The readings for this week revolve around identity, culture, and the general ethos of the tech industry. In particular, we will focus on the Hacker Culture and how that has had an impact on the perception of what it means to be a computer scientist or engineer.
The Capitol of Meritocracy is Silicon Valley, Not Wall Street
Silicon Valley Isn't a Meritocracy. And It's Dangerous to Hero-Worship Entrepreneurs
Note: You should read the articles above for the week. To answer one of the question prompts below, you may need to read some of the additional optional readings.
These additional readings further explore what it means to be a hacker and the culture that has been built up around this image.
These additional readings further explore the notion of meritocracy, which is a central tenet in the technology industry.
These additional readings consider the generosity and philanthropy of some of tech's biggest names.
Please write a response to one of the following questions:
From the readings and from your experience, is Computer Science an art, engineering, or science discipline? Does it matter how it is categorized or viewed by either its practioners or the general public? Explain your thoughts and the implications of your assessment.
From the readings and from your experience, what exactly is a hacker? That is, what are the key characteristics of the hacker archetype? Do you identify with these attributes? That is, would you consider yourself a hacker? What is your reaction to this characterization?
From the readings and from your experience, is the technology industry a meritocracy (what does that actually mean)? If it is, then is that a good thing or a bad thing? If it is not, should it try to be?
Of the following computing luminaries, who is the most moral or ethical: Richard Stallman, Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, or Mark Zuckerberg? Who is the least? Discuss your reasoning and provide support for your positions.
What if we changed the question to who has had the most positive effect on the world rather than who was the most ethical or moral. Does that change your assessment of any of the persons? Explain.