The readings for this week focus on intellectual property:
These articles provide an overview of intellectual property:
This podcast considers the pros and cons of patents:
These articles focus on software patents:
The History of Software Patents: From Benson, Flook, and Diehr to Bilski and Mayo v. Prometheus
The Supreme Court doesn't understand software, and that's a problem
These articles focus on patent trolls:
These articles focus on the recent React software licensing conflict:
WordPress to ditch React library over Facebook patent clause risk
Facebook re-licenses React under MIT license after developer backlash
These articles explain open source:
These articles discuss the difference between open source and free software:
These articles attack the idea of open source:
These articles discuss the recent Oracle v Google case:
Op-ed: Oracle attorney says Google's court victory might kill the GPL
The Google/Oracle decision was bad for copyright and bad for software
These article discuss the DMCA:
These articles discuss reverse engineering:
These articles discuss the right to repair things:
Soon It'll Be OK To Tinker With Your Car's Software After All
The US Government Wants to Permanently Legalize the Right to Repair
These articles consider the negative impacts of copyright:
These articles discuss piracy:
These articles discuss DRM:
These articles discuss the recent W3C controversy:
Amid Unprecedented Controversy, W3C Greenlights DRM for the Web
HTML5 DRM finally makes it as an official W3C Recommendation
The Fight Over DRM Standards for Streaming Video Is Over and Big Business Won
These articles discuss the use of DMCA:
Please write a response to one of the following questions:
From the readings, what exactly are patents? What are the ethical, moral, economic, or social reasons for granting patents?
In your opinion, should patents be granted at all? Are they really necessary or beneficial for society? Do the promote innovation or do they hinder it? Explain.
Additionally, should patents on software be granted or should patents be restricted to physical or more tangible artifacts? Explain.
Finally, is the existence of patent trolls evidence that the patent system is working or that the system is broken? Explain.
From the readings, what exactly is copyright? What are the ethical, moral, economic, or social reasons for granting copyrights?
When should an open source license be preferred over a proprietary license? Is open source software inherently better? If so, how do you explain things like HeartBleed and ShellShock?
Is the distinction between free software and open source meaningful? Between the GPL and BSD license, which one do you prefer? Which one is more free?
Finally, what do you make of the Oracle v Google case? Is the court correct in saying APIs are copyrightable? Is the court correct in ruling Google's use of Java's APIs as "fair use"? Explain.
From the readings, what exactly does the DMCA say about circumvention and reverse engineering? What limitations or restrictions does it impose on users of copyrighted artifacts?
Is it ethical for companies to use DRM schemes to protect their intellectual property? Conversely, is it ethical for end users to circumvent these DRM schemes? For instance, is it moral to rip a CD or DVD from the physical media to a portable audio or video file? Is it moral to remove the DRM from the files you get from iTunes or Audible?
Is it ethical to reverse engineer or build circumention tools that allow end users to fix, modify, or extend copyrighted work? For instance, should car or tractor owners be able to circumvent the protections on the software in their vehicles? Should phone owners have the right to unlock their phone? Should researchers and developers be allowed to probe and reverse engineer software for bugs and security flaws?
Finally, how much control should an inventor of manufacturer have over the use of their product? What does ownership really mean in a world of licensing and DMCA restrictions?
From the readings, what exactly the DMCA say about piracy? What provisions does it have for dealing with infringement? What exactly are the safe-harbor provisions?
Is it ethical or moral for users to download or share copyrighted material? What if they already own a version in another format? What if they were just "sampling" or "testing" the material?
Have you participated in the sharing of copyrighted material? If so, how did you justify your actions (or did you not care)? Moreover, why do you think so many people (regardless of whether or not you do) engage in this behavior even though it is against the law?
Does the emergence of streaming services such as Netflix or Spotify address the problem of piracy, or will are these services not sufficient? Is piracy a solvable problem? Is it a real problem?
If you have any questions, comments, or concerns regarding the course, please provide your feedback at the end of your response.