Secondary Bibliography: Reviews

  • A Catholic Modernity? Charles Taylor's Marianist Award Lecture, with responses by William M. Shea, Rosemary Luling Haughton, George Marsden, and Jean Bethke Elshtain, James L. Heft, ed. (Oxford University Press, 1999)
  • Desmond, William, Review of A Catholic Modernity? Modern Theology, Volume 19, Issue 1 (January 2003), pp. 143-145
  • Dockery, David S. "Modern and Christian: How to Think With the Mind of Christ," [Review of A Catholic Modernity?] Books and Culture, 8/4 (July/August 2002), 36.
  • Grimm, Stephen R. Review of A Catholic Modernity? in International Philosophical Quarterly, 41 (2001), 247-9.
  • McCurry, Jeffrey M. Review of A Catholic Modernity? in Modern Theology, 18 (2002), 409-10.
  • Stout, Jeffrey. Review of A Catholic Modernity? in Philosophy in Review, 21/6 (2001), 425-427.
  •  Boundaries of Toleration [edited with Alfred C. Stepan]. New York: Columbia University Press, 2014.
  • Rosenfeld, Michel. "Boundaries of Toleration. Edited by Alfred Stepan and Charles Taylor." Journal of Church and State 58, no. 3 (2016): 558-560.
  • Dilemmas and Connections: Selected Essays. Cambridge, Mass. : Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2011. [Google Books]
  • Blackburn, Simon. "View from the mountain" [Review of Dilemmas and Connections]. New Statesman 140, no. 5041 (February 21, 2011): 48-49.
  • Blakely, Jason. "How Charles Taylor Philosophizes with History: A Review of Dilemmas and Connections." Journal of the Philosophy of History 7, no. 2 (2013): 231-243.
  • Kavka, Martin. "Dilemmas and Connections: Selected Essays." Church History 81, no. 3 (09, 2012): 747-748. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=8654384
  • Kinsey, John. "Dilemmas and Connections: Selected Essays - by Charles Taylor." Philosophical Investigations 36, no. 3 (07, 2013): 269-275.
  • Martin, Bernice.  Review of Dillemmas and Connections.  Journal of Contemporary Religion, 26.3 (2011): 485-487.
  • Richmond, Sheldon. "Dilemmas and Connections: Selected Essays." Marx & Philosophy Review of Books (12/31, 2013). http://marxandphilosophy.org.uk/reviewofbooks/reviews/2014/902.
  • Schweiker, William. "Dilemmas and Connections: Selected Essays." Ethics & International Affairs (Cambridge University Press) 26, no. 1 (03, 2012): 155-157.
  • Vanheeswijck, Guido. "Dilemmas and Donnections: Selected essays, by Charles Taylor." Heythrop Journal 54, no. 3 (05, 2013): 435-439.
  • The Explanation of Behaviour (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1964)
  • Anscombe, G. "Mechanism and Ideology." New Statesman 69 (1965): 206
  • Brown, Robert. Review of The Explanation of Behaviour in Philosophy, 40 (1965), 344-8.
  • Walker, Jeremy. Review of The Explanation of Human Behavior, in Philosophical Books, 6.1 (1965): 28.
  • Hegel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975)
  • Abel, Betty. "The Grand Design," [Review of Hegel] in Contemporary Review, 227 (1975), 330-1.
  • [Anon]. "Philosophical Münchausen," [Review of Hegel] in Economist, Sept. 6 1975, 120.
  • Brinkmann, Klaus. Review of Hegel in History, 62 (1977), 71-2.
  • Eisenberg, Paul D. Review of Hegel in Noûs, 11 (1977), 55-61.
  • Findlay, J. N. Review of Hegel in Journal of the History of Philosophy, 16 (1978), 233-6.
  • Harris, Errol E. Review of Hegel in Owl of Minerva, 8 (1977), 1-4.
  • Harris, H. S. Review of Hegel in Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 7 (1977), 303-10.
  • Kaufmann, Walter. "Coming to Terms with Hegel," [Review of Hegel] in Times Literary Supplement, Jan. 2 1976, 13-14.
  • Kelly, George Armstrong. Review of Hegel in Political Theory, 4 (1976), 377-81.
  • Lauer, Quentin. Review of Hegel in Thought, 51 (1976), 323-4.
  • Liebich, André. Review of Hegel in Canadian Journal of Political Science, 12 (1979), 159-60.
  • Parkinson, G. H. R. Review of Hegel in Inquiry, 19 (1976), 255-66.
  • Petry, M. J. Review of Hegel in Philosophical Books, 17 (1976), 111-13.
  • Pfohl, David. Review of Hegel in Eidos, 1 (1978), 116-24.
  • Pleydell-Pearce, A. G. Review of Hegel in Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 9 (1978), 201-2.
  • Ryan, Alan. "Be My Geist," [Review of Hegel] New Statesman, Sept. 26 1975, 378-80.
  • Schaper, Eva. Review of Hegel in Philosophy, 51 (1976), 362-4.
  • Scott-Taggart, M. J. Review of Hegel in Journal of European Studies, 6 (1976), 70-2.
  • Stepelevich, Lawrence. Review of Hegel and Modern Society in Review of Metaphysics, 33 (1979), 448.
  • Stillman, Peter G. Review of Hegel in Journal of Politics, 38 (1976), 1044-6.
  • Walsh, W. H. Review of Hegel in Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 6 (1976), 785-96.
  • Walsh, W. H. Review of Hegel in Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 6 (1976), 785-96.
  • Hegel and Modern Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979)
  • Constantineau, Philippe. Review of Hegel et la société moderne in Dialogue, 39 (2000), 823-6.
  • Gerard, Gilbert. Review of Hegel et la société moderne, in Revue Philosophique de Louvain, 97 (1999), 673-7.
  • Gerth, Nancy. Review of Hegel and Modern Society in Philosophical Review, 90 (1981), 436-39.
  • Kiernan, V. G. Review of Hegel and Modern Society in History, 65 (1980), 70.
  • Panagakou, Stamatoula. "[Review of] Charles Taylor, Hegel and Modern Society Hegel and Modern Society." Political Studies Review 15, no. 2 (2017): 270-270.
  • Smith, Steven B. Review of Hegel and Modern Society in Ethics, 92 (1982), 764-5.
  • [With Jocelyn Maclure]. Laïcité et liberté de conscience (Montreal: Boréal, 2010). Republished as Secularism and Freedom of Conscience (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2011).
  • Abbey, Ruth. Review of Jocelyn Maclure and Charles Taylor, Secularism and Freedom of Conscience, Harvard University Press, 2011. Notre Dame Philosophical Review, December 13, 2011. [Full Article].
  • Babie, Paul. "Secularism and Freedom of Conscience by Jocelyn Maclure, Charles Taylor (Review)." Canadian Journal of Law and Society 28, no. 2 (2013): 282-28
  • "Secularism and Freedom of Conscience." American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly: Journal of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 86, no. 2 (Spring 2012): 387-390.
  • "Secularism and Freedom of Conscience." Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 75, no. 2 (2013): 401-402. In Dutch.
  • Heinig, Hans Michael. "[Review of] Maclure, Jocelyn / Taylor, Charles: Laizität Und Gewissensfreiheit, 2011." Zeitschrift Fuer Evangelisches Kirchenrecht 59, no. 3 (2014): 397-400
  • O'Brien, Dennis. "Faith Enters the Public Square." [Review of Secuarlism and Freedom of Conscience] America 206, no. 10 (03/26, 2012): 24-28.
  • Skotnicki, Andrew. "Secularism and Freedom of Conscience
    by Jocelyn Maclure and Charles Taylor, Transl. by Jane Marie Todd." Catholic Higher Education Advocate (11/26, 2013). http://cheausa.org/secularism-and-freedom-of-conscience/.
  • Van Die, Marguerite. "Secularism and Freedom of Conscience." Journal of Church & State 54, no. 4 (12, 2012): 648-650.
  • The Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity. Cambridge, Massachusetts : The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2016. 
  • Blakely, Jason. "Review of the Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity." Philosophy in Review (Comptes Rendus Philosophiques) 36, no. 5 (2016): 229-231.
  • Clem, Stewart. "[Review of] the Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity by Charles Taylor." Modern Theology 34, no. 2 (2018): 297-299.
  • Feser, Edward. "I Speak, therefore I Am." National Review, no. May 23 (May 23, 2016). https://www.nationalreview.com/magazine/2016-05-23-0100/charles-taylor-the-language-animal.
  • Forster, Michael N. "[Review of] the Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity." Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (September 9, 2016). http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/the-language-animal-the-full-shape-of-the-human-linguistic-capacity/.
  • Fritzman, J. M. and Ella M. Crawford. "Language is Not Merely a Means of Communication: Charles Taylor: The Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2016, 368pp, $35.00 HB." Metascience 27, no. 1 (2018): 123-125.
  • Klemm, Matthias. "Sprachsoziologie Revisited: Von Der Machtkritik Zurück Zur Sprache Als Lebensform?" Soziologische Revue 43, no. 1 (2020): 55-63.
    Abstract:
    A review essay covering books by 1) Pierre Bourdieu, Sprache. Schriften zur Kultursoziologie 1. (2017) and 2) Charles Taylor, Das sprachbegabte Tier. Grundzüge des menschlichen Sprachvermögens (2017).
  • Maas, Utz. "Charles Taylor. 2017. Das Sprachbegabte Tier. Grundzüge Des Menschlichen Sprachvermögens. Berlin: Suhrkamp. 656 S. (Original: The Language Animal. the Full Shape of Human Linguistic Capacity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2016.)." Zeitschrift Für Rezensionen Zur Germanistischen Sprachwissenschaft (2018). https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/zrs.ahead-of-print/zrs-2018-0037/zrs-2018-0037.xml.
  • McClorry, Brian. "Review of the Language Animal." Thinking Faith (2016). http://www.thinkingfaith.org/articles/language-animal.
  • McPherson, David. "I Speak, therefore I Am [Review of the Language Animal]." Philosophical Quarterly (Forthcoming).Link.
  • Prickett, Stephen. "[Review of] Charles Taylor, the Language Animal: The Full Shape of Human Linguistic Capacity." Theology 120, no. 3 (2017): 230-231.
  • Rée, Jonathan. "The Language Animal by Charles Taylor Review – how Words Change our World." The Guardian (April 27, 2016). https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/apr/27/the-language-animal-the-full-shape-of-human-linguistic-capacity-charles-taylor-review.
  • Rixon, Gordon. "Book Review: The Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Language Capacity. by Charles Taylor." Theological Studies 78, no. 2 (2017): 511-512.
  • Schwan, Franziska. "Charles Taylor: Das Sprachbegabte Tier. Grundzüge Des Menschlichen Sprachvermögens." Philosophischer Literaturanzeiger 71, no. 4 (2018): 351-361
  • Schweitzer, Don. "The Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity." University of Toronto Quarterly 87, no. 3 (2018): 479.
  • Smith, Nicholas. "REVIEW: The Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity." The Review of Politics 79, no. 3 (2017): 500-502.
  • Stalmaszczyk, Piotr. "[Review of] The Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity." Marx & Philosophy Review of Books (6 November, 2016). https://marxandphilosophy.org.uk/reviewofbooks/reviews/2016/2501.
  • Stalmaszczyk, Piotr. "Review Article: Charles Taylor's Critical Philosophy of Language." Linguistica Silesiana 40 (2019): 409-417. http://journals.pan.pl/dlibra/publication/129420/edition/112959/content.
    Abstract:
    [Expanded version of the review above.] The article presents Charles Taylor’s critical philosophy of language and it reviews his recent book on the human linguistic capacity. Critical philosophy of language is understood here as a broad (philosophical, social and political) perspective on language characterized by multifaceted concern with the linguistic and cognitive mechanisms involved in language use. The paper discusses Taylor’s interest in language and philosophy of language, and focuses on his seminal distinction between the ‘designative-instrumental’ and ‘constitutive-expressive’ theories of language. In the former theory language is understood within the confines of Cartesian representational epistemology, whereas in the latter language constitutes meaning and shapes human experience (one of the features important for defining the critical approach to philosophy of language).
  • Stolorow, Robert D. and George E. Atwood. "Language and the as-Structure of Experience." Human Studies 41, no. 3 (2018): 513-515.
  • Weigel, Peter. "TAYLOR, Charles. the Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity.(Book Review)." The Review of Metaphysics 71, no. 3 (2018): 601
  • Wolf, W. Clark. "[Review of] Charles Taylor: The Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity." Phenomenological Reviews (November 15, 2016). http://reviews.ophen.org/2016/11/15/charles-taylor-the-language-animal-the-full-shape-of-the-human-linguistic-capacity/.
  • The Malaise of Modernity (Concord, Ontario: Anansi, 1991). Republished as The Ethics of Authenticity (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992)
  • Aznar, Hugo. Review of La ética de la Autenticidad, in Telos, 5 (1996), 155-63.
  • Beltrami, Fábio. "A Ética Da Autenticidade." Conjectura: Filosofia e Educação 17, no. 1 (2012): 230-233. In Portuguese.
  • Buela, Alberto. Review of The Ethics of Authenticity in Disenso, 1 (June 1995), 73-4.
  • Dallmayr, Fred. "Modernity Rescued from Knockers and Boosters," [Review of The Ethics of Authenticity] Review of Politics, 56 (1994), 153-7.
  • Danto, A. C. "The Greatness of Narcissus," [Review of The Ethics of Authenticity and Multiculturalism and 'The Politics of Recognition'] Times Literary Supplement, Jan. 29 1993, 5-6.
  • del Junco, Manuel Fontan. Review of La ética de la Autenticidad, in Themata, 13 (1995), 322-4.
  • Descombes, Vincent. Review of The Ethics of Authenticity in Raritan, 13 (1994), 102-23.
  • Erasaari, Risto. Review of The Malaise of Modernity in Sosiologia, 29 (1992), 331-2.
  • Groarke, Louis. Review of The Malaise of Modernity in Eidos, 12 (1994), 175-8.
  • Gulick, Walter. Review of The Ethics of Authenticity in Tradition and Discovery, 19 (1992-3), 39-40.
  • Herman, David. "Private Lives," [Review of The Ethics of Authenticity and Multiculturalism and 'The Politics of Recognition'], New Statesman and Society, Dec. 11 1992, 40-1.
  • Kennedy, Leonard A. Review of The Ethics of Authenticity in American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 67 (1993), 400-1.
  • Keshen, Richard. Review of The Ethics of Authenticity in Canadian Philosophical Reviews, 14 (1994), 423-5.
  • Kivivuoni, Janne. Review of The Ethics of Authenticity in Sosiologia, 30 (1993), 303-4.
  • Legenhausen, Muhammad. Review of The Ethics of Authenticity in Message of Thaqalayn: A Quarterly Journal of Islamic Studies, 7, Nos. 1-2 (2001-2), 125-54.
  • Leroux, Georges. "Le dépassement du Cynisme," [Review of The Malaise of Modernity] Spirale, 118 (Oct. 1992), 3.
  • McCabe, David. Review of The Ethics of Authenticity and Multiculturalism and 'The Politics of Recognition' in Commonweal, 120 (Feb. 12 1993), 558-60.
  • Montefiore, Alan. Review of The Ethics of Authenticity in Philosophical Books, 35 (1994), 62-3.
  • Mos, Leendert P. "We Ought to Be Fighting Over the Meaning of Authenticity," [Review of The Ethics of Authenticity] Theory & Psychology, 4 (1994), 447-54.
  • Narveson, Jan. Review of The Ethics of Authenticity in International Studies in Philosophy, 26/2 (1994), 147-8.
  • Novak, Michael. "An Authentic Morality," [Review of The Ethics of Authenticity], First Things, 33 (May 1993), 40-2.
  • Poirier, Maben Walter. "Reassessing the Modern Age," [Review of The Malaise of Modernity] Modern Age, 35 (1993), 215-23.
  • Pullmann, Michal. Review of Etika authenticity, in Filosoficky Casopis, 51.1 (2003), 153-156.
  • Pyrcz, Greg. Review of The Ethics of Authenticity in Canadian Journal of Political Science, 26 (1993), 603-04.
  • Rorty, Richard. Review of The Ethics of Authenticity in London Review of Books, Apr. 3 1994, 7-8.
  • Rundell, John . "Don't Think for Yourself Unless You Can," [Review of The Ethics of Authenticity], New York Times Book Review, Sept. 27 1992, 16.
  • Salas Astrain, Ricardo. Review of La Malaise de la Modernité, in Revue Philosophique de Louvain, 93 (1995), 464-6.
  • Sullivan, John. Review of The Ethics of Authenticity in Heythrop Journal, 35 (1994), 346-7.
  • Modern Social Imaginaries, Dilip Gaonkar, Jane Kramer, Benjamin Lee and Michael Warner, eds. (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004). [Google Books].
  • Abbey, Ruth. 'Back to Baczko' (Review Article of Modern Social Imaginaries) by Charles Taylor for European Journal of Political Theory, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2006, pp. 355-364
  • Angus, Ian, "Modernity and its Discontents" (Review of Modern Social Imaginaries), Topia, Issue 13 (Spring 2005), pp. 145-151.
  • [Anon]. First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion and Public Life, Review of Modern Social Imaginaries, Issue 144 (June/July 2004), p. 63.
  • Beiner, Ronald. Review of Modern Social Imaginaries, Canadian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 37, Issue 4 (December 2004), pp. 1056-1057.
  • Blattberg, Charles. Review of Modern Social Imaginaries. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review, 45 (Winter 2006), 183.
  • Browne, Craig. "A Moral Order of Mutual Benefit." Review of Modern Social Imaginaries. Thesis Eleven, 86 (August 2006), 114-125.
  • Caterino, Brian. (2005) Review of Modern Social Imaginaries, New Political Science. Vol. 27. No. 3, September, pp. 430-441.
  • Costa, Paolo. Review of Modern Social Imaginaries, in La Societa degli Individui: Quadrimestrale di teoria sociale e storia delle idee, 21.7:3 (2004), 177-180.
  • Ferguson, Michaele L. Review of Modern Social Imaginaries. Philosophy in Review 26 (February 2006), 75-77.
  • Kim, Do Kyun. Review of Modern Social Imaginaries, Howard Journal of Communications, Vol. 17, Issue 1 (Jan-Mar 2006), pp. 75-78.
  • Mahoney, Jon. Review of Modern Social Imaginaries, in International Studies in Philosophy, 38.4 (2006), 169-170.
  • Marshall, Sarah. "Review of Modern Social Imaginaries" in Contemporary Political Theory, May 2005, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp.197-199.
  • Matravers, Matt, Review of Modern Social Imaginaries , Political Studies Review , Vol. 3, No. 1, January 2005, p. 54
  • Mookherjee, Monica. Review of Modern Social Imaginaries, in Radical Philosophy: A Journal of Socialist and Feminist Philosophy, 126 (July-August 2004), 39-41.
  • Nicholas, Jeffery L., Review of Modern Social Imaginaries, Review of Metaphysics, Vol. 59, Issue 2 (Dec 2005), pp. 454-456.
  • Norman, Peter. “What’s A Little Difference of Metatopical Social Imaginary Between Friends? The Implications of Charles Taylor’s Modern Social Imaginaries for Law and Development” [Review of Modern Social Imaginaries]. Global Law Books (6 March 2006). [Full Article]
  • Rossi, Philip J., Review of Modern Social Imaginaries, Theological Studies, Vol. 65, Issue 4 (December 2004), p. 907.
  • Rothfork, John. Review of Modern Social Imaginaries. Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature 60 (2006), 157-163.
  • Sargent, M. Review of Modern Social Imaginaries , Charles Taylor, Commonweal, 131(13), 2004, 30-31.
  • Stock, Femke. Review of Modern Social Imaginaries, in Ars Disputandi, 6 (2006), 1-9.
  • Thunder, David. Review of Charles Taylor's Modern Social Imaginaries, The Review of Politics, Vol. 66, No. 3, Summer, 2004, pp. 519-521.
  • Yack, Bernard, Review of Modern Social Imaginaries, Ethics, Vol. 115, Issue 3 (April 2005), pp. 629-633.
  • Ziolkowski, Eric, Review of Modern Social Imaginaries, Journal of Religion, Vol. 85, Issue 2 (April 2005), pp 353-354.
  • Multiculturalism and 'The Politics of Recognition', Amy Gutmann, ed. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992)
  • Auernheimer, Georg. Review of Multiculturalism and 'The Politics of Recognition' in Das Argument, 36 (1994), 830-1.
  • Elshtain, Jean Bethke. Review of Multiculturalism and 'The Politics of Recognition' in American Political Science Review, 87 (1993), 482-3.
  • Herman, David. "Private Lives," [Review of The Ethics of Authenticity and Multiculturalism and 'The Politics of Recognition'], New Statesman and Society, Dec. 11 1992, 40-1.
  • Haldane, John. Review of Multiculturalism and 'The Politics of Recognition' in European Journal of Philosophy, 1 (1993), 347-50.
  • Halvorson, Jonathan. Review of Multiculturalism and 'The Politics of Recognition' in Conference, 5 (1994), 100-4.
  • Helly, Denise. Review of Multiculturalism: Examining 'The Politics of Recognition' in Anthropolgie et Societés, 19 (1995), 232-5.
  • Jaggar, Alison M. Review of Multiculturalism and 'The Politics of Recognition' in Hastings Center Report, 24 (1994), 44-5.
  • Junge, Matthias. Review of Multikulturalismus und die Politik der Anerkennung in Soziologische Revue, 18 (1995), 351-9.
  • Landesman, Bruce M. Review of Multiculturalism and 'The Politics of Recognition' in Ethics, 104 (1994), 384-6.
  • McAdams, Charles Brian. Review of Multiculturalism, in Vera Lex, 7(1-2) (Winter 2006), 127-130.
  • McCabe, David. Review of The Ethics of Authenticity and Multiculturalism and 'The Politics of Recognition' in Commonweal, 120 (Feb. 12 1993), 558-60.
  • Myers, Richard. Review of Multiculturalism and 'The Politics of Recognition' in American Review of Canadian Studies, 24 (1994), 136-8.
  • Oakes, Edward T. "Attention Must Be Paid," [Review of Multiculturalism and the 'Politics of Recognition'], First Things, 32 (April 1993), 48-51.
  • Oberndörfer, Dieter. Review of Multikulturalismus und die Politik der Anerkennung in Politische Vierteljahresschift, 37 (1996), 182ff.
  • O'Neill, Shane. "Morality, Ethical Life and the Persistence of Universalism," [Review of Multiculturalism and 'The Politics of Recognition'] Theory, Culture and Society, 11(2) (1994), 129-49.
  • Outlaw, Lucius. Review of Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition in Constellations, 3 (1996), 124-9.
  • Pedrana, Yamila. Review of Multiculturalism and 'The Politics of Recognition', in Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia, 22 (1996), 349-52.
  • Reidy, David A. Review of Multiculturalism and 'The Politics of Recognition' in Auslegung, 20 (1995), 43-6.
  • Smeyers, Paul. Review of and 'The Politics of Recognition' and The Ethics of Authenticity in Journal of Philosophy of Education, 30 (1996), 471-8.
  • Velek, Josef. Review of Multikulturalismus und die Politik der Anerkennung, in Filosficky Casopis, 42 (1994), 703-6.
  • Philosophical Arguments (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1995)
  • Arroyo, Julian. Review of Argumentos Filosóficos, in Paideia, 19 (1998), 210-2.
  • Black, Sam. Review of Philosophical Arguments and Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism: The Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question, James Tully, ed., in Philosophical Review, 106 (1997), 455-61.
  • Butchvarov, Panayot. Review of Philosophical Arguments, in International Studies in Philosophy, 31.4 (1999), 134-135.
  • Dunn, John. "Balancing Acts in a Nervous Age," [Review of Philosophical Arguments], Times Higher Education Supplement, Feb. 2 1996, 26-7.
  • Forero-Reyes, Marcela. Review of Argumentos Filosóficos, in Universitas Philosophica, 15 (1998), 172-6.
  • Howe, Stephen. "Little Boxes," [Review of Philosophical Arguments], New Statesman and Society, Aug. 18 1995, 33.
  • Inwood, M. J. Review of Philosophical Arguments in Philosophical Books, 37 (1996), 186-8.
  • MacIntyre, Alasdair. Review of Philosophical Arguments in Philosophical Quarterly, 47 (1997), 94-6.
  • McCabe, David. Review of Philosophical Arguments in Cross Currents, 47 (1997-8), 94-6.
  • Meynell, Hugo. Review of Philosophical Arguments in Heythrop Journal, 38 (1997) 482.
  • Miller, David. "What Holds Us Together," [Review of Philosophical Arguments, and Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism: The Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question James Tully, ed.] Times Literary Supplement, Dec. 15 1995, 26.
  • Persky, Stan. "Engaging Philosophy from Charles Taylor," [Review of Philosophical Arguments] Globe and Mail, July 29 1995, C20.
  • Schefczyk, Michael. Review of Philosophical Arguments in Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 2/2 (1999), 195-6.
  • Schmidtz, David. Review of Philosophical Arguments in Ethics, 109 (1999), 461-4.
  • Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985). [Google Books]
  • Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985). [Google Books]
  • Agassi, Joseph. Review of Philosophical Papers, 1 and 2, in Canadian Philosophical Reviews, 6 (1986), 35-8.
  • Ball, Terence. Review of Philosophical Papers, 1 and 2 in American Political Science Review, 81 (1987), 270-1.
  • Browning, Don S., Review of Philosophical Papers, 1 and 2 in Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 19 (1989), 109-15.
  • Hands, D. Wade. Review of Philosophical Papers, 1 and 2 in Economics and Philosophy, 3 (1987) 172-5.
  • Louth, Andrew. Review of Philosophical Papers, 1 and 2 in Heythrop Journal, 29 (1988), 479-80
  • Rorty, Richard. "Absolutely Non-Absolute," [Review of Philosophical Papers, 1 and 2] Times Literary Supplement, Dec. 6 1985, 1379-80.
  • Rosen, Michael. Review of Philosophical Papers, 1 and 2 in Journal of Philosophy, 86 (1989), 270-6.
  • Rundell, John. "Multicultural Man," [Review of Philosophical Papers, 1 and 2] New Society, July 19 1985, 275-6.
  • Shapiro, Michael J. "Charles Taylor's Moral Subject," [Review of Philosophical Papers, 1 and 2] Political Theory, 14 (1986), 311-24.
  • Vipond, Peter. Review of Philosophical Papers, 1 and 2 in Radical Philosophy, 45 (1987), 52.
  • Rapprocher les solitudes: écrits sur le fédéralisme et le nationalisme au Canada, Guy Laforest, ed. (Sainte-Foy, Les Presses de l'Université Laval, 1992)
  • Broadbent, Ed. Review of Reconciling the Solitudes in Montreal Gazette, July 10 1993, 13-15.
  • Burgess, Michael. Review of Reconciling the Solitudes in International Affairs, 70 (1994), 191.
  • Cairns, Alan C. Review of Reconciling the Solitudes in Canadian Journal of Political Science, 27 (1994), 155-7.
  • Ceyhan, Ayse. Review of Reconciling the Solitudes in Revue de l'Institut de Sociologie, 1 (1993), 454-7.
  • Levy, Gary. Review of Reconciling the Solitudes in Québec Studies, 17 (1993), 208-9.
  • Mallory, James. Review of Reconciling the Solitudes in Political Quarterly, 65 (1994), 220-2.
  • Massicotte, Louis. Review of Rapprocher les Solitudes in Canadian Journal of Political Science, 27 (1994), 795-6.
  • Rovinsky, David J. Review of Reconciling the Solitudes in American Review of Canadian Studies, 24 (1994), 138-40.
  • Roy, Yves. Review of Rapprocher les solitudes in Dialogue, 33 (1994), 563-5.
  • Sanfilippo, Matteo. Review of Reconciling the Solitudes in Studi Emigrazione, 33 (1996), 149- 50.
  • Smith, Miriam. Review of Rapprocher les Solitudes in Canadian Journal of Political Science, 28 (1995), 145-8.
  • Whitaker, Reg. Review of Reconciling the Solitudes in Canadian Historical Review, 75 (1994), 90-1.
  • Reconstructing Democracy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2020).
  • McLemee, Scott. "From the Ground Up [Review of Reconstructing Democracy]." Inside Higher Ed (July 31, 2020). https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2020/07/31/review-charles-taylor-et-al-reconstructing-democracy-how-citizens-are-building.
  • Retrieving Realism (Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press, 2015).
  • Carman, Taylor. "[Review of] Retrieving Realism, by Hubert Dreyfus & Charles Taylor." Mind (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzx032.
  • Godfrey-Smith, Peter. "Finding Your Way Home [Review of Retrieving Realisim]." Boston Review (14 September 2015). http://bostonreview.net/books-ideas/peter-godfrey-smith-dreyfus-taylor-retrieving-realism
  • Grosso, Andrew. "Retrieving Realism Ed. by Hubert Dreyfus and Charles Taylor (Review)." American Journal of Theology & Philosophy 39, no. 3 (2018): 95-98
  • Meijer, Michiel and Guy Vanheeswijck. "Review of Hubert Dreyfus and Charles Taylor, Retrieving Realism." Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 4 (2016). In Dutch.
  • Piercey, Robert. "Review of Hubert Dreyfus and Charles Taylor, Retrieving Realism." Philosophy in Review (Comptes Rendus Philosophiques) 36, no. 5 (2016): 198-200.
  • Sass, Hartmut Von. "Hubert Dreyfus Und Charles Taylor: Die Wiedergewinnung Des Realismus." Philosophische Rundschau 64, no. 1 (2019): 95
  • Segall, Matthew. "[Review of] Dreyfus, Hubert and Charles Taylor. Retrieving Realism." World Futures 73 (2017): 179-185.
  • A Secular Age. Cambridge: Belnap Press of Harvard University Press, 2007.
  • Anderson, David E. “Is That All There Is?” [Review of A Secular Age]. Religion and Ethics Newsweekly, July 24, 2009. [Full Article]
  • Amesbury, Richard. Review of A Secular Age, by Charles Taylor. Philosophical Investigations 33:1, 67 – 74.
  • [Anon]. Review of A Secular Age, in Publisher’s Weekly (June 11, 2007). 
  • [Anon] “A Land Where God Is Absent; Human Society” [Review of A Secular Age].  The Economist (Sept 8, 2007). 
  • Ballard, Bruce.  Review of A Secular Age, by Charles Taylor.  Philosophia Christi 11, no. 2, Series 2 (2009): 485-488.
  • Bateman, Chris. Review of A Secular Age. [Full Article]
  • Berkowitz, Peter “The Persistence of Belief: Review of A Secular Age”, Claremont Review of Books, Spring 2008, pages 20-21. [PDF]
  • Burleigh, Michael. “The Fate of Christian Culture” [Review of A Secular Age]. New York Sun (September 12, 2007). [Full Article]
  • Chakrabarty, Dipesh. "The Modern and the Secular in the West: An Outsider's View" [Review of A Secular Age], Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 77.2 (2009): 393-403.
  • Colorado, Carlos. "Review of A Secular Age." Touchstone 28, no. 2 (May, 2010): 57-68.
  • Crittenden, Paul James.  Review of A Secular Age, in Sophia (16 September 2009).  [Full Article]
  • Dacey, Austin. “One damned thing after another” Review of A Secular Age, Free Inquiry 28:5 (August-Sept. 2008), 57.
  • Derbyshire, Jonathen.  Review of A Secular Age, in The Philosopher’s Magazine.  [Full Article]
  • Diggins, John Patrick, “The Godless Delusion” (Review of A Secular Age), The New York Times Book Review, December 16, 2007
  • DiTommaso, Lorenzo. “Spiritual belief vs. secularism” [Review of A Secular Age]. The Gazette (September 22 2007). [Full Article]
  • Elshtain, Jean Bethke. Review of A Secular Age, in Politics and Religion, 2:02 (August 2009), 312-319.
  • Gray, John. “Faith in Reason: Review of A Secular Age”, Harper’s Magazine 316: 1892 (January 2008), 85-89.
  • Griffiths, Paul J. Review of A Secular Age, in Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review, 72:4 (October 2008), 665-669.
  • Grueso, Delfín Ignacio. “Tres modos de involucrar el reconocimiento en la justicia,” [Review of A Secular Age], Praxis Filosofica, 27 (July-December 2008), 49-71.
  • Horton, John. "Peggy Lee's question: Charles Taylor, secularism and the meaning of life." [Review of A Secular Age]. European Journal of Political Theory, 2011;10 113-121.
  • Hösle, V. "Eine metaphysische Geschichte des Atheismus" [Review of A Secular Age]. Deutsche Zeitschrift Fur Philosophie 57.2 (2009): 319-327.
  • Hurd, Elizabeth Shakman, Review of A Secular Age, Political Theory, Vol. 36, No. 3, June 2008, pp. 486-491.
  • Insole, Christopher J. “Informed Tolerance: Review of A Secular Age”, Times Literary Supplement 5470 (February 1, 2008), 3-5.
  • Jeffries, Stuart. “Religion: Is that all there is?” [Review of A Secular Age]. The Guardian (December 8, 2007). [Full Article]
  • Johnson, Rachael Givens. "Review of A Secular Age."2016. http://www.timesandseasons.org/index.php/author/rachael/.
  • Kinsey, John. Review of A Secular Age, by Charles Taylor. Philosophical Investigations 33, no. 1:75-81.
  • Kollar, Rene. "Review of A Secular Age." Heythrop Journal 52, no. 3 (May, 2011): 535-536.
  • Laitinen, Arto. Review of A Secular Age, by Charles Taylor. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13, no. 3 (June 2010): 353-355.
  • Larmore, Charles. “How Much Can We Stand?: Review of A Secular Age”, The New Republic, April 9, 2008, pp.  39-44.
  • Lindi, Letizia. Review of A Secular Age, in Iride: Filosofia e Discussione Pubblica, 21(55), 772-773.
  • Lovin, Robin W. “A Secular Age/Justice: Rights and Wrongs.” Review of A Secular Age, Christian Century 125:9 (5/6/2008), 24.
  • Lundberg, Anders. Review of A Secular Age, in Acta Sociologica, 52.3 (2009): 291-292.
  • Mahoney, Daniel J. “The Re-Enchantment of the World” [Review of Secular Age], Wall St. Journal, Sept 21, 2007.  [Full Article]
  • Marty, Martin E. Review of A Secular Age, Church History 77:3 (Sept. 2008), 773-775.
  • May, Collin. "Charles Taylor, A Secular Age." Society 46:1 (March 2009), 199-203.
  • McClay, Wilfrid M. “Uncomfortable Unbelief: Review of A Secular Age”, First Things 183 (May 2008), 35.
  • McEvoy, James. “In bed with the secular spirit” [Review of A Secular Age].  Eureka Street (June 25, 2008). [Full Article]
  • Morgan, Michael L. Review of A Secular Age. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008-08-10 (Available Online)
  • Murray, James. "Synopsis of Charles Taylor's, "A Secular Age"." Davidewart.Ca (Dec 10, 2007). http://www.davidewart.ca/2007/12/synopsis-of-cha.html.
  • Norman, Edward. “The Withdrawal of God: Review of A Secular Age”, Spectator 305: 9348 (October 13, 2007), 52.
  • Oviedo, Lluís. "A Secular Age – By Charles Taylor." Reviews in Religion & Theology 16:1 (January 2009), 79-85.
  • Oviedo, Lluís. “I cristiani in un mondo secolarizzato: la proposta di Charles Taylor” [Review of A Secular Age], Antonianum: Periodicum Trimestre, 83.3 (July-September 2008), 511-523.
  • Roberts, Vaughan S.  Review of A Secular Age, in Implicit Religion 12.1 (2009), 121–123. 
  • Rocke, Stephanie, Review of A Secular Age, Eras Edition 10, November 2008. [PDF]
  • Ross, Daniel. Review of A Secular Age, in Thesis Eleven 2009 99: 112-121
  • Rossi, Philip J.“Review of A Secular Age”, Theological Studies 69:4 (Dec. 2008), 953-954.
  • Rundell, John .  “Charles Taylor and the Secularization Thesis.” Review of A Secular Age, by Charles Taylor.  Critical Horizons 11, no. 1 (2010).
  • Schweiker, William. Review of A Secular Age, by Charles Taylor. American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 30, no. 3 (September 2009): 323-329.
  • Sedgwick, Timothy F. "Review of A Secular Age." Anglican Theological Review 93, no. 3 (June, 2011): 510-318.
  • Silva, Alvaro. Review of A Secular Age, in Augustinus: Revista Trimestral Publicada por los Padres Agustinos Recoletos, 53.210-211 (July-December 2008), 502-504.
  • Steinfels, Peter. “Uncertainties About the Role of Doubt in Religion.” Review of A Secular Age, The New York Times 07/19/2008, 4.
  • Stigar, Robson and Vanessa Roberta Massanbani Ruthes. "TAYLOR, Charles. Uma Era Secular." Revista De Estudos Da Religião (REVER) 15, no. 2 (2015): 243-245.
  • Tolson, Jay. “Why God Won’t Die: Review of A Secular Age”, Wilson Quarterly 32:1 (Winter 2008), 107-108.
  • Tonti-Filippini, Nicholas. “Religion in a secular society.” Review of A Secular Age, Quadrant 59:2 (Sept. 2008), 82.
  • Turner, Daniel. “The Sources of Secularism: an encyclopedia work shows the complexity of modern unbelief.” Review of A Secular Age, National Catholic Reporter 44:27 (9/5/08), 19.
  • Urbinati, Nadia. Review of A Secular Age, in European Journal of Sociology, 49 (2008), 462-466.
  • Vanney, María Alejandra. Review of A Secular Age, in Anuario Filosofico, 41.1 (2008), 207-210.
  • Wallulis, Jerry.  Review of A Secular Age, by Charles Taylor.  Philosophy and Rhetoric 42, no.3: 302-312.
  • Ward , Ian. Review of A Secular Age, Journal of Religion 88:3 (July 2008), 420-2.
  • Watson, Micah. “Secularism’s Fragile Buffered Selves” [Review of A Secular Age], Expositions 3.1 (2009).
  • Wilson, John. “The Modern Sense: Review of A Secular Age”, National Review 60: 7 (April 21, 2008), 58-59.
  • Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989). [Google Books]
  • Adeney, Frances S. Review of Sources of the Self in Theology Today, 48 (1991), 204-10.
  • Baldacchino, Joseph. “The New 'Public Order': Within and Above" [Review of Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity], Humanitas (Journal of the National Humanities Institute), 6.1 (Fall 1992), 49-59.
  • Cockburn, David. Review of Sources of the Self in Philosophical Investigations, 14 (1991), 360-64.
  • Cristando, Wayne. Review of Sources of the Self in Political Theory Newsletter, 2/2 (1990), 224-30.
  • Divinsky, Pamela. Review of Sources of the Self in Queen's Quarterly, 97 (1990), 501-4.
  • Ermarth, Michael. Review of Sources of the Self in Journal of Modern History, 64 (1992), 119-21.
  • Glover, Jonathan. "God Loveth Adverbs," [Review of Sources of the Self] London Review of Books, Nov. 22, 1990, 12-13.
  • Hamlyn, David W. Review of Sources of the Self in British Journal of Educational Studies, 39 (1991), 101-3.
  • Hauerwas, Stanley and David Matzko. "The Sources of Charles Taylor," [Review of Sources of the Self], Religious Studies Review, 18 (1992), 286-9.
  • Hittinger, Russell. Review of Sources of the Self in Review of Metaphysics, 44 (1990), 111-30.
  • Kennedy, Roger. Review of Sources of the Self in Free Associations, 3 (1992), 297-305.
  • Kearney, Richard.  Review of Sources of the Self, in Hermathena, 149 (1990): 121.
  • Larmore, Charles. Review of Sources of the Self in Ethics, 102 (1991), 158-62.
  • MacIntyre, Alasdair. "Critical Remarks on The Sources of the Self," Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 54 (1994), 187-90.
  • Miller, Paul Allen. Review of Sources of the Self in Southern Humanities Review, 25 (1991), 384-7.
  • Mulhall, Stephen. Review of Sources of the Self in Philosophical Books, 32 (1991), 129-36.
  • Nussbaum, Martha. "Our Pasts, Ourselves," [Review of Sources of the Self] New Republic, Apr. 9 1990, 27-34.
  • Rosenberg, Morris. Review of Sources of the Self in Society, 27/3 (March/April 1990), 92-3.
  • Schneewind, J.B. Review of Sources of the Self in Journal of Philosophy, 88 (1991), 422-6.
  • Schweiker, William. Review of Sources of the Self in Journal of Religion, 72 (1992), 560-72.
  • Sharpe, R. A. Review of Sources of the Self in Philosophical Quarterly, 42 (1992), 234-9.
  • Shklar, Judith N. Review of Sources of the Self in Political Theory, 19 (1991), 105-9.
  • Scialabba, George. Review of Sources of the Self in Dissent, 37 (Fall 1990), 534-7.
  • Sparshott, Francis. Review of Sources of the Self in Canadian Philosophical Reviews, 11 (1991), 74-7.
  • Staude, John-Raphael. "Language, Narration and the Self," [Review of Sources of the Self] History of the Human Sciences, 7 (1994), 141-9.
  • Steinfath, Holmer. "In den Tiefen des Selbst," [Review of Quellen des Selbst] in Philosophische Rundshau, 38 (1991), 103-11.
  • Teske, Nate. Review of Sources of the Self in Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 35 (1990), 159-65.
  • Waldron, Jeremy. "How We Learn to be Good," [Review of Sources of the Self] Times Literary Supplement, Mar. 23-29 1990), 325-6.
  • Walther, Rudolf. "Der produktive Trümmerhaufen: Charles Taylor philosophiert über die 'Entstehung der neuzeitlichen Identität'," [Review of Quellen des Selbst], Die Zeit, 45 (04/11/1994), Sachbuch, 27.
  • Weisberger, Adam. Review of Sources of the Self in Qualitative Sociology, 13 (1990), 284-7.
  • Williams, Bernard. "Republican and Galilean," [Review of Sources of the Self] New York Review of Books, Nov. 8 1990), 45-8.
  • Wolfe, Alan. Review of Sources of the Self in Contemporary Sociology, 19 (1990), 627-8.
  • Wood, Allen W. Review of Sources of the Self in Philosophical Review, 101 (1992), 621-6.
  • The Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity.Cambridge, Massachusetts : The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2016. 
  • Baggini, Julian. "How Words Shape our World: There is Gold in Charles Taylor's New Work on language—a Pity it's so Hard to Find." Prospect Magazine, April (March 24, 2016). http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/arts-and-books/how-words-shape-our-world.
  • Caldwell, Roger. "The Language Animal by Charles Taylor." Philosophy Now 125 (2018). https://philosophynow.org/issues/125/The_Language_Animal_by_Charles_Taylor
  • Carrol, Gareth. "Meaningful Enactment [Review of the Language Animal]." Review 31 (2016). http://review31.co.uk/article/view/384/meaningful-enactment.
  • Feser, Edward. "I Speak, therefore I Am [Review of the Language Animal]." National Review, no. May 23, 2016 (May 23, 2016).https://www.nationalreview.com/magazine/2016-05-23-0100/charles-taylor-the-language-animal.
  • Forster, Michael N. "[Review of] the Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity." Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (September 9, 2016). http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/the-language-animal-the-full-shape-of-the-human-linguistic-capacity/.
  • Fritzman, J. M. and Ella M. Crawford. "Language is Not Merely a Means of Communication [Review of the Language Animal]." Metascience (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-017-0256-0.
  • Gebhardt, Eike. "Sprache Als Fortschrittsmotor." Deutschlandfunk Kultur (2017). In German. http://www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de/charles-taylor-das-sprachbegabte-tier-sprache-als.1270.de.html?dram:article_id=401353.
  • Hübl, Philipp. "Sprache Kommt Vor Beschreibung: Charles Taylor Versucht, Uns Als Sprechende Tiere Richtig in Den Blick Zu Bekommen." Frankfurter Allgemeine (19 Juli, 2017). In German. https://www.buecher.de/shop/sprachphilosophie/das-sprachbegabte-tier/taylor-charles/products_products/detail/prod_id/46774099/#reviews.
  • McClorry, Brian. "Review of the Language Animal." Thinking Faith (2016). http://www.thinkingfaith.org/articles/language-animal.
  • McPherson, David. "I Speak, therefore I Am [Review of the Language Animal]." Philosophical Quarterly (Forthcoming).Link.
  • McWhorter, John. "Talking Heads: Charles Taylor on the Distinctiveness of Human Language." Books & Culture September/October (2016). http://www.booksandculture.com/articles/2016/sepoct/talking-heads.html.
  • O'Grady, Jane. "The Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity, by Charles Taylor." Times Higher Education, no. April 14 (April 14, 2016). https://www.timeshighereducation.com/books/review-the-language-animal-charles-taylor-belknap-press-harvard-university-press.
  • Prickett, Stephen. "[Review of] Charles Taylor, the Language Animal: The Full Shape of Human Linguistic Capacity." Theology 120, no. 3 (2017): 230-231.
  • Rée, Jonathan. "The Language Animal by Charles Taylor Review – how Words Change our World." The Guardian, no. April 27 (27 April, 2016).https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/apr/27/the-language-animal-the-full-shape-of-human-linguistic-capacity-charles-taylor-review.
  • Rixon, Gordon. "Book Review: The Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Language Capacity. by Charles Taylor." Theological Studies 78, no. 2 (2017): 511-512.
  • Smith, Nicholas H. "[Review of] Charles Taylor: The Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity." The Review of Politics 79, no. 03 (2017): 500-502.
  • Stalmaszczyk, Piotr. "[Review of] The Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity." Marx & Philosophy Review of Books (6 November, 2016). https://marxandphilosophy.org.uk/reviewofbooks/reviews/2016/2501.
  • Weigel, Peter. "TAYLOR, Charles. the Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity.(Book Review)." The Review of Metaphysics 71, no. 3 (March, 2018).
  • Wolf, W. Clark. "[Review of] Charles Taylor: The Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity." Phenomenological Reviews (November 15, 2016). http://reviews.ophen.org/2016/11/15/charles-taylor-the-language-animal-the-full-shape-of-the-human-linguistic-capacity/.
  • Varieties of Religion Today: William James Revisited (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2002)
  • Axtell, Guy. Review of Varieties of Religion Today, Philosophy in Review, 22 (2002), 372-4.
  • Bastien, Stéphane. Review of Varieties of Religion Today, in Horizons Philosophiques, 13.1 (Autumn 2002), 123-124.
  • Bellah, Robert N., "New-Time Religion" (Review of Varieties of Religion Today: William James Revisited), Christian Century, Vol. 119, Issue 11 (22 May 2002), pp. 20-26.
  • Boettcher, James W. Review of Varieties of Religion Today, in American Journal of Theology and Philosophy, 27.1 (January 2006), 117-121.
  • Browning, Don S., Review of Varieties of Religion Today: William James Revisited, Journal of Religion, Vol. 83, Issue 2 (April 2003), pp. 306-8.
  • Campbell, James, Review of Varieties of Religion Today: William James Revisited, Metaphilosophy, Vol. 37, Issue 1 (January 2006), pp. 130-146.
  • Cunningham, Lawrence S. "One Hundred Years On," [Review of Varieties of Religion Today] Review of Politics, 64 (2002), 750-2.
  • Curley, Augustine J., Review of Varieties of Religion Today: William James Revisited, Library Journal, Vol. 127, Issue 2 (1 February 2002), p 108.
  • Emberley, Peter. "William James Revisited, with Rich Results," [Review of Varieties of Religion Today] Globe and Mail, June 1 2002, D6-7.
  • Grimm, Stephen R. Review of Varieties of Religion Today: William James Revisited, International Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 43, Issue 1, pp. 120-3.
  • Harrold, Philip E. Review of Varieties of Religion Today: William James Revisited. Pro Ecclesia, 12 (Summer 2003), 375-377.
  • Hollinger, David A., Review of Varieties of Religion Today: William James Revisited, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Vol. 72, Issue 1 (March 2004), pp. 281-283.
  • Igrek, Apple Zefelius. Review of Varieties of Religion Today, in Essays in Philosophy, 6.2 (June 2005), 1-3.
  • Kingwell, Mark. "Two Concepts of Pluralism," [Critical Notice of Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism: The Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question, James Tully, ed.] Dialogue, 37 (1998), 375-86.
  • Levering, Matthew, Review of Varieties of Religion Today: William James Revisited, Modern Theology, Vol. 21, Issue 1 (Jan 2005), pp. 163-187.
  • Lubling, Yoram. Review of Varieties of Religion Today, in Bridges: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Theology, Philosophy, History, and Science, 11.3-4 (Fall-Winter 2004), 334-337.
  • Madarasz, Norman. “On the Sophistication and Limits of a Philosophy of Religion.” Review of Varieties of Religion Today: William James Revisited. European Legacy, 12 (February 2007), 87-92.
  • Mendoza-Mendez, Yolimar. Review of Las variedades de la religión hoy, in Laguna: Revista de Filosofia, 16 (2005), 189-192.
  • Meynell, Robert, Review of Varieties of Religion Today: William James Revisited, Canadian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 36, Issue 2 (June 2003), pp. 472-3.
  • Mos, Leendert P. Review of Varieties of Religion Today: William James Revisited, Theory and Psychology, Vol. 16, Issue 1 (February 2006), pp. 128-134.
  • Munk, Linda, Review of Varieties of Religion Today: William James Revisited, Letters in Canada, Vol. 73, Issue 1 (Winter 2003/4), pp. 246-247.
  • Naulty, Reg. Review of Varieties of Religion Today, in Sophia: International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Metaphysical Theology and Ethics, 43.2 (October 2004), 131-133.
  • O'Toole, Roger, Review of Varieties of Religion Today: William James Revisited, Journal of Contemporary Religion, Vol. 19, Issue 2 (May 2004), pp. 231-239.
  • Pihlström, Sami. Review of Varieties of Religion Today: William James Revisited, Charles Taylor, Transactions, 39(2), 2003, 342-347.
  • Quinn, Philip L. Review of Taylor, Charles, Varieties of Religion Today: William James Revisited, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2003.04.04, [Full Article]
  • Ricken, F. Review of Varieties of Religion Today, in Theologie und Philosophie: Vierteljahresschrift, 79.4 (2004), 453-454.
  • Sanz, Víctor. Review of Las variedades de la religión hoy, in Anuario Filosofico, 37.1 (2004), 271-273.

  • Reviews of Books About Charles Taylor:

  • Abbey, Ruth. Review of Fraser, Ian, Dialectics of the Self: Transcending Charles Taylor, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, 2007, [Full Article]
  • ----------.  "Difficult Terrain Ahead, Guide Recommended [Review of how (Not) to be Secular : Reading Charles Taylor by James K.A. Smith]." Los Angeles Review of Books (10 September, 2015).https://lareviewofbooks.org/review/difficult-terrain-ahead-guide-recommended.
  • Aguti, Andrea. Review of Charles Taylor: Ermeneutica del sé, etica e modernità, in Idee: Rivista di Filosofia, 52-53 (2003), 224-227.
  • Altini, Carlo. Review of Il soggetto e la comunità: Fenomenologia e metafisica dell'identità in Charles Taylor, in Iride: Filosofia e Discussione Pubblica, 11:25 (December 1998), 648-650. 3 p.
  • Baker, Deane. "'Condemned to meaning': a critical review of recent work on Charles Taylor," Review of Charles Taylor: Thinking and Living Deep Diversity, M Redhead, Charles Taylor: Meaning, Morals and Modernity, N H Smith, Charles Taylor Ruth Abbey, in Theoria, No 102, December 2003, 139-146
  • Barnsley, C. A. "Braak, Andre Van Der. Reimagining Zen in a Secular Age: Charles Taylor and Zen Buddhism in the West." CHOICE: Current Reviews for Academic Libraries 58, no. 11 (2021): 1090.
  • Barwell, Ismay. Review of Charles Taylor: Meaning, Morals and Modernity, in Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 82.2 (June 2004), 364-365.
  • Beam, Craig. Review of Perspectives on the Philosophy of Charles Taylor, in Maritain Studies/ Etudes Maritainiennes, 19 (2003), 107-108.
  • Bennett-Hunter, Guy. "Believe it Or Not.  (Review of Alasdair MacIntyre, Charles Taylor, and the Demise of Naturalism: Reunifying Political Theory and Social Science and Religion and Atheism: Beyond the Divide)." Times Literary Supplement, no. 5981 (November, 2017). In eng. https://www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/private/naturalism/.
  • Bernts, Ton. "Carroll, Anthony, En Staf Hellemans, Red. 2021. Modernity and Transcendence. A Dialogue with Charles Taylor." Religie & Samenleving 17, no. 1 (2022).
  • Bialystok, Lauren. Review of Meaning and Authenticity: Bernard Lonergan and Charles Taylor on the Drama of Authentic Human Existence, in Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy (Revue canadienne de philosophie continentale), 13.1 (Spring 2009), 144-147.
  • Bianchin, Matteo. Review of Verso un'ontologia dell'umano: Antropologia filosofica e filosofia politica in Charles Taylor,in La Societa degli Individui: Quadrimestrale di teoria sociale e storia delle idee, 14 (2002), 147-151.
  • Blattberg, Charles. "[Review of] Charles Taylor, Michael Polanyi and the Critique of Modernity: Pluralist and Emergentist Directions." Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (3 November, 2018). https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/charles-taylor-michael-polanyi-and-the-critique-of-modernity-pluralist-and-emergentist-directions/
  • Boring, WP. Review of Tayloring Reformed Epistemology: Charles Taylor, Alvin Plantinga and the De Jure Challenge to Christian Belief, in Religious Studies Review, 35.1 (2009): 32.
  • Burkholder, Bj. "How (Not) to be Secular: Reading Charles Taylor." Religious Studies Review 41, no. 1 (2015): 18-18
  • Burrell, David W. Review of Brian J. Braman, Meaning and Authenticity: Bernard Lonergan and Charles Taylor on the Drama of Authentic Human Existence, University of Toronto Press, 2008. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, 2008-06-04.
  • Cantirino, Matthew. "How (Not) to be Secular: Reading Charles Taylor.(BRIEFLY NOTED)." First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion and Public Life, no. 246 (2014): 63.
  • Christian, William. Review of George Grant: A Guide to His Thought, and: Northern Spirits: John Watson, George Grant, and Charles Taylor; Appropriations of Hegelian Political Thought, in The Canadian Historical Review 90.1 (2009), 190-193.
  • Christians, Clifford. Review of The Ethics of Authenticity in Journal of Communication, 44(1) (1994), 169-71.
  • Connolly, William E. Review of Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism: The Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question, James Tully, ed., American Political Science Review, 90/1 (1996), 181.
  • DeSouza, Nigel. Review of Northern Spirits: John Watson, George Grant, and Charles Taylor: Appropriations of Hegelian Political Thought, by Robert Sibley. University of Toronto Quarterly, 79.1 (2010): 398-400.
  • Dodd, Susan. "Canadian Idealism and the Philosophy of Freedom: C.B. Macpherson, George Grant and Charles Taylor." 47, no. 3 (2014): 627-629
  • Ebert, Howard J. "[Review of] Solidarity with the World: Charles Taylor and Hans Urs Von Balthasar on Faith, Modernity, and Catholic Mission. by Carolyn A. Chau." Horizons 46, no. 01 (2019): 143-145
  • Erdozain, Dominic. "Review of how (Not) to be Secular: Reading Charles Taylor." Political Theology 17, no. 3 (2016): 306-308.http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1462317X.2016.1161926?journalCode=ypot20
  • Ferguson, Michaele L. Review of Charles Taylor. Philosophy in Review 25 (February 2005), 1-3.
  • Franco, V.W. Review of Charles Taylor: Thinking and Living Deep Diversity , M. Redhead, Review of Metaphysics , 57 (3), March 2004, 646-649.
  • Gibbons, Michael T. "[Review of] Jason Blakely: Alasdair MacIntyre, Charles Taylor, and the Demise of Naturalism: Reunifying Political Theory and Social Science." The Review of Politics 80, no. 4 (2018): 709-711.
  • Gould, G.  Review of Tayloring Reformed Epistemology: Charles Taylor, Alvin Plantinga and the De Jure Challenge to Christian Belief, in Journal of Theological Studies, 59 (2008): 855-856.
  • Graham, Gordon. Review of Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism: The Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question, James Tully, ed., in Utilitas, 8 (1996), 131-4.
  • ----------. Review of Charles Taylor by Ruth Abbey, in Philosophy in Review (Comptes rendus philosophiques), 22.5 (October 2002), 311-312.
  • Gray, David B.
  • ----------. Review of Charles Taylor by Ruth Abbey, Philosophy in Review, 22 (2002), 311-2.
  • ----------.Review of Charles Taylor, by Ruth Abbey. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 28 (2, 2007), 167-168.
  • Hawk, William J. Review of Tayloring Reformed Epistemology: Charles Taylor, Alvin Plantinga and the De Jure Challenge to Christian Belief, in Review of Metaphysics, 62.4 (2009): 909-911.
  • Hedley, Douglas. "[Review of] Aspiring to Fullness in a Secular Age: Essays on Religion and Theology in the Work of Charles Taylor." Theology 119, no. 1 (2016): 41-42.
  • Heft, J. "[Review of] How (Not) to be Secular: Reading Charles Taylor."Review of Metaphysics 68, no. 2 (2014): 447-448
  • Hittinger, John. "[Review of] Renewing the Church in a Secular Age: Holistic Dialogue & Kenotic Vision." Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 30, no. 1 (2018): 213.
  • Hoelzl, Michael. "How (Not) to be Secular: Reading Charles Taylor." Journal of Adult Theological Education 13, no. 1 (2016): 83-83.
  • Höffe, Otfried. Review of Die Formen des Religiösen in der Gegenwart, in Zeitschrift fuer philosophische Forschung, 56.1 (January-March 2002), 165.
  • Ipperciel, Donald. Review of Charles Taylor. Thinking and Living Deep Diversity, Mark Redhead, Philosophy in Review, 23(4), 2003, 274-276.
  • Joustra, Robert. "Charles Taylor Explained [Review of how (Not) to be Secluar by James K. A. Smith]." Books & Culture 20, no. 5 (September; 2014/10, 2014): 17+. In English. http://www.booksandculture.com/articles/2014/sepoct/charles-taylor-explained.html
    Notes: 15.
  • Kaufmann, Andrew. "Review of Alasdair Macintyre, Charles Taylor, and the Demise of Naturalism by Jason Blakely. Notre Dame University Press, 2016." Voegelinview (2018, January 28). https://voegelinview.com/alasdair-macintyre-charles-taylor-demise-naturalism/.
  • Klassen, Justin D. "How (Not) to be Secular: Reading Charles Taylor (Book Review)." The Journal of Religion 96, no. 3 (2016): 427-428.
  • Ladwig, Bernd. Review of Identität und kulturelle Praxis. Politische Philosophie nach Charles Taylor by Hartmut Rosa , Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory , Vol. 11, Issue 1, pp. 140-148. [Link]
  • Laitinen, Arto. Review of Charles Taylor by Ruth Abbey in Radical Philosophy, 108 (July/Aug 2001), 52-3.
  • Lehman, Glen. .'Review of Charles Taylor: Thinking and Living Deep Diversity, by Mark Redhead, Australian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 38, Issue 2 (July 2003), pp. 375-377.
  • Long, Douglas G. Review of Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism: The Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question, James Tully, ed. in Canadian Journal of Political Science, 29, (1996), 617-18.
  • MacIntyre, Alasdair. Review of Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism: the Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question James Tully, ed. in Philosophical Quarterly, 46 (1996), 522-4.
  • MacKenzie, Iain. Review of Charles Taylor: Meaning, Morals and Modernity by Nicholas H. Smith and Charles Taylor: Thinking and Living Deep Diversity by Mark Redhead, Radical Philosophy, Sept./Oct. 2002.
  • Madigan, P. (2005) Review of Abbey (ed.) Contemporary Philosophy in Focus: Charles Taylor. Cambridge University Press, 2004. Heythrop Journal, 46 (2): April, pp. 272-273
  • Madigan, P. "Review of Dialectics of the Self: Transcending Charles Taylor. by Ian Fraser." Heythrop Journal 61, no. 1 (2020): 174-175.
  • Martin, Bernice. "Review of Aspiring to Fullness in a Secular Age: Essays on Religion and Theology in the Work of Charles Taylor." Journal of Contemporary Religion 30, no. 2 (2015): 323-325.
  • Martin, Bernice. "[Review of] Working with A Secular Age: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Charles Taylor’s Master Narrative." Journal of Contemporary Religion 32, no. 2 (2017): 331-333.
  • Martinuk, Matthew J M. Review of Dialectics of the Self: Transcending Charles Taylor, in Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy (Revue canadienne de philosophie continentale), 12.1 (Spring 2008), 182-184.
  • McEvoy, James. Review of Ruth Abbey, Charles Taylor, Philosophy Now Series (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, 2000), and Nicholas H Smith, Charles Taylor: Meaning, Morals and Modernity, Key Contemporary Thinkers Series (Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2002). The Australasian Catholic Record 80, no. 4 (2003), pp. 523-4.
  • Mendoza-Mendez, Yolimar. Review of Charles Taylor, penseur de la pluralité, in Laguna: Revista de Filosofia, 14 (2004), 213-215.
  • Review of Charles Taylor: Una antropología de la identidad, in Acta Philosophica: Pontificia Universita della Santa Croce, 12.2 (2003), 349-353.
  • Morrison, Glenn. Review of Tayloring Reformed Epistemology: Charles Taylor, Alvin Plantinga and the De Jure Challenge to Christian Belief, in Heythrop Journal: A Quarterly Review of Philosophy and Theology, 50.3 (2009): 512.
  • Nicolaysen, Bente Blanche, "En Mangfoldig og Enhetlig Veiviser Rundt i et Mangfoldig og Enhetlig Filosofisk Landskap [A Manifold and Unified Tour of the Manifold and Unified Philosophical Landscape]" Review of Self-Understanding and Freedom: An Introduction to Charles Taylor's Philosophy by Jorgen Fossland and Harald Grimen, Sosiologisk Tidsskrift, Vol. 10, Issue 3 (2002), pp. 261-273.
  • O’Regan, Cyril. "[Review of] Solidarity with the Word: Charles Taylor and Hans Urs Von Balthasar on Faith, Modernity, and Catholic Mission by Carolyn A. Chau." Modern Theology 34, no. 4 (2018): 695-699.
  • Patrick, Colin M., Review of Charles Taylor: Thinking and Living Deep Diversity by Mark Redhead, Ethics, Vol. 113, Issue 4 (July 2003), pp. 927-929.
  • Preece, Gordon. "Review Essay: James K.A. Smith - how Not to be Secular." Zadok Perspectives, no. 132 (2016): 9-14.
  • Pontuso, James F. Review of Contemporary Philosophy in Focus: Charles Taylor. (ed.) Ruth Abbey, Perspectives on Political Science, Vol. 34, Issue 1 (Winter 2005), p. 63.
  • Raposa, Michael L. "Review of: Alasdair MacIntyre, Charles Taylor, and the Demise of Naturalism: Reunifying Political Theory and Social Science. by Jason Blakely." Heythrop Journal 61, no. 1 (2020): 173-174.
  • Redhead, Mark."Introducing Charles Taylor," [Review of Charles Taylor by Ruth Abbey], Review of Politics, 64 (2002), 170-2.
  • ----------. Review of Dialectics of the Self: Transcending Charles Taylor, in Review of Politics, 70.4 (Fall 2008), 641-643.
  • Rengger, N. J. Review of Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism: The Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question, James Tully, ed., in History of Political Thought, 16 (1995), 444-7.
  • Schnell, Martin W. Review of Identität und kulturelle Praxis: Politische Philosophie nach Charles Taylor, in Philosophische Rundschau, 47.1 (March 2000), 84-86.
  • Shaffett, John E. "Smith's "how (Not) to be Secular: Reading Charles Taylor" (Book Review)." The Christian Librarian 57, no. 2 (2014): 176-177. http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1421&context=tcl
  • Sherman, Edward, Review of Contemporary Philosophy in Focus: Charles Taylor. (ed.) Ruth Abbey Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review, Vol. 45, Issue 2 (2006), pp. 381-385
  • Shin, Yoon. "[Review of] how (Not) to be Secular: Reading Charles Taylor, Written by James K.A. Smith." Pneuma 39, no. 1-2 (2017): 251-253.
  • Silar, Mario. Review of Ética y liberalismo: Reflexiones políticas a la luz de la filosofía de Charles Taylor, in Anuario Filosofico, 35.2 (2002), 504-506.
  • Simonian, Kristina. "Book Review: Ian Fraser, Dialectics of the Self: Transcending Charles Taylor." Sociology 47 (02; 2013/8, 2013): 205-207.
  • Simpson, Peter. Review of Charles Taylor by Ruth Abbey, in Review of Metaphysics, 56.1 (September 2002), 157-158.
  • Smith, Ted A. "How (Not) to be Secular: Reading Charles Taylor. (Book Review)." The Christian Century 132, no. 13 (2015): 42.
  • Stephens, Michael J., Review of Charles Taylor by Ruth Abbey, Ethics,Vol. 113, Issue 2 (January 2003), p. 456.
  • Stojanov, Krassimir. Review of Das Unbehagen an der Monderne, in Synthesis Philosophica, 11 (1996), 254-8.
  • Sullins, Paul. "Germain McKenzie, Interpreting Charles Taylor’s Social Theory on Religion and Secularization: A Comparative Study." Catholic Social Science Review 23 (2018): 352-353.
  • Tonelli, Debora, Review of Charles Taylor: Ermeneutica del sé, etica e modernità, in Teoria: Rivista di Filosofia, 24.1 (2004), 216-217.
  • Uberoi, J. P. S. Review of Social Theory as Practice in Contributions to Indian Sociology, 18 (1984), 148.
  • Vroom, H M. Review of Wat betekent religie vandaag? in Philosophia Reformata, 69.1 (2004), 109-110.
  • Weinstock, Daniel M. Review of Grandeur et misère de la modernité in Canadian Journal of Political Science, 26 (1993), 824-6.
  • Wenzel, Uwe Justus. “Lob der Vielfalt” [Review of Laizität und Gewissensfreiheit (Secularism and Freedom of Conscience)].  Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 5. November 2011.  [Full Article].
  • Wintersteiger, M. C. "Unfulfilled Modern? New Perspectives on the Work of Charles Taylor." Philosophisches Jahrbuch 120, no. 1 (2013): 200-202.

  • Yturbe, Corina. Review of Il soggetto e la comunità: Fenomenologia e metafisica dell'identità in Charles Taylor, in Revista Internacional de Filosofia Politica, 8 (December 1996), 203-209.