\documentclass{article}
\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1}
\setlength{\textheight}{9in}
\setlength{\textwidth}{6.0in}
\setlength{\headheight}{0in}
\setlength{\headsep}{0in}
\setlength{\topmargin}{0in}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0in}
\setlength{\evensidemargin}{0in}
\setlength{\parindent}{0.3in}
\pagestyle{empty}
\begin{document}

\leftline{\bf Technical Review} 

\leftline{Pat Q.~Student}

\leftline{AME 20231}

\leftline{7 April 2022}

\bigskip

Here we consider the article of Smith, {\em et al.}\footnote{Smith, W.~J., Jones, J.~W., and Brown, W.~L.,
 2012,
 An important article that considers some aspect of thermodynamics,
 {\em Journal of Propulsion and Power}, 56(3):  1039-1059.}
 which
 describes a new aspect of thermodynamics... 
 A key model equation in this study is the ideal gas law
 \begin{equation}
 PV = n \overline R T.
 \end{equation}
 In this equation $P$ represents pressure,
 $V$ the volume,
 $n$ the number of moles, $\overline R$ the universal gas constant,
 and $T$ the absolute temperature.
 
 The typical method
 of solving this problem is.....In many cases this is deficient because....
 Hence a new method is proposed ....
 The authors summarize their conclusions as follows....

 The article is generally well written....
 A small deficiency is seen in that...
 Nevertheless the strength of 
 this paper is its clarity in.....and novelty in.....Those
 who are interested
 in problems in the related fields of.... would find this paper
 to be useful.

\medskip
\noindent
{\bf Notes} 
\begin{itemize}
\item{Use the format provided here as a template;
the text is entirely yours to write.}
\item{Your review {\em must} consider a recent
      $(t \ge 2015~{\rm AD})$ and substantive article related to thermodynamics from the
       {\em Journal of Propulsion and Power}.  The article should not be a ``lite'' summary article written by the editorial staff.  Instead it should be a research article written by the people who conducted the research.
      }
\item{One page maximum; attach a photocopy of the article
  itself.}
\item One equation minimum.
\item{Run your text file through a spell checker.}
\item{Always use complete sentences.}
%\item{Leave two spaces after a period.  Leave one space after a comma.}
\item{Give a footnote in the precise format given below. Do not be
      redundant with the text.}
\item{Use commas or periods at the end of equations as appropriate.}
\item{Do not use contractions (such as don't).}
\item{Minimize quotations. Try very hard to have zero
quotations.
When necessary, use matched pairs of 
     single quotes, like this: ``your quote here''.}
\item{Identify all variables with words of description.}
\item{All mathematical variables, whether within
      the text or in a separate equation,
      should be written in math mode,
      e.g. ``When $x=0$, there is a singularity.''}
\item{English text within equations should be in text mode: $$x=1 \qquad \mbox{when} \qquad y=0.$$}
%\item{Do not let your review become dominated by equations.}
\item{Avoid simplistic or trite statements such as,
     ``The authors have pointed
     the way to a method from which we can all benefit.''}

\end{itemize}


\end{document}
