000) “The Scientific Status ofProjective Techniques.” Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, 260-271.

Domjan, M. & Purdy, J.E. (1995). Animal Research in Psychology: More than meets the eye of the general psychology student. American Psychologist, 50, 496-503.

Davis, M., Ressler, K., Rothbaum, B.O. & Richardson, R. (2006). Effects of D-Cycloserine on
extinction: Translation from preclinical to clinical work. Biological Psychiatry, 60, 369-375.

McGown, P.O., Sasaki, A., D’Alessio, A.C., Dymov, S., Labonte, B., Szyf, M., Turecki, G., Meaney,
M.J. (2009). Epigenetic regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor in human brain associates
with childhood abuse. Nature Neuroscience, 12, 342-348.