The readings for Tuesday, March 15 are:
The History of Software Patents: From Benson, Flook, and Diehr to Bilski and Mayo v. Prometheus
The Supreme Court doesn't understand software, and that's a problem
Please write a response to one of the following questions:
From the readings, what exactly are patents? What are the ethical, moral, economic, or social reasons for granting patents?
In your opinion, should patents be granted at all? Are they really necessary or beneficial for society? Do the promote innovation or do they hinder it? Explain.
Additionally, should patents on software be granted or should patents be restricted to physical or more tangible artifacts? Explain.
Finally, is the existence of patent trolls evidence that the patent system is working or that the system is broken? Explain.
From the readings, what exactly is copyright? What are the ethical, moral, economic, or social reasons for granting copyrights?
When should an open source license be preferred over a proprietary license? Is open source software inherently better? If so, how do you explain things like HeartBleed and ShellShock?
Is the distinction between [free software] and [open source] meaningful? Between the GPL and BSD license, which one do you prefer? Which one is more free?
Should governments and other public organizations be encourage to adopt and support open source software? What responsibilities do organizations and companies that utilize open source have to the open source projects and community at large?
If you have any questions, comments, or concerns regarding the course, please provide your feedback at the end of your response.