Charles Taylor Bibliography

Sort by Date | Sort A-Z

A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I-J-K | L | M | N | O-P-Q | R | S | T-U-V | W-X-Y-Z | Anonymous/Unknown |
- Kaczmarek, Agnieszka. "Samotnosc Czy Wspolnota- Dylemat Wspolczesnosci." Sprawy Narodowosciowe 23 (2003): 123-143. In Polish.
- ———. "Tesknota Za Tozsamoscia." ['Yearning for identity', in Troubles with identity, Czlowiek i Spoleczenstwo, vol. XXVI] In Klopoty z Tozsamoscia? Czlowiek i Spoleczenstwo, edited by Golka Marian. Pozna: Adam Mickiewicz University Press, 2006. In Polish.
- ———. "Charles Taylor Wobec Odwagi Duchowosci." In Fenomen Duchowo?Ci, edited by A. Grzegorczyk, J. Sojka and R. Koschany. Poznan: Adam Mickiewicz University Press, 2006. In Polish.
- ———. "Charles Taylor Kontra Postmodernizm." In Nowoczesnosc Po Ponowoczesnosci, edited by E. Rewers, G. Dziamski and Adam Mickiewicz. Poznan: University Press, 2007. In Polish.
- ———. "O Interpretacji Charlesa Taylora. Patrymonium Wilhelma Diltheya." In Filozofia i Etyka Interpretacji, edited by A. Kola and Andrzej Szahaj. Krakow: Universitas, 2007. In Polish.
- ———. "W Strone Spolecznych Wyobrazen." Tematy z Szewskiej 1 (2008): 131-136. In Polish.
- ———. "Between the Narrative of Secularization and the Narrative of Authenticity." In Charles Taylor's Vision of Modernity: Reconstructions and Interpretations, edited by Christopher Garbowski, Jan Paweł Hudzik and Jan Kłos. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Pub., 2009. 104-117.
- ———. "Beyond the Unbearable Lightness..." REA: A Journal of Religion, Education and the Arts 7 (2011). http://rea.materdei.ie/media/Issue%207/REA%20Issue%207%20-%20Kaczmarek.pdf.
- ———. "Kultura Solidarności-Kultura Autentyczności." In Kultura Solidarności, edited by K. Ciechorska-Kulesza, R. Kossakowski and P. Luczeczko. Gdansk: Orbis Exterior, 2011. In Polish.
- ———. Nowoczesna Autentyczność : Charles Taylor Wobec Dylematów Współczesności. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie, 2011. In Polish. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/804419157.
- Kaelin, Eugene F. "Review of Hegel." Social Theory and Practice 5 (1979): 264-265.
- Kahn Nisser, S. "Toward a Unity of Ethics and Practice : Interpreting Inclusion and Diversity." International Studies Review 13, no. 3 (2011): 387-410.
- Kahn, Joel S. "Understanding: Between Belief and Unbelief." The Australian Journal of Anthropology 22, no. 1 (2011): 76-88. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1757-6547.2011.00108.x/abstract.
  Abstract:
  
  This paper addresses issues raised in Taylor’s work concerning how communities may come to work in normatively secular ways. for Taylor, it seems to be sufficient for believers (and nonbelievers) to acknowledge that their own ‘construals’ are not shared by everyone. however, this leaves open the question of how the acknowledgement of difference may be turned into respect. A common strategy is to require that faith-based truth claims are ‘bracketed out’, treating secular and religious discourse as ‘nonoverlapping magisteria’. this secularising strategy is, however, problematic on a number of counts. the article makes a case for a less confrontational, more cosmopolitan conversation between secular and religious reason in a postsecular age, examining in particular the possibilities for conversation between science and mysticism. it concludes that it is possible to retain a commitment to naturalism and yet also accept some of the most mystical of propositions, thereby establishing a bridge between ‘secular’ and ‘religious’ forms of reasoning.
- Kainz, Howard P. and Thomas Luzow. "Recent Work on Hegel." American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (1979): 273-284.
- Kalleberg, Arthur L. "Theories of Explanation." Polity 5, no. 3 (Spring, 1973): 386-399. In English. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3234056.
- Kalpokas, Daniel. "¿Realismo o Pragmatismo? El Debate Rorty Vs Taylor Sobre Las Implicaciones De La Superación De La Epistemologia." Topicos: Revista De Filosofia (Mexico), no. 20 (2001): 59-106. In Spanish.
  Abstract:
  This paper analyses the discussion between Taylor and Rorty about the results of overcoming epistemology. firstly, the article summarizes the Taylor's criticism to Rorty. secondly, it considers the Rortyan response to Taylor and his own arguments against Taylor's realism. the main disagreements between Rorty and Taylor are as follows: (1) Rorty says that pragmatism overcomes epistemology; Taylor, on the contrary, says that it is an uncompromising realism which overcomes the mainstream epistemological tradition; (2) they disagree about how to understand vocabularies: Taylor claims that it is always possible to know what vocabulary describes better the world, but Rorty seems to claim that vocabularies are incommensurable; (3) Taylor thinks of truth as a correspondence relation to the world; Rorty, however, dismisses that conception. thirdly, it is made an evaluation of the arguments offered by each side. especially, that section argues against the Rortyan conception of language games and its nonrealistic consequences. finally, it is suggested a reconsideration of the dichotomy realism-pragmatism.
- Kaplan, Grant. "Widening the Dialectic: Secularity and Christianity in Conversation." In Teaching Theology in the 21st Century: Essays by the Students of Michael J. Buckley S.J., edited by Anna Moreland and Joseph Curran. Crossroad/Herder: C21 Series, 2012.
  Notes: Also published in lonergan workshop journal 24 (2010): 131-66.
- Karmis, Dimitrios. "Cultures Autochtones Et Libéralisme Au Canada: Les Vertus Médiatrices Du Communautarisme Libéral De Charles Taylor." Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue Canadienne De Science Politique 26 (1993): 69-96. In French.
- Karolis, Alexander C. "Sense in Competing Narratives of Secularization: Charles Taylor and Jean-Luc Nancy." Sophia: International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Metaphysical Theology and Ethics (April, 2013): 1-22.
  Abstract:
  
  In this article, using the recent work by Charles Taylor in A secular age as my point of departure, I will argue that jean-luc nancy enables us to think past the competing binary of atheistic and religious experience and allows us to surpass the present narratives of secularism. In A secular age, Taylor himself seeks a middle ground between atheism and religion, arguing that it is possible to open ourselves to the cross-pressures of modern existence that find us caught between scientific atheism and a need for spiritual and religious guidance. here, Taylor finds a way of picturing ourselves within a secular age, remaining faithful to scientific rationalism, but still open to religion and a sense of a higher good. however, as I shall demonstrate, in his thesis Taylor misrepresents the continental philosophical tradition (particularly Nietzsche and post-structuralism) that has itself sought to understand these cross-pressures of existence. taking this misrepresentation, and specifically his reductive and colloquial analysis of Nietzsche, camus, and derrida, as my point of departure, I provide an alternative manner of thinking through the work of these writers, one that leads to a detailed analysis of jean-luc nancy and his project the deconstruction of christianity. in this analysis I argue that nancy provides a manner of thinking that remains open and allows an experience of freedom, without seeking to close that sense of openness with explanation, nor maintaining that sense of openness with a conception of the divine.
- Karzulovic, Juan Ormeño. "Conflicto, Convergencia y Reconocimiento." Laguna: Revista De Filosofia 16 (2005): 145-154. In Spanish.
  Abstract:
  Here I want to discuss some of the thesis presented by Charles Taylor in his 'politics of recognition' with the aim of establishing a general point of view about the notion of recognition and its potential usefulness -- or not -- to the political philosophy. I am going to use Taylor's proposal because it is relatively known. so that I will reconstruct -- in my own way -- the context where Taylor's discussion is developed; then I will focus on an aspect of his strategy and, finally, I will discuss, freely and explicitly, the topic of recognition in general.
- Kashima, Yoshihisa. "Is Culture a Problem for Social Psychology." Asian Journal of Social Psychology 8 (April, 2005): 19-38.
- Kaufmann, Walter. "Coming to Terms with Hegel [Review of Hegel]." Times Literary Supplement (Jan. 2, 1976): 13-14.
- Kavanaugh, John. "On the Possibility of a Post-Modern Anthropology." Modern Schoolman 70 (1993): 305-313.
- Kavka, Martin. "What is Immanent in Judaism? Transcending "A Secular Age"." The Journal of Religious Ethics 40, no. 1 (March, 2012): 123-137. In English. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41348823.
  Abstract:
  This essay takes on the implicit claim in Taylor's A secular age, forecast in some of his earlier writings, that the desire for a meaningful life can never be satisfied in this life. as a result, A secular age is suffused with a tragic view of existence; its love of narratives of religious longing makes no sense otherwise. yet there are other models of religion that lend meaning to existence, and in the majority of this essay, I take up one model that Taylor ignores in A secular age, namely that of a God who is immanent in social life throughout religious law. turning to maimonides's account of divine law in the guide of the perplexed, I argue that a vision of the divine law that is divine because of its effects in society, namely the promotion of human welfare, can mend the relations between varying kinds of believers and unbelievers in a way that Taylor thinks is impossible. A God who commands laws is a God who inaugurates an "anthropocentric shift" long before current understandings of secularization see it beginning.
- ———. "Dilemmas and Connections: Selected Essays. by Charles Taylor. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University, 2011. 414 Pp. $39.95 Cloth." Church History: Studies in Christianity and Culture 81, no. 03 (2012): 747. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=8654384.
- Kearney, Richard. "Review of Sources of the Self." Hermathena, no. 149 (Winter, 1990): 121-123. In English. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23041176.
- Kearns, Alan J. "Codes of Ethics in a Secular Age: Loss Or Empowerment of Moral Agency?" In The Taylor Effect: Responding to A Secular Age, edited by Ian Leask, 2010. 146-159.
- Kearns, Alan J., Dónald O'Mathúna P., and P. A. Scott. "Diagnostic Self-Testing: Autonomous Choices and Relational Responsibilities." Bioethics 24, no. 4 (May, 2010): 199-207.
  Abstract:
  We argue that the development of diagnostic tools, especially for home use, will heighten a number of ethical challenges. this paper will explore some of the ethical implications of home-based self-testing diagnostic devices for the autonomous and relational dimensions of the person. this will be facilitated by examining the impact of diagnostic devices for individual autonomy, for the delivery of accurate diagnosis and for the personal significance of the information for the user. the latter will be examined using Charles Taylor's view of personhood and his emphasis on human agency and interpretation. while the ethical issues are not necessarily new, the development of home-based self-testing diagnostic devices will make issues regarding autonomy, accuracy of information and personal significance more and more demanding. this will be the case particularly when an individual's autonomous choices come into conflict with the person's relational responsibilities. (edited).
- Keba, Andre J. "Charles Taylor and the Possibility of Individualism about Identity." Politicka Misao 47, no. 1 (February, 2010): 13-30.
- Keding, Gesche. "Time Norms as Strong Evaluations — A Step Towards a Critique of Time Norms." Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory 23, no. 3 (2016): 448-458.
- ———. "Metaphors and Paradigms of the Language Animal—or—The Advantage of Seeing “Time is a Resource” as a Paradigm." Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 56, no. 4 (2017): 693-704. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217317000762.
  Abstract:
  One of the features of an encompassing account of language that Charles Taylor examines in Chapter Five, “The Figuring Dimension of Language,” of The Language Animal is a special kind of metaphor, which is rooted in the embodiment of humans. Their perspective-taking, their intuition of position in space, etc., provide ‘structural templates’ for thinking and leave their traces in their expressions. Taylor compares these metaphors with paradigms. My paper discusses the differences between the two. Taylor’s example ‘Time Is a Resource’ is understood more deeply if seen as a paradigm, i.e., a set of beliefs and practices, instead of as a ‘structural template,’ i.e., rooted in embodiment.
- ——— and Ulf Bohmann. "Introduction to the Book Symposium on the Language Animal by Charles Taylor." Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 56, no. 4 (2017): 613-620. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217317000804.
- Kelly, Duncan. "Modern Social Imaginaries / the Modern Self in the Labyrinth : Politics and the Entrapment Imagination." Max Weber Studies 8, no. 1 (2008): 111-117.
- Kelly, Erin. "Personal Concern." Canadian Journal of Philosophy 30, no. 1 (2000): 115-136.
- Kelly, George Armstrong. "Review of Hegel." Political Theory 4, no. 3 (Aug., 1976): 377-381. In English. http://www.jstor.org/stable/190753.
- Kelly, Oliver. "Beyond Recognition: Witnessing Ethics." Philosophy Today 44, no. 1 (2000): 31-43.
- Kelly, R. A. "Public Theology and the Modern Social Imaginary." Dialog: A Journal of Theology 50, no. 2 (2011): 162-173.
- Kelsay, John. "Plurality, Pluralism, and Comparative Ethics: A Review Essay." The Journal of Religious Ethics 24, no. 2 (Fall, 1996): 403-428. In English. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40015216.
  Abstract:
  Recent discussions of religious, cultural, and/or moral diversity raise questions relevant to the descriptive and normative aims of students of religious ethics. in conversation with several illustrative works, the author takes up (1) issues of terminology, (2) explanations or classifications of types and origins of plurality and pluralism, (3) the relations between pluralism as a normative theory and the aims of a liberal state, and (4) the import of an emphasis on plurality or pluralism for the comparative study of religious ethics.
- Kennedy, Leonard A. "Review of the Ethics of Authenticity." American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 67 (1993): 400-401.
- Kennedy, Roger. "Review of Sources of the Self." Free Associations 3 (1992): 297-305.
- Kennedy, Terence. "Charles Taylor on Authenticity and the Morality of Modernity." Studia Moralia 32 (1993): 400-401.
- ———. "Charles Taylor on Violence and Social Structure." In Religions, Diversity and Conflict, edited by Edward Foley. Münster, Westf: LIT, 2011.
- Kerby, A. P. "Emotions, Selves, Narratives, and Taylor." De Philosophia 8 (1988): 1-19.
  Abstract:
  This paper explores and develops the thesis that human experience and selfhood have a fundamentally narrative nature, and attempts to substantiate this claim by discovering in our emotional life an ubiquitous and essential narrative ingredient. use is made throughout of Charles Taylor's work on language and emotion. it is claimed that the higher, or self-reflective, emotions can be properly understood only when considered in the context and as the result of a person's self-narration.
- ———. Narrative and the Self. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991.
- Kerr, Donald. "Devoid of Community: Examining Conceptions of Autonomy in Education." Educational Theory 52, no. 1 (Dec., 2002): 13-25.
  Abstract:
  This paper examines conceptions of autonomy put forward by R. F. dearden, eamonn callan and kenneth strike. the fact that these conceptions do not always agree with one another suggests that problems remain, both in conceptualizing autonomy and in understanding its role in liberal and educational theory. in particular, by considering whether these descriptions could be applied to a solitary individual it examines the extent to which these conceptions succumb to the charge that they describe persons free of any social connections and encumbrances. I argue that conceptions that are vulnerable to this charge are mistaken in that way. that there are conceptions that succeed in this manner suggests there may indeed be a successful liberal response to such criticisms of the concept. among other conclusions I argue that this makes us reconsider how we value autonomy.
- Kerr, Fergus. "Charles Taylor's Moral Ontology of the Self." In Immortal Longings: Versions of Transcending Humanity. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1997. 136-158.
- ———. "The Self and the Good: Charles Taylor's Moral Ontology." In Charles Taylor, edited by Ruth Abbey. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004. 84-104.
- ———. "Unstilled Human Longings." The Tablet 20 September (2007). http://www.thetablet.co.uk/review/360.
- ———. "Comment: Christians in a Secular Age." New Blackfriars 91, no. 1036 (2010): 625-626. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nbfr.2010.91.issue-1036/issuetoc
  Notes: Symposium on Charles Taylor with his responses.
- ———. "How Much can a Philosopher do?" Modern Theology 26, no. 3 (2010): 321-336. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0025.2010.01610.x/abstract.
  Abstract:
  Some philosophers (stephen mulhall, peter winch, and D.Z. phillips) complained that in sources of the self Charles Taylor allowed his christian allegiance to ?peep through?, whereas, as a philosopher, he should have done justice to other views than his own, without taking sides. they would no doubt have protested even more about A secular age. reading these two books in the context of his previous work it becomes hard to accuse Taylor of failing to expound fairly views he opposes, especially regarding british empiricism. moreover, how disinterested can critical genealogy of religion in the west ever be?
  Notes: Symposium: Charles Taylor, A Secular Age.
- Keshen, Richard. "Review of the Ethics of Authenticity." Canadian Philosophical Reviews 14 (1994): 423-425.
- Key, Rafael. "Multiculturalismo, Política y Educación." Episteme NS: Revista Del Instituto De Filosofia De La Universidad Central De Venezuela 22, no. 2 (July, 2002): 19-31. In Spanish.
  Abstract:
  Recent demands for the recognition of equal value of different identities, represented by race, sex, ethnical groups or culture, show the necessity of a new way in which the principles of democratic and universalist recognition: Dignity and respect, should be understood, foremost in what regards to education. in particular, due Charles Taylor's analysis, we became aware of the fact that the form of recognition, which demands objectivity, requires a communicative interaction between different cultures. we conclude considering that a universalist policy of equal recognition must include, additionally to the generally admitted basic rights, the right to suppose that the traditional culture of every citizen has an equal value in a not-comparative sense.
- Kiernan, V. G. "Review of Hegel and Modern Society." History 65 (1980): 70.
- Kiewitt, Stefanie. Leben, Bewusstsein Und Verantwortung Bei Charles Taylor : Ethische Reflexionen Zum Neuro-Enhancement. Würzburg : Ergon Verlag, 2016. In German.
- Killius, Markus. "The Ambivalence of Charles Taylor’s Philosophy: What Makes our Everyday Reality Real?" Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 56, no. 4 (2017): 669-679. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217317000932.
  Abstract:
  In The Language Animal, Charles Taylor’s struggle to provide a theoretical framework for his narration of the self finally becomes obvious. About 30 years after he wrote his great and fascinating Sources of the Self, Taylor closes the gap between the self as a radical being-in-the-world and its analytical premises. Even if the main topic of Taylor’s new book may seem to be only a comparison of what he calls ‘HHH-theory’ and ‘HLC-theory,’ there are two other authors, the combination of whose ideas clarifies not only his approach to language but also to his concept of ‘reality’ as such: Gottlob Frege and Ludwig Wittgenstein.
- Kilpinen, Erkki. "Joas, Bourdieu, Taylor." Acta Sociologica 45, no. 1 (2002): 57-62. In English. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4194909.
- Kim, David Kyuman. Melancholic Freedom: Agency and the Spirit of Politics, vol. August. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/ReligionTheology/PhilosophyofReligion/?view=usa&ci=9780195319828.
- Kim, Do Kyun. "Review of Modern Social Imaginaries." Howard Journal of Communications 17, no. 1 (Jan-Mar, 2006): 75-78.
- 김정현 Kim Jung Hyun. "다문화주의와 상호문화주의의 차이에 대한 한 해석: 찰스 테일러의 견해를 중심으로." 코기토, no. 82 (2017): 70-99. In Korean.
  Abstract:
  This paper analyzes the characteristics of interculturalism in relation to multiculturalism. Multiculturalism is often criticized for the reason that it ghettoizes cultural minorities and hinders them from integrating into main stream society. Taking the same stance, Interculturalism suggests itself as a model which aims at both the recognition of diversity and integration.
  To understand the relationship between multiculturalism and interculturalism, we go through Charles Taylor. He suggests to use the term ‘multiculturalism’ on two levels : as a generic term and as a sub term. As a generic one, it is for the ensemble of policies introduced with the combined goals of recognizing diversity, fostering integration and producing/maintaining equality. As a sub one, it designates a sub-species of such policies, to be contrasted with another sub-species, called ‘intercultural’. Following his suggestion, we can have a proper understanding of the relationship between them while reducing the possible confusion.
  Francophone Quebec society prefers interculturalism, while anglophone Canada prefers multiculturalism. This reflects each region’s concerns and situations. ‘Interculturalism’ recognizes official culture maintained by the medium of French, while ‘multiculturalism’ does not. Anglophone Canadian regards Quebec’s such a policy as refusing the recognition of cultural diversity. However, Quebecer considers that as a way of realization of multiculturalism as a generic term in Confederation.
  When we try to understand properly the relationship between multiculturalism and interculturalism, it is important to consider the reason why each model is preferred in each relevant region. On the basis of understanding of each model’s local and historical aspects, we can have a proper recognition of those models and examine the validity of criticism on multiculturalism by interculturalism.
- Kingwell, Mark. "Two Concepts of Pluralism, [Critical Notice of Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism: The Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question, James Tully, Ed.]." Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 37, no. 2 (March, 1998): 375-386.
- Kinjo, Katsuya. "An Indecent Call from a Man: Narrative as Revelation of Framework." Pragmatics 6, no. 4 (1996). http://elanguage.net/journals/index.php/pragmatics/article/view/422/354.
- Kinsey, John. "Charles Taylor, 'A Secular Age'." Philosophical Investigations 33, no. 1 (2010): 75-81.
- ———. "Dilemmas and Connections: Selected Essays - by Charles Taylor." Philosophical Investigations 36, no. 3 (07, 2013): 269-275.
- Kirby, Joseph Morrill. "The Spiritual Meaning of Technological Evolution to Life." Cosmos and History : The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 9, no. 1 (2013): 282.
  Abstract:
  There are two senses by which technology can be seen as a new layer of living complexity: first, while biological systems can only appropriate 24 of the 91 natural elements into their metabolic processes, technological systems can imbue complex form into all 91 elements; second, this added capacity gives life the potential to expand across its current limit – the atmosphere of the Earth – in the same way as it expanded from the oceans to the land some five hundred million years ago. This essay explores what such an understanding of life and technology might mean to us, humanity, in the context of our current ecological and social catastrophe.
- Kirk, J. A. ""A Secular Age" in a Mission Perspective: A Review Article." Transformation 28, no. 3 (July, 2011): 172-181. http://trn.sagepub.com/content/28/3/17.
- Kitchen, Gary. "Charles Taylor: The Malaises of Modernity and the Moral Sources of the Self." Philosophy and Social Criticism 25, no. 3 (May, 1999): 29-55.
  Abstract:
  This paper examines Taylor's moral realism in the light of his criticisms of 'our subjectivist civilization'. I argue that his work is valuable in its stress on the link between identity and moral judgment and its picture of human beings as 'strong evaluators', but I dispute that these considerations lead to moral realism if this is taken to include a claim to truth. specifically, I argue that Taylor's 'best account' principle may generate radical inconsistency and his depiction of practical reason does not lead to any hope of convergence. his own theism serves to illustrate these difficulties.
- Kivivuoni, Janne. "Review of the Ethics of Authenticity." Sosiologia 30 (1993): 303-304.
- Klasẖrster, Manuel. "Die Offenheit Des Subjekts Für Offenbarung : Charles Taylors Analyse Der Moderne in "A Secular Age"." In Zwischen Subjektivität Und Offenbarung : Gegenwärtige Ansätze Systematischer Theologie, edited by Benjamin Dahlke and Bernd Irlenborn. Freiburg: Herder, 2021. In German.
- Klassen, Chris. "Nature Religion and the Ethics of Authenticity: 'I Won't Speak for all of You'." Environmental Ethics: An Interdisciplinary Journal Dedicated to the Philosophical Aspects of Environmental Problems 33, no. 3 (Sept., 2011): 295-305.
  Abstract:
  In 'the ethics of authenticity', Charles Taylor speaks of the malaises of modernity in which individualism and authenticity lose their moral force by becoming simply a type of relativism and/or soft despotism. in contrast, Taylor suggests that individualism and authenticity need to be understood as holding moral salience through the dialogical nature of human life and the external horizons of meaning necessary to the very formulation of the authentic self. individual choice only makes sense when some choices are more socially, politically, and/or ethically valuable than others. Taylor's discussion of the ethics of authenticity can be applied to the religious movement of contemporary paganism and the marked hesitation on the part of pagans to claim any expected responsibility on the part of other pagans toward nature and/or the environment.
- Klassen, Justin D. "The Affirmation of Existential Life in Charles Taylor’s A Secular Age." In Aspiring to Fullness in a Secular Age: Essays on Religion and Theology in the Work of Charles Taylor, edited by Carlos Colorado and Justin D. Klassen. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2014. 13-38. http://undpress.nd.edu/books/P03114.
- ———. "How (Not) to be Secular: Reading Charles Taylor (Book Review)." The Journal of Religion 96, no. 3 (2016): 427-428.
- Klaushofer, Alexandra. "Faith Beyond Nihilism: The Retrieval of Theism in Milbank and Taylor." Heythrop Journal 40, no. 2 (April, 1999): 135-149.
- Kleger, Heinz. "Moderne Bürgerreligion." In Unerfüllte Moderne? - Neue Perspektiven Auf Das Werk Von Charles Taylor, edited by Michael Kühnlein and Matthias Lutz-Bachmann. Berlin: Suhrkamp / Insel, 2011. 493-528. In German.
- Klemm, Matthias. "Sprachsoziologie Revisited: Von Der Machtkritik Zurück Zur Sprache Als Lebensform?" Soziologische Revue 43, no. 1 (2020): 55-63.
  Abstract:
  A review essay covering books by 1) Pierre Bourdieu, Sprache. Schriften zur Kultursoziologie 1. (2017) and 2) Charles Taylor, Das sprachbegabte Tier. Grundzüge des menschlichen Sprachvermögens (2017).
- Klevesath, Lino and Walter Reese-Schäfer. "Eine Moralische Überlastung Von Religion. Gottebenbildlichkeit Als Problematische Motivationsform Altruistischen Handelns." In Unerfüllte Moderne? - Neue Perspektiven Auf Das Werk Von Charles Taylor, edited by Michael Kühnlein and Matthias Lutz-Bachmann. Berlin: Suhrkamp / Insel, 2011. 446-474. In German.
- Klink, A. "Goed, Kwaad En De Affirmatie Van Het Leven." Philosophia Reformata 67, no. 1 (2002): 65-79. In Dutch.
- Kłoczowski OP, o. Jan Andrzej. "Czy Wiara to Religia?" Miesięcznik "Znak" 665 (October, 2010). In Polish. http://www.miesiecznik.znak.com.pl/index.php?tekst=4170
  Notes: Koniec religii czy różne ścieżki wiary? : debata z Charlesem Taylorem.
- Kłos, Jan. "The Three Fellow-Wanderers, Or Three Strategies for Understanding." In Charles Taylor's Vision of Modernity: Reconstructions and Interpretations, edited by Christopher Garbowski, Jan Paweł Hudzik and Jan Kłos. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Pub., 2009. 118-139.
- Knapp, Christopher. "Species Inegalitarianism as a Matter of Principle." Journal of Applied Philosophy 26, no. 2 (May, 2009): 174-189.
  Abstract:
  Most critics of species egalitarianism point to its counterintuitive implications in particular cases. but this argumentative strategy is vulnerable to the response that our intuitions should give way in the face of arguments showing that species egalitarianism is required by our deepest, most fundamental moral principles. in this article, I develop an argument against deontological versions of species egalitarianism on its own terms. appealing to the fundamental moral ideal of proportionality, I show that deontological species egalitarianism is morally objectionable as a matter of principle: It is committed to treating two individuals who are extraordinarily similar in morally relevant respects drastically differently. I then illustrate how an inegalitarian account of moral standing might be incorporated into traditional moral theories in ways that make them far more promising as theories of our obligations to the nonhuman world.
- Knapp, Markus. "Gott in Säkularer Gesellschaft. Zum Gottesverständnis in Charles Taylors Philosophie Der Religion." In Unerfüllte Moderne? - Neue Perspektiven Auf Das Werk Von Charles Taylor, edited by Michael Kühnlein and Matthias Lutz-Bachmann. Berlin: Suhrkamp / Insel, 2011. In German.
- Knight, Christopher J. "Charles Taylor's A Secular Age: The Apophatic Impulse." In Charles Taylor's Vision of Modernity: Reconstructions and Interpretations, edited by Christopher Garbowski, Jan Paweł Hudzik and Jan Kłos. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Pub., 2009. 64-86.
- Koch, Anton Friedrich. "Review of Quellen Des Selbst: Die Entstehung Der Neuzeitlichen Identitèt." Dialektik: Zeitschrift Für Kulturphilosophie 3 (1995): 157-163. In German.
- Kockelman, P. "Value is Life Under an Interpretation: Existential Commitments, Instrumental Reasons and Disorienting Metaphors." Anthropological Theory 10, no. 1-2 (2010): 149-162.
- Koczanowicz, Leszek. "How is Critical Community Possible?" In Charles Taylor's Vision of Modernity: Reconstructions and Interpretations, edited by Christopher Garbowski, Jan Paweł Hudzik and Jan Kłos. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Pub., 2009. 165-173.
- Koenig, Matthias. "Jenseits Des Sakularisierungsparadigmas? Eine Auseinandersetzung Mit Charles Taylor." Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie 63, no. 4 (2011): 649-673. In German.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11577-011-0150-5#.
  Abstract:
  Mit seinem Buch A Secular Age hat der Sozialphilosoph Charles Taylor einen aufsehenerregenden Alternativentwurf zum klassischen Säkularisierungsparadigma vorgelegt. Das Ziel dieses Artikels ist es, ihn auf die religionssoziologische Diskussion um Säkularisierung und deren verschiedenen Teilprozesse zu beziehen. Es werden drei Ansprüche formuliert, an denen Alternativentwürfe zu messen sind. Erstens müssen sie verständlich machen, warum „Säkularität“ zu einer so wichtigen Selbstbeschreibungskategorie moderner Gesellschaften werden konnte. Zweitens müssen sie das in Jahrzenten religionssoziologischer Forschung akkumulierte Wissen über Entkirchlichung mit den von Kritikern hervorgehobenen Befunden genuin moderner religiöser Vitalität integrieren. Und drittens müssen sie die vielfältigen Muster der Differenzierung religiöser und politischer Ordnung im Gesellschafts- und Kulturvergleich beschreiben und erklären können. In kritischer Auseinandersetzung mit Taylor werden Grenzen kulturalistischer Theorien moderner Säkularität und bleibende Aufgaben historisch-soziologischer Forschung zu Religion in der Moderne identifiziert. Charles Taylor's book A Secular Age is a widely appraised alternative to the classical paradigm of secularization theory. This article situates this alternative theory within the debate of sociology of religion on secularization and its sub-components. Three requirements are formulated that alternative conceptions would have to met. First, they need to understand why „secularity" became such a prominent category of self interpretation in modem societies. Second, they have to be able to integrate years of cumulative sociological research on sub-processes of secularization with findings on genuinely modem forms of religious vitality emphasized by the classical paradigm's critics. And in light of on-going debates over multiple modernities, they would need to describe and explain the varieties of differentiation in societal and cultural comparison. In critical discussion of Charles Taylor's contribution, the limits of culturalist theories of modem secularity as well as some tasks for historical-sociological research on religion in modernity are identified. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved)(journal abstract).
- Konstan, David. "Democritus the Physicist." Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 33, no. 2 (June, 2000): 125-144.
  Abstract:
  This article reviews C.C.W. Taylor, 'the atomists: Leucippus and democritus' (toronto 1999), which offers greek texts along with translation and commentary. Taylor proposes several novel interpretations of ancient atomism, e.g., that atoms cannot touch, that there are forces of attraction and repulsion between atoms, that the effluences emitted by living beings are alive, and that democritus was an intellectual skeptic and ethical egoist. while recognizing the ingeniousness and importance of Taylor's arguments, the review offers critical evaluations of these and other hypotheses, and proposes some suggestions of its own, e.g., that soul atoms may qualify as mathematical minima.
- Koppelman, Andrew. "Is it Fair to Give Religion Special Treatment?" University of Illinois Law Review (2006): 571-603.
- ———. "Naked Strong Evaluation." Dissent 56, no. 1 (Winter 2009, 2009): 105-109.
- ———. "Keep it Vague: The Many Meanings of Religious Freedom." Commonweal (11/04, 2013). https://www.commonwealmagazine.org/keep-it-vague.
- Kotkavirta, Jussi. "Charles Taylor and the Concept of a Person." Acta Philosophica Fennica 71 (2002): 65-81.
- Kramer, Hans Martin. "Reconceiving the Secular in Early Meiji Japan: Shimaji Mokurai, Buddhism, Shinto, and the Nation." Japan Review: Journal of the International Research Center for Japanese Studies, no. 30 (2017): 63-77. In eng.
- Kramer, Michael P. "The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere." Common Knowledge 19, no. 1 (Winter, 2013): 148-148.
- Krase, Jerome. "Ethnic Crossroads: Visualizing Urban Narratives." In Orte Der Diversität, edited by Cristina Allemann-Ghionda and Wolf-Dietrich BukowVS Verlag, 2011.
- Kreber, Carolin, Monika Klampfleitner, Velda McCune, Sian Bayne, and Miesbeth Knottenbelt. "“What do You Mean by ‘Authentic?’ A Comparative Review of the Literature on Conceptions of Authenticity in Teaching." Adult Education Quarterly: A Journal of Research and Theory 58 (November, 2007): 22-43.
- Kreber, Carolin. "Courage and Compassion in the Striving for Authenticity: States of Complacency, Compliance, and Contestation." Adult Education Quarterly: A Journal of Research and Theory 60, no. 2 (2010): 177-198. In English. http://aeq.sagepub.com/content/60/2/177.short.
  Abstract:
  Synthesising martha Nussbaum's study of the emotions and the capabilities approach to human development with Charles Taylor's claim that authentic identities ought to be constructed dialogically against "horizons of significance," the author identifies critical features of authenticity that are then applied to the context of adult educators, learners, and pedagogies. with the purpose of surfacing the context-transcendent structure underlying the experience of struggling for authenticity, the article takes as its point of departure the context of coming out about one's sexual orientation. the metaphor of "coming out" is subsequently extended to the process of striving for authenticity also in other contexts. this striving involves overcoming complacency and compliance and engaging in contestation, has both a psychological and sociological dimension, and is associated with the civic virtues of courage and compassion. the author also speculates on why authenticity is perceived as a timely notion by many adult and higher education professionals.
- Krebs, Andreas. "Die Gebrochenheit Des (Ir-)Religiösen Subjekts. Glaube, Nichtglaube Und Säkularität Bei Charles Taylor." In Mission Zwischen Proselytismus Und Selbstabschaffung, edited by Andreas Krebs and Jutta Koslowski. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 2017. 25-38.
- Kreuzer, Thomas. Kontexte Des Selbst : Eine Theologische Rekonstruktion Der Hermeneutischen Anthropologie Charles Taylors. Gütersloh: Kaiser [u.a.], 1999. In German.
- Krizan, Mojmir. "Communitarianism, Charles Taylor, and the Postcommunist Transition." Politicka Misao 34, no. 5 (1997): 152-170.
- Krüger, Hans-Peter. "Soziale Vorstellungsschemata Der Neuzeit Und Das Gespenst Des Idealismus (Kap. 4 Und 5)." In Charles Taylor: Ein Säkulares Zeitalter, edited by Michael Kühnlein. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co, 2019. 59-76. https://www.degruyter.com/view/product/449566
- Kubicki, Roman. "In Search of the Lost God of Supermarkets." In Charles Taylor's Vision of Modernity: Reconstructions and Interpretations, edited by Christopher Garbowski, Jan Paweł Hudzik and Jan Kłos. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Pub., 2009. 87-103.
- Küenzlen, Gottfried. "Säkularisierung, Mobilisierung Und Authentizität (Kap. 12 Und 13)." In Charles Taylor: Ein Säkulares Zeitalter, edited by Michael Kühnlein. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co, 2019. 131-148. https://www.degruyter.com/view/product/449566
- Kuhn, Thomas S. "The Natural and the Human Sciences." In The Interpretive Turn, edited by David R. Hiley. Ithaca: Cornell Univ Press, 1991. 17-24.
  Abstract:
  Intended for an occasion that was to have been an exchange with Charles Taylor, this paper suggests that the interpretive techniques he develops by contrasting the human with the natural sciences are deeply relevant to understanding the natural sciences as well. it closes with inconclusive comments on a resulting problem: How to differentiate the two areas of research.
- Kühnlein, Michael. "Liberalismuskritik Und Religiöser Artikulationsvorsprung: Charles Taylors Theistische Freiheitsethik." Theologie Und Philosophie: Vierteljahresschrift 80, no. 2 (2005): 176-200. In German.
- ———. Religion Als Quelle Des Selbst : Zur Vernunft- Und Freiheitskritik Von Charles Taylor. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008. In German.
- ———. "Religion Als Auszug Der Freiheit Aus Dem Gesetz? Charles Taylor Über Die Vermessungsgrenzen Des Säkularen Zeitalters." In Unerfüllte Moderne? - Neue Perspektiven Auf Das Werk Von Charles Taylor, edited by Michael Kühnlein and Matthias Lutz-Bachmann. Berlin: Suhrkamp / Insel, 2011. 388-445. In German.
- ———. "Anders Sehen – Oder Mein Aufbruch Zu Den »Quellen Des Selbst« ." Transit 49 (2016). http://www.iwm.at/transit/heft-49-grenzen-der-toleranz-charles-taylors-landkarte/. In German.
- ——— (ed.). Charles Taylor : Ein Säkulares Zeitalter. Berlin : Walter de Gruyter & Co, 2019.
  Abstract:
  Charles Taylors 2007 erschienenes Werk 'Ein säkulares Zeitalter' zählt bereits zu den Klassikern der philosophischen Ideengeschichte. Es beschreibt detailliert den Wandel im Sozialprestige unserer 'Fülle'--Vorstellungen, die sich im Ausgang der Moderne zu einer säkularen Identität verjüngt haben. Von ausgewiesenen Fachvertretern wird dieses Buch nun textkritisch kommentiert, um Interpretationshilfen für ein Schlüsselwerk der Sozialphilosophie anzubieten.
- ———. "Charles Taylor: Ein Säkulares Zeitalter." In Charles Taylor: Ein Säkulares Zeitalter, edited by Michael Kühnlein. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co, 2019. 1-16. https://www.degruyter.com/view/product/449566
- ———. "Ausblick: Nach Der Entzauberung Der Entzauberungstheorie – Wo Stehen Politik, Ethik Und Religion Heute?" In Charles Taylor: Ein Säkulares Zeitalter, edited by Michael Kühnlein. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co, 2019. 213-224. https://www.degruyter.com/view/product/449566
- Kühnlein, Michael and Matthias Lutz-Bachmann, eds. Unerfüllte Moderne? - Neue Perspektiven Auf Das Werk Von Charles Taylor. Berlin: Suhrkamp / Insel, 2011. In German.
- ———. "Einleitung: Philosophie Als Selbsreflexion Der Moderne." In Unerfüllte Moderne? - Neue Perspektiven Auf Das Werk Von Charles Taylor, edited by Michael Kühnlein and Matthias Lutz-Bachmann. Berlin: Suhrkamp / Insel, 2011. 9-12. In German.
- Kuipers, Ronald A. "Cross-Pressured Authenticity: Charles Taylor on the Contemporary Challenges to Religious Identity in A Secular Age." Symposium 20, no. 1 (2016): 32-51.
- Kukathas, Chandran. "Against the Communitarian Republic." Australian Quarterly 68, no. 1 (Autumn, 1996): 67-77.
- Kymlicka, Will. Liberalism, Community and Culture. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.
- ———. "The Ethics of Inarticulacy." Inquiry 34 (June, 1991): 155-182.
  Abstract:
  In his impressive and wide-ranging new book, 'sources of the self', Charles Taylor argues that modern moral philosophy, at least within the anglo-american tradition, offers a cramped' view of morality. I argue that Taylor has misunderstood the basic structure of most modern moral theory, which seeks to relocate, rather than suppress, these important questions. in particular, he fails to note the difference between general and specific conceptions of the good, between procedures for assessing the good and specific outcomes of that procedure, and between society's enforcement of morality and an individual's voluntary compliance with morality. (edited).
- ———. "The Sources of Nationalism: Commentary on Taylor." In The Morality of Nationalism, edited by Robert McKim and J. McMahan. New York: Oxford Univ Pr, 1997. 56-65.
  Abstract:
  My paper is a response to Charles Taylor's chapter in the same volume. Taylor's paper has two main sections: An account of the "context" of nationalism, emphasizing the centrality of nation-building to modern states; and an account of the "sources" of nationalism, which elaborates Taylor's earlier ideas about the importance of "recognition". I agree with Taylor's account of the context of nationalism, but I argue that his account of the "sources" of nationalism is less successful. in particular, Taylor's emphasis on "recognition" cannot explain the specificity of nationalist mobilization.
- ———. Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
- Laborde, Cécile. "Protecting Freedom of Religion in the Secular Age." In Interpreting Modernity: Essays on the Work of Charles Taylor, edited by Daniel M. Weinstock, Jacob Levy and Jocelyn Maclure. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2020. 197. https://www.mqup.ca/interpreting-modernity-products-9780228001430.php.
- Lacasta-Zabalza, José Ignacio. "El Reconocimiento De Los Otros." Pasajes, no. 2 (Enero / Abril, 2000): 113-118. In English. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23075582.
- Lacey, Hugh. "The Rationality of Science." In Rationality, Relativism and the Human Sciencies. Dordrecht: Nijoff, 1986. 127-149.
- ———. "Interpretation and Theory in the Natural and the Human Sciences: Comments on Kuhn and Taylor." Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour (Sept., 1990): 197-212.
  Abstract:
  Commenting on views of kuhn and Taylor, I argue that the kind of theory sought in the natural sciences, and the interpretation of the epistemic values associated with it, are unintelligible if separated from commitment to the primacy of (technological) control as the stance towards nature. this suggests (1) that the quest for theory in the human sciences is problematic; (2) that natural sciences might take a different form if the epistemic values come to be interpreted in the light of a value other than control, e.g., social justice; and thence (3) there may be a complex reciprocity between the natural and human sciences.
- ———. "Interpretation and Theory in Natural and Human Sciences: Comments on Kuhn and Taylor (in Portuguese)." Trans/Form/Acao: Revista De Filosofia 20 (1997): 87-106. In Portuguese.
  Abstract:
  The aim of the paper is to extract from Taylor's writings a critique of kuhn's suggestion of the possible unity of the natural and the human sciences, and from kuhn a critique of Taylor's account of the natural sciences. an outcome of this enterprise will be a reconstrual of the unity of the sciences.
- Ladwig, Bernd. "Review of Identität Und Kulturelle Praxis." Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory 11, no. 1 (July 27, 2004): 140-148. http://www.politicalreviewnet.com/polrev/reviews/CONS/R_1351_0487_032_1004151.asp.
- ———. "Rechte Ohne Atomismus. Charles Taylors Hermeneutische Konzeption Subjektiver Ansprüche." In Wie Wollen Wir Leben? Das Politische Denken Und Staatsverständnis Von Charles Taylor, edited by Ulf Bohmann. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2014. 193-218. In German.
- Laforest, Guy.. "Philosophy and Political Judgement in a Multinational Federation." In Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism: The Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question, edited by James Tully and Daniel M. Weinstock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. 194-210. In English. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621970.014.
- ———. "La Commission Bouchard-Taylor Et La Place Du Québec Dans La Trajectoire De l’État-Nation Moderne." In La Diversité Québécoise En Débat : Bouchard, Taylor Et Les Autres, edited by Bernard Gagnon. Montréal: Québec/Amérique, 2010. 157-176.
- ———. "Charles Taylor an Der Front Der Kanadischen Politik." Transit 49 (2016). http://www.iwm.at/transit/heft-49-grenzen-der-toleranz-charles-taylors-landkarte/. In German.
- Laforest, Guy and Philippe de Lara, eds. Charles Taylor Et l'interprétation De l'Identité Moderne. Paris;Sainte Foy;: Centre Culturel International de Cerisy-la-Salle, Cerf;Les Presses de l'Université Laval;, 1998. 372. In French. http://www.pulaval.com/catalogue/charles-Taylor-interpretation-identite-moderne-3366.html
  Abstract:
  La notion d'identité est au centre de la conscience moderne, mais elle paraît en même temps si problématique, entretenant à la fois des confusions intellectuelles déplorables et des passions politiques dangereuses, que beaucoup de penseurs contemporains n'y voient qu'une fiction idéologique et préfèrent s'en passer dans leur analyse des représentations qui s'en réclament. C'est l'un des principaux mérites de Charles Taylor d'avoir transformé cette notion embrouillée en point de départ d'une interrogation rigoureuse sur la modernité comme expérience historique. les textes réunis dans ce volume, issus d'un colloque consacré à l'auteur des sources du moi, témoignent de la fécondité de cette interrogation dans ces domaines extrêmement variés, allant de la recherche conceptuelle la plus abstraite à la discussion de problèmes politiques aussi actuels que l'avenir de l'etat-providence ou le statut des minorités.
- ———. "Charles Taylor Et l’interprétation De l’identité Moderne." In Charles Taylor Et l’interprétation De l’identité Moderne. Paris;Sainte Foy;: Centre Culturel International de Cerisy-la-Salle, Cerf;Les Presses de l'Université Laval;, 1998. 11-18. In French.
- Laniuk, Yevhen. "“Post-Truth” and the “Three Malaises” of the Western Society: The Reception of Charles Taylor’s Ideas in the Digital Age." Visnyk of the Lviv University Series Philosophical Sciences, no. 27 (2021): 33-43.
- Laitinen, Arto. "Evaluative Frameworks and Rationality.". http://sammelpunkt.philo.at:8080/779/1/ARTO.html.
- ———. "Moderni Moraalinen Identiteetti: Tarvitaanko 'Moraalisuuden Lähteita'.". http://www.valt.helsinki.fi/kfil/matti/laitinen.pdf.
- ———. "Charles Taylor and Paul Ricoeur on Self-Interpretations and Narrative Identity.". www.jyu.fi/yhtfil/fil/armala/texts/2002a.pdf.
- ———. "A Critique of Charles Taylor's Notions of "Moral Sources" and "Constitutive Goods".http://www.academia.edu/173005/A_Critique_of_Charles_Taylors_Notions_of_Moral_Sources_and_Constitutive_Goods
- ———. "Culturalist Moral Realism.". www.jyu.fi/yhtfil/fil/armala/texts/2002c.pdf.
- ———. "Strong Evaluations and Personal Identity.". http://www.academia.edu/289975/Strong_Evaluations_and_Personal_Identity
- ———. "'Baffling' Criticism of an 'Ill-Equipped' Theory: An Intervention in the Exchange between MacIntyre and Taylor." In Communitarianism and Citizenship, edited by Emilios A. Christodoulidis. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998.
- ———. "Modernia Koskevan Diskurssin Moraalinen Käänne." Tiedepolitiikka 3 (2000). In Finnish.
- ———. "Review of Charles Taylor by Ruth Abbey." Radical Philosophy 108 (July/August, 2001): 52-53.
- ———. "Charles Taylor and Paul Ricoeur on Self-Interpretations and Narrative Identity." In Narrative Research: Voices of Teachers and Philosophers, edited by Rauno Huttunen, Hannu L. T. Heikkinen and Leena Syrjälä. Jyväskylä: SoPhi, 2002.
- ———. "Culturalist Moral Realism." Acta Philosophica Fennica 71 (2002): 115-131.
  Abstract:
  This paper outlines and defends a 'culturalist' but nevertheless nonrelativistic theory of values. culturalist moral realism is cognitivist concerning our ordinary moral and evaluative reactions and responses to situations: Genuinely correct and incorrect (or better and worse) judgments are possible. these theses are reconstructed from Charles Taylor's writings, but authors like john McDowell and joseph raz hold similar views. not unimportantly, Charles Taylor would add a further thesis claiming that there are 'constitutive goods' which constitute the goodness of 'life goods', or which in other words bring about the fact that evaluative properties have value. this paper tries to show the coherence and appeal of culturalist moral realism without taking any stand on this further claim about constitutive goods. (edited).
- ———. "Charles Taylor and Nicholas H Smith on Human Constants and Transcendental Arguments." Nordic Journal of Philosophy 4, no. 2 (2003): 191-201.
- ———. "Strong Evaluation without Sources. on Charles Taylor's Philosophical Anthropology and Cultural Moral Realism." Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research 224 (2003): 358. http://jyu.academia.edu/ArtoLaitinen/Papers/239871/Strong_Evaluation_Without_Sources._On_Charles_Taylors_Philosophical_Anthropology_and_Cultural_Moral_Realism
- ———. "A Critique of Charles Taylor's Notions of 'Moral Sources' and 'Constitutive Goods'." Acta Philosophica Fennica 76 (2004): 73-104. http://www.academia.edu/173005/A_Critique_of_Charles_Taylors_Notions_of_Moral_Sources_and_Constitutive_Goods.
  Abstract:
  In this paper I argue that moral realism does not, pace Charles Taylor, need "moral sources" or "constitutive goods", and that adding these concepts distorts the basic insights of what can be called "cultural" moral realism. yet the ideas of "moral topography" or "moral space" as well as the idea of "ontological background pictures" are valid, if separated from those notions. what does Taylor mean by these notions? (edited).
- ———. "Stark Vurdering Og Filsosofisk Anthropologi." Slagmark: Tidsskrift for Idehistorie. Tema: Charles Taylor 49 (2007): 25-40. In Danish. http://ojs.statsbiblioteket.dk/index.php/slagmark/article/view/395/340.
- ———. Strong Evaluation without Moral Sources: On Charles Taylor's Philosophical Anthropology and Ethics. Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2008. http://www.degruyter.com/view/product/38264
  Abstract:
  Charles Taylor (1931- ) is one of the leading living philosophers. This is the first extended study on the key notions of his views in philosophical anthropology and ethical theory. Firstly, Laitinen clarifies, qualifies and defends Taylor's thesis that transcendental arguments show that personal understandings concerning ethical and other values (so called "strong evaluation") is necessary, in different ways, for human agency, selfhood, identity and personhood. Secondly, Laitinen defends and develops in various ways Taylor's value realism. Finally, the book criticizes Taylor's view.
- ———. "Charles Taylor, A Secular Age." Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13, no. 3 (2010): 353-355. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40835337.
- ———. "Philosophie Und Selbstausdruck." Transit 49 (2016). http://www.iwm.at/transit/heft-49-grenzen-der-toleranz-charles-taylors-landkarte/. In German.
- ———. "Macintyre and Taylor: Traditions, Rationality, and the Modern Predicament." In The Routledge Companion to Hermeneutics, edited by Jeff Malpas and Hans-Helmuth Gander. New York: Routledge, 2015. 204-215. http://www.academia.edu/9045639/MacIntyre_and_Taylor_Traditions_Rationality_and_Modernity.
- ———. "Entre Nous: Charles Taylor's Social Ontology." International Journal of Philosophical Studies : IJPS 29, no. 5 (2021): 723-737.
  Abstract:
  This article discusses Charles Taylor's philosophy of human sociality, focusing especially on Taylor's analysis of what happens, when a linguistic exchange or conversation starts. On his view, a shared space emerges, in which some object or topic is irreducibly 'for us', entre nous, not merely 'for me' and 'for you,'. When something is brought to our shared attention, a 'we' is at the same time created. This article asks, first, how this differs from mutual recognition of others as candidate conversation partners, and from joint commitments, which bind the parties and structure further joint action. The article argues, against Margaret Gilbert, that these are three different phenomena highlighting different aspects of human sociality. Secondly, the article discusses the nature of the 'we': does the irreducibility claim commit Taylor to a view of plural subjects or 'group minds'? Thirdly, the article outlines two possible readings of a 'shared space': one posits an emergent social layer and another an emergence of a 'conversationally extended mind'. Both are possible interpretations of Taylor's account, while neither is committed to a notorious phenomenal group mind or to a more demanding rational unity -view (Carol Rovane). Taylor's 'entre nous' offers a distinct perspective, of continuing relevance.
- Lalonde, Marc P. "A Critical Theory of Religious Insight." Studies in Religion 34, no. 3-4 (2005): 357-374.
- Lamb, Andrew W. "Freedom, the Self, and Ethical Practice According to Michel Foucault." International Philosophical Quarterly 35 (1995): 449-467.
- Lamey, Andy. "Francophonia for Ever." Times Literary Supplement 5025 (July 23, 1999): 12.
- Landazuri, Carlos O. de. "Review of Sources of the Self." Anuario Filosofico 25, no. 1-2 (1993): 436-438.
- Landes, Xavier. "Multiculturalisme Et Culture: La Portée De La Critique Réductionniste." Revue Philosophique De Louvain 109, no. 4 (Nov., 2011): 641-670. In French.
  Abstract:
  This article deals with the role played by culture within a part of multicultural literature. by studying the positions of Charles Taylor and will kymlicka it provides an introduction to the criticism of reductionism made against approaches based on the intrinsic or instrumental value of culture. at the epistemological level these approaches are held to assimilate cultures to closed sets with strictly defined outlines and content. at the political level a view of this kind is open to three types of objections. it is said to favour the propagation of stereotypes, to influence the relations of power within communities and to cause a deterioration in the distribution of resources. the idea put forward in this article is that the criticism of reductionism makes it possible to reveal a turn in the direction of more dynamic approaches within multiculturalism.
- Landesman, Bruce M. "Review of Multiculturalism and 'the Politics of Recognition'." Ethics 104, no. 2 (Jan., 1994): 384-386. In English. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381584.
- Landesman, Charles. "The New Dualism in the Philosophy of Mind." The Review of Metaphysics 19, no. 2 (Dec., 1965): 329-345. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20124113.
  Abstract:
  The author claims that philosophers of mind who find both physicalism and cartesian dualism unacceptable now seek to define persons as agents to whom irreducible teleological concepts like intention apply. Charles Taylor's "the explanation of behavior" (london, 1964) exemplifies this new dualism. the author identifies weaknesses in Taylor's central theses and concludes that there is no incompatibility between physicalism and ordinary discourse, and no reason why physicalism cannot employ teleological explanations. however, certain actions presuppose social institutions, and while a physicalistic individual psychology may currently be plausible the status of social psychology remains to be clarified. (staff).
- Lane, Melissa. "God Or Orienteering? Charles Taylor's 'Sources of the Self'." Ratio 5, no. 1 (June, 1992): 46-56.
  Abstract:
  This article isolates and evaluates three important claims made by Charles Taylor in "sources of the self": That we must have a morality; that it must have a certain structure; that it must be based on an incomparably higher good. four arguments to support these claims can be distinguished in Taylor's text: Phenomenological, transcendental, historical, and the "best account." it is argued here that neither of the first two arguments is adequate to establish all claims; and that the latter two arguments conflict fatally in attempting to do so.
- Laplante, Laurent. "L’âge Séculier De Charles Taylor." Nuit Blanche, Le Magazine Du Livre 126 (2012): 48-49. In French.
- Larmore, Charles. "Review of Sources of the Self." Ethics 102, no. 1 (Oct., 1991): 158-162. In English. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381730.
- ———. "How Much can we Stand?: Review of A Secular Age." The New Republic April 9 (2008): 39-44.
- Larney, Andy. "Francophonia for Ever." Times Literary Supplement 5025, no. 23 July (1999): 12-16.
- Latré, Stijn. "Review of Dilemmas and Connections: Selected Essays." Bijdragen, Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie En Theologie 72, no. 4 (2011): 456-465.
- ———. "From the Field to the Forest: A Book Review Essay on Charles Taylor's Dilemmas and Connections." Bijdragen, Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie En Theologie 72, no. 4 (2011): 456-465.
- Lauer, Quentin. "Review of Hegel." Thought 51 (1976): 323-324.
- Lauritzen, Paul. "The Self and its Discontents: Recent Work on Morality and the Self." The Journal of Religious Ethics 22, no. 1 (Spring, 1994): 187-210. In English. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40017846.
  Abstract:
  Views of the self may be plotted on a set of coordinates. on the axis that runs from fragmentation to unity, Rorty and Rorty's freud champion the decentered self while wallwork, Taylor, and ricoeur argue for a sovereign, unified self. on the other axis, which runs from the disengaged, inward-turning self to the engaged and "sedimented" self, wallwork, would be positioned near Rorty, defending self-creation against the narrative identity affirmed by Taylor and ricoeur. despite his skepticism concerning the communitarian agenda of the narrativists, flanagan grants that the self is social and relational--a position further explored by oliver, stendahl, deutsch, and mack in "selves, people, and persons".
- Lawlor, Rachel. "Redeeming Recognition through the Ideals of Democratic Legitimacy." Contemporary Politics 13, no. 4 (December, 2007): 291-311.
- Lawry, Edward G. "Dawn Jakubowski's 'Social Justice and the Ethics of Recognition'." Southwest Philosophy Review: The Journal of the Southwestern Philosophical Society 19, no. 2 (July, 2003): 75-77.
- Lazo Briones, Pablo F. "La Coimplicación Constitutiva Entre La Hermenéutica y Una Ética Comunitarista." Revista De Filosofía 35, no. 107 (May, 2003): 107-135. In Spanish.
  Abstract:
  In the present article I present a reflection which is midway between hermeneutics and ethics, taking as a problematic kernel the possibility of establishing a rational action criteria originated from the substantivity of life forms in communities. taking as a prototype the ideas of Charles Taylor and other communitarians, I attempt to show that in the action guided according to ethical ends, there is always an undetachable unit of the interpretation element with the valuation element of the peculiar circumstance in which that act is given, and from which such unit abuses or constrains in the intercultural interpretations could be avoided, on the one hand, and toward the same cultural environment, on the other. I advocate thus, for an ethical-hermeneutical character originated by the action, from which norms and content follow according to every single situation.
- ———. "La Construcción De Una 'Ética Articulada': La Propuesta De Charles Taylor." Revista De Filosofía 37, no. 114 (Sept., 2005): 103-139. In Spanish.
  Abstract:
  Taking as an unavoidable need the design of an substantive or articulated ethic that is committed to the outrage against the concrete conditions of the different cultural contexts in which a decision has to be taken. in this article, we will explore the possibilities of its construction in Charles Taylor's work regarding hermeneutics, making emphasis especially on the phronetic character that such ethics have as its condition of possibility. (edited).
- ———. "Reactualización Hermenéutica De La Noción De La 'Sittlichkeit': La Crítica De Hegel a Kant Vista a Través De Un Contemporáneo." La Lámpara De Diógenes: Revista Semestral De Filosofía 6, no. 10-11 (2005): 23-37. In Spanish.
  Abstract:
  This article attempts to show how a hermeneutical glance at hegel's criticism of the deontological kantian formalism turns out to be a rather suggestive array of reflexive indications in the face of social and political problems of our actual societies. we will use the perspective of a contemporary philosopher, Charles Taylor, to confront the necessity of cultural and political unity in our disjointed societies and to try to show the possibility for a critical renewing the hegelian notion of 'sittlichkeit' as an outcome of such unity.
- ———. "Fundamento y Fondo En Heidegger: Actualidad Hermenéutica." Revista De Filosofía 39, no. 118 (2007): 75-89. In Spanish.
  Abstract:
  This article deals, firstly, with the cultural and academic applications of heidegger's body of work. these are not always related to trying to find a deeper understanding of his thought, or a thorough methodological research line. throughout this reflexive critique of the uses and abuses given to heidegger's work, we defend the following thesis: Reading heidegger, just like any other philosopher, is not just about a closed, isolated, specialized language used only by 'experts', but it also implies that it be read and followed within other fields of thought; more specifically, we propose that, by means of the terms "abyss (abgrund)" and "fundament (grund)", 3 of the biggest heirs of heideggerian thought be analyzed: The school of eranos; G. vattimo's postmodern hermeneutics and Charles Taylor's communitarian hermeneutics.
- ———. "Charles Taylor: Pensador De Los Cruces Culturales." Revista De Filosofía 40, no. 121 (2008): 29-43. In Spanish.
  Abstract:
  The following article focuses on the defense of a language open to cultural difference generated in a dynamic cross-cultural hermeneutics. deriving from Charles Taylor's landmark essay, "comparison, history, truth", I suggest the possibility of an intracultural challenge, followed by an autotransformation of endemic social practices at the moment of contact with a culture other than one's own. the last part of this article offers a commentated guide of readings related to this important text of the Canadian author.
- Lea, David R. "The Managerial University and the Decline of Modern Thought." Educational Philosophy and Theory 43, no. 8 (Oct., 2011): 816-837.
  Abstract:
  In this paper I discuss the managerial template that has become the normative model for the organization of the university. in the first part of the paper I explain the corporatization of academic life in terms of the functional relationships that make up the organizational components of the commercial enterprise and their inappropriateness for the life of the academy. although there is at present a significant body of literature devoted to this issue, the goal of this paper is to explain the genesis of this phenomenon through a reference to the ideology that characterizes our modern secular age. this is the subject of the second part of the paper. most texts seek to explain this ideological development either through the ever increasing dominance of economic rationalism, perceived conservatism of collegial forms of governance, the necessity to transfer fiscal responsibility in tight budgetary periods, the decline of the keynesian 'welfare consensus', or the legacy of the power regimes that began to take shape in the liberal societies of the 19th century. I trace this development to the beginnings of modernity and the cartesian bifurcation that separated the material world from its spiritual and intellectual source and thereby overthrew the hierarchy of related values that informed both nature and human organization. in articulating this argument I make reference to the thought of jacques maritain, Charles Taylor and rené guénon.
- Leask, Ian. "Deism, Spinozism, Anti-Humanism." In The Taylor Effect: Responding to A Secular Age, edited by Ian Leask, 2010. 69-83.
- Ledewitz, Bruce. "Charles Taylor and the Future of Secularism." Expositions 3, no. 1 (2009).
- Lee, Byeong Tae 이병태 and Dae Sik 우대식 Woo. "찰스 테일러의 개인주의 정당화에 관하여 - 개인주의의 재정의, 그리고 ‘대화’ 개념을 중심으로 (on Charles Taylor’s Justification of Individualism - Around the Redefinition of Individualism and the Concept of ‘Conversation’)." 시대와 철학 29, no. 3 (2018): 163.
  Abstract:
  찰스 테일러는 현대 정치의 철학적 원리를 둘러싼 비판적 논쟁, 이른바 ‘자유주의와 공동체주의’ 논쟁에서 일종의 개념적 착종을 발견하고, 이를 자신의 논의 주제로 삼는다. 그가 보기에 이 착종은 ⒜존재론적 이슈와 ⒝옹호론적 이슈의 혼동에서 발생한다. ⒜와 관련해서는 ‘원자론’과 ‘전체론’이 대립하며, ⒝에는 ‘개인주의’와 ‘집단주의’가 맞서는데 이 입장들의 지지와 논박이 간혹 서로 다른 이슈로 부당하게 넘어감으로써 일종의 ‘동문서답’이 발생한다는 것이다. 특히 그는 이러한 구분을 통해 원자론과 개인주의를 엄격하게 구분하고자 한다. 부정적인 뉘앙스의 개인주의를 ‘원자론’이라는 별도의 개념으로 구분함으로써 ‘개인주의’에 대한 소모적 비판의 여지를 차단함과 동시에 ‘자기진실성’에 바탕을 두는 진정한 개인주의를 옹호하려는 것이다. 나아가, 이렇게 재정의된 ‘개인주의’가 ‘소통’, ‘협력’, ‘참여’와 같은 계기와 유기적임을 밝혀, 정치적 역동성의 토대가 될 수 있음을 역설하고자 한다. 이를 위한 특별한 개념이 바로 ‘대화’다. 하지만, 그의 개념적 구분에 자의성의 문제가 잔존하고, ‘대화’ 개념 또한 공적 실천의 당위성을 설명하지는 못한다. 그럼에도 불구하고, 현대 정치철학의 핵심적 논쟁이 개념적 혼란의 방치 위에서 지속되며 확산되고 있기 때문에, 그의 논구는 이에 대한 문제제기 및 환기로서 중요한 의미를 지닌다고 할 수 있다.
- Lee, Chang-ho 이창호. "일상의 긍정을 위한 신학적 윤리적 기반 모색 - 루터와 테일러를 중심으로 ( Exploration of Theological and Ethical Foundations for Affirmation of Everyday Life: Focusing on Luther and Taylor )." 기독교사회윤리 40 (2018): 211. In Korean.
  Abstract:
  Charles Taylor maintains that the Reformers such as Luther and Calvin contributed to a positive interpretation of ‘everyday life’ in theological terms. In discussing divine self-disclosure and faith communities where divine self-revelation and acceptance of the revelation take place, the Reformers’ teachings have been conducive to overcoming religious exclusiveness and reinforcing the possibility of embracing God’s revelation and presence in the spheres of ordinary life. Taylor insists that Luther and Calvin offered a theological foundation where believers can regard their historical existence in the secular as the everyday basis of holiness. Endorsing Taylor’s thesis basically, I aim to explore theological and ethical foundations for affirming the value of ‘everyday life.’ My inquires in this paper are two-fold. First, I attempt to offer a systematic description of theological, philosophical and ethical foundations for such affirmation that are traced in the thoughts of Luther and Taylor. Major themes I will discuss include Taylor’s fundamental understanding of the affirmation of everyday life, a form of belief stressing individual persons as the subjects of everyday life, a positive evaluation of the meaning of everyday life in terms of the doctrine of creation and reason-centeredness, family and labor as key spheres for the affirmation of everyday life, and theological justification of the secular realm. Second, I will make some theological and ethical suggestions, hoping that they contribute to honoring the sacred and the secular comprehensively and strengthening Korean churches’ and their members’ responsible practice and engagement in the sphere of everyday life.
- 이연희 Lee Yeon-hee. "찰스 테일러 윤리사상의현대 한국 사회 적용 가능성 탐색 ( an Exploration of the Applicability of the Ethical Thought of Charles Taylor in Modern Korean Society )." 윤리연구 111 (2016): 165. In Korean.
  Abstract:
  The aim of this paper is for two things: (1) One thing is to explore ethical thought in a Canadian philosopher, Charles Taylor(1931～) and to disclose its significance in terms of a reconstruction of ethics as practical philosophy. (2) Another thing is to suggest that Taylor`s ethical thought is of help to ethical lives of contemporary Koreans as well as West modern individuals. Exactly, `the ethical thought of Taylor` means the conception of human nature of Taylor and (based on the conception) the moral ideal of him. Taylor makes a diagnosis that modern ethics involved modernity does not rightly understand human nature as a live agent, so that it proposes excessively abstractive moral ideals. In other words, he implicates that we need to establish again ethics as practical philosophy, which can help us find an answer in the practical or moral crisis experienced in real life. According to him, there are three main separations in modern culture that are `mind-body` separation, `agent-world` separation, `individual-community` separation. Made based on these, modern ethical theories and views are a main cause of existential crisis of modern people. For this reason, Taylor tries to synthesize certain separation mode implicit in the Western modern society. In short, Taylor is drawing the conception of human agent as the dialectical synthesis between `mind-agent-individual` and `body-world-community`, in accordance with it, the moral ideal. In this context, Taylor`s effort is a kind of prescription for overcome limits of modern ethics or modern culture. Taylor`s ethical thought, which has been constructed under a consistent point of view for more than 30 years, is a critical appraisal of modernity of the western society, a philosophical reflection on it, and an effort to overcome its errors. In this sense, his thought can have important meaning in Western History of ethics. And also, it is worth to be continuously studied in our Korean society today. Because human agent, as Taylor emphasized, only don`t mean to the western modern individuals. Therefore, if we could agree that Taylor`s thought will contribute to overcome an existential crisis of modern Westerns, we would also accept that it will help to Korean`s ethical life in the same manner. And this being so, we need to review more properly Taylor`s message, and reinterpret it in our way.
- ———. "도덕적 실천으로서 문화연구의 필요성 ― 찰스 테일러의 관점에서, 현대 한국사회의 문화갈등과 관련하여 ( the Necessity of Cultural Studies as Moral Practice ― from the Perspective of Charles Taylor, in Relation to Cultural Conflicts in Modern Korean Society )." 윤리연구 120 (2018): 241. In Korean.
  Abstract:
  The aim of this paper is to propose that Cultural Studies is essential to the moral life, as Taylor implies, and to argue that this idea should be recognized especially in Korean society where is rapidly moving into a multi-cultural society.According to Taylor, the moral life is a life in which individual identifies and realizes one’s own originality (true desire) in lifetime. To do this requires a process of understanding and articulating hypergoods. Hypergoods mean strong values, what individual evaluates as the highest in quality. The orientation to such value represents an original content of individual (Self-identity). Now, all goods are derived from and justified in certain cultures. This is because the culture, the product of the language community, is ideal code (rule) that enables individual to give meaning to all things. In other words, the meaning of all languages originates from the culture and can be grasped based on the culture. The same is true of the moral meaning (the good). Thus, the culture is closely related with the moral life.In this context, by developing Taylor's view above, the following could be suggested: in order to lead the moral life, ‘Cultural Studies’ is needed. Cultural Studies is in itself a kind of moral practice. Specifically, it means understanding and articulating the content of culture which is ideal code (or rule), by considering and reflecting the practice of individuals who internalize it. By doing so, we could find out the ground for the value evaluation.Cultural Studies could be urgently needed when there is cultural conflicts between individuals. (value conflicts could be understood as cultural conflicts, considering that the culture is the locus in which goods originate.) The inter-individual deviation or difference leads to cultural conflicts. In general, these conflicts could lead to tension, anxiety, and confusion in the moral life. Therefore, in order to resolve such conflicts, Cultural Studies are required. In other words, it is necessary to deeply understand and articulate cultures that is affecting each other's value evaluation. This could reduce the difference between each other. And, as a result, each individual's moral life could become more mature.Today, in our Korean Society, however, culture conflicts between individuals that mean value conflicts are becoming amplified. Because we have emphasized only cultural homogeneity in a very wide range (e.g. a single ethnic culture, a single language (Hangul) culture, or Confucian culture), while overlooking cultural deviation or difference that could be considered on the individual level. But if these conflicts continue to be neglected and deepened, the moral life of modern koreans will be jeopardized. Therefore, in order to solve this, we should first recognize the inter-individual cultural deviation or difference. And if we experience serious conflicts with values of others, we should strive to understand in depth cultures that is affecting each other’ values. By doing so, we will be able to lead our own moral life properly.
- Legenhausen, Muhammad. "Review of the Ethics of Authenticity." Message of Thaqalayn: A Quarterly Journal of Islamic Studies 7, no. 1-2 (2001): 125-154.
- Leggewie, Claus. "Religionsvielfalt Als Problem? Zur Formgebung Religiöser Differenz Und Zur Zivilisierung Von Religionskonflikten." In Unerfüllte Moderne? - Neue Perspektiven Auf Das Werk Von Charles Taylor, edited by Michael Kühnlein and Matthias Lutz-Bachmann. Berlin: Suhrkamp / Insel, 2011. 529-546. In German.
- Legros, Dominique. "Critique De La Democratie Liberale Et Des Droit De l’Homme: La Question Autochtone." Recherches Amérindiennes Au Québec 35 (2005): 3-16. In French.
- Lehman, Glen. "Disclosing New Worlds: Social and Environmental Accounting." Accounting, Organizations and Society 24, no. 3 (1999): 217-241.
- ———. "Accounting and the Interpretive Turn." Critical Perspectives on Accounting 11, no. 4 (2000): 433-444.
- ———. "Reclaiming the Public Sphere: Problems and Prospects for Corporate Social and Environmental Accounting." Critical Perspectives on Accounting 12, no. 6 (2002): 713-733.
- ———. "Globalization and the Authentic Self: Cosmopolitanism and Charles Taylor's Communitarianism." Global Society 16, no. 4 (October, 2002): 419-437.
- ———. "Review of Charles Taylor: Thinking and Living Deep Diversity, by Mark Redhead." Australian Journal of Political Science 38, no. 2 (July, 2003): 375-377.
- ———. "Perspectives on Charles Taylor's Reconciled Society: Community, Difference and Nature." Philosophy and Social Criticism 32, no. 3 (May, 2006): 347-376.
  Abstract:
  This article explores Charles Taylor's hegelian and aristotelian ethic of reconciliation. it comments on the critical work provided by Joel Anderson, Jürgen Habermas, chandras kukathas, morag patrick, philip pettit and mark redhead. it is argued that these critical perspectives on Taylor's work have not fully developed the spirit of liberalism which runs like a red thread through his ethic of reconciliation. for Taylor, reconciliation embraces others who are different from us and aims to create a virtuous culture. Taylor's critics overlook the liberal implications of his ethic and also do not recognize his commitment to the plural diversity in modern societies. Taylor's communitarianism (postliberalism in his mind) aims to create trust, openness and democratic accountability. (edited).
- ———. "Interpretivism, Postmodernism, and Nature: Ecological Conversations." Philosophy and Social Criticism 37, no. 7 (Sept., 2011): 795-821.
  Abstract:
  This article uses the interpretive work of dreyfus, gadamer, Nussbaum and Taylor to explore the natural environment as a shared ecological and social commonality. I focus on the supposition that the natural world possesses intrinsic value and new political structures are needed. I explore how we might better engage with multiple cultures concerning matters at the heart of ecological politics. political interpretivists offer processes of equal facilitation and maximization that work to include environmental values in democratic thought. interpretivists differ from earth-based and neoconservative environmentalists, who dominate modern debates. the differences involve understanding the role of practical reasoning and how humanity interacts with the natural world. intriguingly, then, interpretivists concur with deep ecologists that nature possesses intrinsic value, but do so guided by an ideal of authenticity.
- ———. Charles Taylor's Ecological Conversations: Politics, Commonalities and the Natural Environment. Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
  Abstract:
  Central to the argument of the book are Charles Taylor's perspectives on authenticity and expressivism, which the author reads as a radical reworking of our understanding of being in the world and a starting point for rethinking the way individuals and communities ought to be dealing politically with ecological crises. Glen Lehman uses Taylor's work on liberalism, interpretivism and socialism to construct a bridge between democratic, ethical and ecological perspectives. The bridge developed involves a fusion between liberal and interpretivist ideas, establishing a common ground through which different values are addressed. Such a fusion of perspectives acts in a spirit that moderates the dominant anthropocentric attitude toward the natural environment.
- Lehmann, Karl Kardinal. "Entsteht Aus Dem Verfälschten Christentum Die Moderne? Zur Begegnung Von Charles Taylor Und Ivan Illich." In Unerfüllte Moderne? - Neue Perspektiven Auf Das Werk Von Charles Taylor, edited by Michael Kühnlein and Matthias Lutz-Bachmann. Berlin: Suhrkamp / Insel, 2011. 327-349. In German.
- Leithart, Peter. "Reformation and the Secular Age." Patheos (Dec 21, 2017). http://www.patheos.com/blogs/leithart/2017/12/reformation-secular-age/.
- Lemmens, Willem. "Inleiding Bij Een Artikel Van Charles Taylor: Bronnen Van Authenticiteit." Streven 61, no. 7 (1994): 579-580. In Dutch.
- ———. "Zelf En Gemeenschap: De Paradox Van De Moderne Identiteit Volgens Charles Taylor." Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 56, no. 1 (Mar., 1994): 117-134. In Dutch.
  Abstract:
  This is a review of Charles Taylor's "sources of the self" and some related recent publications from the same author. Taylor's hermeneutics of the modern identity is evaluated as a substantial contribution to contemporary moral and political philosophy. the reviewer agrees with the critique on modern moral naturalism'. at the same time, however, he formulates some doubts about the possibility of a unified moral ontology: The paradoxical nature of the modern self' (with its search for inward moral sources and its dependence, at the same time, on a larger community for the articulation of this identity) can maybe function as a radical heteronomous, not-integrated source of the modern identity. this paradox points probably also to the essentially searching character of every moral ontology.
- Lemmens, Willem and Paul Smeyers. "Het Project Van Charles Taylor: 'Sources of the Self'." Ethische Perspectieven 5, no. 1 (1996): 15-23. In Dutch.
- Lemmens, Willem. "Een Hermeneutiek Van De Moderne Identiteit: De Filosofie Van Charles Taylor." In Charles Taylor: Een Mozaïek Van Zijn Denken, edited by Stefaan E. Cuypers and Willem Lemmens. Kapellen: Pelckmans, 1997. 11-42. In Dutch.
- ———. "De Malaise Van De Moderniteit: Charles Taylor in Perspectief." In Denkwijzen/12, edited by Harry Breghs. Leuven: Acco, 1999. 98. In Dutch.
- LePage, Charles. "The Role of Religion in Society." Maritain Studies/Etudes Maritainiennes 25 (2009): 58-66.
- Leroux, Georges. "Le Dépassement Du Cynisme." Spirale 118 (Oct., 1992): 3. In French.
- ———. "La Sécularité Et Le Cadre Immanent." Science Et Esprit: Revue De Philosophie Et De Théologie 64, no. 2 (05/01, 2012): 277-292. In French.
  Abstract:
  The concept of "immanent framework" supports the entire hermeneutical and phenomenological enterprise of Charles Taylor's work. The latter insists on intrinsic liberty, constitutive of the immanent framework, firmly opposing the interpreters of sympathisers of a secular rupture or a necessary closure. Due to his grounding in Christianity, the "immanent framework" has preserved an openness, even when it has been directed from the outside, against all religious forms, and particularly against Christianity. As a result, the importance of Taylor's work resides principally in the transcendental analysis of conditions for belief in the "immanence framework.".
- Lessard, Jean-François. "[Untitled]." Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue Canadienne De Science Politique 33, no. 1 (Mar., 2000): 195-197. In English. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3232650.
- Leung, King-Ho. "Living Paradoxes: On Agamben, Taylor, and Human Subjectivity." Telos 187, no. Summer (2019): 85-106.
- Levering, Matthew. "Review of Varieties of Religion Today: William James Revisited." Modern Theology 21, no. 1 (Jan, 2005): 163-187.
- Levomäki, Irma. "On Charles Taylor and the Challenge of Modernity." Acta Philosophica Fennica 71 (2002): 133-147.
  Abstract:
  The purpose of this paper is to reflect on Charles Taylor's contribution to the general debate over modernity. I start by taking a look at some general themes in this debate and situate Taylor in it accordingly. I take up Taylor's criticism for some of the current ways of theorizing modernity and then sketch his own alternative. Taylor can be credited with making an important contribution to the "moral turn" in the discourse of modernity, as well as with delineating a broad view of the richness and complexity of the modern moral culture. I end the article with some contemporary challenges facing Taylor's view.
- Levy, Gary. "Review of Reconciling the Solitudes." Québec Studies 17 (1993): 208-209.
- Levy, Neil. "Charles Taylor on Overcoming Incommensurability." Philosophy and Social Criticism 26, no. 5 (Sept., 2000): 47-61.
  Abstract:
  As he recognizes, Taylor's view of practical reasoning commits him to the existence of incommensurable world-views. however, he holds that it is, in principle, possible to overcome these incommensurabilities. he has two major arguments for this conclusion, which I label the argument from the human condition and the transition argument. I show that the first argument, though perhaps successful in the case Taylor takes as an example, cannot be generalized. the second argument is even less successful, since all the evidence it produces is compatible with a thoroughgoing relativism. (edited).
- Leydet, Dominique. "Reconnaissance, Identite Et Pluralisme: Les Limites Du Projet De Taylor." Lekton 4, no. 1 (1994): 103-121. In French.
- ———. "La Dignité Du Citoyen Et Le Libéralisme." In Charles Taylor Et l'Interprétation De l'Identité Moderne, edited by Guy Laforest and Philippe de Lara. Paris;Sainte Foy;: Centre Culturel International de Cerisy-la-Salle, Cerf;Les Presses de l'Université Laval;, 1998. 185-202. In French.
- Lichanski, Jakub Z. "The Object Vs.the Subject in Literary Research and the Issues of Ethics." In Charles Taylor's Vision of Modernity: Reconstructions and Interpretations, edited by Christopher Garbowski, Jan Paweł Hudzik and Jan Kłos. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Pub., 2009. 205-219.
- Liebich, André. "Review of Hegel." Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue Canadienne De Science Politique 12, no. 1 (Mar., 1979): 159-160. In English. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3229945.
- ———. "Minorités, Identité, Modernité." In Charles Taylor Et l’interprétation De l’identité Moderne, edited by Guy Laforest and Philippe de Lara. Paris;Sainte Foy;: Centre Culturel International de Cerisy-la-Salle, Cerf;Les Presses de l'Université Laval;, 1998. 341-350. In French.
- Liebsch, Burkhard. "Humanismus, Gewalt Und Religion (Kap. 17 Und 18)." In Charles Taylor: Ein Säkulares Zeitalter, edited by Michael Kühnlein. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co, 2019. 179-196. https://www.degruyter.com/view/product/449566
- Liedtka, Jeanne. "Strategy Making and the Search for Authenticity." Journal of Business Ethics 80, no. 2 (06/30, 2008): 237-248.
  Abstract:
  Recent work in the business ethics field has called attention to the promise inherent in the concept of authenticity for enriching the ways we think about core issues at the intersection of management ethics and practice, like moral character, ethical choices, leadership, and corporate social responsibility (driver 2006; jackson 2005; ladkin 2006). in this paper, I aim to extend these contributions by focusing on authenticity in relation to a set of organizational processes related to strategy making; most specifically an organization's strategic intent, arguing that these provide an ideal venue for particularising this exploration, as they represent the key processes through which an organization defines the self it aspires to be. in order to do this, I examine specifically what a shift from "business as usual" to the search for the creation of a more authentic corporate self might look like in practice, contending that such a shift offers the possibility for improving both the moral good and the business outcomes of an institution simultaneously. I conclude with assessment of the risks inherent in undertaking such a search for more authentic strategic intention in business organizations today.
- Lin, C. -P. "Charles Taylor's Concept of the "the Immanent Frame" and its Implications for Education." Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly 20, no. 3 (2012): 89-127. In Chinese. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/820203590.
- Lincoln, A. T. "Spirituality in a Secular Age : From Charles Taylor to Study of the Bible and Spirituality." Acta Theologica : The Spirit that Inspires Perspectives on Biblical Spirituality : Supplementum 15 (2011): 61-80. In English. http://www.ajol.info/index.php/actat/article/view/72911.
  Abstract:
  This essay proposes that those engaged in the study of the bible in relation to spirituality would benefit from awareness of Charles Taylor's thinking in A secular age, which is a narrative not only about the emergence of the secular but also about the role of the spiritual in western civilization. the essay indicates the significance of Taylor's work for understanding the present context of the experience of spirituality. it then suggests some possible implications for how biblical perspectives on spirituality might be studied, highlighting Taylor's category of the social imaginary. finally, it reflects on the potential of Taylor's work for those who are interested in dialogue between a spirituality rooted in biblical perspectives and contemporary forms of spirituality, focusing on his notion of "fullness.".
- Lindi, Letizia. "Review of A Secular Age." Iride 21, no. 55 (: 772-773.
- Linker, Damon. "Is Secularism Inevitable?" The Week (02/27, 2014). http://theweek.com/article/index/257008/is-secularism-inevitable.
- Linscott, Andrew. "The Presumption and Insight of New Atheism." Theology and Science 10, no. 1 (2012): 39-53. In English. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14746700.2012.639210.
  Abstract:
  AbstractThis article analyzes the insights and shortcomings of selected new atheist writings. the first section places the new atheists into critical dialogue with catholic philosopher Charles Taylor. here I argue that the most rhetorically compelling claim of new Atheism—that religion is at odds with the basic values of humanity—is also the point of their greatest philosophical deficiency. the second section addresses some of the scientific arguments that the new atheists advance against supernatural theism. I argue that although such arguments never succeed in disproving the existence of God, they do succeed in rendering some conceptions of God implausible.
- Lipprandt, Björn-Lars. Die Normativität Der Offenheit in Der Moraltheorie Charles Taylors. Berlin: Lit, 2016.
- LiPuma, Edward and Thomas Koelble. "Cultures of Circulation and the Urban Imaginary: Miami as Example and Exemplar." Public Culture 17 (2005): 153-179.
- Litton, Paul. "ADHD,Values, and the Self." American Journal of Bioethics 5 (May/June, 2005): 65-67.
- Liu, Wei 刘, 威. "On Charles Taylor’s Views of the Higher Time and the Secular Time." Advances in Philosophy 09, no. 01 (2020): 12-17. In Chinese.
- Llamas, Encarna. Charles Taylor: Una Antropologia De La Identidad. Pamplona: Ediciones Universidad de Navarra, 2001. In Spanish.
- ———. Identidad, Comunidad y Significado. La Posibilitación Social De La Identidad En Charles Taylor. Pamplona, España: EUNSA, 2002. In Spanish.
- ———. "Charles Taylor: Una Antropologia De La Identidad." Acta-Philosophica 12, no. 2 (2003): 349-353. In Spanish.
- Llanera, Tracy. "Rethinking Nihilism." Philosophy & Social Criticism 42, no. 9 (2016): 937-950.
  Abstract:
  The idea of nihilism continues to figure prominently in philosophical debates about the problems of modernity. The aim of this article is to consider how Richard Rorty’s work might advance these debates. The article begins with a discussion of the problem of nihilism as it appears in the recent exchange between Charles Taylor, Hubert Dreyfus and Sean Kelly. It then brings Rorty into the conversation by considering his reflections on egotism and his proposed antidote to it: self-enlargement. I propose that self-creation and solidarity, two key ideas of Rorty’s earlier work, should be understood as redemptive paths to self-enlargement. With this interpretation in place, Rorty can be seen as offering an alternative perspective on the problem of nihilism, one that compares favourably with those put forward by Taylor, Dreyfus and Kelly.
- Lloyd, Caryl L. "[Untitled]." Research in African Literatures 28, no. 4, Multiculturalism (Winter, 1997): 226-230. In English. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3820799.
- Lombardo, Mario G. La Differenza Amata e Il Paradosso Cristiano: Gli Stadi Sul Cammino Della Vita Di Soren Kierkegaard. Verona: CUSL, 1997.
- Long, D. S. "How to Read Charles Taylor: The Theological Significance of A Secular Age." Pro Ecclesia 18, no. 1 (Dec., 2009): 93-107.
- Long, Douglas. "Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism: The Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question James Tully." Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue Canadienne De Science Politique 29, no. 3 (1996): 617-618.
- Longhorn, Alyona. "Phenomenology and Hermeneutic as the Basic Elements of Charles Taylor’s Methodology." Doxa 2, no. 30 (2019): 172-184.
- Losonczi, Péter. "The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere." Political Theology 13, no. 6 (12, 2012): 775-778.
- Lotz-Sisitka, H. "Changing Social Imaginaries, Multiplicities and 'One Sole World': Reading Scandinavian Environmental and Sustainability Education Research Papers with Badiou and Taylor at Hand." Environmental Education Research 16, no. 1 (2010): 142. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504620903504081.
  Abstract:
  Badiou’s ontological work draws attention to multiplicities – the oneness of ontology, which he explains can only become ontologically differentiated into events or sites through political, artistic or amorous practices that philosophies can think and invent from. he also draws attention to the fusion of events and sites, and he explains that events (such as producing special issues of journals located in particular sites) are reflexive. he also tells us, however, that the reflexive structure of an artistic or scientific event (such as producing a special issue of a journal) is not always immediately evident. in writing this response article I work with this concept – and probe how the production of events (such as a special issue of a journal produced in a specific site) may be reflexive. this is the purpose of the article. this response article therefore probes some of the political, structural and intellectual processes that come to shape scholarship in different sites, and here I draw on the insights into social imaginaries provided by Charles Taylor to develop a perspective on the scholarship that is reflected in this journal. through this, I seek to open the notion of multiplicities, oneness and the particularities of our social imaginaries as themes for thinking about educational scholarship events produced within and across geo‐physical, socio‐ecological and socio‐economic spaces in different parts of the world.
- Louth, Andrew. "Review of Philosophical Papers,1 and 2." Heythrop Journal 29 (1988): 479-480.
- lovicova, Zuzana. "Identity and the Good: Moral Theory of C. Taylor." (2004): 415.
- Lovin, Robin W. "Inescapable Frameworks of Meaning." Christian Century 108, no. 8 (1991): 263-265.
- ———. "A Secular Age/Justice: Rights and Wrongs [Review of A Secular Age]." Christian Century 125, no. 9 (5/6, 2008): 24.
- Low, Andrew. "The Ethics of Modernism: The Contribution and Limitations of Charles Taylor." Mosaic 29 (1996): 111-125.
- Low, Douglas. "Hegel and Merleau-Ponty on Modernism and Postmodernism." International Philosophical Quarterly 50:3, no. 199 (Sept., 2010): 309-321.
  Abstract:
  This essay attempts to provide detailed evidence for Charles Taylor's claim that both hegel and merleau-ponty follow kant's 'refutation of idealism' in an effort to take a stand against modernism's claim that human knowledge of the world is reducible to a conceptual representation of it. for both the hegel of 'phenomenology of mind' and merleau-ponty throughout his career, human consciousness and knowledge must embrace and make sense of a world that is always already there. this stand will be made against postmodernism as well.
- Löw-Beer, Martin. "Living a Life and the Problem of Existential Impossibility." Inquiry (June, 1991): 217-236.
  Abstract:
  Taylor's book 'sources of the self' faces the tasks of showing how persons are situated in moral traditions and how these can be used in moral arguments. it is argued that a minimal version of the principle of equal respect is built into the structure of communication, so that we have no choice but to ask for the normative justification of relationships. (edited).
- Lowney II, Charles W. "Authenticity and the Reconciliation of Modernity." The Pluralist 4, no. 1 (Mar., 2009): 33-50.
  Abstract:
  In contemporary culture, the ideal of authenticity is respected even by the children of modernity who have grown narcissistic and relativistic. Charles Taylor recognizes self-transcendent, objective values implicit in this ideal. he identifies aristotelian and scientistic ‘knockers', as well as postmodern ‘boosters', of modern western liberal culture. this essay brings together what is true and attractive about 'authenticity' for boosters with the sources of the knockers' own convictions. Aristotle's notions that art can complete nature (in 'physics') and that the self is actualized in its products (in 'nicomachean ethics') confirm an artistic understanding of self-creation and self-recognition. tacit knowing in scientific understanding and the notion of emergence in nature also confirm an experience of appropriateness and beauty in the acknowledgement of a new truth. conservative, liberal scientific, and postmodern strands of modern culture thus find common ground and a basis for dialogue in the ethics and aesthetics of authentic knowing.
- ———, ed. Charles Taylor, Michael Polanyi and the Critique of Modernity: Pluralist and Emergentist DirectionsPalgrave Macmillan, 2017. https://www.palgrave.com/us/book/9783319638973
  Abstract:
  This book provides a timely, compelling, multidisciplinary critique of the largely tacit set of assumptions funding Modernity in the West. A partnership between Michael Polanyi and Charles Taylor's thought promises to cast the errors of the past in a new light, to graciously show how these errors can be amended, and to provide a specific cartography of how we can responsibly and meaningfully explore new possibilities for ethics, political society, and religion in a post-modern modernity.
  Notes: Introduction: What a Better Epistemology Can Do for Moral Philosophy Lowney, Charles W., II Pages 1-11 Converging Roads Around Dilemmas of Modernity Taylor, Charles Pages 15-26 Dialogue, Discovery, and an Open Future Taylor, Charles Pages 27-49 The Projects of Michael Polanyi and Charles Taylor Apczynski, John V. Pages 53-69 Authenticity and the Reconciliation of Modernity Lowney, Charles W., II Pages 71-91 “Transcendence” in A Secular Age and Enchanted (Un)Naturalism Stewart, David James Pages 93-114 Polanyi’s Revolutionary Imaginary Fennell, Jon Pages 119-141 Overcoming the Scientistic Imaginary Lowney, Charles W., II Pages 143-168 On Emergent Ethics, Becoming Authentic, and Finding Common Ground Lowney, Charles W., II Pages 169-187 Taylor and Polanyi on Moral Sources and Social Systems Yeager, D. M. Pages 189-213 The Importance of Engagement Taylor, Charles (et al.) Pages 215-234 Epilogue: Robust Realism: Pluralist or Emergent? Lowney, Charles W., II Pages 235-270.
- ———. "Introduction: What a Better Epistemology can do for Moral Philosophy." In Charles Taylor, Michael Polanyi and the Critique of Modernity: Pluralist and Emergentist Directions, edited by Charles W. Lowney II. Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. 1-11.
- ———. "Authenticity and the Reconciliation of Modernity." In Charles Taylor, Michael Polanyi and the Critique of Modernity: Pluralist and Emergentist Directions, edited by Charles W. Lowney II. Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. 71-91.
- ———. "Overcoming the Scientistic Imaginary." In Charles Taylor, Michael Polanyi and the Critique of Modernity: Pluralist and Emergentist Directions, edited by Charles W. Lowney II. Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. 143-168.
- ———. "On Emergent Ethics, Becoming Authentic, and Finding Common Ground." In Charles Taylor, Michael Polanyi and the Critique of Modernity: Pluralist and Emergentist Directions, edited by Charles W. Lowney II. Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. 169-187.
- ———. "Epilogue: Robust Realism: Pluralist Or Emergent?" In Charles Taylor, Michael Polanyi and the Critique of Modernity: Pluralist and Emergentist Directions, edited by Charles W. Lowney II. Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. 235-270.
- Lubling, Yoram. "Review of Varieties of Religion Today." Bridges: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Theology, Philosophy, History, and Science 11, no. 3-4 (Fall-Winter, 2004): 334-337.
- Lucena, Jorge Martínez. "La Narratividad Como Síntesis Trascendental En La Filosofía Contemporánea." Espiritu: Cuadernos Del Instituto Filosofico De Balmesiana 57, no. 137 (2008): 63-89. In Spanish.
- Lucier, Pierre. "La Possibilité De Croire Dans Une Culture De l'Immanence." Science Et Esprit: Revue De Philosophie Et De Théologie 64, no. 2 (05/01, 2012): 263-275. In French.
  Abstract:
  This study is interested in Taylor's thesis, according to which belief would be a possible option in a secularised world, naturally plunged into immanence, provided that, by some ideological bias or by the hidden experience of fulfilment, one does not arbitrarily declare the closure of this world on oneself. The author of 'A Secular Age' suggests that this thesis is tantamount to, by another ideological bias, to deny the logic itself of immanence, and to raise significant philosophical and theological questions concerning the possibility of belief in accepting fully the "immanence framework." He asks himself why religious belief in general and the Christian faith in particular should requires the moved adhesion to some previous world, even the preservation of the preaxial religious?
- Łuczewski, Michał. "Socjoteologia Charlesa Taylora." Miesięcznik "Znak" 665 (October, 2010). In Polish. http://www.miesiecznik.znak.com.pl/index.php?tekst=4166
  Notes: Koniec religii czy różne ścieżki wiary? : debata z Charlesem Taylorem.
- Lukes, Steven. "Multikulturalismus Und Gerechtigkeit: 'Politik Der Gleichen Würde' Und 'Politik Der Anerkennung': Überlegungen Im Anschluß an Charles Taylor." In Die Gegenwart Der Gerechtigkeit: Diskurse Zwischen Recht, Praktischer Philosophie Und Politik, edited by Christoph Demmerling and Thomas Rentsch. Berlin: , 1995. 99-111. In German.
- ———. "Ein großer Geist." Transit 49 (2016). http://www.iwm.at/transit/heft-49-grenzen-der-toleranz-charles-taylors-landkarte/. In German.
- Lumsden, Simon. "The Rise of the Non-Metaphysical Hegel." Philosophy Compass 3, no. 1 (2008): 51-65.
  Abstract:
  There has been a resurgence of interest in hegel's thought by anglo-american philosophers in the last 25 years. that expansion of interest was initiated with the publication of Charles Taylor's hegel (1975). that work stills stands as one of the important branches of hegel interpretation. however, the dominance of the strongly metaphysical interpretation of hegel, which dominated the understanding of hegel until the 1980s, and of which Taylor's work represents the culmination, has now, at least among the major interpreters of hegel, given way to what has come to be known as the nonmetaphysical reading of hegel. this article charts the emergence and development of the nonmetaphysical hegel, which takes his thought to be a continuation of the kantian project of critically examining the presuppositions of any normative claim. this article provides an overview of the latest developments in hegel research, primarily focusing on the english-language literature. recent research has placed hegel's concerns at the centre of contemporary debates in analytic philosophy, particularly concerning the status of norms, the 'space of reasons' and the 'myth of the given'. this research has in turn been influential on the two most important figures in english-language hegel scholarship (robert pippin and terry pinkard). the article will position this new wave of hegel scholarship and its influence in relation to the metaphysical interpretation of hegel and will also provide a brief overview of hegel's reception in french poststructuralism, which has largely accepted and promoted a view of hegel as a metaphysician.
- Lundberg, Anders. "Review of A Secular Age." Acta Sociologica 52, no. 3 (2009): 291-292. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25652133.
- Lusztig, Michael. "Deeper and Deeper: Deep Diversity, Federalism, and Redistributive Politics in Canada." In The Myth of the Sacred: The Charter, the Courts, and the Politics of the Constitution in Canada, edited by Patrick James, Donald E. Abelson and Michael Lusztig. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2002. 207-218.
- Lutz-Bachmann, Matthias. "Religion in Den Ambivalenzen Der Moderne." In Unerfüllte Moderne? - Neue Perspektiven Auf Das Werk Von Charles Taylor, edited by Michael Kühnlein and Matthias Lutz-Bachmann. Berlin: Suhrkamp / Insel, 2011. 371-387. In German.
- Lyon, David. "Epiphany and Apocalypse in the Post-Modern." In Secular Quest for Meaning in Life, edited by Edward I. Bailey. Lampeter: Edwin Mellen Press, 2002. 137-147.
- ———. "Possibilities for Post-Secular Sociology?" Canadian Journal of Sociology 33, no. 3 (2008): 693-696.
- ———. "Being Post-Secular in the Social Sciences: Taylor's Social Imaginaries." New Blackfriars 91, no. 1036 (2010): 648-662. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nbfr.2010.91.issue-1036/issuetoc.
  Abstract:
  Following the fall of mainstream secularization paradigms, this article suggests opportunities arise for considering social and political life as ?religious? phenomena and, specifically, for using Taylor's pregnant notion of ?social imaginaries? as a bridge between ?secular? and ?post-secular? social science. thus, themes implicit in A secular age are made explicit and used to challenge how social science is done in ?post-secular? times.
  Notes: Symposium on Charles Taylor with his responses.
- Lysaker, John. "Finding My Way through Moral Space: A Whim-Wham for Charles Scott." Epoche: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 17, no. 1 (09/01, 2012): 143-154.
  Abstract:
  The ongoing task of self-discovery, which I figure as self-finding, following Emerson, is integral to the human condition. While its results are always fragmentary, self-finding also conducts the currents of life in ways that establish conditions for our lives and those of others. This activity is mistakenly constrained by Charles Taylor, who argues that it remains tied to moral space. Charles Scott's work shows how moral space can be found in a manner that suspends the necessity of moral space and generates new possibilities.
- Lyshaug, Brenda. "Authenticity and the Politics of Identity: A Critique of Charles Taylor's Politics of Recognition." Contemporary Political Theory 3, no. 3 (Dec., 2004): 300-320.
  Abstract:
  This essay evaluates Charles Taylor's defence of a politics of recognition in light of his broader account of modern identity and the self. I argue that his call for a politics of recognition betrays what is most ethically promising in his own account of modern subjectivity--namely, its emphasis on and affirmation of inner multiplicity. the first part of the paper identifies the ways in which his account of the self affirms inner multiplicity. the second part of the paper outlines how a politics of recognition circumscribes this inner plurality by rendering core aspects of personal identity rigid and by promoting attitudes that inhibit attentiveness to multiplicity within the self. (edited).
- MacGregor, David. "Canada's Hegel." Literary Review of Canada June (1994).
- MacIntyre, Alasdair. "Critical Remarks on 'the Sources of the Self' by Charles Taylor." Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54, no. 1 (Mar., 1994): 187-190. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2108366;.
  Abstract:
  Three questions about Charles Taylor's central positions in "sources of the self" are raised. first, how can Taylor's realism about goods by reconciled with his view that judgments about genuine goods may be in conflict? secondly, are choices between the conflicting claims of goods governed by any standard or are they mere preferences? thirdly, do Taylor's historical narratives presuppose the very interpretations which they are supposed to confirm, and is this damaging?.
- ———. "Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism: The Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question James Tully." Philosophical Quarterly 46, no. 185 (1996): 522-524.
- ———. "Review of Philosophical Arguments." Philosophical Quarterly 47, no. 186 (1997): 94-96. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2956476.
- ———. "Charles Taylor Und Das Dramatische Narrativ – Argument Und Genre." Transit 49 (2016). http://www.iwm.at/transit/heft-49-grenzen-der-toleranz-charles-taylors-landkarte/. In German.
- MacKenzie, Iain. "Review of Charles Taylor: Meaning,Morals and Modernity by Nicholas H. Smith and Charles Taylor: Thinking and Living Deep Diversity by Mark Redhead." Radical Philosophy Sept./Oct. (2002).
- Maclure, Jocelyn. Quebec IdentityMcGill-Queen's University Press, 2003. In English.
  Abstract:
  In articulating an alternative narrative maclure reframes the debate, detaching the question of Quebec's identity from the question of sovereignty versus federalism and linking it closely to Quebec's cultural diversity and to the consolidation of its democratic sphere. in so doing, he rethinks the conditions of authenticity, leaves space for first nations' self-determination and takes account of globalization. this edition has been expanded for english-Canadians with additional references as well as a glossary of names, institutions, and concepts.
- ———. "De l'Herméneutique De La Modernité à l'Éthique Normative: Commentaire Sur 'Modern Social Imaginaries'." Philosophiques 33, no. 2 (Sept., 2006): 493-498. In French. http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/013896ar?integral=oui.
- ———. "Ein Stark Wertendes Subjekt." Transit 49 (2016). http://www.iwm.at/transit/heft-49-grenzen-der-toleranz-charles-taylors-landkarte/. In German.
- Madarasz, Norman. "On the Sophistication and Limits of a Philosophy of Religion [Review of Varieties of Religion Today: William James Revisited]." European Legacy 21 (February, 2007): 87-92.
- ———. "The Secularist Counter-Narrative in Charles Taylor's Philosophy of Religion." Ethica: Cadernos Acadêmicos 16, no. 2 (2009): 81-112.
  Abstract:
  My aim in this article is threefold. I seek to contextualize the question of religion in Charles Taylor's recent work. I blend this task, however, with a need to confront Taylor's theory of secularism as fending off marcel Gauchet's incisive post-weberian reading of christianity as producing an "exit from religion". finally, I examine Taylor's perspectivist history and theory of secularism. ultimately, I argue that Taylor's perspectivism forsakes a conception of religion as subjective reason for a subjectivism that embraces order and institutional power in the name of benevolence. by reinforcing his personal faith in catholicism, Taylor inevitably weakens his otherwise solid and important claim to participate in the transformational unfolding of christian moral philosophy into a bona fide public philosophy with universalist ambitions.
- Madathikunnel, Sabu George. "Secularism and the Crisis of Secularization in India: A Taylorian Response." REA: A Journal of Religion, Education and the Arts 7 (2011). http://rea.materdei.ie/media/Issue%207/REA%20Issue%207%20%20Madathikunnel.pdf.
- Maddi, Salvatore R. "Is the Move Toward Modernity so Simple?: Commentary on Charles Taylor." In Hermeneutics and Psychological Theory, edited by Stanley Messer, Louis Sass and Robert Woolfolk. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1988. 328-331.
- Madigan, P. "Review of Abbey (Ed.) Contemporary Philosophy in Focus: Charles Taylor. Cambridge University Press, 2004." Heythrop Journal 46, no. 2 (2005): 272-273.
- Madry, Alan. "Seekers, Comparative Spiritual Narratives, and the Authority of the Church." In Seekers and Dwellers: Plurality and Wholeness in a Time of Secularity, edited by Philip J. Rossi. Washington, DC: Council for Research in Values and Philosophy, 2016. 167-245. http://www.crvp.org/publications/Series-VIII/20-Rossi-Master.pdf.
- Maffie, J. "'in the End, we have the Gatling Gun, and they have Not': Future Prospects of Indigenous Knowledges." Futures 41, no. 1 (2009): 53-65.
- Mahmood, Saba. "Can Secularism be Other-Wise?" In Varieties of Secularism in a Secular Age, edited by Michael Warner, Jonathan VanAntwerpen and Craig Calhoun. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010. 282-299. http://books.google.com/books?id=FhVQf5jTod0C;;;.
- Mahoney, Daniel J. "The Re-Enchantment of the World [Review of Secular Age]." Wall St. Journal (Sept 21, 2007, 2007). http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB119034571151235021.html.
- Mahoney, Jon. "Review of Modern Social Imaginaries." International Studies in Philosophy 38, no. 4 (2006): 169-170.
- Main, Roderick. "In a Secular Age : Weber, Taylor, Jung." Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society 18, no. 3 (2013): 277-294.
  Abstract:
  Sociologists engaging with depth psychology have rarely drawn on the work of C. G. Jung. Part of the reason for this, I suggest, is Jung’s seeming tendency to credit, and be informed by, religious and non-rational perspectives. In this article I first highlight what sociologists might find problematic in Jung by comparing his views on the desacralisation of the modern world with Max Weber’s views on disenchantment. I then argue that Charles Taylor’s recent alternative account of disenchantment and secularity provides a framework within which Jung’s thought becomes more sociologically creditable despite, and even because of, its approach to matters of religion.
- Major, Robert. "Regards Sur Notre Époque." Voix Et Images 19, no. 1 (Automne, 1993): 168-179. In French.
- Malcolm, Norman. "Explaining Behavior." Philosophical Review 76 (1967): 97-104.
- ———. "The Conceivability of Mechanism." Philosophical Review 77 (1968): 45-72.
- Maletz, Donald J. "On the Revival of Hegelian Political Thought." Political Science Reviewer 13 (1983): 155-178.
- Mallory, James. "Review of Reconciling the Solitudes." Political Quarterly 65 (1994): 220-222.
- Mancilla Muñoz, Mauricio. "Del Malestar a La Reivindicación Del 'Ethos' Social: Hacia Una 'Ética De La Autenticidad' En El Pensamiento De Charles Taylor." Episteme NS: Revista Del Instituto De Filosofia De La Universidad Central De Venezuela 24, no. 2 (July, 2004): 97-117. In Spanish.
  Abstract:
  The dissolution of moral horizons, the eclipse of moral aims for an instrumental reason and the progressive loss of freedom are some of the conflicts of contemporary society according to the analysis by Charles Taylor in his book 'the ethics of authenticity'. hence, these problematic aspects are seen as a consequence of a rooted liberal individualism and require an alternative conception of human being, which would recognize and emphasize the role of the community in the configuration of its identity. Taylor argues for a hermeneutic conception of human sciences, emphasizing the dialogical structure that configures the identity of man and proposes a 'politics of recognition' as a basic key to understand the mechanisms of social integration.
- Månson, Per. "Åter Till Hegel?" Sociologisk Forskning 24, no. 1, Historisk sociologi (1987): 81-83. In English. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20850847.
- Manthien, Thomas. "Charles Taylor." In the Canadian Encyclopediahttp://theCanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=A1ARTA0007886.
- Marcon, Gilberto Hoffmann and Reinaldo Furlan. "The Issue of Identity in Postmodernity: Authenticity and Individualism in Charles Tayor." Psicologia USP 31 (2020). https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65642020000100201&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en.
  Abstract:
  The collapsing of communitarian relations and the increasing isolation of individuals in relation to each other figure prominently in the studies of various authors who sought to describe contemporary ways of life. We address this issue as presented by Charles Taylor in Sources of the Self and in The ethics of authenticity. The author identifies three “malaises” that are present in modern society: individualism, the primacy of instrumental reason and the alienation of individuals from the political sphere. Proposing to avoid a restrictively negativist reading of such phenomena, Taylor presents them as transformations of the dynamic frameworks that constitute the modern identity. We undertook a study of the notions of identity and authenticity as presented in those books, aiming at a synthetic comprehension of this issue and investigating the possibilities of overcoming it, that is, of recovering the meanings lost by an individualist fragmentation.
- Margolis, Joseph. "Taylor on the Reduction of Teleological Laws." Inquiry 2 (Mar., 1968): 118-124.
- ———. "Wittgenstein's Question and the Ubiquity of Cultural Space." Contemporary Pragmatism 5, no. 1 (June, 2008): 13-38.
  Abstract:
  Wittgenstein's question about agency in 'philosophical investigations' section 621 provides a fresh way of addressing the analysis of the distinction between physical nature and human culture, featuring the artifactual, hybrid, second-natured, enlanguaged and encultured transformation of the members of homo sapiens into selves; and a third model of the cultural between the hermeneutic and the reductive: Including the cultural "penetration" of the physical, internal and external bildung, the sui generis features of the culturally emergent, and the new unity of the human and natural sciences.
- Marín, Francesc-Xavier. "[Untitled]." El Ciervo: Revista Mensual De Pensamiento y Cultura 56, no. 671 (febrero, 2007): p. 43. In English. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40835237.
- Mark, D. C. "Recognition and Honor: A Critique of Axel Honneth's and Charles Taylor's Histories of Recognition." Constellations 21, no. 1 (2014): 16-31.
- Markell, Patchen. Bound by Recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.
- Marks, Jonathan. Perfection and Disharmony in the Thought of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Pr, 2005.
  Abstract:
  Jonathan marks offers a new interpretation of the philosopher's thought and its place in the contemporary debate between liberals and communitarians. against prevailing views, marks argues that rousseau's thought revolves around the natural perfection of a naturally disharmonious being. at the foundation of rousseau's thought marks finds a natural teleology that takes account of and seeks to harmonize conflicting ends. the rousseau who emerges from this interpretation is a radical critic of liberalism who is nonetheless more cautious about protecting individual freedom than his milder communitarian successors. (publisher, edited).
- ———. "Misreading One's Sources: Charles Taylor's Rousseau." American Journal of Political Science 49, no. 1 (Jan., 2005): 119-134.
- Marsden, George. "Matteo Ricci and the Prodigal Culture." In A Catholic Modernity? Charles Taylor's Marianist Award Lecture, edited by James L. Heft. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. 83-93.
- Marshall, Sarah. "Modern Social Imaginaries." Contemporary Political Theory 4, no. 2 (2005): 197.
- Martin, Bernice. "Dilemmas and Connections: Selected Essays." Journal of Contemporary Religion 26, no. 3 (Oct., 2011): 485-487.
- ———. "Review of Aspiring to Fullness in a Secular Age: Essays on Religion and Theology in the Work of Charles Taylor." Journal of Contemporary Religion 30, no. 2 (2015): 323-325.
- ———. "[Review of] Working with A Secular Age: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Charles Taylor’s Master Narrative." Journal of Contemporary Religion 32, no. 2 (2017): 331-333.
- Martin, Jack and Jeff Sugarman. "Is the Self a Kind of Understanding?" Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 31, no. 1 (Mar., 2001): 103-114.
  Abstract:
  We present a developmental, relational perspective on the self as a kind of reflective, interpretive understanding. such "self" understanding always is embedded and emergent within the historical, sociocultural life-world, and serves to disclose and extend the being of particular embodied agents. following an introduction that links our work to related traditions of scholarly writing on the self, our essay is organized in four parts. (edited).
- Martin, Jack. "Perspectival Selves in Interaction with Others: Re-Reading G.H. Mead's Social Psychology." Journal of the Theory of Social Behavior 35 (September, 2005): 231-253.
- ———. "Does Interpretation in Psychology Differ from Interpretation in Natural Science?" Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 39, no. 1 (Mar., 2009): 19-37.
  Abstract:
  Following an initial discussion of the general nature of interpretation in contemporary psychology, and social and natural science, relevant views of Charles Taylor and thomas kuhn are considered in some detail. although both Taylor and kuhn agree that interpretation in the social or human sciences differs in some ways from interpretation in the natural sciences, they disagree about the nature and origins of such difference. we consider differences in interpretation between the natural and social sciences in terms of ian hacking's use of elizabeth anscombe's conceptualization of actions as intentional acts under particular descriptions. we conclude that both Taylor and kuhn are correct to point to differences in interpretation between the natural and social sciences. we also argue that in psychology, such interpretive differences, contra kuhn and pro Taylor, are qualitative rather than quantitative. (edited).
- Martin, J. P. "Religion and International Relations Theory/The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere/Religion and the Global Politics of Human Rights…." Human Rights Quarterly 34, no. 3 (08, 2012): 896-901.
- Martin, Michael and Lee C. MacIntyre. "Taylor on Interpretation and the Sciences of Man." In Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science, edited by Michael Martin. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1994. 259-279.
- Martínez Lucena, Jorge. "La Autenticidad Como Libertad Plural y Dialéctica: De Charles Taylor a Francesco Botturi." Espiritu: Cuadernos Del Instituto Filosofico De Balmesiana 58, no. 138 (2009): 95-111. In Spanish.
  Abstract:
  In "sources of the self" (1989), C. Taylor explains the human identity as something that we cannot construct in a solipsistic way. in "the malaise of modernity" (1991), he describes the authenticity as a freedom that we cannot reduce to self-determined freedom. we should take account of the "horizons of meaning" and of its "dialogic" component. F. botturi, in "L'ontologia dialettica della libertà" (2003), makes a theoretical exercise and tries to articulate dialectically the different dimensions of the freedom: "autodeterminazione", "autorealizzazione" and "relazione". in this article, we want to cooperate in the theoretical articulation of the "authenticity" understood as "dialectic" and "plural freedom". we also want to understand what was Taylor talking about when he made a call for the "lotta continua", in the chapter VII of "the malaise of modernity".
- Martínez Pérez, Francisco Javier. "Platón y San Agustín De Hipona Según Charles Taylor: Del Yo Como Autodominio y Control Al Yo Como Interioridad." Estudio Agustiniano 56, no. 3 (2021): 535-551.
  Abstract:
  A partir de los distintos mapas morales de la antigüedad, Charles Taylor considera la evolución experimentada desde Platón a Agustín de Hipona como una evolución fundamental.1] Según Taylor, el contraste entre las imágenes de Agustín y de Platón, pese a la continuidad en la teoría metafísica, reside en una importante diferencia filosófica. Mientras que para Platón el mundo de los objetos nos conduce al mundo de las Ideas y al orden racional, Agustín de Hipona abandona dicho enfoque y lo dirige al conocimiento de lo que cada uno de nosotros lleva dentro de sí y nos hace conscientes de ello en primera persona. Captamos lo inteligible no sólo porque el ojo del alma se dirija a los objetos sino por la intimidad de la autopresencia en Dios.
- Martinuk, Matthew J. M. "Review of Dialectics of the Self: Transcending Charles Taylor." Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy (Revue Canadienne De Philosophie Continentale) 12, no. 1 (Spring, 2008): 182-184.
- ———. "A Fundamental Orientation to the Good: Iris Murdoch's Influence on Charles Taylor." In Iris Murdoch Connected: Critical Essays on Her Fiction and Philosophy, edited by Mark Luprecht. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press, 2014. http://utpress.org/bookdetail-2/?jobno=T01778; http://www.academia.edu/815435/A_Fundamental_Orientation_to_the_Good_Iris_Murdochs_Influence_on_Charles_Taylor
- Marty, Martin E. "Review of A Secular Age." Church History: Studies in Christianity and Culture 77, no. 3 (Sept, 2008): 773-775. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20618583.
- Masłowski, Michał. "Na Marginesie Wykładu Charlesa Taylora." Miesięcznik "Znak" 665 (October, 2010). In Polish. http://www.miesiecznik.znak.com.pl/index.php?tekst=4161
  Notes: Koniec religii czy różne ścieżki wiary? : debata z Charlesem Taylorem.
- Massicotte, Louis. "Review of Rapprocher Les Solitudes." Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue Canadienne De Science Politique 27, no. 4 (Dec., 1994): 795-796. In English. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3229107.
- Mathewes, Charles and Joshua Yates. "The “Drive to Reform” and its Discontents." In Aspiring to Fullness in a Secular Age: Essays on Religion and Theology in the Work of Charles Taylor, edited by Carlos Colorado and Justin D. Klassen. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2014. 152-190. http://undpress.nd.edu/books/P03114.
- Matravers, Matt. "Review of Modern Social Imaginaries." Political Studies Review 3, no. 1 (January, 2005): 54.
- Mattio, Eduardo. "The Virtues of the Republic: The Benefits of the Narrative Republic." Andamios 3, no. 6 (June, 2007): 173.
- Mauser, Anthony. "Critical Notice of Hegel." Mind 87 (1978): 116-125.
- May, Collin. "Charles Taylor, A Secular Age." Society 46, no. 1 (March, 2009): 199-203.
- Mayer, Sylvia. "Literature and Environmental Ethical Criticism: Sarah Orne Jewett’s New England Texts." Anglia-Zeitschrift Für Englische Philologie 124 (2006): 101-121.
- McAdams, Charles Brian. "Review of Multiculturalism and the Politics of Recognition
  ." Vera Lex 7, no. 1-2 (Winter, 2006): 127-130.
- McBride, Cillian and Jonathan Seglow. "Introduction: Recognition: Philosophy and Politics." European Journal of Political Theory 8, no. 1 (2009): 7-12.
- McCabe, David. "Review of the Ethics of Authenticity and Multiculturalism and 'the Politics of Recognition." Commonweal 120 (Feb. 12, 1993): 558-560.
- ———. "Review of Philosophical Arguments." Cross Currents 47 (1997-1998): 94-96.
- McCarthy, Thomas. "On Reconciling Cosmopolitan Unity and National Diversity." Public Culture 11, no. 1 (Winter, 1999): 175-208.
- ———. "Imaginaires Sociaux Et Modernités Multiples." Philosophiques 33, no. 2 (Sept., 2006): 485-491. In French. http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/013895ar?integral=oui.
- McCaughey, Mary,. "Reason,Reality and the Re-Personalisation of being: A Response to Taylor's Characterisation of the 'Impersonal Order'." REA: A Journal of Religion, Education and the Arts 7 (2011). http://rea.materdei.ie/media/Issue%207/REA%20Issue%207%20-%20McCaughey.pdf.
- McClay, Wilfrid M. "Uncomfortable Unbelief: Review of A Secular Age." First Things 183 (May, 2008): 35.
- McClimans, L. "Interpretability, Validity, and the Minimum Important Difference." Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics: Philosophy of Medical Research and Practice 32, no. 6 (2011): 389-401.
- McClorry, Brian. "Review of the Language Animal." Thinking Faith (2016). http://www.thinkingfaith.org/articles/language-animal.
- McClure, Joyce Kloc. "Seeing through the Fog: Love and Injustice in 'Bleak House'." Journal of Religious Ethics 31, no. 1 (Mar., 2003): 23-44.
  Abstract:
  The author takes up a provocative question poised by Charles Taylor about the relationship between our commitments to a good such as neighbor love and the possibilities of achieving and sustaining social justice. Taylor's concern is not only that we make such a commitment but that we make it in such a way that we avoid its ability to lead us towards injustice rather than justice. after articulating conceptions of love, justice, and injustice, the author turns to charles dickens's treatment of love and injustice in 'bleak house', to explore more fully how love can lead to injustice, and also its potential role in promoting justice. (edited).
- McCormick, Peter J. "Fictions of Modernity: On the Views of Charles Taylor and Stephen Toulmin." In Myths and Fictions, edited by Shlomo Biderman and Ben-Ami Scharfstein. Leiden; New York: E.J. Brill, 1993.
- McCurry, Jeffrey M. "Review of A Catholic Modernity?" Modern Theology 18, no. 3 (2002): 409-410.
- McEvoy, James. "Review of Ruth Abbey, Charles Taylor, Philosophy Now Series (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, 2000), and Nicholas H Smith, Charles Taylor: Meaning, Morals and Modernity, Key Contemporary Thinkers Series (Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2002)." The Australasian Catholic Record 80, no. 4 (2003): 523-524.
- ———. "In Bed with the Secular Spirit [Review of A Secular Age]." Eureka Street (June 25, 2008). http://www.eurekastreet.com.au/article.aspx?aeid=7790.
- ———. Leaving Christendom for Good: Church-World Dialogue in a Secular Age. Lanham, Maryland; Plymouth, United Kingdom: Lexington Books, 2014.
  Abstract:
  Leaving Christendom for Good argues that the solution to some of the most troubling tensions in the life of the Catholic Church since Vatican II can be found in the council’s document Gaudium et spes. That text’s view of the church’s mission and social relationships as dialogical has the capacity to liberate. Part One studies the contemporary place of religion, with particular reference to Charles Taylor’s groundbreaking work, A Secular Age. In that context, Gaudium et spes’s dialogical view of the church–world relationship is examined. Part Two explores what true dialogue entails, and how it is best understood theologically. Joseph Ratzinger’s view of the church–world relationship is examined. The book’s final chapter considers two practical implications of its argument: how evangelization can be best understood today, and how the church can best approach issues in the public sphere.
- McKenna, Edward J. and Diane C. Zannoni. "Philosophical Foundations of Post Keynesian Economics." Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 15 (1993): 395-407.
- McKenzie-Gonzalez, Germain. Interpreting Charles Taylor’s Social Theory on Religion and Secularization: A Comparative Study. Springer, 2017. http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-47700-8.
- ———. "Charles Taylor’s View on Social Change in A Secular Age." Unpublished article. http://www.academia.edu/5442856/Charles_Taylors_View_on_Social_Change_in_A_Secular_Age
- McLemee, Scott. "From the Ground Up [Review of Reconstructing Democracy]." Inside Higher Ed (July 31, 2020). https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2020/07/31/review-charles-taylor-et-al-reconstructing-democracy-how-citizens-are-building.
- McLennan, Gregor. "Among the Unbelievers." New Left Review 52 (July/August, 2008): 139-148.
- ———. "Uplifting Unbelief." New Blackfriars 91, no. 1036 (2010): 627-645. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nbfr.2010.91.issue-1036/issuetoc.
  Abstract:
  This article analyses three of Taylor's principal theoretical moves: His basic account of secularity and related rejection of secularist ?subtraction stories?; his comprehension of historico-empirical realities in the light of a sort of philosophy of history; and his presentation of the transcendental quality of the experience of ?fullness?. motivated to contest Taylor's framing of the ?unbeliever? as spirituality deprived and intellectually complacent, the coherence, content and rhetorical overkill of his argumentation in each of these areas is questioned.
  Notes: Symposium on Charles Taylor with his responses.
- McLeod, John and Gordon Lynch. "'this is our Life': Strong Evaluation in Psychotherapy Narrative." European Journal of Psychotherapy 3, no. 3 (December, 2000): 389-406.
- McNamara, Tony. "Back to the Future: Confronting the Market State by Re-Affirming the Common Good: An Essay in Political Theology." REA: A Journal of Religion, Education and the Arts 7 (2011). http://rea.materdei.ie/media/Issue%207/REA%20Issue%207%20-%20McNamara.pdf.
- McNeil, Russell. "Soft Relativism And The Malaise Of Modernity."Malaspina Great Books Blog. 2005. http://www.malaspina.org/taylorc.htm.
- McPartland, Thomas J. "Politics and Metaphysics: A Hortatory Exercise." Method: Journal of Lonergan Studies (New Series) 1, no. 2 (Sept., 2010): 163-175.
  Abstract:
  Contemporary political practice in liberal democracies scorns any reference to metaphysics. political philosophers as diverse as eric voegelin, Charles Taylor, and Jürgen Habermas accept that we live in a postmetaphysical world. but a viable political philosophy cannot ignore such persistent metaphysical questions as those about the self (the putative subject of dignity and rights) and about the essential properties of the state (whether a thing, or merely artificial, or something in between). bernard lonergan's sketch of metaphysics in 'insight' offers a promising beginning for such a contemporary metaphysics, based, as it is, on the dynamic and self-transcending process of inquiry.
- McPherson, David. "To what Extent must we Go Beyond Neo-Aristotelian Ethical Naturalism?" American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86, no. 4 (2012): 627-654.
- ———. "Seeking Re-Enchantment." In Seekers and Dwellers: Plurality and Wholeness in a Time of Secularity, edited by Philip J. Rossi. Washington, DC: Council for Research in Values and Philosophy, 2016. 17-46. http://www.crvp.org/publications/Series-VIII/20-Rossi-Master.pdf.
- McPherson, David. "Charles Taylor's Doctrine of Strong Evaluation: Ethics and by Michiel Meijer (Review)." The Review of Metaphysics 73, no. 3 (2020): 618-619
  Notes: ID: TN_cdi_projectmuse_journals_750614_S2154130220300119.
- McWhorter, John. "Talking Heads: Charles Taylor on the Distinctiveness of Human Language." Books & Culture September/October (2016). http://www.booksandculture.com/articles/2016/sepoct/talking-heads.html.
- Mead, Aaron M. "Hegel and Externalism about Intentions." Owl of Minerva 41, no. 1-2 (2009): 107-142.
  Abstract:
  My aim in this paper is to suggest that intentions are, as G. E. M. anscombe puts it, not exclusively "private and interior" act-descriptions that agents alone determine. rather, I argue that the true intention of an action is frequently constrained, and sometimes even determined, by the intersubjective and retrospective view of an action. I begin by offering an interpretation of hegel's account of intention in 'the philosophy of right' -- an interpretation that fits well with work by Charles Taylor and michael quante, but not with a recent paper by arto laitinen. next, I offer examples that support the view -- consistent with my reading of hegel -- that sometimes the intersubjective and retrospective account of an action trumps the agent's prior subjective act-description. finally, I suggest the hegelian view I sketch might be taken as a kind of externalism about intentions, on the order of externalism about epistemic justification.
- Mech, Krzysztof. "Jedna Wiara, Różne Ścieżki?" Miesięcznik "Znak" 665 (October, 2010). In Polish. http://www.miesiecznik.znak.com.pl/index.php?tekst=4158
  Notes: Koniec religii czy różne ścieżki wiary? : debata z Charlesem Taylorem.
- Medina, Carlos. "La Fenomenología Del Lenguaje y El Concepto De La Razón Práctica En El Pensamiento De Charles Taylor." Cinta De Moebio, no. 50 (2014): 53-69. In Spanish.
  Abstract:
  Tomando como punto de partida el concepto que tiene Taylor acerca del ser humano como un ser de significados, este artículo estudia el modo como Taylor elabora su concepción del uso práctico de la razón, recuperando ciertas nociones fundamentales de la tradición fenomenológica y hermenéutica relativas al lenguaje, como lo son la idea del trasfondo y la situación encarnada del hombre. Puesto que, en definitiva, el trasfondo constituye un horizonte de referencia anterior, desde el punto de vista ontológico, al dominio subjetivo de la razón en el agente humano, el análisis de Taylor termina por favorecer ciertos enfoques de la filosofía contemporánea como, por ejemplo, la analítica existenciaria de Heidegger, que buscan prescindir, paradójicamente, de la premisa del sujeto. Si atendemos a esta indicación, un desafío que resta, pues, al desarrollo futuro de los modos de comprensión de la filosofía moral, y de la antropología filosófica, es el de cómo vincular el análisis del problema moral, de un sujeto de sentidos, con una teoría ontológica del trasfondo que es, en cambio, a-subjetiva.
  Taking as a starting point Taylor's concept about man as a being of meanings, this article examines, in particular, the way that Taylor elaborates his conception of the practical use of reason, recovering some fundamental notions of the phenomenological tradition and hermeneutics, relating to language, such as, the idea of the background, and the incarnated situation of man. Considering that, ultimately, the background is a horizon of previous reference, from the ontological point of view, to the subjective domain of reason in the human agent, the analysis of Taylor ends up favoring certain approaches of contemporary philosophy such as, Heidegger’s existential analytic that aims at leaving aside, paradoxically, the premise of the subject. If we consider this indication, a challenge that remains, then, to the future development of the ways of understanding moral philosophy and philosophical anthropology, is how to link the analysis of the moral problem, in a subject of senses, with the ontological theory of the background that is, however, a-subjective.
- Meer, Nasar, Tariq Modood, and Ricard Zapata-Barrero. Multiculturalism and Interculturalism: Debating the Dividing Lines. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016.
  Abstract:
  This volume brings together some of the most prominent scholars in the field to address these two different approaches. With a Foreword by Charles Taylor and an Afterword by Bhikhu Parekh, this collection spans European, North-American and Latin-Americ.
- Megone, Chris. "One Concept of Liberty." Political Studies 35 (1987): 611-622.
- Meijer, Michiel. "Nietzsche, Taylor En De Tegengestelde Krachten Van De Moraal." In Geert Grote Pen 2011. Nederlandstalige Masterscripties Van Vijf Jonge Filosofen. Deventer: Deventer Universitaire Pers, 2011. In Dutch.
- ———. "Nietzsche and Taylor between Truth and Meaning." Bijdragen, Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie En Theologie 73, no. 2 (2012): 168-189.
  Abstract:
  This article explores the relation between truth and meaning by staging a confrontation between Friedrich Nietzsche, the herald of nihilism who claimed that all previous foundations of morality have been undermined, and Charles Taylor, the advocate of 'strong evaluation' and the inevitability of meaningfulness. Central to this discussion is the relation between nihilism, truth, morality and meaning in the morally pluralistic context of a postmodern society. How do meaning and truth relate in a secular, post-traditional age? Does the longing for truth necessarily eliminate all possible forms of meaning, and, vice versa, does the human capacity to create meaning require that we suppress or even abandon the claim to truth altogether?
- ———. "Strong Evaluation and Weak Ontology. the Predicament of Charles Taylor." International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 75, no. 5 (2014): 440-459.
  Abstract:
  This paper aims to come to grips with the rich philosophy of Charles Taylor by focusing on his concept of ‘strong evaluation’. I argue that a close examination of this term brings out more clearly the continuing tensions in his writings as a whole. I trace back the origin of strong evaluation in Taylor’s earliest writings, and continue by laying out the different philosophical themes that revolve around it. Next, the focus is on the separate arguments in which strong evaluation is central, uncovering several methodological conflicts in Taylor’s strategies. Arguing against most of his commentators, I suggest that a distinction should be drawn between the philosophical anthropological, moral, and ontological implications of strong evaluation. As a result, the contribution of this paper is threefold. First, it clarifies the issue of strong evaluation by distinguishing the different arguments in which Taylor employs the concept. Second, it makes the case for multiple tensions within Taylor’s methods. Third, as a consequence, this analysis not only enables us to evaluate the potential and limits of his subject-centered philosophy but also separates his objectivist claims from his theories of human subjectivity, opening up the question of the metaphysical status of his ontological view.
- ———. Charles Taylor's Doctrine of Strong Evaluation: Ethics and Ontology in a Scientific Age. Rowman & Littlefield, 2017.
  Abstract:
  This book provides a comprehensive critical account of the philosophy of Charles Taylor. The author engages with the secondary literature on Taylor's work and suggests that some interpretations and criticisms have been based on misunderstandings of the ontological dimension of strong evaluation, while also developing a novel interpretation of Taylor's ontological thought. Meijer argues that a close examination of Taylor’s central concept of “strong evaluation” reveals both the potential of and the tensions in his entire thinking. The analysis pursues the development of Taylor’s thought from his very first philosophical papers (1958) until his most recent reflections in Retrieving Realism (2015) and The Language Animal (2016). It also examines in detail Taylor’s ambitious philosophical project: to connect arguments in philosophical anthropology, ethics, phenomenology, and ontology across the full range of his diverse writings. The book therefore specifically traces the links between Taylor’s arguments, with strong evaluation as their unifying leitmotif.
- ———. "Is Charles Taylor (Still) a Weak Ontologist?" Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 56, no. 1 (2017): 65-87.
  Abstract:
  In this paper, I critically discuss Charles Taylor’s employment of the concept of ontology by shining a spotlight on a shift in emphasis from an anthropocentric to a non-anthropocentric viewpoint in his more recent writings on ontology. I also argue that Stephen White’s characterization of Taylor’s “weak” ontology, while revealing, only partly explains Taylor’s position, as White’s interpretation leaves no room for the metaphysical thrust in Taylor’s thought. Drawing attention to a Taylor left out of White’s Taylor, I ultimately seek to show why Taylor’s distinctive mode of argumentation is not consonant with White’s weak-ontological approach.
- ———. "Taylor En Nietzsche." In Reeks Denkers. Charles Taylor, edited by G. Groot and Guy Vanheeswijck. Zoetermeer: Klement, 2017. In Dutch.
- ———. "Taylors Ontologische Onzekerheid." In Reeks Denkers. Charles Taylor, edited by G. Groot and Guy Vanheeswijck. Zoetermeer: Klement, 2017. In Dutch.
- ———. "Human-Related, Not Human-Controlled: Charles Taylor on Ethics and Ontology." International Philosophical Quarterly 57, no. 3 (2017): 267-285.
  Abstract:
  This essay critically discusses Charles Taylor’s distinctive mode of argumentation regarding ethics, phenomenology, and ontology. It also examines the meaning of Taylor’s ontological claims by putting a spotlight on the underappreciated significance of Heidegger and Murdoch for Taylor’s ontology. I argue that Taylor’s hybrid position is best understood as a phenomenological attempt to connect Heideggerian ontology and Murdochean ethics. The paper is divided in five sections: (1) Taylor’s engagement with Murdoch and his tendency towards non-anthropocentrism in ethics; (2) his unusual interwoven mode of thought; (3) his debt to Heidegger; (4) his hesitant interpretations of Heidegger and Murdoch; and (5) how these hesitations affect Taylor’s ethical view in general and its underlying ontology in particular.
- ———. "Does Charles Taylor have a Nietzsche Problem?" Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory 24, no. 3 (2017).
  Abstract:
  This paper critically discusses Charles Taylor’s ontological views in an ongoing discussion with Mark Redhead’s analysis of what he calls “Taylor’s Nietzschean predicament.” The paper is divided in five sections. The first section examines Taylor’s evaluation of the difference between theistic and non-theistic moral sources. It becomes clear in the second section that this is only the gateway to Redhead’s critique of Taylor. I argue that his analysis, while revealing, is largely based on interpretive errors. After locating Taylor’s “Nietzsche problem” by drawing heavily on an insightful paper by Michael Shapiro in the third section, I continue to discuss the implications of this problem for Taylor’s views in the fourth section by showing that his hermeneutic perspective of strong evaluation tends to close the very questions that Nietzsche’s genealogy opens up, and finally reflect in the concluding fifth section on how these issues affect Taylor’s ontology as a whole.
- ———. "En De Ethiek? De Uitdaging Voor Het Naturalisme Vanuit Een Tayloriaans Perspectief." Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Wijsbegeerte 109, no. 2 (2017): 231-235. In Dutch.
  Abstract:
  This short article is a commentary of Martin Stokhof’s paper “The End of Philosophy? A Wittgensteinian Perspective on the Challenge of Naturalism” (published in the same volume), in which he addresses the challenges that naturalism poses for the humanities in general, and for philosophy in particular. My commentary is titled “What About Ethics? Challenging Naturalism From a Taylorian Perspective”. Referring to Taylor’s arguments, I suggest that Stokhof’s analysis could be supplemented with a criticism of naturalism concerning its (in)ability to explain the full scope of our moral deliberations, and thereby pose to Stokhof the question as to whether (and if so, to what extent) his Wittgensteinian analysis can also be used to challenge naturalism itself.
- ———. "A Phenomenological Approach with Ontological Implications? Charles Taylor and Maurice Mandelbaum on Explanation in Ethics." Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20, no. 5 (2017): 977-991.
  Abstract:
  This paper critically discusses Charles Taylor’s ethical views in his little known paper “Ethics and Ontology” (J Philos 100 (6): 305–320, 2003) by confronting it with the moral phenomenology of Maurice Mandelbaum, as laid out in his (largely neglected) The Phenomenology of Moral Experience (1955). The aim of the paper is to explore the significance of Taylor’s views for the dispute between naturalists, non-naturalists, and quietists in contemporary metaethics. It is divided in six sections. In the first section, I examine Taylor’s critique of naturalism. I continue to discuss his moral phenomenology in more detail in the second and third sections, arguing that Taylor’s move from phenomenology to ontology is problematic. In the fourth section, I evaluate Taylor’s strategy by comparing it with Mandelbaum’s understanding of moral phenomenology, while also extending this comparison to the issue of how to locate the source of moral experience in the fifth section. Based on these discussions, I finally conclude in the sixth section that Taylor’s hermeneutical position, although ontologically incomplete and underdemonstrated, draws attention to a question to which current moral theory does not adequately respond.
- ———. "Taylor En Nietzsche." In Reeks Denkers. Charles Taylor, edited by G. Groot and Guy Vanheeswijck. Zoetermeer: Klement, 2018. 71-86.
- ———. "Taylors Ontologische Onzekerheid." In Reeks Denkers. Charles Taylor, edited by G. Groot and Guy Vanheeswijck. Zoetermeer: Klement, 2018. 197-217. In Dutch.
- ———. "Ontological Gaps in Advance: Retrieving Charles Taylor’s Realism." Philosophy Today 63, no. 1 (2019).
- ———. "Clarifying Moral Clarification: On Taylor's Contribution to Metaethics." International Journal of Philosophical Studies : IJPS 29, no. 5 (2021): 705-722.
  Abstract:
  Given Taylor's status as one of the most important thinkers in contemporary moral and political philosophy, it is somewhat surprising that so little attention has been paid to the implications of his views for metaethics. To fill this gap, this paper considers the highly unorthodox approach to metaethics articulated in his philosophy. While his views can be seen as 'anti-metaethical,' I argue that Taylor in fact takes the cause of metaethics in a new direction by showing the problems of moral realism in a whole new light. To demonstrate this, I first sketch the mainstream debate on moral realism (§1) to clear the way for Taylor's non-mainstream approach (§2). I continue to explain his unusual position by highlighting the contrast between the classical conception of moral facts and Taylor's key concepts of 'strong evaluation' and 'moral sources' (§3). Against the background of this contrast, I turn to Taylor's view on the nature of language to explain how it informs his distinctive conception of moral realism (§4). I conclude by discussing the implications of Taylor's realism for wider trends within metaethics (§5).
- Meijer, Michiel and Guy Vanheeswijck. "Review of Hubert Dreyfus and Charles Taylor, Retrieving Realism." Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 4 (2016). In Dutch.
- Meijer, Michiel and Rob Compaijen. "What is Distinctively Human? Charles Taylor and Alasdair MacIntyre on the Relation between Humans and Animals." In The Animal Inside: Essays at the Intersection of Philosophical Anthropology and Animal Studies, edited by et al Dierckxens. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2017. 85-101.
- Meijer, Michiel and Herbert De Vriese, eds. The Philosophy of Reenchantment. Routledge, 2021. https://www.routledge.com/The-Philosophy-of-Reenchantment/Meijer-De-Vriese/p/book/9780367418144
  Abstract:
  This book presents a philosophical study of the idea of reenchantment and its merits in the interrelated fields of philosophical anthropology, ethics, and ontology. It features chapters from leading contributors to the debate about reenchantment, including Charles Taylor, John Cottingham, Akeel Bilgrami, and Jane Bennett. The chapters examine neglected and contested notions such as enchantment, transcendence, interpretation, attention, resonance, and the sacred or reverence-worthy—notions that are crucial to human self-understanding but have no place in a scientific worldview. They also explore the significance of adopting a reenchanting perspective for debates on major concepts such as nature, naturalism, God, ontology, and disenchantment. Taken together, they demonstrate that there is much to be gained from working with a more substantial and affirmative concept of reenchantment, understood as a fundamental existential orientation towards what is seen as meaningful and of value. The Philosophy of Reenchantment will be of interest to scholars and advanced students in philosophy—especially those working in moral philosophy, metaphysics, philosophy of religion, theology, religious studies, and sociology.
- Meilaender, Gilbert. "Being Modern." First Things 5 (Aug./Sept., 1990): 63-66.
- Mellon, James G. "The Secular and the Sacred: Reflections on Charles Taylor’s A Secular Age." Religion, State & Society 44, no. 1 (2016): 75-91.
  Abstract:
  ABSTRACTA Secular AgeA Secular Age Charles Taylor’s A Secular Age represents a remarkable achievement. Taylor insists in a reasoned way that the sacred continues to have an important and legitimate role, and challenges assumptions, whether based on Weberian or Durkheimian understandings of religion in society, that faith no longer has a place. In doing this, he distinguishes among different aspects of the secularisation thesis. In this article I assert that there is a coherence to Taylor’s body of work, including A Secular Age , and I trace certain themes, such as a concern with notions of the self, that run through his work. I also identify in Taylor’s argument links to the thought of thinkers like Blondel, Gilson, Maritain and Marcel, and to the notion of an apologetics of hope.
- Mellor, D. H. "Two Fallacies in Charles Taylor's Explanation of Behaviour." Mind 77 (1968): 124-126.
- ———. "Reply to Holobrow." Mind 82 (1973): 106-107.
- Meana, Diego Rosales. "La Identidad Personal y Religiosa En El Espacio Público . Un Comentario Desde La Obra De Charles Taylor." Estudios: Filosofía, Historia, Letras, no. 101 (06, 2012): 165-178. In Spanish.
  Abstract:
  The objective of this work is to show Charles Taylor's theory of how religious identities are coordinated in the public scene. it would seem that religious expression should remain relegated to a private environment. However, Taylor's multiculturalism allows an inclusive view of the public space. firstly, we will address the different notions of identity and then of religious identity and its rationality. finally, we will approach the need for recognition and how this realization of religious identity should go beyond the tolerance of religious practice. (English)
  El objetivo de este trabajo es mostrar cómo se articulan las identidades religiosas en el espacio público según el pensamiento de Charles Taylor. Podría parecer que las expresiones religiosas deben quedar relegadas al ámbito privado. sin embargo, el multiculturalismo de Taylor permite comprender el espacio público de manera incluyente. en primer lugar, hablaré de las diferentes nociones de "identidad". En segundo, de la identidad religiosa y de su racionalidad. por último, de la necesidad reconocimiento y de cómo la afirmación de la identidad religiosa debe ser algo más que permitir el culto de los creyentes. (Spanish)
- Menand, Louis. "Blind Date." Transition, no. 67 (1995): 70-81. In English. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2935257.
- Mendieta, Eduardo. "Das Geschöpf Der Sprache – Drei Postkarten an Chuck." Transit 49 (2016). http://www.iwm.at/transit/heft-49-grenzen-der-toleranz-charles-taylors-landkarte/. In German.
- Mendoza Méndez, Yolimar. "Lenguajes, Valores y Apertura Al Otro En Charles Taylor." Laguna: Revista De Filosofia 13 (2003): 151-166. In Spanish.
  Abstract:
  The aim of this paper is to present a general overview of Taylorian philosophy of language, in order to show the deep implications that it has in the whole of his work. we will expose the main features that language has for Taylor, paying special attention to its constitutive character. this is the bridge that permits us to establish the relationship between meaning, values and openness to others in Charles Taylor's thought.
- ———. "Review of Charles Taylor, Penseur De La Pluralité." Laguna: Revista De Filosofia 14 (2004): 213-215. In Spanish.
- ———. "Review of Las Variedades De La Religión Hoy." Laguna: Revista De Filosofia 16 (2005): 189-192. In Spanish.
- 孟芳 MENG Fang. "在通往和解与圆满途中——从查尔斯·泰勒对黑格尔“自我意识”的诠释谈起 [On the Way Towards to Fullness and Reconciliation——Charles Taylor's Reinterpretation of Hegel's “self- Consciousness”]." 北方论丛, no. 02 (2016): 136-140.
  Abstract:
  Charles Taylor not only makes a strong defense of Hegel＇ s philosophy,but also reveals the relation between Hegel and the modern society. Taylor reinterprets＂self- consciousness＂which forms the basis of Hegel＇ s philosophical system through three phases. The first phase is the transformation process from ＂sense- certainty＂to ＂self- consciousness＂. The second phase is struggles for recognition between self- awareness. The third phase is that self- consciousness pursues freedom. Therefore,Taylor depicts the dangerous journey which self- consciousness aspires to fullness and reconciliation.
- Menke, Christoph. "Was Ist Eine >>Ethik Der Authentizität?<<?" In Unerfüllte Moderne? - Neue Perspektiven Auf Das Werk Von Charles Taylor, edited by Michael Kühnlein and Matthias Lutz-Bachmann. Berlin: Suhrkamp / Insel, 2011. 217-238. In German.
- Mennie, James. "Persons of Interest: Charles Taylor on Philosophy, Trump and Optimism." Montreal Gazette (Oct 11, 2016). http://montrealgazette.com/news/local-news/persons-of-interest-charles-taylor-on-philosophy-trump-and-optimism.
- Mercado, Juan Andrés. "Charles Taylor, De La Autointerpretación a La Participación Política." Anuario Filosofico 36, no. 1-2 (2003): 441-454. In Spanish.
  Abstract:
  Taylor's political proposal is based on a particular way of explaining human action. the modern ideal of authenticity is used to underline the role of responsibility in personal agency. aristotelian prudence or 'phronesis' is considered one of the best interpretations of practical reason for completing the ideal of authenticity because it includes the distinction among goods and their influence in everyone's life. the contemporary notion of 'horizon' is an aid for understanding the role of cultural frames and dialogical exchange in the construction of personal identity.
- Merle, Jean-Christophe. "Cultural Minority Rights;the Rights of the Majority in the Liberal State." Ratio Juris 11 (1998): 259-271.
- Mesa, José. "Revisiting an Old Predicament: Primacy of the Individual Or the Community?" Philosophy of Education: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Philosophy of Education Society (2003): 132-140.
- Mestiri, Soumaya. "Identité Procédurale Ou Substantielle? Autour Du Rapport Identité-Altérité Dans Le Débat Libéraux-Communautariens." Philosophiques 35, no. 2 (Sept., 2008): 419-450. In French.
  Abstract:
  The question of identity is surely not a new one. however, the rise of the liberal-communitarian debate as a consequence of the publication of 'A theory of justice' gave it a real acuity. indeed, liberals, with their so-called procedural vision of identity, conflict with communitarians and their understanding of the person as genuinely embedded in a set of values she couldn't repudiate without disappearing herself. this study works on an adjustment of this manichean setting of the problem, by establishing a dialogue between three philosophers: Taylor and walzer, as members of the communitarian team, and Rawls, as the liberal opponent; this, however, won't prevent us from working on authors who are not directly involved in this debate (tamir). the main idea of this paper is that a particular liberalism is able to propose a vision of identity which takes seriously the most communitarian criticisms, so that the traditional gap between the two doctrines becomes deeply meaningless.
- ———. "Collective Rights, Liberalism and Tolerance: A Debate between Rawls, Kymlicka, Taylor and Habermas." Revue Des Sciences Philosophiques Et Theologiques 92, no. 4 (2008): 753-771.
- Metcalf, Robert. "Capturing the Power of Logos: Gadamer, McDowell and Moral Argument." Philosophy Today 49, no. 5 (2005): 48-60.
- Meyer, Lutz. "Freiheit Gründet Auf Zugehörigkeit: Die Rawls-Kritik Bei Charles Taylor." In John Rawls Und Die Kommunitaristsiche Kritik Am Liberalismus. Würzburg: , 1996. 56-70. In German.
- Meynell, Hugo. "Review of Philosophical Arguments." Heythrop Journal 38 (1997): 482.
- Meynell, Robert. "Review of Varieties of Religion Today: William James Revisited." Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue Canadienne De Science Politique 36, no. 2 (June, 2003): 472-473. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3233274.
- ———. Canadian Idealism and the Philosophy of Freedom: C.B. Macpherson, George Grant, Charles Taylor. Montreal-Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2011.
- Miedema, Siebren. "Public, Social, and Individual Perspectives on Religious Education: Voices from the Past and the Present." Studies in Philosophy and Education 25, no. 1-2 (Mar., 2006): 111-127.
  Abstract:
  Inspired by Charles Taylor's recent quest for the meaning of religion today, this article concentrates on the question of the meaning of religious education (RE) today. the focus is not so much on the 'what' but instead more on the 'where' (the locus) and the 'how' (the function) of RE. the view on what is held to be a pedagogically tenable position regarding RE is build up by methodologically using a differentiated practical-theological three-course model that distinguishes between the public, the social and the private domain. it is made clear what this may mean for religious educators and philosophers of religious education today, who conceptualize religious education as an impossible possibility. (edited).
- Milbank, John. "A Closer Walk on the Wild Side: Some Comments on Charles Taylor's A Secular Age." Studies in Christian Ethics 22, no. 1 (February, 2009): 89-104.
- ———. "A Closer Walk on the Wild Side." In Varieties of Secularism in a Secular Age, edited by Michael Warner, Jonathan VanAntwerpen and Craig Calhoun. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.
- Miles, Robert. "Debating the Secular." Eighteenth-Century Life 37, no. 3 (2013): 110-121.
- Millard, Gregory and Jane Forsey. "Moral Agency in the Modern Age: Reading Charles Taylor through George Grant." Journal of Canadian Studies 40, no. 1 (Winter, 2006): 182-209.
- Miller, Dale E. "Atomists, Liberals and Civic Republicans: Taylor on the Ontology of Citizenship." Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79, no. 4 (Dec., 2001): 465-478.
  Abstract:
  Charles Taylor contends that civic republicanism is inconsistent with "ontological" atomism, which comprises two tenets: Methodological individualism and "axiological individualism" (i.e., welfarism). in fact, although many leading liberal theorists (including mill and Rawls) are ontological atomists, Taylor denies that ontological atomism is consistent with liberalism or any other nondespotic political doctrine. contra Taylor, I show that atomists can subscribe to civic republicanism without inconsistency. further, I show that Taylor gives us no reason to doubt that atomists can be liberals, and I eliminate at least one possible reason for thinking that the best-known liberal theories are inconsistent with civic republicanism.
- Miller, David. "In what Sense must Socialism be Communitarian?" Social Philosophy and Policy 6, no. 2 (1989): 51-73.
- ———. "What Holds Us Together [Review of Philosophical Arguments and Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism: The Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question (James Tully, Ed.)]." Times Literary Supplement (Dec. 15, 1995): 26.
- Miller, James. "What Secular Age?" International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 21, no. 1-4 (2008): 5-10.
- Miller, Paul Allen. "Review of Sources of the Self." Southern Humanities Review 25 (1991): 384-387.
- Miller, Richard B. "On Making a Cultural Turn in Religious Ethics." The Journal of Religious Ethics 33, no. 3 (September, 2005): 409-444.
- Millman, Noah. "“We Will do, and we Will Hear” and the Primacy of Experience." The American Conservative (03/05, 2014). http://www.theamericanconservative.com/millman/we-will-do-and-we-will-hear-and-the-primacy-of-experience/.
- Minton, Arthur J. "Wright and Taylor: Empiricist Teleology." Philosophy of Science 42 (Sept., 1975): 299-306.
- Mitchell, Audra. "Conflict-in-Transformation: Ethics,Phenomenology;the Critique of the 'Liberalizing'Peace." International Peacekeeping 16, no. 5 (2009): 667-684.
- Mitchell, Harvey. "Charles Taylor on the Self, its Languages and its History." History of Political Thought 12, no. 2 (June, 1991): 335-357.
  Abstract:
  To the extent that Charles Taylor's contention that the mysteries of moral questing cannot be divorced from the languages and history of the self takes account of contextualization, his reliance on the residues of "hyper-augustinianism" as a persistent theme in defining the self runs into problems that he does not fully anticipate. while such issues may be of lesser concern for Taylor, a systematic historical account was in any case problematic, given the time scheme he adopted for his enterprise. as a liberal catholic, he looks, in part, to tocqueville as the thinker who captured the dangers of modern subjectivity. this lends support to his claim that modern and post-modern thinking have descended to "historicism", fueled by foucault and derrida and a host of others who dismissed moral problems as a species of outdated religiosity. one of his central beliefs is that the christian belief in creation and Nietzsche's insights may renew the foundations of moral philosophy, but his tone is more suggestive than conclusive.
- Mok, Yeuk-shing. "Charles Taylor's Notion of Identity." Nursing Philosophy 8, no. 1 (2007): 60-63.
- Monod, Jean-Claude. "Les Paradoxes De l’humanisme Séculier En Europe: En Écho à De Charles Taylor." Esprit Novmbr, no. 11 (2018): 89. In French.
- Montefiore, Alan. "Final Causes." Aristotelian Society: Supplementary Volume Suppl 45 (1971): 171-192.
  Abstract:
  The first part of the article aims at setting out the present state of the controversy between those who, like chester Taylor, claim this teleological causation is logically distinct from efficient or mechanical causation and those who maintain their logical equivalence; and at showing that on a traditionally humean analysis the latter claim turns out to be correct. however, the second part of the article attempts to show how, if attention is paid rather to the structure of integrated theories, the distinction may be maintained.
- ———. "The Ethics of Authenticity." Philosophical Books 35, no. 1 (1994): 62-63.
- ———. "Choisir Son Identité." In Charles Taylor Et l’interprétation De l’identité Moderne, edited by Guy Laforest and Philippe de Lara. Paris;Sainte Foy;: Centre Culturel International de Cerisy-la-Salle, Cerf;Les Presses de l'Université Laval;, 1998. 97-113. In French.
- Montenot, Jean. "L’Âge Séculier Dans l’œuvre De Charles Taylor." In Charles Taylor. Religion Et sécularisation, edited by Sylvie Taussig. Paris: CNRS Éditions, 2014. 17-22. In French.http://lectures.revues.org/14084
- Montero, Darío. "A Taylorian Perspective on Social Change: Social Meanings and Cultural Identities." International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research 17 (2011). http://www.ipedr.com/vol17/57-CHHSS%202011-H10091.pdf.
- ———. "Some Elements of a Cultural Theory of Social Change." International Journal of Social Science and Humanity 2, no. 1 (2012): 52-58. http://www.ijssh.org/papers/68-H084.pdf.
  Abstract:
  The present paper attempts to lay the foundations of a cultural approach for the study of social change, in which change is understood as a result of a conflict of self-interpretations between different groups or spheres in a society. this cultural approach seems to be particularly useful in explaining the emergence of social movements, which always presuppose a clash of views, say, between the aspirations of the people and the official doctrine of the state, just to mention the most typical case. the concepts and methodological principles offered here owe a great debt to the work of the Canadian philosopher Charles Taylor – although he never clearly spelled out a meta-theory on change. the paper will then try to show in what would consist such a Taylorian theory of social change, and this we do not only by reconstructing Taylor’s views on this issue, but also through a critical examination of range of key assumptions found both in mainstream social science and, more specifically, in existing theories of social change.
- ———. "Kulturen Der Demokratie." Transit 49 (2016). http://www.iwm.at/transit/heft-49-grenzen-der-toleranz-charles-taylors-landkarte/. In German.
- Moody-Adams, Michele. "Memory, Multiculturalism, and the Sources of Democratic Solidarity." In Interpreting Modernity: Essays on the Work of Charles Taylor, edited by Daniel M. Weinstock, Jacob Levy and Jocelyn Maclure. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2020. 228. https://www.mqup.ca/interpreting-modernity-products-9780228001430.php.
- Mookherjee, Monica. "Review of Modern Social Imaginaries." Radical Philosophy 126 (July-Auguest, 2004): 39-41.
- ———. "Imagining New Dialogues about Human Rights: The Implications of Charles Taylor's Theory of Recognition for Global Feminism." Journal of International Political Theory 10, no. 2 (2014): 127-147.
  Abstract:
  This article explores the implications of Charles Taylor’s politics of recognition for a global feminist theory. The main contention is that Taylor’s thought implies an innovative dialogue about human rights that assists a flexible understanding of diverse women’s needs. This central claim is developed, however unexpectedly, by focusing on the controversial practice of footbinding. Prevalent in imperial China, this debilitating convention was supported by values that contrast markedly with those of the modern West. The case thus confronts global feminists with the serious issue of comprehending sympathetically the lived concerns of diverse human beings, while reacting critically to the oppression that they may experience. A creative reading of Taylor’s theory here yields, I argue, commitments to two normative claims that I call ‘narrativity’ and ‘instability’. Together, these claims promise not a static form of recognition based on uncontroversial rights to autonomy or bodily integrity but an imaginative dialogue which is sensitive to cultural differences in the interpretation of human needs and critical of culturally diverse forms of oppression. The critique of footbinding implied by Taylor’s thought is finally developed through comparison with contemporary cosmetic surgeries in the West. The study reveals a feminist politics of recognition attuned to subaltern struggles over the meaning of human rights and of women as active participants in this vital, ongoing work.
- Moore, Andrew and Roger Crisp. "Welfarism in Moral Theory." Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74, no. 4 (Dec., 1996): 598-613.
  Abstract:
  We take welfarism in moral theory to be the claim that the well-being of individuals matters and is the only consideration that fundamentally matters, from a moral point of view. we argue that criticisms of welfarism due to G.E. moore, donald regan, Charles Taylor and amartya sen all fail. the final section of our paper is a critical survey of the problems which remain for welfarists in moral theory.
- Moore, Robert. "Charles Taylor’s Langue/Parole and Alasdair MacIntyre’s “Networks of Giving and Receiving” as a Foundation for a Positive Anti-Atomist Political Theory." Episteme24, no. 5 (2013). http://digitalcommons.denison.edu/episteme/vol24/iss1/5.
- Morais, Alexander Almeida. "A Concepção De Charles Taylor De Uma Ética Da Autenticidade Unida A Uma Política do Reconhecimento." Revista Filosofia Capital 6, no. 13 (2011). In Portuguese.
- Morales, Juan Enrique. "Review of Modern Social Imaginaries by Charles Taylor." Revista De Ciencia Politica 24, no. 1 (2004): 240-242.
- Moran, Dermot. "The Phenomenology of Personhood: Charles Taylor and Edmund Husserl." Far Eastern University Colloquium 3, no. 1 (2009). http://ejournals.ph/index.php?journal=COLLOQUIUM&page=article&op=viewArticle&path%5B%5D=899.
- Moran, Richard. "Making Up Your Mind: Self-Constitution and Self-Interpretation." Ratio 1, no. 2 (1988): 135-151. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9329.1988.tb00118.x/abstract.
- ———. Authority and Estrangement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.
- Morefield, Jeannie. "Hegelian Organicism, British New Liberalism and the Return of the Family State." History of Political Thought 23, no. 1 (Mar., 2002): 141-171.
  Abstract:
  This paper examines the tensions between liberalism, hegelian idealism and organicism in the thought of the nineteenth-century british 'new liberals' such as T.H. green and bernard bosanquet. it maintains that these thinkers drew upon hegelian conceptual motifs to help them compensate for what they saw as orthodox liberalism's lack of social responsibility. ultimately, however, they rejected hegel's state theory and turned to organicism and social darwinism to help them imagine an alternative notion of community. (edited).
- Morello, Gustavo. "Charles Taylor's 'Imaginary' and 'Best Account' in Latin America." Philosophy and Social Criticism 33, no. 5 (July, 2007): 617-639.
  Abstract:
  Imaginary is, in Taylor's thought, a category of understanding social praxis and the reasons people give to make sense of these practices. the ultimate reason is the hypergood, which influences the strong decisions. those strong evaluations outline the moral framework from which people address their own lives and the lives of others. we only recognize our cultural framework as an 'imaginary' -- challenging the supposition it is something 'objective' -- when others make their apparition in our lives. after the encounter nobody remains the same; something in our imaginary has changed. the outcome of this process is the 'best account' we have to make sense of our life. if we accept the category of 'imaginary' and the process of 'best account' as accurate enough to address latin american reality, the problem we have to solve is how we can find out a latin american social imaginary.
- Morgan, Michael L. "Religion, History and Moral Discourse." In Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism: The Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question, edited by James Tully and Daniel M. Weinstock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. 49-66. In English. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621970.006.
- ———. "Review of A Secular Age." Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (08.10, 2008). http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/23696-a-secular-age/.
- Morita, Akihiko. "Charles Taylor." Waseda Journal of Social Sciences 10 (September, 2007).
- ———. "The Path to the Secular Age in Europe, Referring to A Secular Age by Charles Taylor." Waseda Journal of Social Sciences 11 (April, 2008).
- ———. "Social Imaginaries of Ubiquitous Society and Human Rights." August, 2008.
- ———. "A Difference in the Conceptions of the Self as the Subject of Human Rights between the West and Japan: Can Confucian Self be Strong enough to Exercise Positive Liberty in Authoritarian Society." In Human Rights, Language, and Law, edited by Thomas Bustamante and Oche OnaziFranz Steiner Verlag, 2012. 23-34. http://researchmap.jp/?action=cv_download_main&upload_id=33150.
- ———. "A Neo-Communitarian Approach on Human Rights as a Cosmopolitan Imperative in East Asia." Filosofi a Unisinos 13, no. 3 (Dec, 2012). http://www.unisinos.br/revistas/index.php/filosofia/article/download/fsu.2012.133.01/1227.
- ———. "Collective Human Right to Collective Identity." In Right to Identity (ARSP-Beihefte, Volume 147), edited by Paul Tiedemann. Franz Steiner Verlag, 2016.
  Abstract:
  In this paper, I insist that we need a collective human right to collective identity. This is because collective identity is one in which the members of a community/group have a sense of being an indispensable part of an individual identity, with distinct characteristics as group and individual human rights are not sufficient to protect collective identity. I have also tried to locate the argument within the framework of inter-culturalism presented by Charles Taylor. In my account, Taylor’s inter-culturalism, a variation of his non-procedural liberalism, which aims at ensuring equal opportunity for participation in making new collective identity while admitting the de-facto existence of pervasive collective identity in the given community, could deal with conflicts that are presently unsolvable because it aims at opening a public space for all in creating new collective identity.
- ———. "Intercultural Approach for the Asia Pacific --Human Rights Stories--." Asian Legal Philosophy 3, no. 1 (2016): 118-131.
- Mörkenstam, Ulf. "Identitet, Frihet Och Erkannde: Charles Taylors Kritik Av Individualismen." Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift 97, no. 4 (1994): 347-370. In Swedish.
- Morrison, Glenn. "Review of Tayloring Reformed Epistemology: Charles Taylor, Alvin Plantinga and the De Jure Challenge to Christian Belief." Heythrop Journal 50, no. 3 (2009): 512.
- Mos, Leendert P. "We Ought to be Fighting Over the Meaning of Authenticity, [Review of the Ethics of Authenticity]." Theory & Psychology 4 (1994): 447-454.
- ———. "Religious Belief : Charles Taylor on William James, with an Afterthought on Freud." Theory Psychology 16, no. 1 (2006): 128-134.
- Mott-Thornton, Kevin. "Response to Joyce E. Bellous." Studies in Philosophy and Education 20, no. 2 (Mar., 2001): 153-155.
  Abstract:
  The response begins with thanks to dr. bellous for a generally positive review of the book. in response to dr. bellous's request for a fuller notion of the nature of evaluative versus nonevaluative frameworks and how they operate, mott-thornton refers to discussion of this matter in the book where a framework for highlighting the goals and values contained within various conceptions of spiritual development is offered. taking issue with the reviewer, mott-thornton urges readers to assess for themselves his arguments against Taylor, Rawlsian liberal views of civic education and, in favor, parental control of spiritual education in publicly funded schools.
- Motzkin, Gabriel. "Taylor Et Le Monde Séculier." In Charles Taylor. Religion Et sécularisation, edited by Sylvie Taussig. Paris: CNRS Éditions, 2014. 113-130. In French.http://lectures.revues.org/14084
- Mouffe, Chantal. "American Liberalism and its Critics: Rawls, Taylor, Sandel and Walzer." Praxis International 8 (1988): 193-206.
- Moureau, Loïc and Johan de Tavernier. "The Politics of Authenticity: Charles Taylor's Authentic Self Revisited." Bijdragen, Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie En Theologie 72, no. 4 (2011): 432-455.
- Moussa, Mario. "Review Essay: Writing the History of the 'we': The Claims of Practice." Social Theory and Practice 18, no. 2 (June, 1992): 211-229.
  Abstract:
  In this essay I discuss Charles Taylor's attempt, in "sources of the self", to provide an analysis of the modern western self. I argue that Taylor fails to do so. the reasons behind his failure, however, make for an interesting philosophical discussion by themselves. I emphasize one reason in particular: His inadequate account of everyday practices. confining myself largely to Taylor's arguments about the relationship between philosophical ideas and the practice of everyday life, I suggest why it is that any analysis of the self needs to come to terms with such practice and how best to conceive of it.
- Mulhall, Stephen and Adam Swift. Liberals and Communitarians. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.
- Mulhall, Stephen. "Review of Sources of the Self." Philosophical Books 32 (1991): 129-156.
- ———. "Sources of the Self's Sense of itself: A Theistic Reading of Modernity." In Can Religion be Explained Away?, edited by D. Z. Phillips. London;New York: Methuen;St. Martin's Press, 1996. 131-160.
- ———. "Review of Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism: The Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question, James Tully, Ed." Philosophical Investigations 19 (1996): 201-205.
- ———. "Articulating the Horizons of Liberalism: Taylor's Political Philosophy." In Charles Taylor, edited by Ruth Abbey. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004. 105-126.
  Abstract:
  This essay has three main concerns: (1) Taylor's critique of negative liberty and nozickian rights; (2) his critical relation to communitarian political philosophy; (3) the heideggerian and religious context of Taylor's work.
- ———. "Theology and Narrative: The Self, the Novel, the Bible." International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69, no. 1 (February, 2011): 29-43.
- Muller, K. B. "European Civil Society and Taylor's Inspiration." Filosoficky Casopis 62, no. 2 (2014): 217-235.
  Abstract:
  This article examines Taylor's approach to the conception of civil society and attempts to interpret the relation of this approach to contemporary debates on the forming of European civil society. Byway of introduction, Taylor's interpretation of the medieval socio-political assumptions for the creation of the extra-political public sphere is presented. Next, there is a discussion of Taylor's interpretational conception of the two most significant traditions of civil society which take their rise from a confrontation with European enlightenment absolutism the traditions of Locke and Montesquieu. The author attempts to make sense of the way in which Taylor's approach resonates with the concept of civil society in discussions about the presuppositions and forms of the creation of the European public sphere and trans-national (European) identities as two key forms of European civil society. In conclusion, the concept of the active border is presented as a key matrix of the conceptual constellation of the public sphere, identity and Europeanisation.
- Münch, Nikolai and Hans-Jörg Sigwart. "Wir, Die Gesellschaft: Politik Und Hermeneutik Bei Charles Taylor." In Wie Wollen Wir Leben? Das Politische Denken Und Staatsverständnis Von Charles Taylor, edited by Ulf Bohmann. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2014. 140-175. In German.
- Münch, Nikolai. "the Language Animal and the Passive Side of the Human Condition." Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 56, no. 4 (2017): 653-667. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217317000889.
  Abstract:
  In some strains of current philosophy, there is a growing interest in the passive and receptive aspects of the human condition. This interest is often paired with a criticism that ‘Western’ philosophy unduly neglects those aspects because of an ‘agential bias.’ This criticism has also been directed against the philosophy of Charles Taylor. I try to show that this criticism has some force in principle but is not plausible in the case of Taylor. First, I analyse John Rawls’ hugely influential concept of a life plan and show how this ‘agential bias’ applies here. Second, I argue that such a bias does not apply to Taylor’s The Language Animal by showing how active and passive moments are interwoven in his concepts of articulation and narration.
- Munk, Linda. "Review of Varieties of Religion Today: William James Revisited." Letters in Canada 73, no. 1 (Winter, 2003): 246-247.
- Murison, Justine S. "Obeah and its Others: Buffered Selves in the Era of Tropical Medicine." Atlantic Studies 12, no. 2 (2015): 144-159.
  Abstract:
  This article argues that the eighteenth-century cultural interrelation of obeah practices and European tropical medicine demonstrates a profound limit to Charles Taylor’s theory of the “buffered self.” According to Taylor, Western secularity depended upon the rise of a theory of a disenchanted subjectivity. This article suggests instead that the hallmark of Western secularity is not so much a disenchanted subject, but a conflicted relation between a psychology defined by disenchantment and a theory of the body open to a world of invisible and untraceable forces.
- Murray, James. "Synopsis of Charles Taylor's, "A Secular Age"." Davidewart.Ca (Dec 10, 2007). http://www.davidewart.ca/2007/12/synopsis-of-cha.html.
- Musschenga, A. W. "Identity and Quality of Life." Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 56, no. 4 (Dec., 1994): 643-666. In Dutch.
  Abstract:
  In several publications Charles Taylor makes a distinction between strong' and weak' evaluations. strong evaluations are qualitative distinctions -- in terms of noble', demeaning', etc. weak evaluators evaluate desires only on the basis of their strength and intensity. the ethical theory par excellence that is not capable of making qualitative distinctions, is for Taylor utilitarianism. after having explored the meaning of the concept of strong evaluations, I analyze Taylor's argument for that critique on utilitarianism. I argue that qualitative distinctions cannot be built into a utilitarian theory. however, not all utilitarians are weak evaluators. more sophisticated utilitarians evaluate desires by their contribution to a rational life- plan. they do have an identity, but it is not a moral one. my conclusion is that what Taylor really means is that utilitarians are not able to articulate their identity. (edited).
- Myers, Richard. "Review of Multiculturalism and 'the Politics of Recognition'." American Review of Canadian Studies 24 (1994): 136-138.
- Nagl, Ludwig. "Symposium Zu Charles Taylor: A Secular Age." Deutsche Zeitschrift Für Philosophie 57, no. 2 (May, 2009): 288-292. In German. http://dx.doi.org/10.1524/dzph.2009.0024.
  Abstract:
  This article is my introduction, as the editor, to a book symposium on Charles Taylor's 'A secular age'. I point out that Taylor's book focusses on "the entstehungsgeschichte of exclusive humanism": On the historical genesis, that is, of "the immanent frame" that is "common to all of us in the modern west". this "immanent frame", Taylor claims, "some of us want to live as open to something beyond", but "some live as closed". in the book symposium this thesis is discussed from various perspectives (pragmatism, deconstruction, post-hegelian thought) by hans joas, hent de vries, and vittorio hösle.
- ———. ">>The Jamesian Open Space<<. Charles Taylor Und Der Pragmatismus." In Unerfüllte Moderne? - Neue Perspektiven Auf Das Werk Von Charles Taylor, edited by Michael Kühnlein and Matthias Lutz-Bachmann. Berlin: Suhrkamp / Insel, 2011. 117-160. In German.
- ———. "Begegnungen Mit Charles Taylor, Anregungen Durch Charles Taylor." Transit 49 (2016). http://www.iwm.at/transit/heft-49-grenzen-der-toleranz-charles-taylors-landkarte/. In German.
- Nardone, Giorgio. "Il Secolarismo Secondo Charles Taylor: Un Percorso Ragionato Sull'Uomo e La Fede / Secularism According to Charles Taylor. A Critical Route on Man and Faith." Aggiornamenti Sociali 67, no. 2 (2016): 132.
  Abstract:
  Il filosofo canadese Charles Taylor si è a lungo misurato con la domanda «Chi è l’uomo?». Presentiamo una sintesi del suo pensiero su questo tema, con particolare attenzione alla risposta data dal secolarismo occidentale.
- Narveson, Jan. "Review of the Ethics of Authenticity." International Studies in Philosophy 26, no. 2 (1994): 147-148.
- Naulty, Reg. "Review of Varieties of Religion Today." Sophia: International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Metaphysical Theology and Ethics 43, no. 2 (October, 2004): 131-133.
- Neill, Jeremy. "Review Essay : Charles Taylor, Modern Social Imaginaries (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004)." Philosophy and Social Criticism 34, no. 5 (2008): 575-580.
- Nelson, Laura. "The Achievement of Charles Taylor." Medium (August 21, 2019). https://medium.com/@lnelson10051954/the-achievement-of-charles-taylor-47bfe416754.
- Nelson, Ralph C. "History and the Advent of the Self." Maritain Studies/Etudes Maritainiennes 8 (1992): 112-142.
- Nelson, Samuel. "Charles Taylor and Jeffrey C. Alexander on Secularity and the Sacred." American Journal of Cultural Sociology 9, no. 1 (2021): 1-2.
  Abstract:
  Introduction to a conversation between Charles Taylor and Jefrey Alexander
  which developed from a panel convened for the tenth anniversary of Taylor’s A Secular Age, held at the Annual Meeting of the Social Science History Association in
  Montreal in November 2017. Taylor was present to hear and address the refections
  of four scholars, including Alexander, who were invited to discuss the book’s legacy
  a decade on.
- Nelson, Sioban. "The Search for the Good in Nursing? the Burden of Ethical Expertise." Nursing Philosophy 5, no. 1 (April, 2004): 12-22.
  Abstract:
  This paper examines the increasing trend by nursing scholars, such as patricia benner, to conceptualize ethics as a contextual and embodied 'way of knowing', embedded in nursing expertise. the intellectual origins of this development and its debt to neo-aristotelian thinkers, such as philosopher Charles Taylor, are discussed. it will be argued that rather than revealing a truth about ethical expertise, the emergence of the 'expert' nurse as a moral and ethical category is the result of the elaboration of neo-thomist discourses in the educational and professional shaping of nurses. (edited).
- Nepi, Paolo. Individui e Persona: L'Identità Del Soggetto Morale in Taylor, MacIntyre, e Jonas. Rome: Studium, 2000. In Italian.
- Nardone, Giorgio. "Il Secolarismo Secondo Charles Taylor: Un Percorso Ragionato Sull'Uomo e La Fede / Secularism According to Charles Taylor. A Critical Route on Man and Faith." Aggiornamenti Sociali 67, no. 2 (2016): 132.
  Abstract:
  Il filosofo canadese Charles Taylor si è a lungo misurato con la domanda «Chi è l’uomo?». Presentiamo una sintesi del suo pensiero su questo tema, con particolare attenzione alla risposta data dal secolarismo occidentale.
- Nešpor, Zdeněk R. "[Untitled]." Sociologický Časopis / Czech Sociological Review 40, no. 3 (JUNE, 2004): 385-387. In English. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41132035.
- Neto,José Aldo Camurça de Araújo. "A Influência Hegeliana do Reconhecimento Em Charles Taylor E Axel Honnet Na Contemporaneidade." Revista Dialectus - Revista De Filosofia, no. 12 (2018). In Portuguese
- Neufeld, Mark. "Interpretation and the 'Science' of International Relations." Review of International Studies 19 (1993): 39-61.
- ———. "Identity of the Good in International Relations." Global Society 10 (1996): 43-56.
- Ngosso, Thierry. "Laïcité Et Liberté De Conscience." Revue Philosophique De Louvain 109, no. 4 (11, 2011): 803-806. In French.
- Nicholas, Jeffery. "Modern Social Imaginaries Charles Taylor." The Review of Metaphysics 59, no. 2 (2005): 454-456. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20130644.
- Nicholson, Carol J. "Three Views of Philosophy and Multiculturalism: Searle, Rorty, and Taylor." In Philosophy, Culture, and Pluralism, edited by William Sweet. Aylmer, Québec: Éditions du Scribe, 2002. 3-9.
  Abstract:
  My purpose is to examine arguments about multiculturalism by john searle, richard Rorty, and Charles Taylor. I argue that the debate over epistemological and political issues has tended to obscure the educational benefits of multiculturalism. the challenge of different points of view has been a stimulus to thought at least since the origins of western philosophy in ancient greece. A multicultural curriculum can fulfill the traditional goals of a socratic education, delivering students of their narrow and uncritical opinions and awakening them to a world of intellectual diversity. thus, multiculturalism is not so much a recent movement as a new name for an old method of teaching.
- Nicholson, Linda. "To be Or Not to be: Charles Taylor and the Politics of Recognition." Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory 3, no. 1 (April, 1996): 1-16.
  Abstract:
  This article comments upon Charles Taylor's essay "the politics of recognition" in two stages. firstly, it critiques the strain in Taylor's argument which describes identity and the need for its recognition as issues of "modernity," whose ethical and political implications are generalizable across a wide set of social struggles. I argue that even within the context of the very recent past, the meaning of identity and of recognition has varied widely. secondly, it argues that certain understandings of identity and of recognition have emerged in the post 1960s feminist and african-american movements which highlight shortcomings in Taylor's analysis of multiculturalism. in contrast to Taylor's understanding of multiculturalism as a process where those with authority give preliminary credence to the claims of some of those whose previous claims for recognition have been denied, this essay argues for an understanding of multiculturalism which calls into question the very processes by which judgments of worth have often previously been made.
- Nickel, James W. "Does Basing Rights on Autonomy Imply Obligations of Political Allegiance?" Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 28, no. 4 (1989): 531-544.
  Abstract:
  This paper criticizes Charles Taylor's essay, "atomism." the first section reconstructs Taylor's argument that grounding rights on autonomy commits one to belong to, support, and give obedience to those institutions which create the environment in which autonomy can be developed. subsequent sections evaluate the argument's premises. it is concluded that the most one can hope to get from Taylor's argument is that one who grounds rights in autonomy has good moral reasons to sustain an autonomy-supporting environment. the alleged path from autonomy-based rights to a full-fledged theory of political obligation does not go through.
- Nicolaysen, Bente Blanche. "En Mangfoldig Og Enhetlig Veiviser Rundt i Et Mangfoldig Og Enhetlig Filosofisk Landskap [A Manifold and Unified Tour of the Manifold and Unified Philosophical Landscape]" Review of Self-Understanding and Freedom: An Introduction to Charles Taylor's Philosophy by Jorgen Fossland and Harald Grimen." Sosiologisk Tidsskrift 10, no. 3 (2002): 261-273. In Norwegian.
- Nielsen, Kai. "Social Science and Hard Data." Cultural Hermeneutics 2 (July, 1973): 115-142.
- ———. "Social Science and American Foreign Policy." In Philosophy, Morality and International Affairs, edited by Virginia Held and Sidney Morgenbesser. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974. 286-319.
- Nielsen, Morten Ebbe Juul. "The Duty to Recognize Culture." Cultura: International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology 9, no. 1 (2012): 215-234.
  Abstract:
  Do we have a "duty to recognize culture"? The aim of this paper is to examine the following question: assuming we have reasons to respect or value recognition 'per se', do we on that background also have reasons to recognize culture? More specifically, does "culture" furnish a particular morally relevant fact with 'pro tanto' force, providing the basis for a duty to recognize culture? The paper first examines the concept of recognition and then proceeds to analyze "the recognition thesis", a general argument for why or how culture can be a salient part of what should be recognized. On that basis, the more specific theories of recognition proposed by Axel Honneth and Charles Taylor are examined, and it is argued that neither of these theories support a general duty to recognize culture.
- Nitschke, Peter. "Immanente Gegenaufklärung Und Ihre Moralischen Foren Im 19. Jahrhundert (Kap. 11)." In Charles Taylor: Ein Säkulares Zeitalter, edited by Michael Kühnlein. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co, 2019. 109-130. https://www.degruyter.com/view/product/449566
- Noble, Denis. "Charles Taylor on Teleological Explanation." Analysis 27 (1967): 96-103.
- ———. "The Conceptualist View of Teleology." Analysis 28 (December, 1967): 62-63.
- Nootens, Geneviève. "Ontologie, Philosophie Et Politique: La Critique De La Tradition Épistémologique Chez Charles Taylor." Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 35, no. 3 (June, 1996): 553-569. In French.
- ———. "Compte Rendu De La Liberté Des Modernes." Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 37 (1998): 837-840.
- Nørager, Troels. "Difficult but Necessary: Conditions of a Contemporary Theology of Love." Dialog: A Journal of Theology 50, no. 1 (Spring, 2011): 47-52.
- Norman, Edward. "The Withdrawal of God: Review of A Secular Age." Spectator 305, no. 9348 (October 13, 2007): 52.
- Norman, Peter. "What’s A Little Difference of Metatopical Social Imaginary between Friends? the Implications of Charles Taylor’s Modern Social Imaginaries for Law and Development." Global Law Books (6 March, 2006). http://globallawbooks.org/reviews/getFile.asp?id=169.
- Norman, Wayne. "Les Paradoxes Du Nationalisme Civique Book." In Charles Taylor Et l’interprétation De l’identité Moderne, edited by Guy Laforest and Philippe de Lara. Paris;Sainte Foy;: Centre Culturel International de Cerisy-la-Salle, Cerf;Les Presses de l'Université Laval;, 1998. 155-170. In French.
- Nosek, M. "Nonviolent Communication: A Dialogical Retrieval of the Ethic of Authenticity." Nursing Ethics 19, no. 6 (2012): 829-37. In English. http://nej.sagepub.com/content/19/6/829.
  Abstract:
  Charles Taylor called for a retrieval of the ethic of authenticity that has been distorted in modern notions of autonomy and self-fulfillment. via exchanges with others who matter to us, he proposed that human identities develop through the use of rich language draped in shared horizons of significance. the fostering of these dialogical ties beyond purely instrumental purposes, along with the recognition of the human dignity in all, may avert the fallen ideal of authenticity. nonviolent communication affords the skillful dialogue with others cradled in a shared sense of significance and supports the development of a meaningful identity-one that is formed through the realization of what exists beyond the self. the purpose of this article is to argue that nonviolent communication facilitates the retrieval of the ethic of authenticity. narratives from nursing students' journals on the use of nonviolent communication skills will be used to support the argument.
- Note, Nicole. "Reflecting on the Meaning of Life." Philosophy in the Contemporary World 16, no. 2 (Sept., 2009): 22-31.
  Abstract:
  The question of the meaning and meaningfulness of life is neglected by philosophers today. meaning is implicitly assumed to be associated with individual choices and preferences. this article argues that meaningfulness works in another way as well, when something provokes meaningfulness. one of the consequences of this vision is that there may well be implicit "standards" for meaning. certain benchmarks for meaning -- references concerned with our "being-in-the-world" -- have not been explored fully enough. another point that has been neglected in the recent discussion on meaningfulness is the very structure of being that is appealed to. this is the key to the experience of a deeper kind of meaningfulness.
- Note, Nicole and Pieter Meurs. "Charles Taylor and a Hermeneutical Understanding of Meaningfulness." Sofia Philosophical Review 3, no. 1 (January, 2009): 137-149.
  Abstract:
  Meaningfulness is generally considered essential to human life. what meaningfulness implies, however, is difficult to delineate. in this paper, we focus on the philosophy of Charles Taylor and his account of hermeneutics. we discern important components of meaningfulness: Situatedness, orientatedness and articulacy are necessary to understand the world as horizontal rather than flattened. meaningfulness is also related to our capacity to take a step back and look at our lives from a distance.
- Nothelle-Wildfeuer, Ursula. "Zivilgesellschaft Als Begründung Und Realisierung Von Menschsein Und Freiheit: Charles Taylor." In Soziale Gerechtigkeit Und Zivilgesellschaft. Paderborn: Schöningh, 1999. 128-172. In German.
- Novak, Michael. "An Authentic Morality [Review of the Ethics of Authenticity]." First Things 33 (May, 1993): 40-42.
- Novotny, Kristin M. "'Taylor'-made? Feminist Theory and the Politics of Identity." Women and Politics 19 (1998).
- Nowak, Witold M. "O Metodzie Filozoficznej Charlesa Taylora." In Filozofia w Szkole VII : Współczesne Kierunki Filozoficzne : Kielce, 23-24 Września 2005, edited by Wojciecha Rechlewicza and Jana Kochanowskiego. Kielce: Wydawnictwo Polskiego Towarzystwa Filozoficznego, 2005. 131-142. In Polish.
- ———. "Utrata Zestrojenia: Charles Taylor o Religii w Warunkach Nowoczesności." In VIII Polski Zjazd Filozoficzny, księga Streszczeń: Warszawa, 15-20 września 2008 Roku, edited by Polski Zjazd Filozoficzny, Anna Brożek and Jacek Juliusz Jadacki. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Semper, 2008. In Polish. https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pan-ol.lublin.pl%2Fwydawnictwa%2FTPol3%2FNowak.pdf.
- ———. Spór o Nowoczesność w Poglądach Charlesa Taylora i Alasdaira MacIntyre'a : Analiza Krytyczna. Rzeszów: Wydawn. Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego, 2008. In Polish.
- ———. "Charles Taylor o Religii i Humanizmie Wyłącznym w Warunkach Nowoczesności." Teka Komisji Politologii i Stosunków Międzynarodowych 3 (2008): 95-106. In Polish. http://www.pan-ol.lublin.pl/wydawnictwa/TPol3/Nowak.pdf.
- ———. "Charles Taylor o Dziedzictwie Oświecenia." In Racjonalność w Przestrzeni Publicznej, edited by Aleksander Bobko and Stanisław Gałkowski. Rzeszów: Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego, 2009. 99-116. In Polish.
- Nussbaum, Martha C. "Our Pasts, Ourselves [Review of Sources of the Self]." New Republic (Apr. 9, 1990): 27-34.
- ———. "Chapter 15: Transcending Humanity." In Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990. 365-392.
- ———. "Charles Taylor: Explanation and Practical Reason: A Commentary." In The Quality of Life, edited by Martha C. Nussbaum and Amartya Sen. New York: Oxford Univ Pr, 1993. 232-241.
- Nusser, Karl-Heinz. "Expansive Demokratietheorien Bei Charles Taylor, Michael Walzer Und Jürgen Habermas." Zeitschrift Für Politik 49, no. 3 (September, 2002): 250-266. In German.
- Nutbrown, Richard. "The Self, Language, and Community: Taylor's Hermeneutic Project." Eidos: The Canadian Graduate Journal of Philosophy 5 (June, 1986): 1-30.
- Nyeng, Frode. Det Autentiske Menneske: Med Charles Taylors Blikk på Menneskevitenskap Og Moral. Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget, 2000. In Norwegian.
- ———. "Autenticitet, Moralsk Realisme Og Overfladiske Valg." Slagmark: Tidsskrift for Idehistorie. Tema: Charles Taylor 49 (2007): 41-60. In Danish. http://ojs.statsbiblioteket.dk/index.php/slagmark/article/view/396/341.
- ———. "Taylors Filosofi Og Det Livet Vi Faktisk Lever. Kampen for Autentisitet i Vår Urene Praksis." AGORA: Journal for Metafysisk Spekulasjon 3 (2007): 54-82. In Norwegian.
- Nys, Thomas R. V. "Re-Sourcing the Self? Isaiah Berlin and Charles Taylor: The Tension between Freedom and Authenticity." Ethical Perspectives: Journal of the European Ethics Network 11, no. 4 (2004): 215-227.
  Abstract:
  The aim of this article is to compare the theories of isaiah berlin and Charles Taylor with regard to the topic of freedom. I will argue that berlin's famous positive-negative distinction still serves an important purpose by maintaining a crucial tension within the concept of liberty. this tension allows ethical pluralism to be taken seriously instead of being covered up by ideological rhetoric. berlin held that the implementation of positive liberty--defining the boundaries of true liberty--is always problematic. Taylor, however, tries to bypass the gap between negative and positive liberty by means of his concept of 'authenticity'. I will argue that this notion is a sound descriptive term for an individual's entrenchment in community, but that the normative appeal from authenticity amounts to a project of 'resourcing the self' which is ultimately rooted in an optimistic perspective on pluralism and multiculturalism. however, to the extent that there are indeed different communities with different values and different ways of being authentic, it is worthwhile to repeat the berlinian 'grundgedanke' that human beings should cope with the inexorable and irreducible tragedy in moral life.
- O’Callaghan, Paul. "The Eclipse of Worship: Reflections on Charles Taylor's A Secular Age." Euntes Docete 62, no. 2 (2009): 89-123.
- O’Shea, Andrew. Selfhood and Sacrifice: Rene Girard and Charles Taylor on the Crisis of Modernity. New York: Continuum, 2010.
- ———. "Sources of the Sacred: Strong Pedagogy and the Making
  of a Secular Age." In The Taylor Effect: Responding to A Secular Age, edited by Ian Leask, 2010. 160-174.
- Oakes, Edward T. "Attention must be Paid [Review of Multiculturalism the 'Politics of Recognition']." First Things 32 (April, 1993): 48-51.
- Oberndörfer, Dieter. "Review of Multikulturalismus Und Die Politik Der Anerkennung." Politische Vierteljahresschrift 37 (1996): 182.
- O'Brien, Dennis. "Review of Dilemmas and Connections : Selected Essays." America 204, no. 17 (05/23, 2011): 24-26.
- ———. "Faith Enters the Public Square." [Review of Secuarlism and Freedom of Conscience] America 206, no. 10 (03/26, 2012): 24-28.
- O'Hagan, Timothy. "Charles Taylor's Hidden God: Aristotle, Rawls and Religion through Post-Modernist Eyes." Ratio 6, no. 1 (June, 1993): 72-81.
- O'Hagan, Timothy. "Charles Taylor's Hidden God: Aristotle, Rawls and Religion through Post-Modernist Eyes." Ratio 6, no. 1 (June, 1993): 72-81.
  Abstract:
  With tongue half-way in cheek, the author distinguishes, among the post-modernists, an "extremist" tendency (derrida and his followers), and a "moderate" tendency ("conservative" faction: MacIntyre, sandel; "progressive" faction: Dworkin). locating Charles Taylor's "sources of the self" on the "moderate-progressive" wing of the movement, he criticizes Taylor for misreading two key authors in his intellectual history. for Taylor, Aristotle is either naively parochial or improperly relativist; and Rawls is wedded to an erroneous, abstract philosophical anthropology. the author argues that both Taylor's charges are mistaken, and undertakes a rapid re-assessment of the two figures. finally he addresses Taylor's ambiguous theology. it serves to give coherence and significance to human strivings. but, beyond the appellation "judaeo-christian", we are given no clue about its sources or content.
- Ohna, Stein Erik. "Education of Deaf Children and the Politics of Recognition." Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 8, no. 1 (Winter, 2003): 5-10.
- Olafson, Frederick A. "Comments on Sources of the Self by Charles Taylor." Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54, no. 1 (Mar., 1994): 191-196. In English. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2108367.
- Oliveira, Isabel Assis Ribeiro de. "O Mal-Estar Contemporâneo Na Perspectiva De Charles Taylor." Revista Brasileira De Ciências Sociais 21, no. 60 (2006): 135-145. In Portuguese. http://ref.scielo.org/4dtnyw.
- Oliveira, Juliano Cordeiro Da Costa. "Reconhecimento, Religião e Secularismo Em Charles Taylor." Veritas 64, no. 1 (2019). In Portuguese.
  Abstract:
  O artigo objetiva investigar, à luz do filósofo Charles Taylor, a questão do reconhecimento dos sujeitos a partir da relação entre secularismo e religião. O fio condutor do pensamento de Taylor é o comunitarismo. Este se relaciona com a ideia de que o contexto das normas que regem uma sociedade deve ser o de uma comunidade que, em seus valores, práticas e instituições formam um horizonte constitutivo para a identidade de seus membros. Somente assim seria possível colocar as questões da justiça e, então, responder sobre o que é bom e o que deve valer para a comunidade. Segundo Taylor, os homens são seres expressivos porque pertencem a uma cultura que é nutrida e transmitida no interior de uma comunidade. Taylor parte da crítica hegeliana ao formalismo kantiano que deslocou o sujeito da comunidade, da história e da cultura, gerando demandas de reconhecimento. Ele enfatiza que a religião, por exemplo, ainda se relaciona com a formação das diversas identidades, tal qual uma esfera essencial na constituição dos sujeitos, mesmo em sociedades secularizadas. Taylor destaca a existência de múltiplas modernidades, uma vez que culturas não ocidentais foram modernizadas à sua maneira, sem a necessária separação entre identidades secularizadas e religiosas. O filósofo também defende uma redefinição do secularismo que valorize as religiões como fontes essenciais e indispensáveis para diversos sujeitos que se formaram a partir de outras linguagens, culturas e tradições diversas da concepção tradicional de secularismo. Como, então, pensar a questão do reconhecimento, no âmbito da relação entre secularismo e religião?
- Oliverio Jr., L. William. "A Secular Age." Pneuma: The Journal of the Society for Pentecostal Studies 31, no. 1 (2009): 137-138.
- ———. "The Work of Charles Taylor and the Future of Pentecostalism." Pneuma: The Journal of the Society for Pentecostal Studies 40, no. 1-2 (2018): 5-16.
  Abstract:
  Charles Taylor has been one of the most significant philosophers in the Western world for the past four decades, and his work on secularism and religion in the late modern world has been a major contribution to contemporary philosophy and religious studies. Taylor's visit to the 2017 Annual Meeting of the Society for Pentecostal Studies in St. Louis has led to responses to his work in relationship to Pentecostal studies. Taylor's narration of the secular, culminating in his major work A Secular Age, in relationship to his wider philosophical works has led to the responses in this issue of Pneuma. This introductory article frames Taylor's work in relationship to these responses to his work from leading and emerging scholars of Pentecostal studies.
- Olsen, James C. "Faith and Knowledge: Intellectual Prospects for Mormonism Charles Taylor: Catholic Mentor to the Mormon Scholar." Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 44, no. 3 (Fall, 2011): 94-120.
- O'Neill, Daniel I. "Multicultural Liberals and the Rushdie Affair: A Critique of Kymlicka, Taylor, and Walzer." Theory, Culture and Society 11, no. 2 (1999): 129-149.
- O'Neill, Shane. "Morality, Ethical Life and the Persistence of Universalism." Theory, Culture and Society 11, no. 2 (May, 1994): 129-149.
  Abstract:
  This article assesses jurgen Habermas's discourse ethics as a version of moral universalism. Habermas's contextualist critics, inspired by hegel's critique of kant, reject his distinction between moral and ethical questions. they maintain that no moral norms could be justified without reference to some substantive ethical commitment. the article reviews recent contributions of seyla benhabib, georgia warnke and Charles Taylor to this debate. while discourse ethics is defended in general, it is argued that Habermas needs to develop further his thinking on the relationship between moral and ethical uses of practical reason if his defense of universalism is to convince.
- Oppelt, Martin. "Zwischen Authentizität Und Totalitärem Terror. Charles Taylor Liest Rousseau." In Wie Wollen Wir Leben? Das Politische Denken Und Staatsverständnis Von Charles Taylor, edited by Ulf Bohmann. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2014. 21-39. In German.
- Oppenheimer, Mark. "Sentimentality Or Honesty? on Charles Taylor." The Nation (August 10, 2011). http://www.thenation.com/article/162667/sentimentality-or-honesty-charles-Taylor?page=full.
- Orejudo Pedrosa, Juan Carlos. "El Comunitarismo De Taylor Frente Al Liberalismo Político De Rawls: La Justicia Liberal Frente Al Multiculturalismo." Revista De Filosofía 40, no. 121 (2008): 83-103. In Spanish.
  Abstract:
  The work of Charles Taylor takes place during the debate between liberals and communitarians in the eighties, which provokes the revision of liberal principles. the communitarians, such as Taylor, sandel, walzer, MacIntyre, argued against liberal thinkers who have defended individualism instead of social and communitarian's values. in the opinion of communitarians, liberals destroy the values of the community as a consequence of their individualism and "atomism". in this essay, I will analyse Taylor's point of view, and his defence of the concept of multiculturalism that derives of his defence of the rights that different cultures have to affirm their cultural identity, which makes necessary that individuals take care of their community.
- Orlie, Melissa A. "Taylor and Feminism: From Recognition of Identity to a Politics of the Good." In Charles Taylor, edited by Ruth Abbey. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
- Ormerod, Neil. "Charles Taylor and Bernard Lonergan on Natural Theology." Irish Theological Quarterly 74, no. 4 (2009): 419-433.
- Orwin, Clifford. "Charles Taylor's Pedagogy of Recognition." In Canadian Political Philosophy: Contemporary Reflections, edited by Ronald Beiner and Wayne Norman. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
- Oshana, Marina A. L. "Autonomy and the Question of Authenticity." Social Theory and Practice 33, no. 3 (July, 2007): 411-429.
  Abstract:
  This paper examines an account of authenticity offered by karl jaspers against an ideal of authenticity attributed to johann herder in an effort to find out which, if either, can be of service to a plausible theory of autonomous agency. I argue that the herderian ideal informs the view of authenticity that has come to dominate current discussion, but that it has less to do with autonomy than we think. the situations of david kaczynski, younger brother of unabomber ted kaczynski, and that of the acclaimed german novelist günter grass, are examined as case studies.
- Ospina Muñoz, Doris Elena. "Las Condiciones Para El Consenso, La Visión De Charles Taylor." Praxis Filosófica 45 (2017): 57-83. In Spanish. http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/pafi/n45/2389-9387-pafi-45-00057.pdf.
  Abstract:
  Este artículo hace parte de una tesis doctoral inédita, titulada el consenso deseable, entre la visión de Charles Taylor y el cosmopolitismo contemporáneo. Basado en la lectura orientada al problema, el artículo introduce en las condiciones que, según la visión de Charles Taylor, requiere el consenso en las sociedades contemporáneas. Esas condiciones son: primero, la demostración de la tesis de la refutabilidad de las posiciones morales y, segundo, la ruptura con el etnocentrismo en el análisis de las situaciones de conflicto. La primera condición nos pone en contacto con las nociones básicas que estructuran el pensamiento de Taylor, a saber, autocomprensión, trasfondo moral compartido y orden moral secular. La segunda implica un marco de pensamiento político cosmopolita y producción de conocimiento transcultural que desafía el hacer de las ciencias sociales.
- O'Toole, Roger. "Review of Varieties of Religion Today: William James Revisited." Journal of Contemporary Religion 19, no. 2 (May, 2004): 231-239.
- Ouellet, Samuel, Joseph Facal, and Louis Hebert. "Understanding Cultural Difference Management through Charles Taylor's Philosophy: Case Studies from the Food Processing Industry." Administrative Sciences 5, no. 2 (2015): 46-70.
  Abstract:
  In this paper, we use the work of the philosopher, Charles Taylor, to investigate the role of culture on internationalization decisions. Using parameters related to key constructs such as positive liberty, social ontology, expressivism, civic republicanism and common spaces, we look at how culture influences the decisions regarding corporate international expansion. This framework was applied in a multi-interview design in four firms from the food processing industry from France and Canada. Results showed an obvious sensitivity to cultural difference and that managerial practices surrounding this issue tended to be intuitive and emergent. These practices were not crystallized in the form of a conscious and deliberate organizational strategy for dealing with cultural difference when planning foreign market entry. Our findings triggered further reflections on managerial implications such as the importance of searching more explicitly for cultural and organizational anchors when reviewing location factors.
- Ouaknine, Léon and Évelyne Abitbol. "Lettre Ouverte Au Grand Philosophe Charles Taylor." Huffington Post (Jun 17, 2018). In French. https://quebec.huffingtonpost.ca/evelyne-abitbol-/lettre-ouverte-au-grand-philosophe-charles-taylor_a_23460943/.
- Outlaw, Lucius. "Review of Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition." Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory 3 (1996): 124-129.
- Oviedo, Lluís. "I Cristiani in Un Mondo Secolarizzato: La Proposta Di Charles Taylor [Review of A Secular Age]." Antonianum: Periodicum Trimestre 83, no. 3 (July-September 2008, 2008): 511-523. In Italian.
- ———. "A Secular Age - by Charles Taylor." Reviews in Religion & Theology 16, no. 1 (January, 2009): 79-85.
- Öztürk, Sevcan. "The Construction of Muhammad Iqbal’s Theory of Action in the Context of Charles Taylor’s Philosophy of Action." Beytulhikme: An International Journal of Philosophy. 8, no. 1 (2018): 395-411.
- Paden, Roger. "The Lost Childhood of Homo Economicus." In Explorations of Value, edited by Thomas Magnell. Amsterdam;Atlanta, Georgia: Rodopi, 1997. 119-128.
- Paek, Hun-Seung. "Selbstidentität Und Anerkennung Bei Ch. Taylor Und Hegel." In Hegels Politische Philosophie: Zweiter Teil. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2009. In German.
- Paetzold, Heinz. "Kulturelle Differenz Und Multikulturalität: Ein Kernproblem Der Kulturphilosophie." Journal of the Faculty of Letters, the University of Tokyo, Aesthetics 22 (1997): 43-60. In German.
  Abstract:
  A productive discussion of cultural difference and multiculturalism presupposes to accept the relativity of cultures ('cultural relativism'), which is a heritage from herder. we can cope with cultural otherness only to the extent that a hermeneutic component meets with a political component of recognition. in face of the experienced cultural otherness we discover what is peculiar to our own. this is a rephrasing of rousseau's search of authenticity. the article discusses Charles Taylor's mapping of multiculturality and adds new components deriving from kristeva's psychoanalytical model of a 'split' subjectivity which according to her view always contains elements of 'otherness' within the own.
- Paine, Robert. "Aboriginality, Multiculturalism and Liberal Rights Philosophy." Ethnos 64, no. 3 (1999): 325-349.
- Palaver, Wolfgang. "Güterordunung Und Vermittelnde Gnade. René Girard Und Charles Taylor Angesichts Der Krise Der Moderne." In Unerfüllte Moderne? - Neue Perspektiven Auf Das Werk Von Charles Taylor, edited by Michael Kühnlein and Matthias Lutz-Bachmann. Berlin: Suhrkamp / Insel, 2011. 733-754. In German.
- ———. "René Girard and Charles Taylor: Complementary Engagements with the Crisis of Modernity." In The Palgrave Handbook of Mimetic Theory and Religion, edited by Wolfgang Palaver and J. Alison. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. 335-342.
  Abstract:
  Girard distanced himself from philosophy so strongly most of the time that only a few philosophers engaged with his mimetic theory. Besides philosophers committed to mimetic theory and Gianni Vattimo, Charles Taylor is one of the few philosophers who has taken Girard’s work seriously. Girard and Taylor are among those contemporary thinkers who address the crisis of modernity without ending up in a fundamentalist antimodernism. Taylor is less apocalyptic, but also does not discount the crisis of modernity, as the original title (The Malaise of Modernity) of one of his books attests. He comes closest to Girard’s apocalyptic attitude when he follows Ivan Illich’s interpretation of modernity as a perversion of Christianity.
- Palmer, Daniel E. "Taylor and Foucault on Power, Truth, and Freedom." Southwest Philosophy Review: The Journal of the Southwestern Philosophical Society 12, no. 2 (July, 1996): 171-188.
- Palovicová, Zuzana. "Ethics and the Principle of Authenticity." Filozofia 59, no. 9 (2004): 627-640. In Slovak.
  Abstract:
  The paper examines the relationship between ethics and the principle of authenticity, focusing on two fundamental questions: What is it, what distorts today the ideal of authenticity and how to differentiate between morally responsible forms of self-determination and other ways of modern searching for authenticity? the author follows Taylor's conception of authenticity. on one hand Taylor is not willing simply to reject the diagnosis of the conservative critics of modernity. he shares their idea, that it was the modernity, which made the dynamic of ongoing social individualization and purpose-made rationalization possible. the consequence, however, is, among other things, a challenge to our moral certainties. on the other hand Taylor does not want to be an adherent of antimodernism. according to him the background of contemporary occurrences is also the ideal of authenticity, which could be attributed a moral role and which seems to break down the value relativism from inside.
- ———. "Normative Character of the Notion of Recognition." Filozofia 62, no. 8 (2007): 658-667. In Slovak.
  Abstract:
  The request of recognition is nowadays being raised under strongly varying conditions, as in the name of minorities, collective identities or within feminism. still growing emphasis on the need of recognition is based on the assumption of certain links existing between recognition and identity, where the identity is used to specify human self-understanding. the first part of the study tries to follow the argumentation in support of the social and cultural recognition theory. while interpreting this theory, the author focuses on the works of contemporary influential recognition theory philosophers, namely ch. Taylor and A. honneth. the second part of the study explores the relationship between the recognition of collective identities and the ideal of individual autonomy.
- Panagakou, Stamatoula. "[Review of] Charles Taylor, Hegel and Modern Society Hegel and Modern Society." Political Studies Review 15, no. 2 (2017): 270-270.
- Papanikolaou, Aristotle. "Liberating Eros: Confession and Desire." Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 26, no. 1 (Mar., 2006): 115-136.
  Abstract:
  The basic thesis of this essay is that confession -- defined as acts of truth-telling about that which one most fears to speak -- affects the landscape of one's emotions and desires. the kind of effect confession will have on emotions and desires is determined, in part, by the identity of the listener. thus, the listener is not neutral in such acts of confession. I explore this relationship between confession and desire through an analysis of the sacrament of confession and in conversation with dionysius the areopagite, maximus the confessor, Charles Taylor, and martha Nussbaum. I suggest an alternative understanding of the sacrament of confession as an event whose purpose is to increase one's desire for God. I argue that Taylor and Nussbaum give insufficient attention to how desire affects interpretation and to how the particular iconic role of the listener affects how confession affects emotions and desires. (edited).
- Pareles, Argenis. "Charles Taylor y La Crítica Al 'Atomismo Político'." Apuntes Filosoficos 5 (1994): 147-156. In Spanish.
- ———. "La 'Teoría De La Justicia'." Apuntes Filosoficos 13 (1998): 51-68. In Spanish.
  Abstract:
  This paper analyzes the relations between the concepts of justice and well-being as they appear in the discussion of two of the most relevant contemporary authors: John Rawls and Charles Taylor. I show the deep involvement of these concepts within the Rawlsian framework. special emphasis is placed on the notion of good as it is implied in the idea of a well-ordered society and how this affects the anthropological conception of 'A theory of justice'.
- Park, Rosemary. "Review of Multiculturalism and "the Politics of Recognition"." Change 25, no. 2 (Mar. - Apr., 1993): 54. In English. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40164911.
- Parkinson, G. H. R.,. "Review of Hegel." Inquiry 19 (1976): 255-266.
- Patrick, Colin M. "Review of Charles Taylor: Thinking and Living Deep Diversity by Mark Redhead." Ethics 113 (July 2003, 2003): 927-929.
- Patrick, Morag. "Liberalism, Rights and Recognition." Philosophy and Social Criticism 26, no. 5 (Sept., 2000): 28-46.
  Abstract:
  In this article I examine the liberal conviction that tolerance (in the sense of a commitment to individual autonomy) best promotes recognition of cultural diversity. I argue that two weaknesses haunt the liberal project and undermine this belief. they prevail because of a failure adequately to address the question of recognition in its normative, ontological and symbolic aspects. in contrast, I argue that philosophical hermeneutics affords a critical perspective on democratic theory and practice that must be taken up and extended following the experience of identity politics. (edited).
- ———. "Rights and Recognition: Perspectives on Multicultural Democracy." Ethnicities 2, no. 1 (March, 2002): 31-51.
- Patten, Alan. "The Republican Critique of Liberalism." British Journal of Political Science 26 (1996): 25-44.
- Patton, Paul. "Taylor and Foucault on Power and Freedom." Political Studies 37, no. 2 (1989): 260-276.
- ———. "L'Identité Des Imaginaires Sociaux Et La Nature Des Droits." Philosophiques 33, no. 2 (Sept., 2006): 499-506. In French. http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/013897ar?integral=oui.
- Pawelec, Andrzej. "The Romantic Theory of Language and Metaphor." In Charles Taylor's Vision of Modernity: Reconstructions and Interpretations, edited by Christopher Garbowski, Jan Paweł Hudzik and Jan Kłos. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Pub., 2009. 194-204.
- Peddle, David. "Re-Sourcing Charles Taylor's Augustine." Augustinian Studies 32, no. 2 (2001): 207-217. http://secure.pdcnet.org/augstudies/content/augstudies_2001_0032_0002_0207_0218
- Pedrana, Yamila. "Review of Multiculturalism and 'the Politics of Recognition'." Revista Latinoamericana De Filosofia 22 (1996): 349-352.
- Peetush, A. "The Ethics of Interconnectedness: Charles Taylor, no-Self, and Buddhism." In Ethics without Self, Dharma without Atman: Western and Buddhist Philosophical Traditions in Dialogue, edited by Gordon Davis. New York: Springer, 2018. 235-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67407-0_12.
- Pélabay, Janie. Charles Taylor: Penseur De La Pluralité. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l'Université Laval, 2001. In French.
- Peñas, Santiago Lago. "Federalismo e Nacionalismo En Canadá." Grial 40, no. 156, Liberalismo, Comunitarismo, Republicanismo (Outubro, Novembro, Decembro, 2002): 790-791. In Spanish. http://www.jstor.org/stable/29752004.
- Pereira, Gustavo. "Intersubjectivity and Evaluations of Justice." Thesis Eleven 108, no. 1 (02, 2012): 66-83.
  Abstract:
  The capability approach assigns a central role to the contexts within which social interactions take place, which make individual liberty achievable. however, an auxiliary concept is necessary to explain the contexts of collective action more accurately. in this paper I shall present Taylor’s concept of irreducibly social goods as a supplement to the capability approach. I shall also introduce the concept of hermeneutics as a strategy suitable for evaluating which capabilities are to be considered valid, as an alternative to aggregative methodologies. this conceptual development at the core of the capability approach demands to be framed by a normative criterion that enables us to distinguish between emancipatory and conservative contexts of social action; for that purpose I make use of the subject idealization that honneth and anderson present.
- Perrucci, Adamo. L'Identità Dinamica : Individuo, Etica e Politica in Charles Taylor. Firenze: Le lettere, 2009. In Italian.
- Persky, Stan. "Breathing New Life into National Debate." Globe and Mail (June 24, 1995): C21.
- ———. "Engaging Philosophy from Charles Taylor [Review of Philosophical Arguments]." Globe and Mail (July 29, 1995): C20.
- Peterson, Gregory R. "Stage-Two Secularity and the Future of Theology-and-Science." Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 45, no. 2 (June, 2010): 506-516.
  Abstract:
  Charles Taylor has recently provided an in-depth exploration of secularity, with a central characteristic being the understanding that religious commitment is optional. this essay extends this analysis, considering the possibility that american society may be entering a second stage of secularity, one in which the possibility of religious commitment ceases to be an option at all for many. the possible implications of such a development are considered for the theology-and-science dialogue.
- Petoukhov, K. S. "Locating a Theoretical Framework for the Canadian Truth and Reconciliation Commission: Charles Taylor Or Nancy Fraser?" The International Indigenous Policy Journal 3, no. 2 (2012). In Undetermined. http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/iipj/vol3/iss2/4.
  Abstract:
  The truth and reconciliation commission (TRC) of Canada was established to uncover and acknowledge the injustices that took place in indian residential schools and, in doing so, to pave the way to reconciliation. however, the TRC does not define reconciliation or how we would know it when (and if) we get there, thus stirring a debate about what it could mean. this article examines two theories that may potentially be relevant to the TRC’s work: Charles Taylor’s theory of recognition and nancy Fraser’s tripartite theory of justice. the goal is to discover what each theory contributes to our understanding of the harms that indigenous peoples suffered in residential schools, as well as in the broader colonial project, and how to address these harms appropriately.
- Petry, M. J. "Review of Hegel." Philosophical Books 17 (1976): 111-113.
- Pettit, Philip. "Reply: Evaluative 'Realism' and Interpretation." In Wittgenstein: To Follow a Rule, edited by Steven H. Holtzmann and Christopher Leich. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1981. 211-245.
- Pfohl, David. "Review of Hegel." Eidos: The Canadian Graduate Journal of Philosophy 1 (1978): 116-124.
- Philippe de Lara and Charles Taylor. "A Defence of Realist Moral Philosophy (in Czech)." Filosofický Casopis 52, no. 1 (2004): 85-88. In Czech.
- Aaron Pidel. "Charles Taylor on Celibacy [3 parts]."2010. http://whosoeverdesires.wordpress.com/2010/05/23/charles-Taylor-on-celibacy-i-mutual-fragilization/.
- Piercey, Robert. "Review of Hubert Dreyfus and Charles Taylor, Retrieving Realism." Philosophy in Review (Comptes Rendus Philosophiques) 36, no. 5 (2016): 198-200.
- Pievatolo, Maria Chiara. "Soggetti Di Diritto o Animali Culturali? Charles Taylor e Il Problema Del Multiculturalismo." Il Politico 59, no. 1 (1994): 137-159. In Italian.
- Pihlström, Sami. "Kant Anthropologized: Charles Taylor on Naturalism Transcendental Conditions." In Kant Und Die Berliner Aufklärung: Akten Des IX. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, edited by Volker Gerhardt, Rolf Horstmann and Ralph Schumacher, vol. 5. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2001. 582-591.
- ———. "Linguistic Practices and Transcendental Arguments: Taylor and Wittgenstein." Acta Philosophica Fennica 71 (2002): 13-27.
  Abstract:
  This essay reconsiders Charles Taylor's discussion of transcendental argumentation and his reading of wittgenstein's later philosophy, particularly the private language argument, as an example of such argumentation. Taylor's criticism of naturalism and his defense of what may be labeled a "culturalist" philosophical anthropology are crucially related to this argumentative strategy. the problem of the factual grounding of normativity is explored as a major challenge for Taylor's wittgensteinian view.
- ———. "Review of Varieties of Religion Today: William James Revisited." Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy 39, no. 2 (Spring, 2003): 342-347. In English. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40320943.
- Pijnenburg, Martien and Bert Gordijn. "Identity and Moral Responsibility of Healthcare Organizations." Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics: Philosophy of Medical Research and Practice 26, no. 2 (2005): 141-160.
  Abstract:
  In this paper the moral responsibility of a healthcare organization (HCO) is conceived as an inextricable aspect of the identity of the HCO. we attempt to show that by exploring this relation a more profound insight in moral responsibility can be gained. referring to Charles Taylor we explore the meaning of the concept of identity. it consists of three interdependent dimensions: A moral, a dialogical, and a narrative one. in section two we develop some additional arguments to apply his concept of personal identity to organizations. the final section works out the relationship of three dimensions of identity to some actual issues in contemporary HCOs: The tension between care and justice, the importance of dialogues about the diversity of goods, and the relevance of becoming familiar with the life-story of the HCO. (edited).
- Pijnenburg, Martien A. M., Bert Gordijn, and Frans J. H. Vosman. "Catholic Healthcare Organizations and the Articulation of their Identity." HealthCare Ethics Committee Forum 20, no. 1 (Mar., 2008): 75-97.
  Abstract:
  This paper deals with the question why it is relevant for contemporary catholic healthcare organizations (HCOs) to articulate their catholic identity. this question is answered from three different perspectives: An organizational one, an ecclesiastical one, and a philosophical one referring to Charles Taylor. in the end we conclude that articulation enables to contribute to the primary objective of the medical-ethical teaching of the church: A healthcare practice in accordance with the dignity of human beings. second, by articulating their identity catholic HCOs can perform an exemplary role in contemporary pluralistic society on humanity and justice in healthcare.
- Pinheiro, Jean Rodrigo and Vitor Hugo Dos Reis Costa. "Reconhecimento, Crise e Diálogo Na Formação Da Identidade Pessoal Em Charles Taylor." Revista Missioneira 21, no. 1 (2019): 10-23. In Portuguese.
  Abstract:
  O presente artigo quer trazer a pesquisa entorno do pensamento ético/político de Charles Taylor na compreensão das fontes da identidade pessoal. Para isso, a relação entre reconhecimento e identidade é fundamental na construção do self e no reconhecimento de sua originalidade. Reconhecer a identidade pessoal é um movimento contínuo que se desenvolve na troca dialógica, no espaço moral, numa formação positiva ou pela via negativa do reconhecimento da identidade. Por isso, o agente humano deve estar inserido no contexto social e reconhecer-se na cultura da comunidade como pertencente à mesma. O reconhecimento não se dá de forma monológica, isolado, mas pela troca, no diálogo do agente social com seus significantes humanos. Todavia, a identidade pessoal requer uma narrativa da pergunta “quem sou eu”, que é desvelada na medida em que o agente vai se relacionando no espaço social e se projetando. Por isso, reconhecer “quem sou” é narrar o “quem fui” e o “quem quero ser”. Reconhecer a identidade pessoal é reconhecer o seu lugar no mundo e, assim, ser o protagonista da própria história a partir daquilo que desenvolve em relação aos demais agentes sociais.
- Pinkard, Terry. "Interpretation and Verification in the Human Sciences: A Note on Taylor." Philosophy of the Social Sciences 6 (June, 1976): 165-173.
- ———. "Taylor, 'History,' and the History of Philosophy." In Charles Taylor, edited by Ruth Abbey. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
- Pippin, Robert. "Recognition and Reconciliation: Actualized Agency in Hegel's Jena Phenomenology." In Recognition and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. 57-78.
  Abstract:
  Most modern liberal versions of the state depend on a philosophically ambitious theory about the nature of human individuality and its normatively relevant implications. it is often assumed that contrasting theories about the ultimacy of inter-subjective relations and the derivative or secondary status of individuality are potentially if not actually illiberal, and hegel's putative “organic” theory of the state is often cited as an example. A major arena for such disputes has been the claim by such neo-hegelians as Charles Taylor and axel honneth that the key liberal notion of the “free and rational individual” depends for its possibility on a social condition of great political relevance: “mutual recognition.” in the following, I return to the sources of this dispute (a dispute sometimes called postmodern “identity” politics) in hegel's original arguments about “dependence” and “independence,” and investigate what according to hegel is the exact nature of the human dependence at issue and what might count as the successful satisfaction of this condition of dependence. it is, I argue, much easier to see what hegel's answer is to the former question than to the latter.
- Pirnajmmudin, Hossein and Sanaz Bayat. "Charles Taylor’s Ontological Hermeneutics and the Question of Existence in Marilynne Robinson’s Lila." Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching 7, no. 1 (2017): 46.
- Pirni, Alberto. "Comprensione Di Se e Comprensione Del Bene in Charles Taylor [Understanding of the Self and Understanding of Good in the Work of Charles Taylor]." Fenomenologia e Società 22, no. 1 (1999): 128-145. In Italian.
- ———. Charles Taylor: Ermeneutica Del sé, Etica e Modernità. Lecce: Milella, 2002. In Italian.
- ———. La Via Identitaria Al Multiculturalismo: Charles Taylor e Oltre. Soveria Manelli: Ribbettino, 2006. In Italian.
- Plants, Nicholas. "Lonergan and Taylor: A Critical Integration." Method: Journal of Lonergan Studies 19, no. 1 (Mar., 2001): 143-172.
- Pleydell-Pearce, A. G. "Review of Hegel." Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 9 (1978): 201-202.
- Pogonyi, Szabolcs. "Illiberal Practices Under the Veil of Multiculturalism." Regio: Minorities, Politics, Society 1 (2007): 217-237.
- Poirier, Maben Walter. "Reassessing the Modern Age [Review of the Malaise of Modernity]." Modern Age 35 (1993): 215-223.
- Polke, Christian. "Ein Säkulares Zeitalter." Theologische Literaturzeitung 135, no. 5 (May, 2010): 536-538. In German.
- Ponger, Lisl. "Photoessay." Transit 49 (2016). http://www.iwm.at/transit/heft-49-grenzen-der-toleranz-charles-taylors-landkarte/. In German.
- Pontes,Nicole Louise Macedo Teles de. "Classes Sociais, Identidade e Reconhecimento: Críticas Bourdieusianas a Charles Taylor." Mediações - Revista De Ciências Sociais 16, no. 2 (2011). In Portuguese. http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/mediacoes/article/view/8771.
  Abstract:
  O presente trabalho irá analisar o conceito de classes sociais a partir de uma perspectiva teórica da produção de identidades e coletividades e do papel do sujeito social em obras seminais de pierre bourdieu e chales Taylor. em ambos os autores, o conceito de classes sociais aparece atrelado a uma idéia central de sujeito, que perpassa o campo da ação política, definindo temporal e espacialmente as possibilidade objetivas da ação subjetiva. buscando um diálogo crítico entre esses dois autores, oberva-se como o projeto de revisão do conceito de classe social proposto por bourdieu está inscrito num projeto crítico de reconhecimento tanto na sua vertente econômica como sócio-cultural. the present paper will analyze the concept of social class from a theoretical perspective of the production of identities and communities and the role of the social subject within seminal works of pierre bourdieu and Charles Taylor. in both authors, the concept of social class appears connected to a central idea of subject that pervades the field of political action, defining temporally and spatially the objective possibilities of subjective action. seeking a critical dialogue between these two authors, it is observed how the revision project of the concept of social class proposed by bourdieu is engraved in a critical project of recognition both in its economic and socio-cultural realms.
- Pontuso, James F. "Review of Contemporary Philosophy in Focus: Charles Taylor, Ed. Ruth Abbey." Perspectives on Political Science 34, no. 1 (Winter, 2005): 63.
- Porpora, Douglas V. "Operant Conditioning and Teleology." Philosophy of Science 47 (Dec., 1980): 568-582.
  Abstract:
  This paper defends the relevance of Taylor's (1961) critique of s-r behaviorism to skinner's model of operant conditioning. in particular, it is argued against ringen (1976) that the model of operant conditioning is a nonteleological variety of explanation. operant conditioning is shown unable, on this account, to provide a parsimonious and predictive explanation of the behavior of higher level organisms. finally, it is shown that the principle of operant conditioning implicitly assumes a teleological capacity, the admission of which renders the principle of operant conditioning superfluous.
- Porter, Sam. "Are we all in this Together?" The Register-Guard (May 2, 2021). https://www.registerguard.com/story/opinion/columns/2021/05/02/guest-view-democracy-and-solidarity-we-all-together/4890760001/.
- Portier, Philippe. "Charles Taylor Et La Sociologie De La Sécularisation." In Charles Taylor. Religion Et sécularisation, edited by Sylvie Taussig. Paris: CNRS Éditions, 2014. 83-112. In French.http://lectures.revues.org/14084
- Poulain, Jacques. "Le Dépassement De l'Épistémologie." In Critique De La Raison Phénomenologique: La Transformation Pragmaatique. Actes Du Colloque De Vienne 10-13 Mai 1985, edited by Jacques Poulain. Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf, 1991. 115-135. In French.
- ———. "La Phénoménologique Herméneutique De l’esprit." In Charles Taylor Et l’interprétation De l’identité Moderne, edited by Guy Laforest and Philippe de Lara. Paris;Sainte Foy;: Centre Culturel International de Cerisy-la-Salle, Cerf;Les Presses de l'Université Laval;, 1998. 79-96. In French.
- Poulat, Émile. "« Un Océan Et Trois Cents Hivers »." In Charles Taylor. Religion Et sécularisation, edited by Sylvie Taussig. Paris: CNRS Éditions, 2014. 23-26. In French.http://lectures.revues.org/14084
- Pourtois, Hervé. "Reconnaissance Morale Et Constitution De l’identité. Narration, Argumentation, Reconstruction." Revue Philosophique De Louvain 91, no. 4 (novembre, 1993): 641-653. In French.
- ———. "La Société Libérale Face Au Défi Du Pluralisme Culturel: De La Politique De La Tolérance à La Politique Multiculturaliste." Chap. 1, In Raison, Sphère Publique Et Défis Du Pluralisme, edited by C. Arnsperger and H. Pourtois, vol. 98, 2000. 6-26. In French.
- Preece, Gordon. "Review Essay: James K.A. Smith - how Not to be Secular." Zadok Perspectives, no. 132 (2016): 9-14.
  Abstract:
  How James K. A. Smith is a Canadian professor of philosophy at Calvin College, an assembly line for outstanding philosophers and apologists. Canadians come from a secular society that, unlike its southern cousin the US, doesn't see itself still as part of Christendom, so he is closer to an Australian wavelength. Commonwealth connections, and coming from a continent-sized, largely barren country like Australia - though from cold, not heat - also help.
- Prendergast, Monica. "Utopian Performatives and the Social Imaginary: Toward a New Philosophy of Drama/Theater Education." Journal of Aesthetic Education 45, no. 1 (Mar., 2011): 58-73.
  Abstract:
  In moving toward the articulation of a new philosophy for drama/theatre education, the recent work of performance theorist jill dolan and philosopher Charles Taylor is presented. dolan's 'utopian performative' suggests that in certain performance contexts, spectators experience "glimpse(s) of utopia". Taylor's 'social imaginary' suggests that society itself is created and sustained by collective acts of the imagination that are possible to harness in the cause of social justice and change. drawing on the work of these thinkers, and selected others, a new philosophical way of seeing drama/theatre education as 'the collective creation of socially-imagined performative utopias' is offered.
- Prickett, Stephen. "[Review of] Charles Taylor, the Language Animal: The Full Shape of Human Linguistic Capacity." Theology 120, no. 3 (2017): 230-231.
- Prokesová, Eva. "Identity Crisis and Strong Evaluation (in Slovak)." Filozofia 66, no. 5 (2011): 486-490.
  Abstract:
  The paper examines the connection between identity crisis and Charles Taylor's concept of strong evaluation. the latter is construed as one of the fundamental characteristics of human identity. it is argued that in the absence the ability of strong evaluation a specific form of identity crisis occurs. the main objective of the paper is to show the necessity of strong evaluation for "healthy identity" and for human capability "to cure" the identity already in crisis.
- Prostak, Rafal and Anna Spiewak. Community, Language and Ethical Dimension of Cultural Identity: Charles Taylor and Challenges of Post-Modernity. Memory in Canada: Global Perspectives, Magdalena Paluszkiewicz-Misiaczek and Anna Reczynska, editors. Krakow: Place; Polska Akademia Umiejetnosci, 2005. 399-408.
- Purdy, Jedediah S. "Poststructualism and the Inescapability of Ethics." Harvard Review of Philosophy 6 (Mar., 1996): 77-94.
- Pyrcz, Greg. "Review of the Ethics of Authenticity." Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue Canadienne De Science Politique 26, no. 3 (Sep., 1993): 603-604. In English. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3229079.
- Quinn, Carol V. A. "On Integrity." International Journal of Applied Philosophy 23, no. 2 (Sept., 2009): 189-197.
  Abstract:
  In this paper I develop a social conception of integrity while still holding onto the original meaning of the term. to that end I build mainly on the works of cheshire calhoun, whose view of integrity, developed over a decade ago, I consider to be one of the best; Charles Taylor, who has an insightful understanding of the self, which helps provide a richer conception of integrity than I believe calhoun developed, and lawrence langer, who gives an instructive critique of Taylor, which I use to provide the foundation for an integrity richly grounded in community. finally, I discuss how community can contribute to or diminish one's integrity and how it can help restore one's integrity if it has been diminished or lost.
- Quinn, Kevin. "A Rhetorical Conception of Practical Rationality." Journal of Economic Issues 30 (1996): 1127-1142.
- Quinn, Philip L. "Review of Varieties of Religion Today: William James Revisited by Charles Taylor." Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (04.04, 2003). http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/23349-varieties-of-religion-today-william-james-revisited/.
- Qun, X. "Divided Moral Self and Robert's Tragedy." Foreign Literature Studies 30, no. 3 (2008): 39-48.
- Racine, Louise. "Examining the Conflation of Multiculturalism, Sexism, and Religious Fundamentalism through Taylor and Bakhtin: Expanding Post-Colonial Feminist Epistemology." Nursing Philosophy 10, no. 1 (2009): 14-25.
  Abstract:
  Through the lens of postcolonial feminism, this paper explores the challenge of providing culturally safe nursing care in the context of the post-9/11 in Canadian healthcare settings. A critical appraisal of the literature demonstrates that postcolonial feminism, despite some limitations, remains a valuable theoretical perspective to apply in cultural nursing research and develop culturally safe nursing practice. postcolonial feminism offers the analytical lens to understand how health, social and cultural context, race and gender intersect to impact on non-western populations' health. however, an uncritical application of postcolonial feminism may not serve racialized men's and women's interests because of its essentialist risk. postcolonial feminism must expand its epistemological assumptions to integrate Taylor's concept of identity and recognition and bakhtin's concepts of dialogism and unfinalizability to explore non-western populations' health issues and the context of nursing practice. this would strengthen the theoretical adequacy of postcolonial feminist approaches in unveiling the process of racialization that arises from the conflation of multiculturalism, sexism, and religious fundamentalism in western healthcare settings. (edited).
- Raffnsøe-Møller, Morten. "Taylors Politiske Filosofi: Ontologisk Politik Og Hermeneutisk Retfærdighed." Slagmark: Tidsskrift for Idehistorie. Tema: Charles Taylor 49 (2007): 61-82. In Danish. http://ojs.statsbiblioteket.dk/index.php/slagmark/article/view/397/342.
- Raguž, I. "Vjernik i nevjernik pod unakrsnim pritiskom: Charles Taylor o sekularnom dobu [Theist and Atheist under the cross-pressure: Charles Taylor on Secular Age]." Diacovensia 20 (2007). In Croatian.
- Rakuza-Szuszczewski, Mikołaj. "Charles Taylor's Three Meanings of the "Engaged Self"." In Charles Taylor's Vision of Modernity: Reconstructions and Interpretations, edited by Christopher Garbowski, Jan Paweł Hudzik and Jan Kłos. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Pub., 2009. 54-63.
- Ramis Barceló, Rafael. "Review of Dilemmas and Connections: Selected Essays." Estudios Filosoficos 60, no. 175 (Sept., 2011): 592-593.
- Ramos, Cesar Augusto. "A Crítica Comunitarista De Charles Taylor à Concepção Liberal De Liberdade (Negativa)." Filosofia Unisinos 15, no. 1 (2014): 20-34. In Spanish.
  Abstract:
  We intend to show that Taylor's communitarian criticism of the liberal view of (negative) freedom proposes a new way of seeing the freedom of the will (which is called positive freedom). Theories of negative liberty simply rely on an opportunity-concept. This concept does not involve the capacity for realization, since it applies to (negative) freedom as the absence of obstacles, which becomes explicit as the power to do this or that without facing external, physical or legal impediments, for the exercise of this or that possible action. The issue becomes more complex with the exercise-concept, whereby freedom essentially entails self-determination and control over the person of the agent and their action and, therefore, has an intrinsic value of achievement and not simply an instrumental one. Without neglecting the importance of the liberal value of individual freedom, Taylor proposes a new way of seeing this freedom: it does not reside in the exercise of undifferentiated options, but in the actual exercise of capacities through the fulfilment of certain desires that are defined as authentic. We are free only if we do what we really want on the basis of our true desires, not compromised by internal obstacles, in particular by the non-authenticity of some of them.
- Rand, David. "Has the Templeton Prize Compromised Charles Taylor?" (. http://atheisme.ca/repertoire/rand_david/Taylor_templeton_en.html.
- ———. "Charles Taylor Est-Il Compromis Avec Le Prix Templeton?" Cité Laïque 9, no. Summer (été, 2007). In French. http://www.mlq.qc.ca/vx/7_pub/cl/cl_9/cl_9_rand.html.
- Rayner, Jeremy. "Therapy for an Imaginary Invalid: Charles Taylor and the Malaise of Modernity." History of the Human Sciences 5 (August, 1992): 145-155.
- Raza, Sebastian. "Max Weber and Charles Taylor: On Normative Aspects of a Theory of Human Action." Journal of Classical Sociology (March 1, 2022). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1468795X221080770.
  Abstract:
  This paper seeks to make two distinctive sets of contributions through a supplementary reinterpretation of Max Weber in the light of Charles Taylor’s expressivist-hermeneutical theory of human agency. First, it offers a reinterpretation of Weber’s work. Focussing on the concept of stance, the paper highlights that Weber’s theorising on values and their relation to cognition, action and identity is less underpinned by subjectivism, representationalism, emotivism and decisionism than is typically thought. Instead, Weber sets values within a non-naturalist dimension where agents find their bearings and are constituted as such. In this dimension, orientation to meaning takes place; identity, action and thought are constituted; and normative experiences (such as freedom, or responsibility) are made possible. Weber recognised that this non-naturalist dimension has variegated modes, but seemingly studied them in their purest and most logical form (the ‘ideal type’), hence his focus on explicit belief systems and world-images. Second, there is a prospective supplementation of Weber’s theory through Taylor’s notion of expression. For Taylor, we take a stance and orient ourselves expressively through the domain of strongly valued meanings. The notions of strong evaluation and articulation prove central to understanding embodied, symbolic and representational meaning-orientation in the non-naturalist dimensions of values. This supplementary reading places Weber as a central figure in current American, British and French debates about, respectively, the normative nature of human agency; the question of culture, meaning and their different forms and modes of operation; and the question of how to examine identity-formation.
- Reckling, Falk J. "Interpreted Modernity: Weber and Taylor on Values and Modernity." European Journal of Social Theory 4 (2001): 153-176.
- Reckwitz, Andreas. Die Transformation Der Kulturtheorien: Zur Entwicklung Eines Theorieprogramms. Velbrück: Weilerswist, 2000. In German.
- ———. "Multikulturalismustheorien Und Der Kulturbegriff: Vom Homogenitatsmodell Zum Modell Kultureller Interferenzen." Berliner Journal Für Soziologie 11, no. 2 (11, 2001): 179-200. In German.
- Redhead, Mark. "Charles Taylor’s Nietzschean Predicament: A Dilemma More Self-Revealing than Foreboding." Philosophy & Social Criticism 27, no. 6 (November 01, 2001): 81-106. http://psc.sagepub.com/content/27/6/81.abstract;.
  Abstract:
  In this article, I discuss charles Taylor’s reading of Nietzsche. Taylor argues that Nietzsche presents a challenge on the ‘deepest level’ because, on Taylor’s reading, Nietzsche forces us to consider whether or not our ‘continuing allegiance to standards of justice and benevolence’ goes against our inner nature. I argue that this purported Nietzschean challenge is more self-revealing of Taylor than it is foreboding, as it brings to light the tension between the open and pluralistic content of Taylor’s faith, and the epistemological grounding of it, which a more well-rounded appreciation of Nietzsche could help to alleviate.
- ———. "Introducing Charles Taylor [Review of Charles Taylor by Ruth Abbey]." Review of Politics 64, no. 1 (2002): 170-172.
- ———. "Making the Past Useful for a Pluralistic Present: Taylor, Arendt, and a Problem for Historical Reasoning." American Journal of Political Science 46, no. 4 (October, 2002): 803-819.
- ———. Charles Taylor: Thinking and Living Deep DiversityRowman and Littlefield, 2002.
- ———. "Charles Taylor's Deeply Diverse Response to Canadian Fragmentation: A Project often Commented on but Seldom Explored." Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue Canadienne De Science Politique 36, no. 1 (March, 2003): 61-84.
- ———. "[Untitled]." Perspectives on Politics 2, no. 3 (Sep., 2004): 584-585. In English. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3688838.
- ———. "Alternative Secularisms." Philosophy and Social Criticism 32, no. 5 (July, 2006): 639-666.
  Abstract:
  This article focuses on Charles Taylor's and william connolly's attempts to fashion alternative forms of secular public reasoning to those of liberals like Rawls and galston. I provide a weak defense of Taylor against both connolly and many of Taylor's liberal secular foes. despite its noted shortcomings that connolly can help to address, Taylor's model does provide a more adequate basis for thinking through a public morality appropriate to the times because it takes seriously the hold certain values have on nonsecular individuals. and thus is very much attuned to the realities of ethical deliberation in early 21st-century western democracies.
- ———. "Review of Dialectics of the Self: Transcending Charles Taylor." Review of Politics 70, no. 4 (Fall 2008, 2008): 641-643.
- ———. Reasoning with Who we are: Democratic Theory for a Not so Liberal Era. Lanham, Maryland : Rowman & Littlefield, 2014.
- ———. "Das Verstehen Des Anderen." Transit 49 (2016). http://www.iwm.at/transit/heft-49-grenzen-der-toleranz-charles-taylors-landkarte/. In German.
- Redpath, Peter. "Charles Taylor: Meaning, Morals and Modernity Nicholas H. Smith." The Review of Metaphysics 57, no. 2 (2003): 441-442. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20132008.
- Rée, Jonathan. "The Language Animal by Charles Taylor Review – how Words Change our World." The Guardian (April 27, 2016). https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/apr/27/the-language-animal-the-full-shape-of-human-linguistic-capacity-charles-taylor-review.
- Reese-Schäfer, Walter. "'Nach Innen Geht Der Geheimnisvolle Weg': Einige Kritische Bemerkungen Zu Charles Taylors Ontologie Der Moralität Und Des Modernen Selbst." Deutsche Zeitschrift Für Philosophie 44, no. 4 (1996): 621-634. In German.
- Rehg, William. Insight and Solidarity: A Study in the Discourse Ethics of Jürgen Habermas. University of California Press: Berkeley, 1994.
- Reid, Barton. "Breaking the Impasse: The Search for a New Direction." City Magazine 14, no. 1 (Winter, 1993): 44-45.
- Reidy, David A. "Review of Multiculturalism and'the Politics of Recognition'." Auslegung: A Journal of Philosophy 20, no. 1 (Dec., 1995): 43-46.
- Reisert, Joseph R. "Authenticity,Justice, and Virtue in Taylor and Rousseau." Polity XXXIII, no. 2 (2000).
- Reitz, Tilman. "Die Katholische Ethik Und Der Geist Des Sozialismus. Charles Taylors frühe Marx-Rezeption." In Wie Wollen Wir Leben? Das Politische Denken Und Staatsverständnis Von Charles Taylor, edited by Ulf Bohmann. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2014. 61-74. In German.
- Remien, Florian. Muslime in Europa: Westlicher Staat Und Islamische Identität. Untersuchung Zu Ansätzen Von Yusuf Al-Qaradawi, Tariq Ramadan Und Charles Taylor. Schenefeld: EB-Verlag, 2007. In German.
- Rengger, N. J. "Review of Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism: The Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question, James Tully, Ed." History of Political Thought 16 (1995): 444-447.
- Rentsch, Thomas. "Wie is Transzendenz Zu Denken? Kritische Thesen Zu Charles Taylors Säkularisierungskonzept." In Unerfüllte Moderne? - Neue Perspektiven Auf Das Werk Von Charles Taylor, edited by Michael Kühnlein and Matthias Lutz-Bachmann. Berlin: Suhrkamp / Insel, 2011. 573-598. In German.
- Resnick, Philip. "In Search of the Lost Community: Charles Taylor and Modernity." In Twenty-First Century Democracy. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1997.
- ———. "À La Recherche De La Communauté Perdue: Charles Taylor Et La Modernité." In Charles Taylor Et l’interprétation De l’identité Moderne. Paris;Sainte Foy;: Centre Culturel International de Cerisy-la-Salle, Cerf;Les Presses de l'Université Laval;, 1998. 319-340. In French.
- Rettig, Edward. "Charles Taylor and Jewish Identity in the Twenty-First Century." Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs (12/31, 2013). http://jcpa.org/article/charles-taylor-and-jewish-identity/.
- Rhonheimer, Martin. "Cittadinanza Multiculturale Nella Democrazia Liberale: Le Proposte Di Charles Taylor, Jürgen Habermas e Will Kymlicka." Acta Philosophica: Pontificia Universita Della Santa Croce 15, no. 1 (2006): 29-52. In Italian.
  Abstract:
  Multiculturalism in the sense of the presence of groups in democratic societies which do not -- like traditionalistic islam -- share a genuine secular understanding of the state poses significant problems regarding both the understanding of citizenship and the politics of recognition of cultural difference. divergent approaches by Charles Taylor, Jürgen Habermas and will kymlicka to this question are presented. in spite of disagreements on important issues, these authors manifest a consensus on two points: (1) that pure proceduralism without any shared understanding of basic values is not sufficient and (2) that the self-understanding of citizenship in a liberal constitutional democracy is not compatible with all cultural traditions. A culturally diversified understanding of citizenship in one and the same democratic society, so the paper concludes, is impossible. respect for cultural diversity presupposes assimilation of culturally different groups to the constitutional essentials of modern occidental democracies, based on secularity, pluralism and the recognition of political autonomy of citizens. (edited).
- Richmond, Stuart. "Liberalism, Multiculturalism, and Art Education." The Journal of Aesthetic Education 29, no. 3 (1995): 15-25.
- Ricken, Friedo. "Review of Varieties of Religion Today." Theologie Und Philosophie: Vierteljahresschrift 79, no. 4 (2004): 453-454.
- ———. "Ethik Des Glaubens." In Unerfüllte Moderne? - Neue Perspektiven Auf Das Werk Von Charles Taylor, edited by Michael Kühnlein and Matthias Lutz-Bachmann. Berlin: Suhrkamp / Insel, 2011. 350-370. In German.
- Ricker, Aaron. "Immodest Proposals: Learned Liberal Consensus as a Cannibalistic Theological System." Critical Research on Religion 8, no. 2 (2020): 178-195.
  Abstract:
  This article considers imperial Roman and German forms of liberal elite consensus on “proper religious diversity” to set the stage for an examination of the contemporary form of liberal consensus discernible in a recent public talk given by Charles Taylor and Rowan Williams. In each case, attention is drawn to the ways in which “proper religious diversity” is defined to serve ideological and theological agendas. Romanitas, Germanentum, and the Taylor–Williams consensus are cannibalistic theological systems: each uses a public stance of reasonable openmindedness regarding “proper religious diversity” to build and police a theological position that arrogates the perceived value of selected “religious” traditions by re-making them in its own image. Imperial Romanitas and Germanentum served in this way to absorb a diversity of traditions deemed palatable and digestible into overarching theological visions which were convenient to those in power. When Taylor and Williams use the...
- Ricoeur, Paul. "Le Fondamental Et l'Historique: Note Sur Sources of the Self De Charles Taylor." In Charles Taylor Et l’interprétation De l’identité Moderne, edited by Guy Laforest and Philippe de Lara. Paris;Sainte Foy;: Centre Culturel International de Cerisy-la-Salle, Cerf;Les Presses de l'Université Laval;, 1998. 19-34. In French.
- ———. "The Fundamental and the Historical: Notes on Charles Taylor’s Sources of the Self." [Le fondamental et l'historique: note sur Sources of the Self de Charles Taylor] In Reflections on the just, translated by David Pellauer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.
- Rieger, Günther. "Wieviel Gemeinschaft Braucht Die Demokratie? Zur Diskussion Um Den Kommunitarismus." Zeitschrift Für Politik 40, no. 3 (1993): 304-322. In German.
- Ringen, Jon D. "Explanation, Teleology and Operant Behaviourism: A Study of the Experimental Analysis of Purposive Behaviour." Philosophy of Science 43 (1976): 223-253.
- Rings, Michael. "Authenticity, Self-Fulfillment, and Self-Acknowledgment." Journal of Value Inquiry 51, no. 3 (2017): 475-489.
  Abstract:
  The philosophical literature on personal authenticity is (as many philosophical literatures admittedly are) deeply fraught and riddled with controversy. n this paper I will focus on one particular, prominent sense in which authenticity has been conceived—as an ethical ideal of self-fulfillment.1 This conception finds its most well known expression in the work of Charles Taylor, and more recently in that of Somogy Varga.2 Herein I will consider Taylor’s and Varga’s accounts of authenticity as self-fulfillment, and show that, though rich and largely successful on certain grounds, they are ultimately incomplete, failing to capture certain intuitions that seem key to our pre-theoretical notions of self-fulfillment, and are also key if authenticity is to be conceived as a full-fledged ethical ideal. I recommend that their model be integrated with another sense of authenticity, originating in Sartre’s work but also discussed in recent analytic literature, which centers on epistemic notions of self-acknowledgement. I argue that this conception supplies considerations of honesty and epistemic responsibility to oneself and others regarding the facts of one’s personal situation, condition, and character—factors that are missing in the theories of Taylor and Varga.
- Ripstein, Arthur. "Recognition and Cultural Membership." Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 34, no. 2 (Mar., 1995): 331-341.
- Ritchie, Benbow F. "[Untitled]." The American Journal of Psychology 79, no. 3 (Sep., 1966): 505-506. In English. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1420903.
- Rivas, Eugenio and Luiz Carlos Sureki. "Modernidade Inviável...? A Pertinência Teológica Das “Modernidades Alternativas”: Lendo Charles Taylor." Perspectiva Teológica 49, no. 3 (2017): 527. In Portuguese.
- Rixon, Gordon. "Book Review: The Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Language Capacity. by Charles Taylor." Theological Studies 78, no. 2 (2017): 511-512.
- Rizvi, Fazal. "Imagination and the Globalization of Educational Policy Research." Globalization, Societies, and Education 4 (July, 2006): 193-205.
- Rober, Daniel A. "Grace and the Secular: Reading Charles Taylor through Henri De Lubac." Philosophy and Theology 30, no. 1 (2018): 179-206.
- Roberts, Vaughan S. "Review of A Secular Age." Implicit Religion 12, no. 1 (2009): 121-123.
- Rocke, Stephanie. "Review of A Secular Age." Eras 10 (Nov, 2008). http://www.arts.monash.edu.au/publications/eras/edition-10/rocke-review.pdf.
- Rockefeller, Steven C. "Comment." In Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition; Multiculturalism and 'the Politics of Recognition', edited by Amy Gutmann. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994. 87-98.
- Rodrigues, Osvaldino Marra and Elnora Gondim. "Considerações Sobre a Educação: Uma Perspectiva do Self." Acta Scientiarum: Human & Social Sciences 33, no. 2 (07, 2011): 179-186. In Portuguese.
  Abstract:
  In the theory of Charles Taylor there is an understanding of what is, per se, the self. such a concept related to education can, qualitatively, transform a form of society, is what we aim to demonstrate. believing in it, criticized both cartesians' theses on of dennett as those of physicalism in favor of the conception of self Taylorian. (English)
  Na teoria de Charles Taylor há a compreensão do que é, propriamente, o self. tal conceito relacionado com a educação pode, qualitativamente, transformar uma forma de sociedade, é o que nós pretendemos demonstrar. Acreditando nisso, criticamos tanto as teses dos cartesianos, quanto às de dennett quanto às do fisicalismo em favor da concepção de self Tayloriana. (Portuguese)
- Rodríguez García, Sonia Ester. "El Poder De La Religión En La Esfera Pública." Endoxa: Series Filosoficas 28 (2011): 351-357. In Spanish.
- ———. "Laicidad y Libertad De Conciencia." Laguna: Revista De Filosofia 29 (2011): 171-173. In Spanish.
- ———. "Hilvanes De Una Fenomenología Del Sentimiento En Charles Taylor." Stoa 9, no. 18 (2018).
- Rodríguez García, Sonia E. "Charles Taylor: De La Antropología Filosófica a La Filosofía Práctica." Investigaciones Fenomenológicas, no. 11 (2021): 263.
  Abstract:
  Charles Taylor es comúnmente identificado como uno de los padres fundadores del comunitarismo teórico, pero tal identificación no da cuenta de la amplitud del pensamiento del filósofo canadiense. A través de este trabajo de investigación pretendemos articular la filosofía de Taylor partiendo del proyecto filosófico que explícitamente inicia en sus primeros trabajos, a saber, la configuración de una antropología filosófica, a través de la cual abordaremos los grandes temas que han ocupado su vida -ética, política y religión- en la puesta en marcha de una filosofía con intenciones puramente prácticas.Charles Taylor is commonly identified as one of the founding fathers of theoretical communitarianism, but such identification does not realize the extent of his thinking. Through this research, we try to articulate the Taylor's philosophy from his philosophical project, that he explicitly started in his early work, namely, the configuration of a philosophical anthropology, through which we will address the major issues that have occupied his life - ethics, politics and religion- in the implementation of a philosophy with purely practical intentions.
- ———. "La Investigación Trascendental De Charles Taylor." Investigaciones Fenomenológicas, no. 14 (2021): 213.
  Abstract:
  Taylor analiza la investigación trascendental como el método propio de la filosofía en una serie de artículos tempranos. El objetivo de este artículo es doble. En primer lugar, queremos acercar al lector a las bases filosóficas del pensamiento de Taylor, exponiendo el descubrimiento y los análisis de Taylor sobre la investigación trascendental. En segundo lugar, queremos mostrar la necesidad de atender a la metodología y a las fases de esta investigación trascendental para la correcta interpretación e identificación de la filosofía de Taylor.Taylor analyzes transcendental investigation as the proper method of philosophy in a serie of early articles. The purpose of this article is double. First, we want to bring the reader closer to the philosophical foundations of Taylor's thought, exposing Taylor's discovery and analysis of transcendental investigation. Second, we want to show the need to attend to the methodology and phases of this transcendental investigation in order to achieve the correct interpretation and identification of Taylor's philosophy.
- Roeffaers, Hugo. "Charles Taylor." Revista Portuguesa De Filosofia 60, no. 2 (April, 2004): 485-492.
  Abstract:
  How does christianity, c.q., catholicism, relate to contemporary issues as selfhood, moral life and secularity? Taylor argues that the modern conception of 'selfhood' is in line with the biblical notion of the human being called to enter into dialogue with his/her fellow human beings and with a transcendent other; that our identity as moral agents depends on our recognition of a good which is never just our invention and that christianity inspired the secular belief that the self and the world could be actively reordered for the better.
- Roemer, T. "Standing at the Crossroads: Identity and Recognition of the Applied Science Technologist in British Columbia." Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences 70, no. 3-A (2009): 851.
- Rogers, Ben. "Portrait: Charles Taylor." Prospect Magazine (February, 2008): 54-57.
- Roiz, Javier. "Review of A Secular Age." Foro Interno: Anuario De Teoría Política 9 (Dec., 2009): 242-245. In Spanish.
- Romano, Carlin. "Are Sacred Texts Sacred? the Challenge for Atheists." Chronicle of Higher Education 54, no. 4 (September 21, 2007): B11-B12.
- Root, Andrew. "Review of A Secular Age." Word & World 30, no. 1 (Dec., 2010): 111-113.
- Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg. "The Hidden Politics of Cultural Identification." Political Theory 22, no. 1 (Feb., 1994): 152-166.
- Rorty, Richard. "A Reply to Dreyfus and Taylor." The Review of Metaphysics 34, no. 1 (September, 1980): 39-46. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20127457.
- ———. "Absolutely Non-Absolute [Review of Philosophical Papers,1 and 2]." Times Literary Supplement Dec. 6 (1985): 1379-1380.
- ———. "Inquiry as Recontextualization: An Anti-Dualist Account of Interpretation." In The Interpretive Turn: Philosophy, Science, Culture, edited by David R. Hiley. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991. 59-80.
- ———. "Review of the Ethics of Authenticity." London Review of Books Apr. 3 (1994): 7-8.
- ———. "Taylor on Self-Celebration and Gratitude." Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54, no. 1 (Mar., 1994): 197-201. In English. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2108368.
- ———. "Taylor on Truth." In Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism: The Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question, edited by James Tully and Daniel M. Weinstock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. 20-34. In English. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621970.004.
- ———. "Justice as a Larger Loyalty." Ethical Perspectives: Journal of the European Ethics Network 4, no. 3 (Oct., 1997): 139-151.
- Rosa, Hartmut. "Goods and Life Forms: Relativism in Charles Taylor's Political Philosophy." Radical Philosophy 71 (May, 1995): 20-26.
- ———. "Hypergüter Der Moderne: Die Konfliktreiche Moralische Landkarte Der GegenwarT [Literatur-Essay Zu Quellen Des Selbst]." Politische Vierteljahresschrift 36 (1995): 505-522. In German.
- ———. "Cultural Relativism and Social Criticism from a Taylorian Perspective." Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory 3, no. 1 (April, 1996): 39-60.
- ———. "Sprache Als Selbstschöpfung Und Welterschliessung: Bausteine Einer Expressiv-Konstitutiven Sprachtheorie Bei Charles Taylor." In Die Grenzen Der Sprache: Sprachimmanenz - Sprachtranszendenz, edited by Asmuth von Christoph, Friedrich Glauner and Burkhard Mojsisch. Amsterdam: Grüner, 1998. 223-248. In German.
- ———. Identität Und Kulturelle Praxis: Politische Philosophie Nach Charles Taylor. New York: Campus Verlag, 1998.
- ———. "Die Politische Theorie Des Kommunitarismus: Charles Taylor." In Politische Theorien Der Gegenwart, edited by Brodocz von André and Gary S. SchaalOpladen, 1999. 43-68. In German.
- ———. "Operatives Paradigma Und Objektiver Geist: Kuhn, Taylor Und Die Konstruktion Der Sozialen Wirklichkeit." In Interpretation, Konstruktion, Kultur: Ein Paradigmenwechsel in Den Sozialwissenschaften, edited by Reckwitx von Andreas and Holger SievertOpladen u. Wiesbaden, 1999. 158-180. In German.
- ———. "Identität Und Kulturelle Praxis: Politische Philosophie Nach Charles Taylor." Philosophische Rundschau 47 (2000): 84-86. In German.
- ———. "Four Levels of Self-Interpretation: A Paradigm for Interpretive Social Philosophy and Political Criticism." Philosophy and Social Criticism 30, no. 5-6 (Sept., 2004): 691-720.
  Abstract:
  The paper presents a model according to which there are four interdependent as well as partially autonomous spheres or 'levels' of socially relevant self-interpretation that have to be taken into account equally in order to provide a sound basis for social and political criticism. thus, it is from the tensions and incoherences between (A) social ideas and doctrines, (B) social institutions and practices, (C) individual beliefs and convictions, and (D) body-practices and habits that social pathologies can be identified and possible solutions can be envisaged. (edited).
- ———."Ist Da draußen Jemand?" Frankfurter Rundschau (18. Juni, 2011). In German. http://www.fr-online.de/kultur/zeitdiagnose-ist-da-draussen-jemand-,1472786,8569942.html.
- ———. "Is there Anybody Out there? Stumme Und Resonante Weltbeziehungen - Charles Taylors Monomanischer Analysefokus." In Unerfüllte Moderne? - Neue Perspektiven Auf Das Werk Von Charles Taylor, edited by Michael Kühnlein and Matthias Lutz-Bachmann. Berlin: Suhrkamp / Insel, 2011. 15-43. In German.
- Rosa, Hartmut and Thomas Kern. "Poröses Und Abgepuffertes Selbst: Charles Taylors Religionsgeschichte Als Soziologie Der Weltbeziehung. Der Weg Ins Säkulare Zeitalter. 2 Symposiumsbeiträge Zu Charles Taylor, Ein Säkulares Zeitalter, Frankfurt/M. Suhrkamp, 2009." Soziologische Revue 35, no. 1 (2012): 3-18. In German. http://www.oldenbourg-link.com/doi/abs/10.1524/srsr.2012.0002.
- Rosales Meana, Diego I. "El Surgimiento De Un Yo: Las Raíces Agustinianas De Las Ideas De “identidad” y “autenticidad” En Charles Taylor." Revista De Filosofía 48, no. 140 (2016): 87-110.
  Abstract:
  En este trabajo me propongo mostrar las raíces agustinianas del pensamiento de Charles Taylor. Para ello, describiré el agustinismo tal como lo hace Taylor en Sources of the Self e intentaré mostrar los avances de Agustín respecto de la ﬁlosofía antigua (sobre todo Platón y Plotino): la interioridad, la creación ex nihilio y una nueva interpretación del deseo. En segundo lugar, describiré los rasgos esenciales que tiene la Modernidad para Taylor así como la ambivalente aﬁrmación-crítica que hace de ellos, sobre todo a partir de su teoría de la acción y su comunitarismo. Por último, intentaré mostrar que tanto la aﬁrmación y la crítica de la Modernidad como el ideal de “autenticidad” que deﬁende Taylor son deudores de un agustinismo que, si bien la Modernidad asumió, lo hizo de manera incompleta.
- Rose, Andrew D. "Kierkegaard, Charles Taylor, and Narrative Sources of Identity." Southwest Philosophy Review 34, no. 1 (2018): 225-234.
- Rose, Matthew. "Tayloring Christianity: Charles Taylor is a Theolgian of the Secular Status Quo." First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion and Public Life (December, 2014). http://www.firstthings.com/article/2014/12/tayloring-christianity.
- Rose, Wolfgang. "Town and City Renewal as 'Societal Therapy': A Programmatic Sketch [Dorf- Und Stadterneuerung Als 'Gesellschaftstherapie']." Kultursoziologie 5, no. 1 (1996): 174-198.
- Rosebury, Brian. "Explaining Irreducibly Social Goods." In Charles Taylor's Vision of Modernity: Reconstructions and Interpretations, edited by Christopher Garbowski, Jan Paweł Hudzik and Jan Kłos. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Pub., 2009. 140-153.
- Roseman, Sharon R. "A Historicidade e o Futuro: O Patrimonio Cultural Como Un Enfoque Crítico Na Loita Pola Identidade e a Convivencia." Agora: Papeles De Filosofia 26, no. 1 (2007): 7-26. In Galician.
  Abstract:
  In this article, I argue that in the study of cultural heritage and tourism it is important to consider historicity, identity, and the Canadian philosopher Charles Taylor's concept of the "politics of recognition". I propose that we are currently living in a time when efforts are being made to conserve and protect the past. the struggle to protect or conserve one or another element of the heritage of a nation or other social group implicates the affirmation of people's identities, while at the same time recognizing the importance of dialogue which is a fundamental aspect of the 'recognition' of 'some' by 'others'.
- Rosen, Michael. "Review of Philosophical Papers1 and 2." The Journal of Philosophy 86, no. 5 (May, 1989): 270-276. In English. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2027111.
- ———. "Must we Return to Moral Realism?" Inquiry (June, 1991): 183-194.
  Abstract:
  In this paper I discuss Taylor's criticism of contemporary moral philosophy and the role which this plays in his wider account of the development of western moral consciousness, an account which I compare with hans blumenberg's 'the legitimacy of the modern age'. while I endorse Taylor's rejection of 'naturalism', I deny that this entails the rejection of non-realism and I maintain that, indeed, the non-realist conception of a social foundation for morality represents the most cogent response to the contemporary dilemmas Taylor identifies.
- ———. "Whatever Happened to the Ontic Logos? German Idealism and the Legitimacy of Modernity." In Interpreting Modernity: Essays on the Work of Charles Taylor, edited by Daniel M. Weinstock, Jacob Levy and Jocelyn Maclure. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2020. 127. https://www.mqup.ca/interpreting-modernity-products-9780228001430.php.
- Rosenberg, Morris. "Review of Sources of the Self." Society 27, no. 3 (March/April, 1990): 92-93.
- Rosenberg, Randall S. "The Catholic Imagination and Modernity: William Cavanaugh's Theopolitical Imagination and Charles Taylor's Modern Social Imagination." Heythrop Journal 48, no. 6 (Nov., 2007): 911-931.
  Abstract:
  This essay argues that william cavanaugh's 'theopolitical imagination' uncovers some of the possibilities latent within the catholic imagination. while his critique of modernity is often persuasive, this essay questions whether cavanaugh's assessment of modernity can be complemented by a more differentiated approach. what Charles Taylor provides is both a bolstering of cavanaugh's thesis about the power of the imagination and an alternative: That there is a way of thinking about the relationship between the church and modernity other than in dialectical terms -- namely a 'ricci reading' of modernity.
- ———. "Meaning and Authenticity: Bernard Lonergan and Charles Taylor on the Drama of Authentic Human Existence." Heythrop Journal 51, no. 2 (2010): 359-361.
- Rosenfeld, Michel. "Boundaries of Toleration. Edited by Alfred Stepan and Charles Taylor." Journal of Church and State 58, no. 3 (2016): 558-560.
- Ross, Daniel. "Review of A Secular Age." Thesis Eleven 99 (2009): 112-121.
- Rossi, Philip J. "Divine Transcendence and the 'Languages of Personal Resonance': The Work of Charles Taylor as a Resource for Spirituality in an Era of Post-Modernity." In Theology and Conversation. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2003. 783-794.
- ———. "Modern Social Imaginaries." Theological Studies 65, no. 4 (December, 2004): 907.
- ———. "The Authority of Experience: What Counts as Experience?" In Religious Experience and Contemporary Theological Epistemology, edited by L. Boeve, Y. de Maeseneer and S. Van Den Bossche. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2005.
- ———. "Review of A Secular Age." Theological Studies 69, no. 4 (Dec., 2008): 953-954.
- ———. "Review of Dilemmas and Connections: Selected Essays." Theological Studies 73, no. 1 (Mar., 2012): 244-245.
- ———, ed. Seekers and Dwellers : Plurality and Wholeness in a Time of Secularity. Washington, D.C.: Council for Research in Values and Philosophy, 2016.
- Rothfork, John. "[Untitled]." Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature 60, no. 1 (2006): 157-163. In English. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4143907.
- Rothman, Joshua. "How to Restore Your Faith in Democracy." The New Yorker (Nov 11, 2016). http://www.newyorker.com/culture/persons-of-interest/how-to-restore-your-faith-in-democracy.
- Rothstein, Lawrence E. "What about the Fact-Value Dichotomy: A Belated Reply." Journal of Value Inquiry 9 (Dec., 1975): 307-311.
  Abstract:
  It has been argued, following hume, that normative conclusions may not be logically derived from factual premises. this position maintains that there is a logical fact-value dichotomy. the argument for the existence of a fact-value dichotomy proceeds from three grounds: 1) that philosophical precedent weighs in favor of the dichotomy, 2) that only statements which can be verified by observation can be considered true or false, i.e., factual; 3) that factual statements are descriptive, while normative statements are prescriptive. none of these grounds is sufficient to uphold the dichotomy. philosophical precedent, as hume admits, regularly allows the derivation of normative conclusions from factual premises. the verificationist or logical positivist epistemology is itself unverifiable and fraught with difficulties. the usage of so-called normative or factual statements does not cut the way those who argue for the dichotomy suppose. the persistence of the dichotomy is due to the examples of statements chosen to illustrate it. the real difference between statements deemed "factual" and statements deemed "normative" is their relative complexity.
- Rouse Jr., Joseph T. "Interpretation in Natural and Human Science." In The Interpretive Turn: Philosophy, Science, Culture, edited by David R. Hiley. Ithaca: Cornell Univ Pr, 1991. 42-56.
  Abstract:
  I extend earlier arguments denying epistemically interesting differences in kind between natural and human sciences. drawing upon Charles Taylor's own discussion of language and "social reality" as intertwined, and of how empiricist social science makes important political phenomena invisible, I argue against Taylor's attempt to confine these points to the human sciences. "natural reality" as the object of scientific research cannot be abstracted from the language of scientific practice, and the attempt to do so obscures some important cultural and political concerns and conflicts. rejecting Taylor's natural/human science dualism, however, yields not a unified science, but a multiplicity of sciences.
- ———. "Power/knowledge." In The Cambridge Companion to Foucault, edited by Gary Gutting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. 92-114.
- Roussel, François. "[Untitled]." Cités, no. 4, Bienvenue dans un monde meilleur ! Sur les risques technologiques majeurs (2000): 209-211. In English. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40620726.
- Rovinsky, David J. "Review of Reconciling the Solitudes." American Review of Canadian Studies 24 (1994): 138-140.
- Rowse, Tim. "Indigenous Culture: The Politics of Vulnerability and Survival." In Handbook of Cultural Analysis, edited by T. Bennett and J. FrowSage, 2006.
- Roy, Yves. "Review of Rapprocher Les Solitudes." Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 33, no. 3 (June, 1994): 563-565.
- Rudd, Anthony. "In Defence of Narrative." European Journal of Philosophy 17, no. 1 (March, 2009): 60-75.
  Abstract:
  Over the last few decades, many philosophers and others theorists have argued that narrative has a central role to play in our thinking about personal identity and ethics. recently, something of a backlash against these narrative theories seems to have developed, exemplified in work by galen strawson, peter lamarque and john christman. this paper responds to some of these criticisms and in so doing defends an approach to personal identity and ethics (based mainly on work by alasdair MacIntyre and Charles Taylor) in which narrative plays a central, though not a foundational, role.
- Rudolph, Enno. "Rousseau Absconditus. Zur Kritik Der Taylorschen Liberalismuskritik." In Unerfüllte Moderne? - Neue Perspektiven Auf Das Werk Von Charles Taylor, edited by Michael Kühnlein and Matthias Lutz-Bachmann. Berlin: Suhrkamp / Insel, 2011. 107-116. In German.
- Ruiz Schneider, Carlos. "Modernity and Identity in Charles Taylor." Revista De Filosofía 69 (2013): 227-243. In Spanish.
  Abstract:
  Este ensayo es una investigación sobre las relaciones entre las concepciones de modernidad e identidad en la obra del filósofo canadiense Charles Taylor. En los escritos recientes de Taylor, el concepto de identidad es una herramienta útil para percibir claramente la concepción del yo, en el contexto de una nueva visión del espacio moral. En su búsqueda de las fuentes morales del yo, Taylor centra su análisis en la modernidad. Subraya en este período el rol de la interioridad, la preeminencia de la vida ordinaria de la familia y la economía y la emergencia de la naturaleza y la expresión, el giro expresivista. En sus ensayos de fines de la década de 1980 y en los 1990, Taylor le asigna gran significación al ideal expresivista de la autenticidad y explora sus relaciones con la idea de reconocimiento. Es en este lenguaje moderno de la autenticidad y el reconocimiento que podemos expresar mejor el renacimiento del nacionalismo y la religión como un símbolo de la identidad cultural. Otras consecuencias prácticas de estas distinciones y conceptos de Taylor pueden encontrarse en el multiculturalismo, la filosofía política y la filosofía del lenguaje. Al final del texto se exploran muy sintéticamente alguna críticas a las concepciones de la autenticidad de Taylor. En particular, me parece muy interesante la crítica del filósofo español José María González que se centra en la ausencia del barroco en el filósofo canadiense, y en la idea barroca de una identidad múltiple.
- Rundell, John. "Charles Taylor and the Secularization Thesis." Critical Horizons: A Journal of Philosophy and Social Theory 11, no. 1 (2010): 119-132.
  Abstract:
  This paper argues that in 'A secular age' Charles Taylor provides a critical reconstruction of modernity's cultural frames, which at the same time gives religion an endurance often denied it by theorists of modernity. however, Taylor's critique of modernity does not concern religiosity, but the absence of what he terms transcendence, that is, another dimension of experience that modernity circumscribes and undermines. 'A secular age' remains an argument against the long modern history of the formation of what might be termed, "this-sided" philosophical anthropologies of human self-formation which Taylor argues cannot address the problem of indeterminate transcendence.
- ———. "Charles Taylor’s Search for Transcendence: Mystery, Suffering, Violence." In Secularisations and their Debates: Perspectives on the Return of Religion in the Contemporary West, edited by Matthew Sharpe and Dylan Nickelson, vol. 5, 2014. 199-210. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-007-7116-1_11
  Abstract:
  This chapter critically reconstructs Taylor’s image of modernity, and his accompanying human self-image of what he terms the modern buffered self against which he will posit a porous one. The porous self is his own critical anthropology, which points beyond the specifically religious reference point of A Secular Age to the transcendent. It is argued here that there are three main threads with which Taylor weaves his concern with transcendence—suffering, violence and mystery. Suffering, violence and mystery are imbued in his critique of the modern condition. By contrast, and in a critique of modern violence, mystery, so Taylor argues, has been re-articulated in the Romantic counter-current in a way that opens onto another possible relation to moments of transcendence.
- Ruparelia, Sanjay. "How the Politics of Recognition Enables India's Democratic Exceptionalism." International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 21, no. 1-4 (2008): 39-56.
- Ruprecht, Louis A. Jr. "In the Aftermath of Modernism: On Present Postures and their Portrait of the Past." Soundings 72 (1992): 255-285.
- Ruytter, Trui De. "[Untitled]." Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57, no. 4 (DECEMBER, 1995): p. 782. In English. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40887401.
- Ryan, Alan. "Be My Geist, [Review of Hegel]." New Statesman (Sept. 26, 1975): 378-380.
- ———. "Multicultural Man, [Review of Philosophical Papers,1 and 2]." New Society (July 19, 1985): 275-276.
- ———. "Don't Think for Yourself Unless You can, [Review of the Ethics of Authenticity]." New York Times Book Review (Sept. 27, 1992): 16.
- Ryan, Fainche. "“Code Fixation”, Dilemmas and the Missing Virtue: Practical Wisdom in a Secular Age." In The Taylor Effect: Responding to A Secular Age, edited by Ian Leask. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 2010. 175-190.
- Ryan, Gerard. "Charles Taylor and the Political Recognition of Difference as a Resource for Theological Reflection on Religious Recognition." Open Theology 2, no. 1 (2016).
- Ryu, Honglim. "A Study of the Philosophical Foundations of Communitarianism: Alasdair MacIntyre and Charles Taylor." Migukhak 19 (Dec., 1996): 1.

Secondary Bibliography A-Z

A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I-J-K | L | M | N | O-P-Q | R | S | T-U-V | W-X-Y-Z | Anonymous/Unknown |

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I-J-K

L

M

N

O-P-Q

R

S

T-U-V

W-X-Y-Z

Anonymous/Unknown Authors