Competing WLAN Technologies

The ISM band is quite crowded with different systems from cordless phones to microwave ovens! There are other WLAN technologies operating in this band including Bluetooth and HomeRF. HomeRF is an industry driven standard specifying a 2.4 GHz FHSS system with data rate of 1.6 Mbps per channel and a range of about 150 feet. There are 15 channels and it is possible to operate multiple WLANs in close proximity using different hopping patterns. However this technology is mainly targeted, as the name implies, to the the home voice/data network. Members of the consortium include Microsoft, IBM, Motorola, Ericsson, Hewlett-Packard, Compaq and Intel.
Bluetooth is another technology operating in the 2.4 GHz ISM band. It is also an industry driven standard by the Bluetooth SIG specifying a low power, low cost frequency hopping scheme of 1600 hops per second. Originally developed by Ericsson, it was really designed for a personal area network (PAN) connecting cell phones, PDAs laptops and other peripherals. Its members also include Motorola, Agere, 3Com, IBM, Intel, Nokia and Microsoft. Table 1 gives some comparisons between the three technologies.
 


Table 1 Comparison of 802.11b, Bluetooth and HomeRF

Parameter 802.11b Bluetooth HomeRF
Data rate 11 Mbps 780 kbps 1, 2, 10 Mbps
Modulation DSSS FHSS FHSS
Range (ft) 50-300 30 150
Power amplifier Highly linear - expensive Nonlinear - easier to implement Nonlinear - easier to implement
User devices Laptops, PDAs Laptop, PDAs, pager, car, cell phone and other mobile devices Laptop, PDAs, internet appliance, modem, cordless phones
Environment Office, campus LAN, hotel, airport, convention, home  Personal Area Network Home
Interference affected by other users of the spectrum. Particularly affected by Bluetooth PANs in the area Less affected by interference due to frequency hopping Less affected by interference due to frequency hopping
Encryption Wireless Encryption Privacy (WEP)
Optional 40 bit Rivest Code 4 (RC4) Pseudo Random Number Generator (PRNG) encryption algorithm
128 bit (SAFER+) 128 bit key encryption algorithm
Transmit power 100 mW < 10 mW (inactive mode)
Voice Voice over IP, therefore relies on TCP for error checking in segments. Delay may be unacceptable Voice channels support links of 64 Kbps.  Bandwidth also reserved for voice. Up to 8 simultaneous toll quality calls

Interference between Bluetooth and 802.11b has been extensively studied [6]. It was shown that a DSSS receiver suffered severe degradation when place 20m away from an AP with a Bluetooth piconet located within 10m. For more on the topic please see [6].  For encryption, most vendors have value-added features e.g. Cisco Aironet products provide 128 bit encryption.