The readings for Tuesday, November 22 are:
The History of Software Patents: From Benson, Flook, and Diehr to Bilski and Mayo v. Prometheus
Soon It'll Be OK To Tinker With Your Car's Software After All
The Copyright Rule We Need to Repeal If We Want to Preserve Our Cultural Heritage
Please write a response to one of the following questions:
From the readings, what exactly are patents? What are the ethical, moral, economic, or social reasons for granting patents?
In your opinion, should patents be granted at all? Are they really necessary or beneficial for society? Do the promote innovation or do they hinder it? Explain.
Additionally, should patents on software be granted or should patents be restricted to physical or more tangible artifacts? Explain.
Finally, is the existence of patent trolls evidence that the patent system is working or that the system is broken? Explain.
From the readings, what exactly is copyright? What are the ethical, moral, economic, or social reasons for granting copyrights?
When should an open source license be preferred over a proprietary license? Is open source software inherently better? If so, how do you explain things like HeartBleed and ShellShock?
Is the distinction between free software and open source meaningful? Between the GPL and BSD license, which one do you prefer? Which one is more free?
Finally, what do you make of the Oracle v Google case? Is the court correct in saying APIs are copyrightable? Is the court correct in ruling Google's use of Java's APIs as "fair use"? Explain.
From the readings, what exactly does the DMCA say about circumvention and reverse engineering? What limitations or restrictions does it impose on users of copyrighted artifacts?
Is it ethical for companies to use DRM schemes to protect their intellectual property? Conversely, is it ethical for end users to circumvent these DRM schemes? For instance, is it moral to rip a CD or DVD from the physical media to a portable audio or video file? Is it moral to remove the DRM from the files you get from iTunes or Audible?
Is it ethical to reverse engineer or build circumention tools that allow end users to fix, modify, or extend copyrighted work? For instance, should car or tractor owners be able to circumvent the protections on the software in their vehicles? Should phone owners have the right to unlock their phone? Should researchers and developers be allowed to probe and reverse engineer software for bugs and security flaws?
From the readings, what exactly the DMCA say about piracy? What provisions does it have for dealing with infringement? What exactly are the safe-harbor provisions?
Is it ethical or moral for users to download or share copyrighted material? What if they already own a version in another format? What if they were just "sampling" or "testing" the material?
Have you participated in the sharing of copyrighted material? If so, how did you justify your actions (or did you not care)? Moreover, why do you think so many people (regardless of whether or not you do) engage in this behavior even though it is against the law?
Does the emergence of streaming services such as Netflix or Spotify address the problem of piracy, or will are these services not sufficient? Is piracy a solvable problem? Is it a real problem?
If you have any questions, comments, or concerns regarding the course, please provide your feedback at the end of your response.