Introduction     Technology     Organizations     Pros and Cons     FAQs     Resources

Pros and Cons

Pros

- High-speed: Physical Layer bit rates up to 54Mbps, application throughput > 20Mbps

- QoS support: Suitable for real-time applications such as video, voice, and other multimedia

- OFDM modulation scheme is robust in highly dispersive environment, eliminating the need of complicated equalization

- Interoperability: with Ethernet, 3G, FireWire (IEEE 1394), ATM

- Flexibility: link adaptation; dynamic frequency selection; power control

- Security and authentication mechanism

 

Back to top

Cons

- Higher cost (mainly due to the highly-linear amplifier for OFDM)

- Tedious protocol specification

- No commercial products in market till now (Will be available by the end of 2001, according to Ericsson)

 

Back to top

Comparison

IEEE 802.11a and HiperLAN 2 employ the same OFDM technology, have almost the same physical layer, and differ mainly in the MAC layer only.

 

Comparison of IEEE 802.11 and HiperLAN 2
Table below summarizes the characteristics of 802.11, 802.11b, 802.11a, and HiperLAN2. (from H2GF white paper)

Characteristic

802.11

802.11b

802.11a

HiperLAN2

Spectrum

2.4 GHz

2.4 GHz

5 GHz

5 GHz

~Max physical rate

2 Mb/s

11 Mb/s

54 Mb/s

54 Mb/s

~Max data rate, layer 3

1.2 Mb/s

5 Mb/s

32 Mb/s

32 Mb/s

Medium access control/Media sharing

Carrier sense

CSMA/CA

 

Central resource control/ TDMA/TDD

Connectivity

Conn.-less

Conn.-less

Conn.-less

Conn.-orientated

Multicast

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

QoS support

(PCF) *2

(PCF) *2

(PCF) *2

ATM/802. 1p/RSVP/DiffServ (full control)

Frequency selection

Frequency-hopping or DSSS

DSSS

Single Carrier

Single carrier with Dynamic Frequency Selection

Authentication

No

No

No

NAI/IEEE address/X.509

Encryption

40-bit RC4

40-bit RC4

40-bit RC4

DES, 3DES

Handover support

(NO) *3

(NO) *3

(NO) *3

(No) *4

Fixed network support

Ethernet

Ethernet

Ethernet

Ethernet, IP, ATM, UMTS, FireWire, PPP *5

Management

802.11 MIB

802.11 MIB

802.11 MIB

HiperLAN2 MIB

Radio link quality control

No

No

No

Link adaptation


*1. Two different modes supported, multicast via a dedicated MAC-ID (same as for 802.11) and N*unicast for improved quality.
*2. Point Control Function, a concept defined in 802.11 to allow certain time slots being allocated for real-time critical traffic.
*3. Requires signaling over the fixed network, which is still proprietary.
*4. Requires signaling over the fixed network, to be specified by H2GF.

*5. Ethernet supported in first release.

 

Back to top