|
questions, its cultural context, and its relation to the Roman de la Rose and the Comedy. Above all it constituted, in the judgment of the participants themselves, the most important discussion of the poem's attribution to Dante since Contini's pronouncement on the question in 1965.
The published proceedings reproduce both the questionnaire that framed the conference, in which each participant weighs all the principal arguments for and against attributing the Fiore to Dante, as well as the lively discussion that followed each paper.
Table of Contents
Part I: The Question of Attribution
PATRICK BOYDE, "The Questionnaire and Related Materials"
PATRICK BOYDE, "
Summus Minimusve Poeta?
Arguments for and against Attributing the
Fiore
to Dante"
Part II: The Manuscript and the Text
TERESA DE ROBERTIS BONIFORTI, "Nota sul codice e la sua scrittura"
GUGLIELMO GORNI, "Sul
Fiore.
Punti critici del testo"
DAVID ROBEY, "The
Fiore
and the
Comedy
: Some Computerized Comparisons"
Part III: France and Italy
LUCIA LAZZERINI, "Il
Fiore,
il
Roman de la Rose
e i precursori d'oc e d'oïl"
SYLVIA HUOT, "The
Fiore
and the Early Reception of the
Roman de la Rose
"
KEVIN BROWNLEE, "Jason's Voyage and the Poetics of Rewriting: The
Fiore
and the
Roman de la Rose"
Part IV: The Literary Context
DOMENICO DE ROBERTIS, "La traccia del
Fiore
"
ZYGMUNT G. BARANSKI, "The Ethics of Literature: The
Fiore
and Medieval Traditions of Rewriting"
LINO LEONARDI, "Il
Fiore,
il
Roman de la Rose
e la tradizione lirica italiana prima di Dante"
Part V: The Fiore and the Commedia
IRENE MAFFIA SCARIATI, "
Fiore Inferno in fieri:
Schede di letture in parallelo"
MARK DAVIE, "The
Fiore
Revisited in the
Inferno
Part VI: The Question of Attribution II
JOHN C. BARNES, "Uno, nessuno e tanti: il
Fiore
attribuibile a chi?
PATRICK BOYDE, "The Results of the Poll: Presentation and Analysis"
|
